This work studies the success probability of key recovery attacks based on using a single linear approximation. Previous works had analysed success probability under different hypotheses on the distributions of correlations for the right and wrong key choices. This work puts forward a unifying framework of general key randomisation hypotheses. All previously used key randomisation hypotheses as also zero correlation attacks can be seen to special cases of the general framework. Derivations of expressions for the success probability are carried out under both the settings of the plaintexts being sampled with and without replacements. Compared to previous analysis, we uncover several new cases which have not been considered in the literature. For most of the cases which have been considered earlier, we provide complete expressions for the respective success probabilities. Finally, the complete picture of the dependence of the success probability on the data complexity is revealed. Compared to the extant literature, our work provides a deeper and more thorough understanding of the success probability of single linear cryptanalysis.

We revisit the problem of whether the known classic constant-round public-coin argument/proof systems are witness hiding for languages/distributions with unique witnesses. Though strong black-box \emph{impossibility} results are known, we provide some less unexpected \emph{positive} results on the witness hiding security of these classic protocols: --We give sufficient conditions on a hard distribution over \emph{unique} witness NP relation for which all witness indistinguishable protocols (including all public-coin ones, such as ZAPs, Blum protocol and GMW protocol) are indeed witness hiding. We also show a wide range of cryptographic problems with unique witnesses satisfy these conditions, and thus admit constant-round public-coin witness hiding proof system. ---For the classic Schnorr protocol (for which the distribution of statements being proven seems not to satisfy the above sufficient conditions), we develop an embedding technique and extend the result of Bellare and Palacio to base the witness hiding property of the Schnorr protocol in the standalone setting on a \emph{relaxed} version of one-more like discrete logarithm (DL) assumption, and show that breaking this assumption would lead to some surprising consequences, such as instance compression for DL problem, zero knowledge protocols for the AND-DL language with extremely efficient communication and highly non-trivial hash combiner for hash functions based on DL problem. Similar results hold for the Guillou-Quisquater protocol.

Blacklistable anonymous credential systems provide service providers with a way to authenticate users according to their historical behaviors, while guaranteeing that all users can access services in an anonymous and unlinkable manner, thus are potentially useful in practice. Traditionally, to protect services from illegal access, the credential issuer, which completes the registration with users, must be trusted by the service provider. However, in practice, this trust assumption is usually unsatisfied. Besides, to better evaluate users, it is desired to use blacklists, which record historical behaviors of users, of other service providers, but currently, this will threaten the security unless a strong trust assumption is made. Another potential security issue in current blacklistable anonymous credential systems is the blacklist gaming attack, where the service provider attempt to compromise the privacy of users via generating blacklist maliciously. In this paper, we solve these problems and present the decentralized blacklistable anonymous credential system with reputation, which inherits nearly all features of the BLACR system presented in Au et.al. (NDSS'12). However, in our new system, no trusted party is needed to register users. Moreover, blacklists from other service providers can be used safely in the new system assuming a minimal trust assumption holds. Besides, the new system is also partially resilient to the blacklist gaming attack. Technically, the main approach to solving these problems is a novel use of the blockchain technique, which serve as a public append-only ledger and are used to store credentials and blacklists. To simplify the construction, we also present a generic framework for constructing our new system. The general framework can be instantiated from three different types of cryptographic systems, including the RSA system, the classical DL system, and the pairing based system, and all these three types of instantiations can be supported simultaneously in the framework. To demonstrate the practicability of our system, we also give a proof of concept implementation for the instantiation under the RSA system. The experiment results indicate that when authenticating with blacklists of reasonable size, our implementation can fulfill practical efficiency demands, and when authenticating with empty blacklists, it is more efficient than that of Garman et al. (NDSS'14), which presents a decentralized anonymous credential system without considering revocation.

