Data, when coupled with state-of-the-art machine learning models, can enable remarkable applications. But, there exists an underlying tension: users wish to keep their data private, and model providers wish to protect their intellectual property. Homomorphic encryption (HE) and multi-party computation (MPC) techniques have been proposed as solutions to this problem; however, both techniques require model providers to fully trust the server performing the machine learning computation. This limits the scale of inference applications, since it prevents model providers from leveraging shared public cloud infrastructures. In this work, we present CHEX-MIX, a solution to the problem of privacy-preserving machine learning between two mutually distrustful parties in an untrusted cloud setting. CHEX-MIX relies on a combination of HE and trusted execution environments (TEEs), using HE to provide clients with confidentiality guarantees, and TEEs to provide model providers with confidentiality guarantees and protect the integrity of computation from malicious cloud adversaries. Unlike prior solutions to this problem, such as multi-key HE, single-key HE, MPC, or TEE-only techniques, our solution assumes that both the client and the cloud can be malicious, makes no collusion assumptions, and frees model providers from needing to maintain private online infrastructures. Our results show that CHEX-MIX can execute at high efficiency, with low communication cost, while providing security guarantees unaddressed by prior work. Compared to a recent multi-key HE work that allows partial cloud offload, for example, CHEX-MIX achieves a 3× lower communication cost and a 3× faster computation time.

This paper's primary purpose is to provide a source of introductory information into building a zero knowledge proof system for general computation. We review how to build such a system with a polynomial commitment scheme, and how to implement a fully functional command set in terms of zero knowledge primitives.

In previous years there has been an increased interest in designing threshold signature schemes. Most of the recent works focus on constructing threshold versions of ECDSA or Schnorr signature schemes due to their appealing usage in blockchain technologies. Additionally, a lot of research is being done on cryptographic schemes that are resistant to quantum computer attacks. In this work, we propose a new version of the two-party Dilithium signature scheme. The security of our scheme is based on the hardness of Module-LWE and Module-SIS problems. In our construction, we follow a similar logic as Damgård et al. (PKC 2021) and use an additively homomorphic commitment scheme. However, compared to them, our protocol uses signature compression techniques from the original Dilithium signature scheme which makes it closer to the version submitted to the NIST PQC competition. We focus on two-party signature schemes in the context of user authentication.

Let $N=pq$ be the product of two balanced prime numbers $p$ and $q$. Murru and Saettone presented in 2017 an interesting RSA-like cryptosystem that uses the key equation $ed - k (p^2+p+1)(q^2+q+1) = 1$, instead of the classical RSA key equation $ed - k (p-1)(q-1) = 1$. The authors claimed that their scheme is immune to Wiener's continued fraction attack. Unfortunately, Nitaj \emph{et. al.} developed exactly such an attack. In this paper, we introduce a family of RSA-like encryption schemes that uses the key equation $ed - k [(p^n-1)(q^n-1)]/[(p-1)(q-1)] = 1$, where $n>1$ is an integer. Then, we show that regardless of the choice of $n$, there exists an attack based on continued fractions that recovers the secret exponent.

The hodlCoin game is a competitive zero-sum massively multiplayer financial game where the goal is to hodl an asset for long periods of time. By hodling, a player deposits coins of a given asset in a common reserve and receives a proportional amount of hodlCoins. Players who un-hodl pay a fee that is accumulated in the common reserve. Thus, the longer a player hodls, in comparison with other players, the more the player will benefit from fees paid by the players who are un-hodling earlier. Surprisingly, we prove here that, thanks to the accumulation of fees, the price of hodlCoins in comparison with the underlying asset never decreases.

With the ever greater adaptation of blockchain systems, smart contract based ecosystems have formed to provide financial services and other utility. This results in an ever increasing demand for transactions on blockchains, however, the amount of transactions per second on a given ledger is limited. Layer-2 systems attempt to improve scalability by taking transactions off-chain, with building blocks that are two party channels which are concatenated to form networks. Interaction between two parties requires (1) routing such a network, (2) interaction with and collateral from all intermediaries on the routed path and (3) interactions are often more limited compared to what can be done on the ledger. In contrast to that design, recent constructions such as Hydra Heads (FC’21) are both multi-party and isomorphic, allowing interactions to have the same expressiveness as on the ledger making it akin to a ledger located on Layer-2. The follow up Interhead Construction (MARBLE’22) further extends the protocol to connect Hydra Heads into networks by means of a “virtual” Hydra Head construction. This work puts forth an even greater generalization of the Interhead Protocol, allowing for inter- action across different Layer-2 ledgers with a multitude of improvements. As concrete example, our design is modular and lightweight, which makes it viable for both full virtual ledger constructions as well as straightfor- ward one-time interactions and payments systems.

In this paper we provide the implementation details and performance analysis of the lattice-based post-quantum commitment scheme introduced by Martínez and Morillo in their work titled «RLWE-Based Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Linear and Multiplicative Relations» together with the corresponding Zero-Knowledge Proofs of Knowledge (ZKPoK) of valid openings, linear and multiplicative relations among committed elements. We bridge the gap between the existing theoretical proposals and practical applications, thoroughly revisiting the security proofs of the aforementioned paper to obtain tight conditions that allow us to find the best sets of parameters for actual instantiations of the commitment scheme and its companion ZKPoK. Our implementation is very flexible and its parameters can be adjusted to obtain a trade-off between speed and memory usage, analyzing how suitable for practical use are the underlying lattice-based techniques. Moreover, our implementation further extends the literature of exact Zero-Knowledge proofs, providing ZKPoK of committed elements without any soundness slack.

Ring Confidential Transaction (RingCT) protocol is an effective cryptographic component for preserving the privacy of cryptocurrencies. However, existing RingCT protocols are instantiated from one-out-of-many proofs with only one secret, leading to low efficiency and weak anonymity when handling transactions with multiple inputs. Additionally, current partial knowledge proofs with multiple secrets are neither secure nor efficient to be applied in a RingCT protocol. In this paper, we propose a novel \emph{any-out-of-many proof}, a logarithmic-sized zero-knowledge proof scheme for showing the knowledge of arbitrarily many secrets out of a public list. Unlike other partial knowledge proofs that have to reveal the number of secrets [ACF21], our approach proves the knowledge of multiple secrets without leaking the exact number of them. Furthermore, we improve the efficiency of our method with a generic inner-product transformation to adopt the Bulletproofs compression [BBB+18], which reduces the proof size to $2 \lceil \log_2(N) \rceil \! + \! 9$. Based on our proposed proof scheme, we further construct a compact RingCT protocol for privacy cryptocurrencies, which can provide a logarithmic-sized communication complexity for transactions with multiple inputs. More importantly, as the only known RingCT protocol instantiated from the partial knowledge proofs, our protocol can achieve the highest anonymity level compared with other approaches like Omniring [LRR+19]. For other applications, such as multiple ring signatures, our protocol can also be applied with some modifications. We believe our techniques are also applicable in other privacy-preserving scenarios, such as multiple ring signatures and coin-mixing in the blockchain.

Proving security bounds in contexts with a large number of users is one of the central problems in symmetric-key cryptography today. This paper introduces a new method for information-theoretic multi-user security proofs, called ``the Squared-Ratio Method''. At its core, the method requires the expectation of the square of the ratio of observing the so-called good transcripts (from Patarin's H-coefficient technique) in the real and the ideal world. Central to the method is the observation that for information-theoretic adversaries, the KL-divergence for the multi-user security bound can be written as a summation of the KL-divergence of every single user. We showcase the Squared-Ratio Method on three examples: the Xor of two Permutations by Bellare et al. (EUROCRYPT '98) and Hall et al. (CRYPTO '98), the Encrypted Davies-Mayer by Cogliati and Seurin (CRYPTO '16), and the two permutation variant of the nEHtM MAC algorithm by Dutta et al. (EUROCRYPT '19). With this new tool, we provide improved bounds for the multi-user security of these constructions. Our approach is modular in the sense that the multi-user security can be obtained directly from single-user results.

Succinct Non-interactive Arguments of Knowledge (SNARKs) enable a party to cryptographically prove a statement regarding a computation to another party that has constrained resources. Practical use of SNARKs often involves a Zero-Knowledge Virtual Machine (zkVM) that receives an input program and input data, then generates a SNARK proof of the correct execution of the input program. Most zkVMs emulate the von Neumann architecture and must prove relations between a program's execution and its use of Random Access Memory. However, there are conceptually simpler models of computation that are naturally modeled in a SNARK yet are still practical for use. Nock is a minimal, homoiconic combinator function, a Turing-complete instruction set that is practical for general computation, and is notable for its use in Urbit. We introduce Eden, an Efficient Dyck Encoding of Nock that serves as a practical, SNARK-friendly combinator function and instruction set architecture. We describe arithmetization techniques and polynomial equations used to represent the Eden ISA in an Interactive Oracle Proof. Eden provides the ability to prove statements regarding the execution of any program that compiles down to the Eden ISA. We present the Eden zkVM, a particular instantiation of Eden as a zk-STARK.

A privacy pool enables clients to deposit units of a cryptocurrency into a shared pool where ownership of deposited currency is tracked via a system of cryptographically hidden records. Clients may later withdraw from the pool without linkage to previous deposits. Some privacy pools also support hidden transfer of currency ownership within the pool. In August 2022, the U.S. Department of Treasury sanctioned Tornado Cash, the largest Ethereum privacy pool, on the premise that it enables illicit actors to hide the origin of funds, citing its usage by the DPRK-sponsored Lazarus Group to launder over \$455 million dollars worth of stolen cryptocurrency. This ruling effectively made it illegal for U.S. persons/institutions to use or accept funds that went through Tornado Cash, sparking a global debate among privacy rights activists and lawmakers. Against this backdrop, we present Derecho, a system that institutions could use to request cryptographic attestations of fund origins rather than naively rejecting all funds coming from privacy pools. Derecho is a novel application of proof-carrying data, which allows users to propagate allowlist membership proofs through a privacy pool's transaction graph. Derecho is backwards-compatible with existing Ethereum privacy pool designs, adds no overhead in gas costs, and costs users only a few seconds to produce attestations.

Anonymous credentials (AC) have emerged as a promising privacy-preserving solu- tion for user-centric identity management. They allow users to authenticate in an anonymous and unlinkable way such that only required information (i.e., attributes) from their credentials are re- vealed. With the increasing push towards decentralized systems and identity, e.g., self-sovereign identity (SSI) and the concept of verifiable credentials, this also necessitates the need for suit- able AC systems. For instance, when relying on existing AC systems, obtaining credentials from different issuers requires the presentation of independent credentials, which can become cum- bersome. Consequently, it is desirable for AC systems to support the so-called multi-authority (MA) feature. It allows a compact and efficient showing of multiple credentials from different is- suers. Another important property is called issuer hiding (IH). This means that showing a set of credentials is not revealed which issuer has issued which credentials but only whether a verifier- defined policy on the acceptable set of issuers is satisfied. This issue becomes particularly acute in the context of MA, where a user could be uniquely identified by the combination of issuers in their showing. Unfortunately, there are no AC schemes that satisfy both these properties simul- taneously. To close this gap, we introduce the concept of Issuer-Hiding Multi-Authority Anonymous Cre- dentials (IhMA). Our proposed solution involves the development of two new signature primi- tives with versatile randomization features which are independent of interest: 1) Aggregate Sig- natures with Randomizable Tags and Public Keys (AtoSa) and 2) Aggregate Mercurial Signatures (ATMS), which extend the functionality of AtoSa to additionally support the randomization of messages and yield the first instance of an aggregate (equivalence-class) structure-preserving sig- nature. These primitives can be elegantly used to obtain IhMA with different trade-offs but have applications beyond. We formalize all notations and provide rigorous security definitions for our proposed primi- tives. We present provably secure and efficient instantiations of the two primitives as well as corresponding IhMA systems. Finally, we provide benchmarks based on an implementation to demonstrate the practical efficiency of our constructions

We introduce a new data-independent priority queue which supports amortized polylogarithmic-time insertions and constant-time deletions, and crucially, (non-amortized) constant-time \textit{read-front} operations, in contrast with a prior construction of Toft (PODC'11). Moreover, we reduce the number of required comparisons. Data-independent data structures - first identified explicitly by Toft, and further elaborated by Mitchell and Zimmerman (STACS'14) - facilitate computation on encrypted data without branching, which is prohibitively expensive in secure computation. Using our efficient data-independent priority queue, we introduce a new privacy-preserving dark pool application, which significantly improves upon prior constructions which were based on costly sorting operations. Dark pools are securities-trading venues which attain ad-hoc order privacy, by matching orders outside of publicly visible exchanges. In this paper, we describe an efficient and secure dark pool (implementing a full continuous double auction), building upon our priority queue construction. Our dark pool's security guarantees are cryptographic - based on secure multiparty computation (MPC) - and do not require that the dark pool operators be trusted. Our approach improves upon the asymptotic and concrete efficiency attained by previous efforts. Existing cryptographic dark pools process new orders in time which grows linearly in the size of the standing order book; ours does so in polylogarithmic time. We describe a concrete implementation of our protocol, with malicious security in the honest majority setting. We also report benchmarks of our implementation, and compare these to prior works. Our protocol reduces the total running time by several orders of magnitude, compared to prior secure dark pool solutions.