NewHope and NewHope-Simple are two recently proposed post-quantum key exchange protocols based on the hardness of the Ring-LWE problem. Due to their high security margins and performance, there have been already discussions and proposals for integrating them into Internet standards, like TLS, and anonymity network protocols, like Tor. In this work, we present time-constant and vector-optimized implementations of NewHope and NewHope-Simple for ARMv8-A 64-bit processors which target high-speed applications. This architecture is implemented in a growing number of smart phone and tablet processors, and features powerful 128-bit SIMD operations provided by the NEON engine. In particular, we propose the use of three alternative modular reduction methods, which allow to better exploit NEON parallelism by avoiding larger data types during the Number Theoretic Transform (NTT) and remove the need to transform input coefficients into Montgomery domain during pointwise multiplications. The NEON vectorized NTT uses a 16-bit unsigned integer representation and executes in only 18, 909 clock cycles on an ARM Cortex-A53 core. Our implementation improves previous assembly-optimized results on ARM NEON platforms by a factor of 3.4 and outperforms the C reference implementation on the same platform by a factor of 8.3. The total time spent on the key exchange was reduced by more than a factor of 3.5 for both protocols.

Fully homomorphic encryption allows cloud servers to evaluate any computable functions for clients without revealing any information. It attracts much attention from both of the scientific community and the industry since Gentry’s seminal scheme. Currently, the Brakerski- Gentry-Vaikuntanathan scheme with its optimizations is one of the most potentially practical schemes and has been implemented in a homomorphic encryption C++ library HElib. HElib supplies friendly interfaces for arithmetic operations of polynomials over finite fields. Based on HElib, Chen and Gong (2015) implemented arithmetic over encrypted integers. In this paper, we revisit the HElib-based implementation of homomorphically arithmetic operations on encrypted integers. Due to several optimizations and more suitable arithmetic circuits for homomorphic encryption evaluation, our implementation is able to homomorphically evaluate 64-bit addition/subtraction and 16-bit multiplication for encrypted integers without bootstrapping. Experiments show that our implementation outperforms Chen and Gong’s significantly.

We construct a 4-round multi-party computation protocol in the plain model for any functionality, secure against a malicious adversary. Our protocol relies on the sub-exponential hardness of the Learning with Errors (LWE) problem with slightly super-polynomial noise ratio, and on the existence of adaptively secure commitments. Lin, Pass and Soni (FOCS '17) provide an adaptively secure commitment scheme from Time-Lock Puzzles. Our round complexity matches a lower bound of Garg et al. (EUROCRYPT '16), and outperforms the state of the art of 6 rounds based on similar assumptions to ours, and 5 rounds relying on indistinguishability obfuscation and other strong assumptions. To do this, we construct an LWE based multi-key FHE scheme with a very simple one-round distributed setup procedure (vs. the trusted setup required in previous LWE based constructions). This lets us construct the first 3-round semi-malicious MPC protocol without setup from standard LWE using the approach of Mukherjee and Wichs (EUROCRYPT '16). Finally, subexponential hardness and adaptive commitments are used to ''compile'' the protocol into the fully malicious setting.

Yao's garbled circuit construction is a central cryptographic tool with numerous applications. In this tutorial, we study garbled circuits from a foundational point of view under the framework of randomized encoding (RE) of Functions. We review old and new constructions of REs, present some lower-bounds, and describe some applications. We will also discuss new directions and open problems in the foundations of REs. This is a survey that appeared in a book of surveys in honor of Oded Goldreich's 60th birthday.