Fair exchange is a fundamental primitive enabled by blockchains, and is widely adopted in applications such as atomic swaps, payment channels, and DeFi. Most existing designs of blockchain-based fair exchange protocols consider only the participating users as strategic players, and assume the miners are honest and passive. However, recent works revealed that the fairness of commonly deployed fair exchange protocols can be broken entirely in the presence of user-miner collusion. In particular, a user can bribe the miners to help it cheat — a phenomenon also referred to as Miner Extractable Value (MEV). In this work, we provide the first formal treatment of side-contract-resilient fair exchange where users and miners may enter into arbitrary contracts on the side. We propose a new fair exchange protocol called Rapidash, and prove that the protocol is incentive compatible in the presence of user-miner collusion. In particular, we show that Rapidash satisfies a coalition-resistant Nash equilibrium absent external incentives. Further, even when there exist arbitrary but bounded external incentives, Rapidash still protects honest players and ensures that they cannot be harmed. Last but not least, our game-theoretic formulations also lay the theoretical groundwork for studying side-contract-resilient fair exchange protocols. Finally, to showcase the instantiability of Rapidash with a wide range of blockchain systems, we present instantiations of Rapidash that are compatible with Bitcoin and Ethereum while incurring only a minimal overhead in terms of costs for the users.

Despite the great potential and flexibility of smart contract-enabled blockchains, building privacy-preserving applications using these platforms remains an open question. Existing solutions fall short since they ask end users to coordinate and perform the computation off-chain themselves. While such an approach reduces the burden of the miners of the system, it largely limits the ability of lightweight users to enjoy privacy since performing the actual computation on their own and attesting to its correctness is expensive even with state-of-the-art proof systems. To address this limitation, we propose smartFHE, a framework to support private smart contracts using fully homomorphic encryption (FHE). To the best of our knowledge, smartFHE is the first to use FHE in the blockchain model; moreover, it is the first to support arbitrary privacy-preserving applications for lightweight users under the same computation-on-demand model pioneered by Ethereum. smartFHE does not overload the user since miners are instead responsible for performing the private computation. This is achieved by employing FHE so miners can compute over encrypted data and account balances. Users are only responsible for proving well-formedness of their private inputs using efficient zero-knowledge proof systems (ZKPs). We formulate a notion for a privacy-preserving smart contract (PPSC) scheme and show a concrete instantiation of our smartFHE framework. We address challenges resulting from using FHE in the blockchain setting---including concurrency and dealing with leveled schemes. We also show how to choose suitable FHE and ZKP schemes to instantiate our framework, since naively choosing these will lead to poor performance in practice. We formally prove correctness and security of our construction. Finally, we conduct experiments to evaluate its efficiency, including comparisons with a state-of-the-art scheme and testing several private smart contract applications. We have open-sourced our (highly optimized) ZKP library, which could be of independent interest.

In CRYPTO 2019, Gohr opens up a new direction for cryptanalysis. He successfully applied deep learning to differential cryptanalysis against the NSA block cipher SPECK32/64, achieving higher accuracy than traditional differential distinguishers. Until now, one of the mainstream research directions is increasing the training sample size and utilizing different neural networks to improve the accuracy of neural distinguishers. This conversion mindset may lead to a huge number of parameters, heavy computing load, and a large number of memory in the distinguishers training process. However, in the practical application of cryptanalysis, the applicability of the attacks method in a resource-constrained environment is very important. Therefore, we focus on the cost optimization and aim to reduce network parameters for differential neural cryptanalysis. In this paper, we propose two cost-optimized neural distinguisher improvement methods from the aspect of data format and network structure, respectively. Firstly, we obtain a partial output difference neural distinguisher using only 4-bits training data format which is constructed with a new advantage bits search algorithm based on two key improvement conditions. In addition, we perform an interpretability analysis of the new neural distinguishers whose results are mainly reflected in the relationship between the neural distinguishers, truncated differential, and advantage bits. Secondly, we replace the traditional convolution with the depthwise separable convolution to reduce the training cost without affecting the accuracy as much as possible. Overall, the number of training parameters can be reduced by less than 50\% by using our new network structure for training neural distinguishers. Finally, we apply the network structure to the partial output difference neural distinguishers. The combinatorial approach have led to a further reduction in the number of parameters (approximately 30\% of Gohr's distinguishers for SPECK).

Statistical sender privacy (SSP) is the strongest achievable security notion for two-message oblivious transfer (OT) in the standard model, providing statistical security against malicious receivers and computational security against semi-honest senders. In this work we provide a novel construction of SSP OT from the Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) and the Learning Parity with Noise (LPN) assumptions achieving (asymptotically) optimal amortized communication complexity, i.e. it achieves rate 1. Concretely, the total communication complexity for $k$ OT instances is $2k(1+o(1))$, which (asymptotically) approaches the information-theoretic lower bound. Previously, it was only known how to realize this primitive using heavy rate-1 FHE techniques [Brakerski et al., Gentry and Halevi TCC'19]. At the heart of our construction is a primitive called statistical co-PIR, essentially a a public key encryption scheme which statistically erases bits of the message in a few hidden locations. Our scheme achieves nearly optimal ciphertext size and provides statistical security against malicious receivers. Computational security against semi-honest senders holds under the DDH assumption.

Circuit-based Private Set Intersection (circuit-PSI) refers to cryptographic protocols that let two parties with input set $X$ and $Y$ compute a function $f$ over the intersection set $X \cap Y$, without revealing any other information. The research efforts for circuit-PSI mainly focus on the case where input set sizes $|X|$ and $|Y|$ are similar so far, and they scale poorly for extremely unbalanced set sizes $|X| \gg |Y|$. Recently, Lepoint \textit{et al.} (ASIACRYPT'21) proposed the first dedicated solutions for this problem, which has online cost only linear in the small set size $|Y|$. However, it requires an expensive setup phase that requires huge storage of about $O(|X|)$ on the small set holder side, which can be problematic in applications where the small set holder is assumed to have restricted equipment. In this work, we suggest new efficient proposals for circuit-PSI tailored for unbalanced inputs, which feature {\emph{zero}} small set holder side storage, and comparable online phase performance to the previous work. At the technical core, we use homomorphic encryption (HE) based {\emph{plain}} PSI protocols of Cong \textit{et al.} (CCS'21), with several technically non-trivial arguments on algorithm and security. We demonstrate the superiority of our proposals in several input set sizes by an implementation. As a representative example, for input sets of size $2^{24}$ and $2^{12}$, our proposals require {\emph{zero}} storage on the small set holder whereas Lepoint \textit{et al.} requires over $7$GB. The online phase remains similar; over LAN network setting, ours takes $7.5$ (or $20.9$s) seconds with $45$MB (or $11.7$MB) communication, while Lepoint \textit{et al.} requires $4.2$ seconds with $117$MB communication.

In this work, we introduce a new attack for the Loidreau scheme [PQCrypto 2017] and its more recent variant LowMS. This attack is based on a constrained linear system for which we provide two solving approaches: - The first one is an enumeration algorithm inspired from combinatorial attacks on the Rank Decoding (RD) Problem. While the attack technique remains very simple, it allows us to obtain the best known structural attack on the parameters of these two schemes. - The second one is to rewrite it as a bilinear system over Fq. Even if Gröbner basis techniques on this second system seem infeasible, we provide a detailed analysis of the first degree fall polynomials which arise when applying such algorithms.

In this work we introduce a new code-based signature scheme, called \textsf{FuLeeca}, based on the NP-hard problem of finding codewords of given Lee-weight. The scheme follows the Hash-and-Sign approach applied to quasi-cyclic codes. Similar approaches in the Hamming metric have suffered statistical attacks, which revealed the small support of the secret basis. Using the Lee metric, we are able to thwart such attacks. We use existing hardness results on the underlying problem and study adapted statistical attacks. We propose parameters for \textsf{FuLeeca}~and compare them to an extensive list of proposed post-quantum secure signature schemes including the ones already standardized by NIST. This comparison reveals that \textsf{FuLeeca}~is competitive. For example, for NIST category I, i.e., 160 bit of classical security, we obtain an average signature size of 1100 bytes and public key sizes of 1318 bytes. Comparing the total communication cost, i.e., the sum of the signature and public key size, we see that \textsf{FuLeeca} is only outperformed by Falcon while the other standardized schemes Dilithium and SPHINCS+ show larger communication costs than \textsf{FuLeeca}.

Incompressibility is a popular security notion for white-box cryptography and captures that a large encryption program cannot be compressed without losing functionality. Fouque, Karpman, Kirchner and Minaud (FKKM) defined strong incompressibility, where a compressed program should not even help to distinguish encryptions of two messages of equal length. Equivalently, the notion can be phrased as indistinguishability under chosen-plaintext attacks and key-leakage (LK-IND-CPA), where the leakage rate is high. In this paper, we show that LK-IND-CPA security with superlogarithmic-length leakage, and thus strong incompressibility, cannot be proven under standard (i.e. single-stage) assumptions, if the encryption scheme is key-fixing, i.e. a polynomial number of message-ciphertext pairs uniquely determine the key with high probability. Our impossibility result refutes a claim by FKKM that their big-key generation mechanism achieves strong incompressibility when combined with any PRG or any conventional encryption scheme, since the claim is not true for encryption schemes which are key-fixing (or for PRGs which are injective). In particular, we prove that the cipher block chaining (CBC) block cipher mode is key-fixing when modelling the cipher as a truly random permutation for each key. Subsequent to and inspired by our work, FKKM prove that their original big-key generation mechanism can be combined with a random oracle into an LK-IND-CPA-secure encryption scheme, circumventing the impossibility result by the use of an idealised model. Along the way, our work also helps clarifying the relations between incompressible white-box cryptography, big-key symmetric encryption, and general leakage resilient cryptography, and their limitations.

Consider the standard setting of two-party computation where the sender has a secret function $f$ and the receiver has a secret input $x$ and the output $f(x)$ is delivered to the receiver at the end of the protocol. Let us consider the unidirectional message model where only one party speaks in each round. In this setting, Katz and Ostrovsky (Crypto 2004) showed that at least four rounds of interaction between the parties are needed in the plain model (i.e., no trusted setup) if the simulator uses the adversary in a black-box way (a.k.a. black-box simulation). Suppose the sender and the receiver would like to run multiple sequential iterations of the secure computation protocol on possibly different inputs. For each of these iterations, do the parties need to start the protocol from scratch and exchange four messages? In this work, we explore the possibility of \textit{amortizing} the round complexity or in other words, \textit{reusing} a certain number of rounds of the secure computation protocol in the plain model. We obtain the following results. 1. Under standard cryptographic assumptions, we construct a four-round two-party computation protocol where (i) the first three rounds of the protocol could be reused an unbounded number of times if the receiver input remains the same and only the sender input changes, and (ii) the first two rounds of the protocol could be reused an unbounded number of times if the receiver input needs to change as well. In other words, the sender sends a single additional message if only its input changes, and in the other case, we need one message each from the receiver and the sender. The number of additional messages needed in each of the above two modes is optimal and, additionally, our protocol allows arbitrary interleaving of these two modes. 2. We also extend these results to the multiparty setting (in the simultaneous message exchange model) and give round-optimal protocols such that (i) the first two rounds could be reused an unbounded number of times if the inputs of the parties need to change and (ii) the first three rounds could be reused an unbounded number of times if the inputs remain the same but the functionality to be computed changes. As in the two-party setting, we allow arbitrary interleaving of the above two modes of operation.

Vehicular Social Networks (VSNs) rely on data shared by users to provide convenient services. Data is outsourced to the cloud server and the distributed roadside unit in VSNs. However, roadside unit has limited resources, so that data sharing process is inefficient and is vulnerable to security threats, such as illegal access, tampering attack and collusion attack. In this article, to overcome the shortcomings of security, we define a chain tolerance semi-trusted model to describe the credibility of distributed group based on the anti tampering feature of blockchain. We further propose a Blockchain-based Lightweight Access Control scheme in VSNs that resist tampering and collusion attacks, called BLAC. To overcome the shortcomings of efficiency, we design a ciphertext piece storage algorithm and a recovery one to achieve lightweight storage cost. In the decryption operation, we separate a pre-decryption algorithm based on outsourcing to achieve lightweight decryption computation cost on the user side. Finally, we present the formal security analyses and the simulation experiments for BLAC, and compare the results of experiments with existing relevant schemes. The security analyses show that our scheme is secure, and the results of experiments show that our scheme is lightweight and practical.

ECVRF is a verifiable random function (VRF) scheme used in multiple cryptocurrency systems. It has recently been proven to satisfy the notion of non-malleability which is useful in applications to blockchains (Peikert and Xu, CT-RSA 2023); however, the existing proof uses the rewinding technique and has a quadratic security loss. In this work, we re-analyze the non-malleability of ECVRF in the algebraic group model (AGM) and give a tight proof. We also compare our proof with the unforgeability proof for the Schnorr signature scheme in the AGM (Fuchsbauer, Plouviez and Seurin, EUROCRYPT 2020).

The relationship between oblivious transfer (OT) and public-key encryption (PKE) has been studied by Gertner et al. (FOCS 2000). They showed that OT can be constructed from special types of PKE, i.e., PKE with oblivious sampleability of public keys or ciphertexts. In this work, we give new black-box constructions of OT from PKE without any oblivious sampleability. Instead, we require that the PKE scheme is rerandomizable, meaning that one can use the public key to rerandomize a ciphertext into a fresh ciphertext. We give two different OT protocols with different efficiency features based on rerandomizable PKE. For $1$-out-of-$n$ OT, in our first OT protocol, the sender has sublinear (in $n$) cost, and in our second OT protocol, the cost of the receiver is independent of $n$. As a comparison, in the PKE-based OT protocols of Gertner et al., both the sender and receiver have linear cost.

A cryptographic accumulator is a succinct set commitment scheme with efficient (non-)membership proofs that typically supports updates (additions and deletions) on the accumulated set. When elements are added to or deleted from the set, an update message is issued. The collection of all the update messages essentially leaks the underlying accumulated set which in certain applications is not desirable. In this work, we define oblivious accumulators, a set commitment with concise membership proofs that hides the elements and the set size from every entity: an outsider, a verifier or other element holders. We formalize this notion of privacy via two properties: element hiding and add-delete indistinguishability. We also define almost-oblivious accumulators, that only achieve a weaker notion of privacy called add-delete unlinkability. Such accumulators hide the elements but not the set size. We consider the trapdoorless, decentralized setting where different users can add and delete elements from the accumulator and compute membership proofs. We then give a generic construction of an oblivious accumulator based on key-value commitments (KVC). We also show a generic way to construct KVCs from an accumulator and a vector commitment scheme. Finally, we give lower bounds on the communication (size of update messages) required for oblivious accumulators and almost-oblivious accumulators.

In this paper, we present a novel method for timestamping and data notarisation on a distributed ledger. The problem with on-chain hashes is that a cryptographic hash is a deterministic function that it allows the blockchain be used as an oracle that confirms whether potentially leaked data is authentic (timestamped or notarised by the user). Instead, we suggest using on-chain Pedersen commitments and off-chain zero knowledge proofs (ZKP) for designated verifiers to prove the link between the data and the on-chain commitment. Our technique maintains the privacy of the data, and retains control of who can access it and when they can access it. This holds true even on a public blockchain, and even if the data is leaked by authorised parties. Indeed, an authorised data consumer (a designated-verifier for the ZKP), who discloses the data publicly, cannot convince anyone about the legitimacy of the data (in the sense that it is consistent with the information uploaded to the blockchain), because the ZKP proof is valid only for them. Our techniques can be used in scenarios where it is required to audit highly-sensitive data (e.g. application logs) by specific third parties, or to provide on-demand data certification by notaries

The security of several cryptosystems rests on the trust assumption that a certain fraction of the parties are honest. This trust assumption has enabled a diverse of cryptographic applications such as secure multiparty computation, threshold encryption, and threshold signatures. However, current and emerging practical use cases suggest that this paradigm of one-person-one-vote is outdated. In this work, we consider {\em weighted} cryptosystems where every party is assigned a certain weight and the trust assumption is that a certain fraction of the total weight is honest. This setting can be translated to the standard setting (where each party has a unit weight) via virtualization. However, this method is quite expensive, incurring a multiplicative overhead in the weight. We present new weighted cryptosystems with significantly better efficiency. Specifically, our proposed schemes incur only an {\em additive} overhead in weights. \begin{itemize} \item We first present a weighted ramp secret-sharing scheme where the size of the secret share is as short as $O(w)$ (where $w$ corresponds to the weight). In comparison, Shamir's secret sharing with virtualization requires secret shares of size $w\cdot\lambda$, where $\lambda=\log |\mathbb{F}|$ is the security parameter. \item Next, we use our weighted secret-sharing scheme to construct weighted versions of (semi-honest) secure multiparty computation (MPC), threshold encryption, and threshold signatures. All these schemes inherit the efficiency of our secret sharing scheme and incur only an additive overhead in the weights. \end{itemize} Our weighted secret-sharing scheme is based on the Chinese remainder theorem. Interestingly, this secret-sharing scheme is {\em non-linear} and only achieves statistical privacy. These distinct features introduce several technical hurdles in applications to MPC and threshold cryptosystems. We resolve these challenges by developing several new ideas.

In this paper, we present a new diverse class of post-quantum group-based Digital Signature Schemes (DSS). The approach is significantly different from previous examples of group-based digital signatures and adopts the framework of group action-based cryptography: we show that each finite group defines a group action relative to the semidirect product of the group by its automorphism group, and give security bounds on the resulting signature scheme in terms of the group-theoretic computational problem known as the Semidirect Discrete Logarithm Problem (SDLP). Crucially, we make progress towards being able to efficiently compute the novel group action, and give an example of a parameterised family of groups for which the group action can be computed for any parameters, thereby negating the need for expensive offline computation or inclusion of redundancy required in other schemes of this type.

With the advancement in technology, Cloud computing always amazes the world with revolutionizing solutions that automate and simplify complex computational tasks. The advantages like no maintenance cost, accessibility, data backup, pay-per-use models, unlimited storage, and processing power encourage individuals and businesses to migrate their workload to the cloud. Despite the numerous advantages of cloud computing, the geolocation of data in the cloud environment is a massive concern, which relates to the performance and government legislation that will be applied to data. The unclarity of data geolocation can cause compliance concerns. In this work, we have presented a technique that will allow users to restrict the geolocation of their data in the cloud environment. We have used trusted computing mechanisms to attest the host and its geolocation remotely. With this model, the user will upload the data whose decryption key will be shared with a third-party attestation server only. The decryption key will be sealed to the TPM of the host after successful attestation guaranteeing the authorized geolocation and platform state.

In this paper, we will show the hidden discrete logarithm problem(HDLP) and the generalized form of HDLP(GHDLP) over non-commutative associative algebras (FNAAs) can be reduced to discrete logarithm problem(DLP) in a finite field through analyzing the eigenvalues of the representation matrix. Through the analysis of computational complexity, we will show that HDLP and GHDLP is not are not good improvements of DLP.With all the instruments in hand, we will show how some schemes based on GHDLP can be broken. Thus we can conclude that, all ideas of constructing cryptographic schemes based on the two problem are of no practical significance.

In this article, we discuss the decoding of Gabidulin and related codes from a cryptographic point of view, and we observe that these codes can be decoded solely from the knowledge of a generator matrix. We then extend and revisit Gibson and Overbeck attacks on the generalized GPT encryption scheme (instantiated with the Gabidulin code) for different ranks of the distortion matrix. We apply our attack to the case of an instantiation with twisted Gabidulin codes.

We present a new method for transforming zero-knowledge protocols in the designated verifier setting into public-coin protocols, which can be made non-interactive and publicly verifiable. Our transformation applies to a large class of ZK protocols based on oblivious transfer. In particular, we show that it can be applied to recent, fast protocols based on vector oblivious linear evaluation (VOLE), with a technique we call VOLE-in-the-head, upgrading these protocols to support public verifiability. Our resulting ZK protocols have linear proof size, and are simpler, smaller and faster than related approaches based on MPC-in-the-head. To build VOLE-in-the-head while supporting both binary circuits and large finite fields, we develop several new technical tools. One of these is a new proof of security for the SoftSpokenOT protocol (Crypto 2022), which generalizes it to produce certain types of VOLE correlations over large fields. Secondly, we present a new ZK protocol that is tailored to take advantage of this form of VOLE, which leads to a publicly verifiable VOLE-in-the-head protocol with only 2x more communication than the best, designated-verifier VOLE-based protocols. We analyze the soundness of our approach when made non-interactive using the Fiat-Shamir transform, using round-by-round soundness. As an application of the resulting NIZK, we present FAEST, a post-quantum signature scheme based on AES. FAEST is the first AES-based signature scheme to be smaller than SPHINCS+, with signature sizes between 5.6 and 6.6kB at the 128-bit security level. Compared with the smallest version of SPHINCS+ (7.9kB), FAEST verification is slower, but the signing times are between 8x and 40x faster.

The so-called $\omega$-encoding, introduced by Goudarzi, Joux and Rivain (Asiacrypt 2018), generalizes the commonly used arithmetic encoding. By using the additionnal structure of this encoding, they proposed a masked multiplication gadget (GJR) with quasilinear (randomness and operations) complexity. A follow-up contribution by Goudarzi, Prest, Rivain and Vergnaud in this line of research appeared in TCHES 2021. The authors revisited the aforementioned multiplication gadget (GPRV), and brought the IOS security notion for refresh gadgets to allow secure composition between probing secure gadgets. In this paper, we propose a follow up on GPRV, that is, a region-probing secure arithmetic circuit masked compiler. Our contribution stems from a single Lemma, linking algebra and probing security for a wide class of circuits, further taking advantage of the algebraic structure of $\omega$-encoding, and the extension field structure of the underlying field $\mathbb F$ that was so far left unexploited. On the theoretical side, we propose a security notion for $\boldsymbol{\omega}_d$-masked circuits which we call Reducible-To-Independent-K-linear (RTIK). When the number of shares $d$ is less than or equal to the degree $k$ of $\mathbb F$, RTIK circuits achieve region-probing security. Moreover, RTIK circuits may be composed naively and remain RTIK. We also propose a weaker version of IOS, which we call KIOS, for refresh gadgets. This notion allows to compose RTIK circuits with a randomness/security tradeoff compared to the naive composition. To substantiate our new definitions, we also provide examples of competitively efficient gadgets verifying the latter weaker security notions. Explicitly, we give 1) two refresh gadgets that use $d-1$ random field elements to refresh a length $d$ encoding, both of which are KIOS but not IOS, and 2) a multiplication gadget with bilinear multiplication complexity $d^{\log 3}$ and uses $d$ fresh random elements per run. Our compiler outperforms ISW asymptotically, but for our security proofs to hold, we do require that the number of shares $d$ is less than or equal to the degree of $\mathbb F$ as an extension, so that there is sufficient structure to exploit.

In this work, we provide a systematisation of knowledge of delay-based cryptography, in which we discuss and compare the existing primitives within cryptography that utilise a time-delay. We start by considering the role of time within cryptography, explaining broadly what a delay aimed to achieve at its inception and now, in the modern age. We then move on to describing the underlying assumptions used to achieve these goals, and analyse topics including trust, decentralisation and concrete methods to implement a delay. We then survey the existing primitives, discussing their security properties, instantiations and applications. We make explicit the relationships between these primitives, identifying a hierarchy and the theoretical gaps that exist. We end this systematisation of knowledge by highlighting relevant future research directions within the field of delay-based cryptography, from which this area would greatly benefit.

Code-Based Cryptosystem, CBC, is one of the candidates for Post-Quantum Cryptosystems, PQCs. Its security primarily bases on the Syndrome Decoding Problem, SDP. In this paper, we focus on the rank CBC whose security relies on the rank SDP. The GRS (Gaborit-Ruatta-Schrek) algorithm is well known as the current best decoding algorithm for the rank SDP. We propose the quantum version of the GRS algorithm. Then, we introduce the attack strategy using that quantum algorithm for previous rank CBCs remained at the 2nd Round of the NIST's PQC standardization project, and consider the quantum security for those cryptosystems. We present a result that is effective for RQC by our attack method, so give new RQC's instances which is secure against that attack.

We show that the key agreement scheme [Multim. Tools Appl. 80:799-829, 2021] is flawed. (1) The scheme is a hybrid which piles up various tools such as public key encryption, signature, symmetric key encryption, hash function, cancelable templates from thumb fingerprints, and elliptic curve cryptography. These tools are excessively used because key agreement is just a simple cryptographic primitive in contrast to public key encryption. (2) The involved reliance is very intricate. Especially, the requirement for a secure channel between two parties is generally unavailable.

Cross-chain communication is instrumental in unleashing the full potential of blockchain technologies, as it allows users and developers to exploit the unique design features and the profit opportunities of different existing blockchains. The majority of interoperability solutions are provided by centralized exchanges and bridge protocols based on a trusted majority, both introducing undesirable trust assumptions compared to native blockchain assets. Hence, increasing attention has been given to decentralized solutions: Light and super-light clients paved the way for chain relays, which allow verifying on a blockchain the state of another blockchain by respectively verifying and storing a linear and logarithmic amount of data. Unfortunately, relays turn out to be inefficient in terms of computational costs, storage, or compatibility. We introduce Glimpse, an on-demand bridge that leverages a novel on-demand light client construction with only constant on-chain storage, cost, and computational overhead. Glimpse is expressive, enabling a plethora of DeFi and off-chain applications such as lending, pegs, proofs of oracle attestations, and betting hubs. Glimpse also remains compatible with blockchains featuring a limited scripting language such as the Liquid Network (a pegged sidechain of Bitcoin), for which we present a concrete instantiation. We prove Glimpse security in the Universal Composability (UC) framework and further conduct an economic analysis. We evaluate the cost of Glimpse for Bitcoin-like chains: verifying a simple transaction has at most 700 bytes of on-chain overhead, resulting in a one-time fee of $3, only twice as much as a standard Bitcoin transaction.