Time-memory-data (TMD) tradeoff attacks limit the security level of many classical stream ciphers (like $E_0$, A5/1, Trivium, Grain) to $\frac{1}{2}n$, where $n$ denotes the inner state length of the underlying keystream generator. This implies that to withstand TMD tradeoff attacks, the state size should be at least double the key size. In 2015, Armknecht and Mikhalev introduced a new line of research, which pursues the goal of reducing the inner state size of lightweight stream ciphers below this boundary by deploying a key-dependent state update function in a Grain-like stream cipher. Although their design Sprout was broken soon after publication, it has raised interest in the design principle, and a number of related ciphers have been suggested since, including Plantlet, a follow-up of Sprout, and the cipher Fruit. In this paper, existing TMD tradeoff attacks are revisited, and new insights on distinguishers and key recovery related to small-state stream ciphers are derived. A particular result is the transfer of a generic distinguishing attack suggested in 2007 by Englund, Hell, and Johansson to this new class of lightweight ciphers. Our analysis shows that the initial hope of achieving full security against TMD tradeoff attacks by continuously using the secret key has failed. In particular, we demonstrate that there are generic distinguishing attacks against Plantlet and Fruit with complexity significantly smaller than that of exhaustive key search. However, by studying the assumptions underlying the applicability of these attacks, we are able to come up with a new design idea for small-state stream ciphers which might allow to finally achieve full security against TMD tradeoff attacks. Another contribution of this paper is the first key recovery attack against the most recent version of Fruit. We show that there are at least $2^{64}$ weak keys, each of which does not provide 80-bit security as promised by designers. This new attack against Fruit, together with previous attacks against Sprout, raises the question whether a more complicated key schedule than the basic one used in Plantlet is actually beneficial for the security of such ciphers.

We call a simple abelian variety over $\mathbb{F}_p$ super-isolated if its ($\mathbb{F}_p$-rational) isogeny class contains no other varieties. The motivation for considering these varieties comes from concerns about isogeny based attacks on the discrete log problem. We heuristically estimate that the number of super-isolated elliptic curves over $\mathbb{F}_p$ with prime order and $p \leq N$, is roughly $\tilde{\Theta}(\sqrt{N})$. In contrast, we prove that there are only 2 super-isolated surfaces of cryptographic size and near-prime order.

A Degenerate Grouping Power Attack (DGPA) is a type of Partitioning Power Analysis (PPA) used to extract secret keys from the power sidechannel signal of an encryption algorithm running on a device along with some known and varying information such as the associated plaintext or ciphertext associated with each encryption. The DGPA is applied to SIMON and SPECK implementations on MSP430, PIC16F, and Spartan 6 platforms in this work. While keys are successfully recovered from unprotected implementations, guidance is given on a minimum number of rounds, $d$, to perform per clock cycle in FPGAs and ASICs as to mitigate against such attacks for a deployment dependent maximum quantity of data which is to be encrypted with a given key. On the Spartan 6, full key recovery of SIMON 64/128 $d\leq4$ and SPECK 64/128 $d\leq3$ is trivially achieved in seconds with no more than one million random plaintexts, requiring the use of larger $d$ for most implementations. The amount of work to recover a key as a function of the amount of collected data encrypted with that key is explored. To ensure security when performing most modes of block cipher operation with an algorithm having block size $2n$, a particular key should be used to perform no more than $2^n$ encryptions. A feasible key recovery requiring less than 80-bits of work and data from less than $2^{32}$ encryptions is excluded for SIMON 64/128 implementations having $d\geq 9$ and for SPECK 64/128 implementations having $d\geq5$. The DGPA attack method is demonstrated to succeed against a limited data set consisting of one power sample per device clock cycle against a specifically targeted instruction. This provides a basis for a low power field deployed power side channel signal capture hardware for embedded key recovery and exfiltration.

In quantum cryptography, a one-way permutation is a bounded unitary operator $U: H \mapsto H$ on a Hilbert space $H$ that is easy to compute on every input, but hard to invert given the image of a random input. Levin [Probl. Inf. Transm., vol. 39 (1): 92-103 (2003)] has conjectured that the unitary transformation $g(a,x) = (a,f(x)+ax)$, where $f$ is any length-preserving function and $a,x \in GF_{2^{||x||}}$, is an information-theoretically secure operator within a polynomial factor. Here, we show that Levin’s oneway permutation is provably secure because its output values are four maximally entangled two-qubit states, and whose probability of factoring them approaches zero faster than the multiplicative inverse of any positive polynomial $poly(x)$ over the Boolean ring of all subsets of $x$. Our results demonstrate through well-known theorems that existence of classical one-way functions implies existence of a universal quantum one-way permutation that cannot be inverted in subexponential time in the worst case.

A software watermarking scheme allows one to embed a "mark" into a program without significantly altering the behavior of the program. Moreover, it should be difficult to remove the watermark without destroying the functionality of the program. Recently, Cohen et al. (STOC 2016) and Boneh et al. (PKC 2017) showed how to watermark cryptographic functions such as PRFs using indistinguishability obfuscation. Notably, in their constructions, the watermark remains intact even against arbitrary removal strategies. A natural question is whether we can build watermarking schemes from standard assumptions that achieve this strong mark-unremovability property. We give the first construction of a watermarkable family of PRFs that satisfy this strong mark-unremovability property from standard lattice assumptions (namely, the learning with errors (LWE) and the one-dimensional short integer solution (SIS) problems). As part of our construction, we introduce a new cryptographic primitive called a translucent PRF. Next, we give a concrete construction of a translucent PRF family from standard lattice assumptions. Finally, we show that using our new lattice-based translucent PRFs, we obtain the first watermarkable family of PRFs with strong unremovability against arbitrary strategies from standard assumptions.

We present the first fault attack on cryptosystems based on supersingular isogenies. During the computation of the auxiliary points, the attack aims to change the base point to a random point on the curve via a fault injection. We will show that this would reveal the secret isogeny with one successful perturbation with high probability. We will exhibit the attack by placing it against signature schemes and key-exchange protocols with validations in place. Our paper therefore demonstrates the need to incorporate checks in implementations of the cryptosystem.

We present an actively secure protocol for secure multi-party computation based on lookup tables, by extending the recent, two-party `TinyTable' protocol of Damgard et al. (ePrint 2016). Like TinyTable, an attractive feature of our protocol is a very fast and simple online evaluation phase. We also give a new method for efficiently implementing the preprocessing material required for the online phase using arithmetic circuits over characteristic two fields. This improves over the suggested method from TinyTable by at least a factor of 50. As an application of our protocol, we consider secure computation of the Triple DES and the AES block ciphers, computing the S-boxes via lookup tables. Additionally, we adapt a technique for evaluating (Triple) DES based on a polynomial representation of its S-boxes that was recently proposed in the side-channel countermeasures community. We compare the above two approaches with an implementation. The table lookup method leads to a very fast online time of over 230,000 blocks per second for AES and 45,000 for Triple DES. The preprocessing cost is not much more than previous methods that have a much slower online time.

A majority of electronic bartering transactions is carried out via online platforms. Typically, these platforms require users to disclose sensitive information about their trade capabilities which might restrict their room for negotiation. It is in this context that we propose a novel decentralized and privacy-preserving bartering protocol for multiple parties that offers the same privacy guarantees as provided by traditional bartering and by cash payments. The proposed protocol is even secure against an active attacker who controls a majority of colluding parties.

S-boxes are important building blocks in block ciphers. For secure design one should not choose an S-box that has low degree. In this work we consider minimum degree of an S-box which is the minimum value of the degree of the nonzero component functions of the S-box. For an S-box $F : {F_2}^n \rightarrow {F_2}^m$, there are $2^m - 1$ nonzero component functions, we show that there is a better way to determine the minimum degree of an S-box which does not require to check all the $2^m - 1$ component functions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the best algorithm for determining the minimum degree of an S-box in the literature.

Blockchain is being praised as a technological innovation which allows to revolutionize how society trades and interacts. This reputation is in particular attributable to its properties of allowing mutually mistrusting entities to exchange financial value and interact without relying on a trusted third party. A blockchain moreover provides an integrity protected data storage and allows to provide process transparency. In this article we critically analyze whether a blockchain is indeed the appropriate technical solution for a particular application scenario. We differentiate between permissionless (e.g., Bitcoin/Ethereum) and permissioned (e.g. Hyperledger/Corda) blockchains and contrast their properties to those of a centrally managed database. We provide a structured methodology to determine the appropriate technical solution to solve a particular application problem. Given our methodology, we analyze in depth three use cases --- Supply Chain Management, Interbank and International Payments, and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations and conclude the article with an outlook for further opportunities.