Private set intersection (PSI) enables two parties, each holding a private set to compute their intersection without revealing other information in the process. We introduce a variant of conventional PSI termed as third-party PSI, whereby the intersection output of the two parties is only known to an inputless third party. In this setting, the two parties who participate in the protocol have no knowledge of the intersection result or any information of the set content of the other party. In general, third-party PSI settings arise where there is a need for an external party to obtain the intersection outcome without leakage of additional information to any other party. This setting is motivated by an increasing importance in several real-world applications. We describe protocols which achieve this functionality with minimal communication overhead. To the best of knowledge, our work is the first of its kind to explore this variant of PSI.

Data-dependent accesses to memory are necessary for many real-world applications, but their cost remains prohibitive in secure computation. Prior work either focused on minimizing the need for data-dependent access in these applications, or reduced its cost by improving oblivious RAM for secure computation (SC-ORAM). Despite extensive efforts to improve SC-ORAM, the most concretely efficient solutions still require $\approx0.7$s per access to arrays of $2^{30}$ entries. This plainly precludes using MPC in a number of settings. In this work, we take a pragmatic approach, exploring how concretely cheap MPC RAM access could be made if we are willing to allow one of the participants to learn the access pattern. We design a highly efficient Shared-Output Client-Server ORAM (SOCS-ORAM) that has constant overhead, uses one round-trip of interaction per access, and whose access cost is independent of array size. SOCS-ORAM is useful in settings with hard performance constraints, where one party in the computation is more trust-worthy and is allowed to learn the RAM access pattern. Our SOCS-ORAM is assisted by a third helper party that helps initialize the protocol and is designed for the honest-majority semi-honest corruption model. We implement our construction in C++ and report its performance. For an array of length $2^{30}$ with $4$B entries, we communicate $13$B per access and take essentially no overhead beyond network latency.

Healthcare providers cannot share their patients' encrypted data among themselves because of interoperability issues. Many blockchain- based solutions have been proposed to allow for sharing medical data in a privacy-preserving manner, but interoperability problems persist. In this paper, we present a protocol called Blockchain-Format Preserving Encryption (B-FPE) to preserve patients' data privacy. Each patient is provided with an FPE key at the time of registration. All medical records are encrypted with the FPE key and stored in the blockchain. All the blockchain transactions are signed using group signatures. We use group signatures for signing the transactions to maintain the anonymity of healthcare providers. The new encrypted data block is concatenated to the blockchain. We present two cases: The regular phase, in which a patient is in a conscious state to share their FPE key with the healthcare provider, and the Emergency phase, in which a patient is not in a conscious state to share their key with the healthcare provider. In the latter case, the healthcare provider reconstructs the FPE key and decrypts the ciphertext. We assume this decryption happens in an oblivious manner.

Considering password-based authentication technique, password memorability is a real challenge on users. Hence, password reuse across different web applications is a common trend among users which makes websites vulnerable to credential stuffing attack. A solution as password manager helps the users to create random passwords for different websites on the user machine. However, it has practical challenges. Password database breach detection is another related and challenging task. Among recent developments for breach detection, honeyword-based approach is much appreciated by the research community. However, honeyword generation itself is a challenging part of the solution. In this work, we propose i) Password Reuse Detection (PRD) protocol for detecting password reuse using a secure two party private set intersection; ii) Breach Detection (BD) protocol that detects credential stuffing attacks using two party private set inclusion protocol based on random oblivious transfer. Both the proposals are designed for the authentication servers of the respective applications and need communication between multiple websites following the work by wang et al. Through analysis we show that our PRD protocol is around 2.8 times faster, and space efficient than existing works for 5000 honeywords. Our near to real-time BD protcol is around 2 times faster than existing works.

Proofs for machine computation allow for proving the correct execution of arbitrary programs that operate over fixed instruction sets (e.g., RISC-V, EVM, Wasm). A standard approach for proving machine computation is to prove a universal set of constraints that encode the full instruction set at each step of program execution. This approach incurs prover cost per execution step on the order of the sum of instruction constraints for instructions in the set despite only a single instruction being executed. Existing approaches that avoid the universal cost per step (and incur only the cost of a single instruction’s constraints per step) either fail to provide zero-knowledge of program execution or rely on recursive proof composition techniques where security derives from heuristic non-black-box random oracle instantiation. We present a new protocol for proving machine execution that resolves the above limitations, allowing for prover efficiency on the order of executed instructions while achieving zero-knowledge and avoiding the use of proof recursion. Our core technical contribution is a new primitive that we call a tuple lookup argument which is used to allow a prover to build up a machine execution “on-the-fly”. Our tuple lookup argument relies on univariate polynomial commitments in which tuples are encoded as evaluations on cosets of a multiplicative subgroup. We instantiate our protocol by combining our tuple lookup with the popular Marlin succinct non-interactive proof system.

In this paper we present a new representation of the AES key schedule, with some implications to the security of AES-based schemes. In particular, we show that the AES-128 key schedule can be split into four independent parallel computations operating on 32-bit chunks, up to linear transformation. Surprisingly, this property has not been described in the literature after more than 20 years of analysis of AES. We show two consequences of our new representation, improving previous cryptanalysis results of AES-based schemes. First, we observe that iterating an odd number of key schedule rounds results in a permutation with short cycles. This explains an observation of Khairallah on mixFeed, a second-round candidate in the NIST lightweight competition. Our analysis actually shows that his forgery attack on mixFeed succeeds with probability 0.44 (with data complexity 220GB), breaking the scheme in practice. The same observation also leads to a novel attack on ALE, another AES-based AEAD scheme. Our new representation also gives efficient ways to combine information from the first subkeys and information from the last subkeys, in order to reconstruct the corresponding master key. This results in small improvements to previous attacks: we improve impossible differential attacks against several variants of AES (and Rijndael), and a square attack against AES-192.

Fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) schemes are either lightweight and can evaluate boolean circuits or are relatively heavy and can evaluate arithmetic circuits on encrypted vectors, i.e., they perform single instruction multiple data operations (SIMD). SIMD FHE schemes can either perform exact modular arithmetic in the case of the Brakerski-Gentry-Vaikuntanathan (BGV) and Brakerski-Fan-Vercauteren (BFV) schemes or approximate arithmetic in the case of the Cheon-Kim-Kim-Song (CKKS) scheme. While one can homomorphically switch between BGV/BFV and CKKS using the computationally expensive bootstrapping procedure, it is unknown how to switch between these schemes without bootstrapping. Finding more efficient methods than bootstrapping of converting between these schemes was stated as an open problem by Halevi and Shoup, Eurocrypt 2015. In this work, we provide strong evidence that homomorphic switching between BGV/BFV and CKKS is as hard as bootstrapping. In more detail, if one could efficiently switch between these SIMD schemes, then one could bootstrap these SIMD FHE schemes using a single call to a homomorphic scheme-switching algorithm without applying homomorphic linear transformations. Thus, one cannot hope to obtain significant improvements to homomorphic scheme-switching without also significantly improving the state-of-the-art for bootstrapping. We also explore the relative hardness of computing homomorphic comparison in these same SIMD FHE schemes as a secondary contribution. We show that given a comparison algorithm, one can bootstrap these schemes using a few calls to the comparison algorithm for typical parameter settings. While we focus on the comparison function in this work, the overall approach to demonstrate relative hardness of computing specific functions homomorphically extends beyond comparison to other useful functions such as min/max or ReLU.

We propose a novel approach that utilizes fuzzification theory to perform feature selection on website content for encryption purposes. Our objective is to identify and select the most relevant features from the website by harnessing the principles of fuzzy logic. Fuzzification allows us to transform the crisp website content into fuzzy representations, enabling a more nuanced analysis of their characteristics. By considering the degree of membership of each feature in different fuzzy categories, we can evaluate their importance and relevance for encryption. This approach enables us to prioritize and focus on the features that exhibit higher membership degrees, indicating their significance in the encryption process. By employing fuzzification-based feature selection, we aim to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of website content encryption, ultimately improving the overall internet security

In order to maintain a similar security level in a post-quantum setting, many symmetric primitives should have to double their keys and increase their state sizes. So far, no generic way for doing this is known that would provide convincing quantum security guarantees. In this paper we propose a new generic construction, QuEME, that allows to double the key and the state size of a block cipher. The QuEME design is inspired by the ECB-Mix-ECB (EME) construction, but is defined for a different choice of mixing function that withstands our new quantum superposition attack that exhibits a periodic property found in collisions and that breaks EME and a large class of variants of it. We prove that QuEME achieves $n$-bit security in the classical setting, where $n$ is the block size of the underlying block cipher, and at least $n/6$-bit security in the quantum setting. We propose a concrete instantiation of this construction, called Double-AES, that is built with variants of AES-128.

Private-ID (PID) protocol enables two parties, each holding a private set of items, to privately compute a set of random universal identifiers (UID) corresponding to the records in the union of their sets, where each party additionally learns which UIDs correspond to which items in its set but not if they belong to the intersection or not. PID is very useful in the privacy computation of databases query, e.g. inner join and join for compute. Known PID protocols all assume the input of both parties is a set. In the case of join, a more common scenario is that one party's primary key (unique) needs to join the other party's foreign key (duplicate). How to construct an efficient Private Multiset ID (PMID) protocol to support the above \emph{key-foreign key join} remains open. We resolve this problem by constructing efficient PMID protocols from Oblivious PRF, Private Set Union, and a newly introduced primitive called Deterministic-Value Oblivious Programmable PRF (dv-OPPRF). We also propose some PMID applications, including Private Inner Join, Private Full Join, and Private Join for Compute. We implement our PMID protocols and state-of-the-art PID protocols as performance baselines. The experiments show that the performances of our PMID are almost the same as the state-of-the-art PIDs when we set the multiplicity $U_x = U_y = 1$. Our PMID protocols scale well when either $U_x > 1$ or $U_y > 1$. The performances also correctly reflect excessive data expansion when both $U_x, U_y > 1$ for the more general \emph{cross join} case.

This paper explores the good-case latency of synchronous Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) consensus protocols in the rotating leader setting. We first present a lower bound that relates the latency of a broadcast when the sender is honest and the latency of switching to the next sender. We then present a matching upper bound with a latency of $2\Delta$ ($\Delta$ is the pessimistic synchronous delay) with an optimistically responsive change to the next sender. The results imply that both our lower and upper bounds are tight. We implement and evaluate our protocol and show that our protocol obtains similar latency compared to state-of-the-art stable-leader protocol Sync~HotStuff while allowing optimistically responsive leader rotation.

We prove adaptive security of a simple three-round threshold Schnorr signature scheme, which we call Sparkle. The standard notion of security for threshold signatures considers a static adversary – one who must declare which parties are corrupt at the beginning of the protocol. The stronger adaptive adversary can at any time corrupt parties and learn their state. This notion is natural and practical, yet not proven to be met by most schemes in the literature. In this paper, we demonstrate that Sparkle achieves several levels of security based on different corruption models and assumptions. To begin with, Sparkle is statically secure under minimal assumptions: the discrete logarithm assumption (DL) and the random oracle model (ROM). If an adaptive adversary corrupts fewer than t/2 out of a threshold of t + 1 signers, then Sparkle is adaptively secure under a weaker variant of the one-more discrete logarithm assumption (AOMDL) in the ROM. Finally, we prove that Sparkle achieves full adaptive security, with a corruption threshold of t, under AOMDL in the algebraic group model (AGM) with random oracles. Importantly, we show adaptive security without requiring secure erasures. Ours is the first proof achieving full adaptive security without exponential tightness loss for any threshold Schnorr signature scheme; moreover, the reduction is tight.

A possible new approach to the Zodiac Killer's 32-Character Cipher (Z32) is proposed based on the strengths and weaknesses of previous approaches and novel interpretations. This approach does not assume the use of anagrams or similar complex transposition methods; does not assume the identity of a particular Zodiac suspect; and assumes the use of homophonic substitution (as in Z408 and Z340), and simple transposition (as in Z340). Assumptions are clearly defined and tested with sensitivity tests. With Mount Diablo as the pole of a plane polar coordinate system, the instruction "set to Mag. N." is interpreted by setting the hour and minute hands of a watchface to the magnetic declination of the Bay Area circa 1970. Sensitivity tests reveal the exact year and location have little impact on the declination in this case. The hour and minute given by the hands are interpreted as the radial coordinate r and the angular coordinate theta, as in "Radians & # inches along the radians". The hand corresponding to each coordinate is tested, as are 12- and 24-hour interpretations. Impossible or improbable coordinates are excluded leaving one coordinate as a possible solution. This coordinate is explored as the possible plaintext for Z32 using the Z340 transposition method. Further exploration of the proposed method is necessary.