Cryptographic schemes based on supersingular isogenies have become an active area of research in the field of post-quantum cryptography. We investigate the resistance of these cryptosystems to fault injection attacks. It appears that the iterative structure of the secret isogeny computation renders these schemes vulnerable to loop-abort attacks. Loop-abort faults allow to perform a full key recovery, bypassing all the previously introduced validation methods. Therefore implementing additional countermeasures seems unavoidable for applications where physical attacks are relevant.

We propose multi target homomorphic attribute-based encryption (MT-HABE) with fully dynamic homomorphic evaluation: it can take as input arbitrary additional ciphertexts during homomorphic computation. In the previous MT-HABE of Brakerski et al. (TCC 2016-B), the output of homomorphic computation, which is related to a policy set, cannot be computed with a fresh ciphertext whose attribute does not satisfy any policy in the set. This is because the underlying multi-key fully homomorphic encryption (MKFHE) is single-hop: some keys are related to the output of homomorphic computation, which cannot be combined with ciphertexts encrypted under other keys. To implement fully dynamic homomorphic evaluations, we construct MT-HABE from the multi-hop MKFHE proposed by Peikert and Shiehian (TCC 2016-B).

We consider the problem of solving multivariate systems of Boolean polynomial equations: starting from a system of $m$ polynomials of degree at most $d$ in $n$ variables, we want to find its solutions over $\F_2$. Except for $d=1$, the problem is known to be NP-hard, and its hardness has been used to create public cryptosystems; this motivates the search for faster algorithms to solve this problem. After reviewing the state of the art, we describe a new algorithm and show that it outperforms previously known methods in a wide range of relevant parameters. In particular, the first named author has been able to solve all the Fukuoka Type~I MQ challenges, culminating with the resolution of a system of 148 quadratic equations in 74 variables in less than a day (and with a lot of luck).

In present paper, we investigate 4 problems. Firstly, it is known that, a matrix is MDS if and only if all sub-matrices of this matrix of degree from 1 to $n$ are full rank. In this paper, we propose a theorem that an orthogonal matrix is MDS if and only if all sub-matrices of this orthogonal matrix of degree from 1 to $\lfloor\frac{n}{2}\rfloor$ are full rank. With this theorem, calculation of constructing orthogonal MDS matrices is reduced largely. Secondly, Although it has been proven that the $2^d\times2^d$ circulant orthogonal matrix does not exist over the finite field, we discover that it also does not exist over a bigger set. Thirdly, previous algorithms have to continually change entries of the matrix to construct a lot of candidates. Unfortunately, in these candidates, only very few candidates are orthogonal matrices. With the matrix polynomial residue ring and the minimum polynomials of lightweight element-matrices, we propose an extremely efficient algorithm for constructing $4\times4$ circulant orthogonal MDS matrices. In this algorithm, every candidate must be an circulant orthogonal matrix. Finally, we use this algorithm to construct a lot of lightweight results, and some of them are constructed first time.

In 2015, Chou and Orlandi presented an oblivious transfer protocol that already drew a lot of attention both from theorists and practitioners due to its extreme simplicity and high efficiency. Chou and Orlandi claimed that their protocol is UC-secure in the random oracle model under dynamic corruptions, which is a very strong security guarantee. Unfortunately, in this work we point out a flaw in their security proof for the case of sender corruption. We define a decisional problem and we prove that, if a correct proof is provided, then this problem can be solved correctly with overwhelming probability. Therefore, the protocol by Chou and Orlandi cannot be instantiated securely with groups for which our decisional problem cannot be solved correctly with overwhelming probability. Our decisional problem can be solved with overwhelming probability when a DDH oracle is provided. Therefore, it seems likely that the protocol by Chou and Orlandi can be instantiated securely with gap-DH groups.