We present a reactive MPC protocol built from FHE which is robust in the presence of active adversaries. In addition the protocol enables reduced bandwidth via means of transciphering, and also enables more expressive/efficient programs via means of a $\mathsf{Declassify}$ operation. All sub-components of the protocol can be efficiently realised using existing technology. We prove our protocol secure in the UC framework.

The original NTRU cryptosystem from 1998 can be considered the starting point of the great success story of lattice-based cryptography. Modern NTRU versions like NTRU-HPS and NTRU-HRSS are round-3 finalists in NIST's selection process, and also Crystals-Kyber and especially Falcon are heavily influenced by NTRU. Coppersmith and Shamir proposed to attack NTRU via lattice basis reduction, and variations of the Coppersmith-Shamir lattice have been successfully applied to solve official NTRU challenges by Security Innovations, Inc. up to dimension $n=173$. In our work, we provide the tools to attack modern NTRU versions, both by the design of a proper lattice basis, as well as by tuning the modern BKZ with lattice sieving algorithm from the G6K library to NTRU needs. Let $n$ be prime, $\Phi_n := (X^n-1)/(X-1)$, and let $\mathbb{Z}_q[X]/(\Phi_n)$ be the cyclotomic ring. As opposed to the common belief, we show that switching from the Coppersmith-Shamir lattice to a basis for the cyclotomic ring provides benefits. To this end, we slightly enhance the LWE with Hints framework by Dachman-Soled, Ducas, Gong, Rossi with the concept of projections against almost-parallel hints. Using our new lattice bases, we set the first cryptanalysis landmarks for NTRU-HPS with $n \in [101,171]$ and for NTRU-HRSS with $n \in [101,211]$. As a numerical example, we break our largest HPS-171 instance using the cyclotomic ring basis within $83$ core days, whereas the Coppersmith-Shamir basis requires $172$ core days. We also break one more official NTRU challenges by Security Innovation, Inc., originally worth 1000\$, in dimension $n=181$ in $20$ core years.

GLWE secret keys come with some associated public information, like their size or the distribution probability of their coefficients. Those information have an impact on the FHE algorithms, their computational cost, their noise growth, and the overall security level. In this paper, we identify two limitations with (T)FHE: there is no fine-grained control over the size of a GLWE secret key, and there is a minimal noise variance which leads to an unnecessary increment of the level of security with large GLWE secret keys. We introduce two (non exclusive) new types of secret keys for GLWE-based cryptosystems, that are designed to overcome the aforementioned limitations. We explain why these are as secure as the traditional ones, and detail all the improvements that they brought to the FHE algorithms. We provide many comparisons with state-of-the-art TFHE techniques, and benchmarks showing computational speed-ups between $1.3$ and $2.4$ while keeping the same level of security and failure probability. Furthermore, the size of the public material (i.e., key switching and bootstrapping keys) is also reduced by factors from $1.5$ and $2.7$.

Blockchain is a newly emerging technology, however, it has proven effective in many applications because it provides multiple advantages, mainly as it represents a trust system in which data is encrypted in a way that cannot be tampered with or forged. Because it contains many details such as smart contracts, consensus, authentication, etc. the blockchain is a fertile ground for researchers where they can continually improve previous versions of these concepts. This paper introduces a new multi-signature scheme based on RSA. This scheme is designed to reduce the blockchain's size and prevent known attacks and is also applicable in many other settings that require multi-signatures. Our scheme is in the plain public key model, which means nodes do not need to prove knowledge or possession of their private key. In which, whatever the number of signers, the final signature size is equal to $O(k)$ where $k$ is a security parameter and no interaction between signers is needed. To verify that a number of parties have signed a shared message $m$, a verifier needs the signature, list of signers, and the message $m$. The presented practical short accountable-subgroup multi-signature (ASM) scheme allows a valid signature to disclose which subset generated the signature. It is worth noting that our multi-signatures with public key aggregation is an interactive two-round protocol and a multi-signature model applied to the entire block and not to individual transactions.

Four recent trends have emerged in the evolution of authenticated encryption schemes: (1) Regarding simplicity, the adoption of public permutations as primitives allows for sparing a key schedule and the need for storing round keys; (2) using the sums of permutation outputs, inputs, or outputs has been a well-studied means to achieve higher security beyond the birthday bound; (3) concerning robustness, schemes should provide graceful security degradation if a limited amount of nonces repeats during the lifetime of a key, and (4) Andreeva et al.'s ForkCipher approach can increase the efficiency of a scheme since they can use fewer rounds per output branch compared to full-round primitives. In this work, we improve on the state of the art by combining those aspects for efficient authenticated encryption. We propose $\textsf{PAE}$, an efficient nonce-based AE scheme that employs a public permutation and one call to an XOR-universal hash function. $\textsf{PAE}$ provides $O(2n/3)$-bit security and high throughput by combining forked public-permutation-based variants of $\textsf{nEHtM}$ and an Encrypted Davies-Meyer. Thus, it can use a single, in part round-reduced, public permutation for most operations, spare a key schedule, and guarantee security beyond the birthday bound even under limited nonce reuse.

Oblivious RAMs (ORAMs) are an important cryptographic primitive that enable outsourcing data to a potentially untrusted server while hiding patterns of access to the data. ORAMs provide strong guarantees even in the face of a {\em persistent adversary} that views the transcripts of all operations and resulting memory contents. Unfortunately, the strong guarantees against persistent adversaries comes at the cost of efficiency as ORAMs are known to require $\Omega(\log n)$ overhead. In an attempt to obtain faster constructions, prior works considered security against {\em snapshot adversaries} that only have limited access to operational transcripts and memory. We consider $(s,\ell)$-snapshot adversaries that perform $s$ data breaches and views the transcripts of $\ell$ total queries. Promisingly, Du, Genkin and Grubbs [Crypto'22] presented an ORAM construction with $O(\log \ell)$ overhead protecting against $(1,\ell)$-snapshot adversaries with the transcript of $\ell$ consecutive operations from a single breach. For small values of $\ell$, this outperforms standard ORAMs. In this work, we tackle whether it is possible to further push this construction beyond a single breach. Unfortunately, we show that protecting against even slightly stronger snapshot adversaries becomes difficult. As our main result, we present a $\Omega(\log n)$ lower bound for any ORAM protecting against a $(3,1)$-snapshot adversary that performs three breaches and sees the transcript of only one query. In other words, our lower bound holds even if an adversary observes only memory contents during two breaches while managing to view the transcript of only one query in the other breach. Therefore, we surprisingly show that protecting against a snapshot adversary with three data breaches is as difficult as protecting against a persistent adversary

Timed commitments (Boneh and Naor, CRYPTO 2000) are a variant of standard commitments which incorporates a forced opening mechanism that allows anyone to reveal the committed message, but not before a certain prescribed date. Timed commitments have a wide-range of applications such as contract signing, fair multi-party computation, sealed bid auctions or new blockchain applications such as preventing front-running or unbiased randomness generation. We revisit the notion of timed commitments and propose an alternative simplified definition. We also provide two new constructions of timed commitments with different trade-offs.

In a hybrid key establishment system, multiple independent key establishment schemes are combined in a manner that also combines their security properties. Such constructions can combine systems that are secure in different settings and achieve the combined security of all systems. For example, classical and post-quantum systems can be combined in order to secure communication against current threats as well as future quantum adversaries. This paper describes machine-checked proofs of security for a commonly-used hybrid key establishment system that concatenates the secrets produced by other key establishment systems. Practical interpretation of these results is also provided in order to guide the use of this system in applications and standards.

Secure multiparty computation (MPC) on incomplete communication networks has been studied within two primary models: (1) Where a partial network is fixed a priori, and thus corruptions can occur dependent on its structure, and (2) Where edges in the communication graph are determined dynamically as part of the protocol. Whereas a rich literature has succeeded in mapping out the feasibility and limitations of graph structures supporting secure computation in the fixed-graph model (including strong classical lower bounds), these bounds do not apply in the latter dynamic-graph setting, which has recently seen exciting new results, but remains relatively unexplored. In this work, we initiate a similar foundational study of MPC within the dynamic-graph model. As a first step, we investigate the property of graph expansion. All existing protocols (implicitly or explicitly) yield communication graphs which are expanders, but it is not clear whether this is inherent. Our results consist of two types (for constant fraction of corruptions): * Upper bounds: We demonstrate secure protocols whose induced communication graphs are not expander graphs, within a wide range of settings (computational, information theoretic, with low locality, even with low locality and adaptive security) each assuming some form of input-independent setup. * Lower bounds: In the setting without setup and adaptive corruptions, we demonstrate that for certain functionalities, no protocol can maintain a non-expanding communication graph against all adversarial strategies. Our lower bound relies only on protocol correctness (not privacy), and requires a surprisingly delicate argument. More generally, we provide a formal framework for analyzing the evolving communication graph of MPC protocols, giving a starting point for studying the relation between secure computation and further, more general graph properties.

We present a new framework for defining information leakage in the setting of US equities trading, and construct methods for deriving trading schedules that stay within specified information leakage bounds. Our approach treats the stock market as an interactive protocol performed in the presence of an adversary, and draws inspiration from the related disciplines of differential privacy as well as quantitative information flow. We apply a linear programming solver using examples from historical trade and quote (TAQ) data for US equities and describe how this framework can inform actual algorithmic trading strategies.

We build non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) and ZAP arguments for all $\mathsf{NP}$ where soundness holds for infinitely-many security parameters, and against uniform adversaries, assuming the subexponential hardness of the Computational Diffie-Hellman (CDH) assumption. We additionally prove the existence of NIZK arguments with these same properties assuming the polynomial hardness of both CDH and the Learning Parity with Noise (LPN) assumption. In both cases, the CDH assumption does not require a group equipped with a pairing. Infinitely-often uniform security is a standard byproduct of commonly used non-black-box techniques that build on disjunction arguments on the (in)security of some primitive. In the course of proving our results, we develop a new variant of this non-black-box technique that yields improved guarantees: we obtain explicit constructions (previous works generally only obtained existential results) where security holds for a relatively dense set of security parameters (as opposed to an arbitrary infinite set of security parameters). We demonstrate that our technique can have applications beyond our main results.

Nova is an efficient recursive proof system built from an elegant folding scheme for (relaxed) R1CS statements. The original Nova paper (CRYPTO'22) presented Nova using a single elliptic curve group of order $p$. However, for improved efficiency, the implementation of Nova alters the scheme to use a 2-cycle of elliptic curves. This altered scheme is only described in the code and has not been proven secure. In this work, we point out a soundness vulnerability in the original implementation of the 2-cycle Nova system. To demonstrate this vulnerability, we construct a convincing Nova proof for the correct evaluation of $2^{75}$ rounds of the Minroot VDF in only 1.46 seconds. We then present a modification of the 2-cycle Nova system and formally prove its security. The modified system also happens to be more efficient than the original implementation. In particular, the modification eliminates an R1CS instance-witness pair from the recursive proof. The implementation of Nova has now been updated to use our optimized and secure system. We also show that Nova's IVC proofs are malleable and discuss several mitigations.

Society appears to be on the verge of recognizing the need for control over sensitive data in modern web applications. Recently, many systems claim to give control to individuals, promising the preeminent goal of data sovereignty. However, despite recent attention, research and industry efforts are fragmented and lack a holistic system overview. In this paper, we provide the first transecting systematization of data sovereignty by drawing from a dispersed body of knowledge. We clarify the field by identifying its three main areas: (i) decentralized identity, (ii) decentralized access control and (iii) policy-compliant decentralized computation. We find that literature lacks a cohesive set of formal definitions. Each area is considered in isolation, and priorities in industry and academia are not aligned due to a lack of clarity regarding user control. To solve this issue, we propose formal definitions for each sub-area. By highlighting that data sovereignty transcends the domain of decentralized identity, we aim to guide future works to embrace a broader perspective on user control. In each section, we augment our definition with security and privacy properties, discuss the state of the art and proceed to identify open challenges. We conclude by highlighting synergies between areas, emphasizing the real-world benefit obtained by further developing data sovereign systems.

With the announcement of the first winners of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) competition in 2022, the industry has now a confirmed foundation to revisit established cryptographic algorithms applied in automotive use cases and replace them with quantum-safe alternatives. In this paper, we investigate the application of the NIST competition winner CRYSTALS-Dilithium to protect the integrity and authenticity of over-the-air update packages. We show how this post-quantum secure digital signature algorithm can be integrated in AUTOSAR Adaptive Platform Update and Configuration Management framework and evaluate our approach practically using the NXP S32G vehicle network processor. We discuss two implementation variants with respect to performance and resilience against relevant attacks, and conclude that PQC has little impact on the update process as a whole.

Restricting access to certified users is not only desirable for many blockchain applications, it is also legally mandated for decentralized finance (DeFi) applications to counter malicious actors. Existing solutions, however, are either (i) non-private, i.e., they reveal the link between users and their wallets to the authority granting credentials, or (ii) they introduce additional trust assumptions by relying on a decentralized oracle to verify anonymous credentials (ACs). To remove additional trust in the latter approach, we propose verifying credentials on-chain in this work. We find that this approach has impractical costs with prior AC schemes, and propose a new AC scheme ZEBRA that crucially relies on zkSNARKs to provide efficient on-chain verification for the first time. In addition to the standard unlinkability property that provides privacy for users, ZEBRA also supports auditability, revocation, traceability, and theft detection, which adds accountability for malicious users and convenience for honest users to our access control solution. Even with these properties, ZEBRA reduces the gas cost incurred on the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) by 14.3x when compared to Coconut [NDSS 2019], the state-of-the-art AC scheme for blockchains that only provides unlinkability. This improvement translates to a reduction in transaction fees from 176 USD to 12 USD on Ethereum in May 2023. Since 12 USD is still high for most applications, ZEBRA further drives down credential verification costs through batched verification. For a batch of 512 layer-1 and layer-2 wallets, the transaction fee on Ethereum is reduced to just 0.44 USD and 0.02 USD, respectively, which is comparable to the minimum transaction costs on Ethereum.

The syndrome decoding problem lies at the heart of code-based cryptographic constructions. Information Set Decoding (ISD) algorithms are commonly used to assess the security of these systems. The most efficient ISD algorithms rely heavily on nearest neighbor search techniques. However, the runtime result of the fastest known ISD algorithm by Both-May (PQCrypto '17) was recently challenged by Carrier et al. (Asiacrypt '22), which introduce themselves a new technique called RLPN decoding which yields improvements over ISD for codes with small rates $\frac{k}{n}\leq 0.3$. In this work we first revisit the Both-May algorithm, by giving a clean exposition and a corrected analysis. In this context we confirm the result by Carrier et al. that the initial analysis is flawed and conclude with the same runtime exponent. Our work aims at fully substantiating the corrected runtime exponent by a detailed analysis. Furthermore, we show that the Both-May algorithm significantly improves on memory complexity over previous algorithms. Our first main contribution is therefore to give the correct perspective on the significance of the Both-May algorithm and to clarify any remaining doubts on the corrected baseline. As a second main contribution we detail a possible strategy for future improvements of the Both-May algorithm. This strategy is based on introducing a novel technique to combine the list construction step and the list filtering step commonly applied by ISD algorithms. Therefore we treat the nearest neighbor routine in a non-blackbox fashion which allows us to embed the filtering into the nearest neighbor search. In this context we introduce the fixed-weight nearest neighbor problem, and propose a first algorithm to solve this problem. Even though, our current analysis does not yet yield a gain in complexity over the Both-May algorithm, we point out different ways to further improve the proposed technique.

In recent history of fully homomorphic encryption, bootstrapping has been actively studied throughout many HE schemes. As bootstrapping is an essential process to transform somewhat homomorphic encryption schemes into fully homomorphic, enhancing its performance is one of the key factors of improving the utility of homomorphic encryption. In this paper, we propose an extended bootstrapping for TFHE, which we name it by EBS. One of the main drawback of TFHE bootstrapping was that the precision of bootstrapping is mainly decided by the polynomial dimension $N$. Thus if one wants to bootstrap with high precision, one must enlarge $N$, or take alternative method. Our EBS enables to use small $N$ for parameter selection, but to bootstrap in higher dimension to keep high precision. Moreover, it can be easily parallelized for faster computation. Also, the EBS can be easily adapted to other known variants of TFHE bootstrappings based on the original bootstrapping algorithm. We implement our EBS along with the full domain bootstrapping methods known ($\mathsf{FDFB}$, $\mathsf{TOTA}$, $\mathsf{Comp}$), and show how much our EBS can improve the precision for those bootstrapping methods. We provide experimental results and thorough analysis with our EBS, and show that EBS is capable of bootstrapping with high precision even with small $N$, thus small key size, and small complexity than selecting large $N$ by birth.

Integrating traditional Internet (web2) identities with blockchain (web3) identities presents considerable obstacles. Conventional solutions typically employ a mapping strategy, linking web2 identities directly to specific blockchain addresses. However, this method can lead to complications such as fragmentation of identifiers across disparate networks. To address these challenges, we propose a novel scheme, Address Abstraction (AA), that circumvents the need for direct mapping. AA scheme replaces the existing blockchain address system while maintaining essential properties including a unique identifier, immutability of requests, and privacy preservation. This capability allows users to interact with the blockchain via their web2 identities, irrespective of the specific blockchain address, thereby eliminating limitations tied to a blockchain-specific address system. This mechanism fosters the seamless integration of web2 identities within the web3, in addition, promotes cross-chain compatibility. We also provide an application of AA, denoted as zero-knowledge Address Abstraction (zkAA). It mainly leverages the zero-knowledge proofs to ensure the properties of AA. zkAA has been implemented as a smart contract — compatible with any existing contract-enabled blockchains. Our evaluation of zkAA on Ethereum demonstrates its efficiency. The average cost for registering an abstracted identity is approximate \$7.66, whereas publishing an abstracted transaction costs around \$4.75. In contrast, on Polygon, the associated costs are markedly lower: \$0.02 for registration and \$0.01 for publication, as of January 13, 2023. This empirical evaluation substantiates the feasibility of our proposed solution.

Cuckoo hashing is a powerful primitive that enables storing items using small space with efficient querying. At a high level, cuckoo hashing maps $n$ items into $b$ entries storing at most $\ell$ items such that each item is placed into one of $k$ randomly chosen entries. Additionally, there is an overflow stash that can store at most $s$ items. Many cryptographic primitives rely upon cuckoo hashing to privately embed and query data where it is integral to ensure small failure probability when constructing cuckoo hashing tables as it directly relates to the privacy guarantees. As our main result, we present a more query-efficient cuckoo hashing construction using more hash functions. For construction failure probability $\epsilon$, the query overhead of our scheme is $O(1 + \sqrt{\log(1/\epsilon)/\log n})$. Our scheme has quadratically smaller query overhead than prior works for any target failure probability $\epsilon$. We also prove lower bounds matching our construction. Our improvements come from a new understanding of the locality of cuckoo hashing failures for small sets of items. We also initiate the study of robust cuckoo hashing where the input set may be chosen with knowledge of the hash functions. We present a cuckoo hashing scheme using more hash functions with query overhead $\tilde{O}(\log \lambda)$ that is robust against poly$(\lambda)$ adversaries. Furthermore, we present lower bounds showing that this construction is tight and that extending previous approaches of large stashes or entries cannot obtain robustness except with $\Omega(n)$ query overhead. As applications of our results, we obtain improved constructions for batch codes and PIR. In particular, we present the most efficient explicit batch code and blackbox reduction from single-query PIR to batch PIR.

This note shows that there exists a nontrivial invariant for the unkeyed round function of QARMAv2-64. It is invariant under translation by a set of $2^{32}$ constants. The invariant does not extend over all rounds of QARMAv2-64 and probably does not lead to full-round attacks. Nevertheless, it might be of interest as it can be expected to give meaningful weak-key attacks on round-reduced instances when combined with other techniques such as integral cryptanalysis.

In this paper we consider multipartite access structures obtained from polymatroids with extreme rank function. They are proved to be ideal and partially hierarchical. It turns out that the family of structures induced by polymatroids with minimal rank function is a natural generalization of the class of disjunctive access structure considered by Simmons and the class of conjunctive access structures introduced by Tassa. The results are based on the connections between multipartite access structures and polymatroids discovered by Farràs, Martí-Farré and Padró.

We present $\mathsf{Testudo}$, a new FFT-less SNARK with a near linear-time prover, constant-time verifier, constant-size proofs and a square-root-size universal setup. $\mathsf{Testudo}$ is based on a variant of Spartan~\cite{C:Setty20}—and hence does not require FFTs—as well as a new, fast multivariate polynomial commitment scheme (PCS) with a square-root-sized trusted setup that is derived from PST (TCC 2013) and IPPs (Asiacrypt 2021). To achieve constant-size SNARK proofs in $\mathsf{Testudo}$ we then combine our PCS openings proofs recursively with a Groth16 SNARK. We also evaluate our construction and its building blocks: to compute a PCS opening proof for a polynomial of size $2^{25}$, our new scheme opening procedure achieves a 110x speed-up compared to PST and 3x compared to Gemini (Eurocrypt 2022), since opening computations are heavily parallelizable and operate on smaller polynomials. Furthermore, a $\mathsf{Testudo}$ proof for a witness of size $2^{30} (\approx 1\,GB)$ requires a setup of size only $2^{15}$ ($\approx$ tens of kilobytes). Finally, we show that a $\mathsf{Testudo}$ variant for proving data-parallel computations is almost 10x faster at verifying $2^{10}$ Poseidon-based Merkle tree opening proofs than the regular version.

TinyJAMBU is one of the ten finalists of the NIST lightweight cryptography competition, announced in March 2021. It proposes a lightweight authenticated encryption scheme based on a lightweight 128-bit keyed permutation. TinyJAMBU supports three key lengths 128, 192, and 256 denoted by TinyJambu-128, TinyJambu192, and TinyJambu-256, respectively. The scheme as well as the permutation is well studied by the designers and third parties. The most relevant work to ours is the full-round zero-sum distinguisher under the known-key setting assumption published at Indocrypt 2022. In this work, we show that even without the known-key setting assumption, there are integral distinguishers not only for full-round versions of the permutations of TinyJambu-128 and TinyJambu-192 but also for round-increased versions of them up to 1273 rounds.

It is well-known that randomness is essential for secure cryptography. The randomness used in cryptographic primitives is not necessarily recoverable even by the party who can, e.g., decrypt or recover the underlying secret/message. Several cryptographic primitives that support randomness recovery have turned out useful in various applications. In this paper, we study randomness recoverable secret sharing schemes (RR-SSS), in both information-theoretic and computational settings and provide two results. First, we show that while every access structure admits a perfect RR-SSS, there are very simple access structures (e.g., in monotone $\mathsf{AC}^0$) that do not admit efficient perfect (or even statistical) RR-SSS. Second, we show that the existence of efficient computational RR-SSS for certain access structures in monotone $\mathsf{AC}^0$ implies the existence of one-way functions. This stands in sharp contrast to (non-RR) SSS schemes for which no such results are known. RR-SSS plays a key role in making advanced attributed-based encryption schemes randomness recoverable, which in turn have applications in the context of designated-verifier non-interactive zero knowledge.

Fully Homomorphic Encryption over the Torus (TFHE) is a homomorphic encryption scheme which supports efficient Boolean operations over encrypted bits. TFHE has a unique feature in that the evaluation of each binary gate is followed by a bootstrapping procedure to refresh the noise of a ciphertext. In particular, this gate bootstrapping involves two algorithms called the blind rotation and key-switching. In this work, we introduce several optimization techniques for the TFHE bootstrapping. We first define a new key distribution, called the block binary distribution, where the secret key can be expressed as a concatenation of several vectors of Hamming weight at most one. We analyze the hardness of (Ring) LWE with a block binary secret and provide candidate parameter sets which are secure against the best-known attacks. Then, we use the block key structure to simplify the inner working of blind rotation and reduce its complexity. We also modify the RLWE key generation and the gadget decomposition method to improve the performance of the key-switching algorithm in terms of complexity and noise growth. Finally, we use the TFHE library to implement our algorithms and demonstrate their benchmarks. Our experimentation shows that the execution time of TFHE bootstrapping is reduced from 10.5ms down to 6.4ms under the same security level, and the size of the bootstrapping key decreases from 109MB to 60MB.

A secret-sharing scheme enables a dealer to share a secret $s$ among $n$ parties such that only authorized subsets of parties, specified by a monotone access structure $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}$, can reconstruct $s$ from their shares. Other subsets of parties learn nothing about $s$. The question of minimizing the (largest) share size for a given $f$ has been the subject of a large body of work. However, in most existing constructions for general access structures $f$, the share size is not much smaller than the size of some natural computational representation of $f$, a fact that has often been referred to as the ``representation size barrier'' in secret sharing. In this work, we initiate a systematic study of succinct computational secret sharing (SCSS), where the secrecy requirement is computational and the goal is to substantially beat the representation size barrier. We obtain the following main results. (1) SCSS via Projective PRGs. We introduce the notion of a *projective PRG*, a pseudorandom generator for which any subset of the output bits can be revealed while keeping the other output bits hidden, using a *short* projective seed. We construct projective PRGs with different levels of succinctness under a variety of computational assumptions, and apply them towards constructing SCSS for graph access structures, monotone CNF formulas, and (less succinctly) useful subclasses of monotone circuits and branching programs. Most notably, under the sub-exponential RSA assumption, we obtain a SCSS scheme that, given an arbitrary access structure $f$, represented by a truth table of size $N=2^n$, produces shares of size polylog(N)=\poly(n) in time $\tilde O(N)$. For comparison, the share size of the best known information-theoretic schemes is $O(N^{0.58})$. (2) SCSS via One-way Functions. Under the (minimal) assumption that one-way functions exist, we obtain a near-quadratic separation between the total share size of computational and information-theoretic secret sharing. This is the strongest separation one can hope for, given the state of the art in secret sharing lower bounds. We also construct SCSS schemes from one-way functions for useful classes of access structures, including forbidden graphs and monotone DNF formulas. This leads to constructions of fully-decomposable conditional disclosure of secrets (also known as privacy-free garbled circuits) for general functions, represented by a truth table of size $N=2^n$, with share size polylog(N) and computation time $\tilde O(N)$, assuming sub-exponentially secure one-way functions.

In permissionless consensus, the ordering of transactions or inputs in each block is freely determined by an anonymously elected block leader. A rational block leader will choose an ordering of inputs that maximizes financial gain; the emergence of automatic market makers in decentralized finance enables the block leader to front-run honest trade orders by injecting its own inputs prior to and after honest trades. Front-running is rampant in decentralized finance and reduces the utility of the system by extracting financial value from honest trades and increasing demand for block-space. Current proposals to prevent input order attacks by encrypting user inputs are not permissionless, as they rely on small static committees to perform distributed key generation and threshold decryption. Such committees require party authentication, knowledge of the number of participating parties or do not permit player replaceability and are therefore not permissionless. Moreover, alternative solutions based on sequencing inputs in order of their arrival cannot prevent front-running in an unauthenticated peer-2-peer network where message arrival is adversarially controlled. We present FairPoS, the first consensus protocol to achieve input fairness in the permissionless setting with security against adaptive adversaries in semi-synchronous networks. In FairPoS, the adversary cannot learn the plaintext of any client input before it is included in a block in the chain's common-prefix. Thus, input ordering attacks that depend on observing pending client inputs in the clear are no longer possible. In FairPoS, this is achieved via Delay Encryption (DeFeo et al., EUROCRYPT 2021), a recent cryptographic primitive related to time-lock puzzles, allowing all client inputs in a given round to be encrypted under a key that can only be extracted after enough time has elapsed. In contrast to alternative approaches, the key extraction task in delay encryption can, in principle, be performed by any party in the permissionless setting and requires no distribution of secret key material amongst authenticated parties. However, key extraction requires highly specialized hardware in practice. Thus, FairPoS requires resource-rich staking parties to insert extracted keys into blocks, enabling light-clients to decrypt past inputs and relieving parties who join the execution from decrypting all inputs in the entire chain history. Realizing this in proof-of-stake is non-trivial; naive application of key extraction to proof-of-stake can result in chain stalls lasting the entire key extraction period. We overcome this challenge with a novel key extraction protocol, which tolerates adversarial delays in block delivery intended to prevent key extraction from completing on schedule. Critically, this also enables the adoption of a new longest-extendable-chain rule which allows FairPoS to achieve the same guarantees as Ouroborous Praos against an adaptive adversary.

This work addresses the long quest for proving full (adaptive) security for attribute-based encryption (ABE). We show that in order to prove full security in a black-box manner, the scheme must be ``irregular'' in the sense that it is impossible to ``validate'' secret keys to ascertain consistent decryption of ciphertexts. This extends a result of Lewko and Waters (Eurocrypt 2014) that was only applicable to straight-line proofs (without rewinding). Our work, therefore, establishes that it is impossible to circumvent the irregularity property using creative proof techniques, so long as the adversary is used in a black-box manner. As a consequence, our work provides an explanation as to why some lattice-based ABE schemes cannot be proven fully secure, even though no known adaptive attacks exist.

Blockchain systems can become overwhelmed by a large number of transactions, leading to increased latency. As a consequence, latency-sensitive users must bid against each other and pay higher fees to ensure that their transactions are processed in priority. However, most of the time of a blockchain system (78% in Ethereum), there is still a lot of unused computational power, with few users sending transactions. To address this issue and reduce latency for users, we propose the latency-first smart contract model in this paper, which optimistically accepts committed transactions. This allows users to submit a commitment during times of high demand, and then complete the rest of the work at a lower priority. From the perspective of the blockchain, this temporarily “overclocks” the system. We have developed a programming tool for our model, and our experiments show that the proposed latency-first smart contract model can greatly reduce latency during the periods of high demand.

The word-oriented feedback shift registers (WFSRs) possess very attractive properties as they take advantage of modern word-based processors and thus increase the throughput. We provide a generalized form of the feedback function of WFSR along with some special cases. Then, a necessary and sufficient condition for nonsingular WFSR is discussed. We study different word-based cascade systems and the period of sequences produced by these cascade systems is derived. We provide experimental results on avalanche property on states of cascade systems and statistical results of sequences produced by them. Finally, we present a crypt-analytic attack on cascade systems and suggest its countermeasure.

A famous reduction by Regev shows that random instances of the Learning With Errors (LWE) problem are asymptotically at least as hard as a worst-case lattice problem. As such, by assuming that standard lattice problems are hard to solve, the asymptotic security of cryptosystems based on the LWE problem is guaranteed. However, it has not been clear to which extent, if any, this reduction provides support for the security of present concrete parametrizations. In this work we therefore use Regev's reduction to parametrize a cryptosystem, providing a reference as to what parameters are required to actually claim security from this reduction. This requires us to account for the concrete performance of this reduction, allowing the first parametrization of a cryptosystem that is provably secure based only on a conservative hardness estimate for a standard lattice problem. Even though we attempt to optimize the reduction, our system still requires significantly larger parameters than typical LWE-based cryptosystems, highlighting the significant gap between parameters that are used in practice and those for which worst-case reductions actually are applicable.

Succinct arguments that rely on the Merkle-tree paradigm introduced by Kilian (STOC 92) suffer from larger proof sizes in practice due to the use of generic cryptographic primitives. In contrast, succinct arguments with the smallest proof sizes in practice exploit homomorphic commitments. However these latter are quantum insecure, unlike succinct arguments based on the Merkle-tree paradigm. A recent line of works seeks to address this limitation, by constructing quantum-safe succinct arguments that exploit lattice-based commitments. The eventual goal is smaller proof sizes than those achieved via the Merkle-tree paradigm. Alas, known constructions lack succinct verification. In this paper, we construct the first interactive argument system for NP with succinct verification that, departing from the Merkle-tree paradigm, exploits the homomorphic properties of lattice-based commitments. For an arithmetic circuit with N gates, our construction achieves verification time polylog(N) based on the hardness of the Ring Short-Integer-Solution (RSIS) problem. The core technique in our construction is a delegation protocol built from commitment schemes based on leveled bilinear modules, a new notion that we deem of independent interest. We show that leveled bilinear modules can be realized from pre-quantum and from post-quantum cryptographic assumptions.

$\newcommand{\gen}{\mathsf{Gen}}\newcommand{\enc}{\mathsf{Enc}}\newcommand{\dec}{\mathsf{Dec}}$ A recent work of Fleischhacker, Larsen, and Simkin (Eurocrypt 2023) shows how to efficiently compress encrypted sparse vectors. Subsequently, Fleischhacker, Larsen, Obremski, and Simkin (Eprint 2023) improve upon their work and provide more efficient constructions solving the same problem. Being able to efficiently compress such vectors is very useful in a variety of applications, such as private information retrieval, searchable encryption, and oblivious message retrieval. Concretely, assume one is given a vector $(m_1, \dots, m_n)$ with at most $t$ distinct indices $i \in [n]$, such that $m_i \neq 0$ and assume $(\gen,\enc, \dec)$ is an additively homomorphic encryption scheme. The authors show that one can compress $(\enc(k, m_1), \dots, \enc(k, m_n))$, without knowing the secret key $k$, into a digest with size dependent on the upper bound on the sparsity $t$, but not on the total vector length $n$. Unfortunately, all existing constructions either only work for encryption schemes that have sufficiently large plaintext spaces or require additional encrypted auxiliary information about the plaintext vector. In this work, we show how to generalize the results of Fleischhacker, Larsen, and Simkin to encryption schemes with arbitrarily small plaintext spaces. Our construction follows the same general ideas laid out in previous works but modifies them in a way that allows compressing the encrypted vectors correctly with high probability, independently of the size of the plaintext space.

Simon (1998) proved that it is impossible to construct collision-resistant hash functions from one-way functions using a black-box reduction. It is conjectured more generally that one-way functions do not imply, via a black-box reduction, the hardness of any total NP search problem (collision-resistant hash functions being just one such example). We make progress towards this conjecture by ruling out a large class of “single-query” reductions. In particular, we improve over the prior work of Hubáček et al. (2020) in two ways: our result is established via a novel simpler combinatorial technique and applies to a broader class of semi black-box reductions.

Persistent fault analysis is a novel and efficient cryptanalysis method. The persistent fault attacks take advantage of a persistent fault injected in a non-volatile memory, then present on the device until the reboot of the device. Contrary to classical physical fault injection, where differential analysis can be performed, persistent fault analysis requires new analyses and dedicated countermeasures. Persistent fault analysis requires a persistent fault injected in the S-box such that the bijective characteristic of the permutation function is not present anymore. In particular, the analysis will use the non-uniform distribution of the S-box values: when one of the possible S-box values never appears and one of the possible S-box values appears twice. In this paper, we present the first dedicated protection to prevent persistent fault analysis. This countermeasure, called BALoo for Bijection Assert with Loops, checks the property of bijectivity of the S-box. We show that this countermeasure has a 100% fault coverage for the persistent fault analysis, with a very small software overhead (memory overhead) and reasonable hardware overhead (logical resources, memory and performance). To evaluate the overhead of BALoo, we provide experimental results obtained with the software and the hardware (FPGA) implementations of an AES-128.

Recent years have seen the emergence of practical advanced cryptographic tools that not only protect data privacy and authenticity, but also allow for jointly processing data from different institutions without sacrificing privacy. The ability to do so has enabled implementations a number of traditional and decentralized financial applications that would have required sacrificing privacy or trusting a third party. The main catalyst of this revolution was the advent of decentralized cryptocurrencies that use public ledgers to register financial transactions, which must be verifiable by any third party, while keeping sensitive data private. Zero Knowledge (ZK) proofs rose to prominence as a solution to this challenge, allowing for the owner of sensitive data (e.g. the identities of users involved in an operation) to convince a third party verifier that a certain operation has been correctly executed without revealing said data. It quickly became clear that performing arbitrary computation on private data from multiple sources by means of secure Multiparty Computation (MPC) and related techniques allows for more powerful financial applications, also in traditional finance. In this SoK, we categorize the main traditional and decentralized financial applications that can benefit from state-of-the-art Privacy-Enhancing Technologies (PETs) and identify design patterns commonly used when applying PETs in the context of these applications. In particular, we consider the following classes of applications: 1. Identity Management, KYC & AML; and 2. Markets & Settlement; 3. Legal; and 4. Digital Asset Custody. We examine how ZK proofs, MPC and related PETs have been used to tackle the main security challenges in each of these applications. Moreover, we provide an assessment of the technological readiness of each PET in the context of different financial applications according to the availability of: theoretical feasibility results, preliminary benchmarks (in scientific papers) or benchmarks achieving real-world performance (in commercially deployed solutions). Finally, we propose future applications of PETs as Fintech solutions to currently unsolved issues. While we systematize financial applications of PETs at large, we focus mainly on those applications that require privacy preserving computation on data from multiple parties.

Cuckoo Hashing is a dictionary data structure in which a data item is stored in a small constant number of possible locations. It has the appealing property that a data structure of size $2m$ can hold up to $n = \frac{1}{d} m$ elements for any constant $d > 1$; i.e. the data structure size is a small constant times larger than the combined size of all inserted data elements. However, the probability that a cuckoo hash table build fails is $\Theta(\frac{1}{m})$. This is too high for many applications, especially cryptographic applications and Oblivious RAM. An alternative proposal introduced by Kirsch et al. is to store elements which cannot be placed in the main table in a ``stash'', reducing the failure probability to $\mathcal{O}(m^{-(s+1)})$ where $s$ is any constant stash size. However, this analysis did not apply to super-constant $s$, and the bounds are asymptotic rather than explicit. Further works improved upon this, but either were not explicit, not closed-form or had limitations on the stash size. In this paper we present the first explicit, closed-form bounds for the failure probability of cuckoo hashing with a stash for general stash sizes.

This paper presents the first protocols for Proactive Secret Sharing (PSS) that only require constant (in the number of parties, $n$) communication per party per epoch. By harnessing the power of expander graphs, we are able to obtain strong guarantees about the security of the system. We present the following PSS protocols: – A PSS protocol that provides privacy (but no robustness) against an adversary controlling $O(n)$ parties per epoch. – A PSS protocol that provides robustness (but no privacy) against an adversary controlling $O(n)$ parties per epoch. – A PSS protocol that provides privacy against an adversary controlling $O(n^{a})$ parties per epoch and provides robustness against an adversary controlling $O(n^{1−a})$ parties per epoch, for any constant $0 \leq a \leq 1$. Instantiating this with $a = \frac{1}{2}$ gives a PSS protocol that is proactively secure (private and robust) against an adversary controlling $O(\sqrt{n})$ parties per epoch. Additionally, we discuss how secure channels, whose existence is usually assumed by PSS protocols, are challenging to create in the mobile adversary setting, and we present a method to instantiate them from a weaker assumption.

We implement the Schnorr protocol in assembler via the Jasmin toolchain, and prove the security (proof-of-knowledge and zero-knowledge properties) and the absence of leakage through timing side-channels of that implementation in EasyCrypt. In order to do so, we provide a semantic characterization of leakage-freeness for probabilistic Jasmin programs (that are not constant-time). We design a library for multiple-precision integer arithmetic in Jasmin -- the "libjbn'' library. Among others, we implement and verify algorithms for fast constant-time modular multiplication and exponentiation (using Barrett reduction and Montgomery ladder). We also implement and verify correctness and leakage-freeness of the rejection sampling algorithm. And finally, we put it all together and show the security of the overall implementation (end-to-end verification) of the Schnorr protocol, by connecting our implementation to prior security analyses in EasyCrypt (Firsov, Unruh, CSF~2023).

We study the post-quantum security of authenticated encryption (AE) schemes, designed with classical security in mind. Under superposition attacks, many CBC-MAC variants have been broken, and AE modes employing those variants, such as EAX and GCM, thus fail at authenticity. As we show, the same modes are IND-qCPA insecure, i.e., they fail to provide privacy under superposition attacks. However, a constrained version of GCM is IND-qCPA secure, and a nonce-based variant of the CBC-MAC is secure under superposition queries. Further, the combination of classical authenticity and classical chosen-plaintext privacy thwarts attacks with superposition chosen-ciphertext and classical chosen-plaintext queries -a security notion that we refer to as IND-qdCCA. And nonce-based key derivation allows generically turning an IND-qdCCA secure scheme into an IND-qCCA secure scheme.

Constructing advanced cryptographic primitives such as obfuscation or broadcast encryption from standard hardness assumptions in the post quantum regime is an important area of research, which has met with limited success despite significant effort. It is therefore extremely important to find new, simple to state assumptions in this regime which can be used to fill this gap. An important step was taken recently by Wee (Eurocrypt '22) who identified two new assumptions from lattices, namely evasive ${\sf LWE}$ and tensor ${\sf LWE}$, and used these to construct broadcast encryption and ciphertext policy attribute based encryption for ${\sf P}$ with optimal parameters. Independently, Tsabary formulated a similar assumption and used it to construct witness encryption (Crypto '22). Following Wee's work, Vaikuntanathan, Wee and Wichs independently provided a construction of witness encryption (Asiacrypt '22). In this work, we advance this line of research by providing the first construction of multi-input attribute based encryption (${\sf MIABE}$) for the function class ${\sf NC_1}$ for any constant arity from evasive ${\sf LWE}$. Our construction can be extended to support the function class ${\sf P}$ by using evasive and a suitable strengthening of tensor ${\sf LWE}$. In more detail, our construction supports $k$ encryptors, for any constant $k$, where each encryptor uses the master secret key ${\sf msk}$ to encode its input $(\mathbf{x}_i, m_i)$, the key generator computes a key ${\sf sk}_f$ for a function $f \in {\sf NC}_1$ and the decryptor can recover $(m_1,\ldots,m_k)$ if and only if $f(\mathbf{x}_1,\ldots,\mathbf{x}_k)=1$. The only known construction for ${\sf MIABE}$ for ${\sf NC}_1$ by Agrawal, Yadav and Yamada (Crypto '22) supports arity $2$ and relies on pairings in the generic group model (or with a non-standard knowledge assumption) in addition to ${\sf LWE}$. Furthermore, it is completely unclear how to go beyond arity $2$ using this approach due to the reliance on pairings. Using a compiler from Agrawal, Yadav and Yamada (Crypto '22), our ${\sf MIABE}$ can be upgraded to multi-input predicate encryption for the same arity and function class. Thus, we obtain the first constructions for constant-arity predicate and attribute based encryption for a generalized class such as ${\sf NC}_1$ or ${\sf P}$ from simple assumptions that may be conjectured post-quantum secure. Along the way, we show that the tensor ${\sf LWE}$ assumption can be reduced to standard ${\sf LWE}$ in an important special case which was not known before. This adds confidence to the plausibility of the assumption and may be of wider interest.

We introduce reductions of knowledge, a generalization of arguments of knowledge, which reduce checking knowledge of a witness in one relation to checking knowledge of a witness in another (simpler) relation. Reductions of knowledge unify a growing class of modern techniques as well as provide a compositional framework to modularly reason about individual steps in complex arguments of knowledge. As a demonstration, we simplify and unify recursive arguments over linear algebraic statements by decomposing them as a sequence of reductions of knowledge. To do so, we develop the tensor reduction of knowledge, which generalizes the central reductive step common to many recursive arguments. Underlying the tensor reduction of knowledge is a new information-theoretic reduction, which, for any modules $U$, $U_1$, and $U_2$ such that $U \cong U_1 \otimes U_2$, reduces the task of evaluating a homomorphism in $U$ to evaluating a homomorphism in $U_1$ and evaluating a homomorphism in $U_2$.

We propose a new inner product argument (IPA), called TENET, which features sublogarithmic proof size and sublinear verifier without a trusted setup. IPA is a core primitive for various advanced proof systems including range proofs, circuit satisfiability, and polynomial commitment, particularly where a trusted setup is hard to apply. At ASIACRYPT 2022, Kim, Lee, and Seo showed that pairings can be utilized to exceed the complexity barrier of the previous discrete logarithm-based IPA without a trusted setup. More precisely, they proposed two pairing-based IPAs, one with sublogarithmic proof size and the other one with sublinear verifier cost, but they left achieving both complexities simultaneously as an open problem. We investigate the obstacles for this open problem and then provide our solution TENET, which achieves both sublogarithmic proof size and sublinear verifier. We prove the soundness of TENET under the discrete logarithm assumption and double pairing assumption.

In this work, we revisit the severely limited throughput problem of cryptocurrencies and propose a novel rebalancing approach for Payment Channel Networks (PCNs). PCNs are a popular solution for increasing the blockchain throughput, however, their benefit depends on the overall users’ liquidity. Rebalancing mechanisms are the state-of-the-art approach to maintaining high liquidity in PCNs. However, existing opt-in rebalancing mechanisms exclude users that may assist in rebalancing for small service fees, leading to suboptimal solutions and under-utilization of the PCNs’ bounded liquidity. We introduce the first rebalancing approach for PCNs that includes all users, following an “all for one and one for all” design philosophy that yields optimal throughput. The proposed approach introduces a double-auction rebalancing problem, which we term Musketeer, where users can participate as buyers (paying fees to rebalance) or sellers (charging fees to route transactions). The desired properties tailored to the unique characteristics of PCNs are formally defined, including the novel property of cyclic budget balance that is a stronger variation of strong budget balance. Basic results derived from auction theory, including an impossibility and multiple mechanisms that either achieve all desiderata under a relaxed model or sacrifice one of the properties, are presented. We also propose a novel mechanism that leverages time delays as an additional cost to users. This mechanism is provably truthful, cyclic budget balanced, individually rational, and economic efficient but only with respect to liquidity.

Since the announcement of the NIST call for a new lightweight cryptographic standard, a lot of schemes have been proposed in response. Xoodyak is one of these schemes and is among the finalists of the NIST competition with a sponge structure very similar to the Keccak hash function – the winner of the SHA3 NIST competition. In this paper with conditional cube attack technique, we fully recover the key of Xoodyak reduced to 6 and 7 rounds with time complexity resp. 2^{42.58} and 2^{76.003} in the nonce-reusing scenario. In our attack setting, we import the cube variables in the absorbing associated data phase, which has higher degree of freedom in comparison to data absorption phase. We use MILP tool for finding enough cube variables to perform the conditional key recovery attack. The 6-round attack is practical and has been implemented. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first proposed attack on 7-round Xoodyak.

FPGAs have been used in the cloud since several years, as accelerators for various workloads such as machine learning, database processes and security tasks. As for other cloud services, a highly desired feature is virtualization in which multiple tenants can share a single FPGA to increase utilization and by that efficiency. By solely using standard FPGA logic in the untrusted tenant, on-chip logic sensors allow remote power analysis side-channel and covert channel attacks on the victim tenant. However, such sensors are implemented by unusual circuit constructions, such as ring oscillators, delay lines, or unusual interconnect configuration, which might be easily detected by bitstream and/or netlist checking. In this paper, we show that such structural checking methods are not universal solutions as the attacks can make use of any normal circuits, which mean they are ``benign-looking'' to any checking method. We indeed demonstrate that -- without any additional and suspicious implementation constraints -- standard circuits intended for legitimate tasks can be misused as a sensor thereby monitoring instantaneous power consumption, and hence conducting key-recovery attacks. This extremely stealthy attack is a threat that can originate from the application layers, i.e. through various high-level synthesis approaches.

Anonymous or attribute-based credential (ABC) systems are a versatile and important cryptographic tool to achieve strong access control guarantees while simultaneously respecting the privacy of individuals. A major problem in the practical adoption of ABCs is their transferability, i.e., such credentials can easily be duplicated, shared or lent. One way to counter this problem is to tie ABCs to biometric features of the credential holder and to require biometric verification on every use. While this is certainly not a viable solution for all ABC use-cases, there are relevant and timely use-cases, such as vaccination credentials as widely deployed during the COVID-19 pandemic. In such settings, ABCs that are tied to biometrics, which we call Biometric-Bound Attribute-Based Credentials (bb-ABC), allow to implement scalable and privacy-friendly systems to control physical access to (critical) infrastructure and facilities. While there are some previous works on bb-ABC in the literature, the state of affairs is not satisfactory. Firstly, in existing work the problem is treated in a very abstract way when it comes to the actual type of biometrics. Thus, it does not provide concrete solutions which allow for assessing their practicality when deployed in a real-world setting. Secondly, there is no formal model which rigorously captures bb-ABC systems and their security requirements, making it hard to assess their security guarantees. With this work we overcome these limitations and provide a rigorous formalization of bb-ABC systems. Moreover, we introduce two generic constructions which offer different trade-offs between efficiency and trust assumptions, and provide benchmarks from a concrete instantiation of such a system using facial biometrics. The latter represents a contact-less biometric feature that provides acceptable accuracy and seems particularly suitable to the above use-case.

Transition to PQC brings complex challenges to builders of secure cryptographic hardware. PQC keys usually need to be stored off-module and protected via symmetric encryption and message authentication codes. Only a short, symmetric Key-Encrypting Key (KEK) can be managed on-chip with trusted non-volatile key storage. For secure use, PQC key material is handled in masked format; as randomized shares. Due to the masked encoding of the key material, algorithm-specific techniques are needed to protect the side-channel security of the PQC key import and export processes. In this work, we study key handling techniques used in real-life secure Kyber and Dilithium hardware. We describe WrapQ, a masking-friendly key-wrapping mechanism designed for lattice cryptography. On a high level, WrapQ protects the integrity and confidentiality of key material and allows keys to be stored outside the main security boundary of the module. Significantly, its wrapping and unwrapping processes minimize side-channel leakage from the KEK integrity/authentication keys as well as the masked Kyber or Dilithium key material payload. We demonstrate that masked Kyber or Dilithium private keys can be managed in a leakage-free fashion from a compact WrapQ format without updating its encoding in non-volatile (or read-only) memory. WrapQ has been implemented in a side-channel secure hardware module. Kyber and Dilithium wrapping and unwrapping functions were validated with 100K traces of ISO 17825 / TVLA-type leakage assessment.

A functional commitment (FC) scheme allows one to commit to a vector $\vec{x}$ and later produce a short opening proof of $(f, f(\vec{x}))$ for any admissible function $f$. Since their inception, FC schemes supporting ever more expressive classes of functions have been proposed. In this work, we introduce a novel primitive that we call chainable functional commitment (CFC), which extends the functionality of FCs by allowing one to 1) open to functions of multiple inputs $f(\vec x_1, \ldots, \vec x_m)$ that are committed independently, 2) while preserving the output also in committed form. We show that CFCs for quadratic polynomial maps generically imply FCs for circuits. Then, we efficiently realize CFCs for quadratic polynomials over pairing groups and lattices, resulting in the first FC schemes for circuits of unbounded depth based on either pairing-based or lattice-based falsifiable assumptions. Our FCs require fixing a-priori only the maximal width of the circuit to be evaluated, and have opening proofs whose size only depends on the depth of the circuit. Additionally, our FCs feature other nice properties such as being additively homomorphic and supporting sublinear-time verification after offline preprocessing. Using a recent transformation that constructs homomorphic signatures (HS) from FCs, we obtain the first pairing- and lattice-based realisations of HS for bounded-width, but unbounded-depth, circuits. Prior to this work, the only HS for general circuits is lattice-based and requires bounding the circuit depth at setup time.