Secure multi-party computation allows a number of participants to securely evaluate a function on their private inputs and has a growing number of applications. Two standard adversarial models that treat the participants as semi-honest or malicious, respectively, are normally considered for showing security of constructions in this framework. In this work, we go beyond the standard security model in the presence of malicious participants and treat the problem of enforcing correct inputs to be entered into the computation. We achieve this by having a certification authority certify user's information, which is consequently used in secure two-party computation based on garbled circuit evaluation. The focus of this work on enforcing correctness of garbler's inputs via certification, as prior work already allows one to achieve this goal for circuit evaluator's input. Thus, in this work, we put forward a novel approach for certifying user's input and tying certification to garbler's input used during secure function evaluation based on garbled circuits. Our construction achieves notable performance of adding only one (standard) signature verification and $O(n\rho)$ symmetric key/hash operations to the cost of garbled circuit evaluation in the malicious model via cut-and-choose, in which $\rho$ circuits are garbled and $n$ is the length of the garbler's input in bits. Security of our construction is rigorously proved in the standard model.

This work considers the problem of constructing efficient MDS matrices over the field $\F_{2^m}$. Efficiency is measured by the metric XOR count which was introduced by Khoo et al. in CHES 2014. Recently Sarkar and Syed (ToSC Vol. 1, 2016) have shown the existence of $4\times 4$ Toeplitz MDS matrices with optimal XOR counts. In this paper, we present some characterizations of Toeplitz matrices in light of MDS property. Our study leads to improving the known bounds of XOR counts of $8\times 8$ MDS matrices by obtaining Toeplitz MDS matrices with lower XOR counts over $\F_{2^4}$ and $\F_{2^8}$.

Bitcoin and its underlying blockchain mechanism have been attracting much attention. One of their core innovations, Proof-of-Work (PoW), is notoriously inefficient which potentially motivates a centralization of computing power, defeating the original goal of decentralization. Proof-of-Stake (PoS) is later proposed to replace PoW. However, both PoW and PoS have different inherent advantages and disadvantages, so does Proof-of-Activity (PoA) of Bentov et al. (SIGMETRICS 2014) which only offers limited combinations of two mechanisms. On the other hand, the hybrid consensus protocol of Pass and Shi (ePrint 16/917) aims to improve the efficiency by dynamically maintaining a rotating committee. Yet, there are unsatisfactory issues including chain forks and fair committee election. In this paper, we firstly devise a generalized variant of PoW. After that, we leverage our newly proposed generalized PoW to construct a fork-free hybrid consensus protocol, which addresses issues faced by the existing hybrid consensus mechanism. We further combine our fork-free hybrid consensus mechanism with PoS for a flexible version of PoA, which offers a flexible combination of PoW and PoS. Compared with Bentov et al.’s PoA, our “flexible PoA” improves the efficiency and provides more flexible combinations of PoW and PoS, resulting in a more powerful and applicable consensus protocol.

We present a cipher that represents a novel strategy: replacing algorithmic complexity with computational simplicity while generating cryptographic efficacy through large as desired quantities of randomness. The BitFlip cipher allows its user to defend herself with credibly appraised mathematical intractability, well-hinged on solid combinatorics. This is the situation when the amount of randomness is small relative to the accumulated amount of processed plaintext. Deploying more randomness, BitFlip will frustrate its cryptanalyst with terminal equivocation among two or more plausible message candidates. This equivocation defense can be increased by simply increasing the amount of deployed randomness, coming at-will close to Vernam’s perfect secrecy. BitFlip is structured as a super polyalphabetic cipher where a letter comprised of 2n bits is pointed-to by any 2n bits string with a Hamming distance of n from it. When a passed 2n bits string is found to have no n-valued Hamming distance from any letter in the reader’s alphabet, it is regarded as null. This allows for co-encryption of several messages each over its respective alphabet; thereby offering a powerful equivocation defense because the ciphertext does not indicate which alphabet the intended reader is using. BitFlip becomes increasingly timely and practical, exploiting the advent of high quality non-algorithmic randomness, as well as the effect of Moore’s law on the cost of handling large amounts of memory. BitFlip is a natural fit for what fast emerges as the biggest customer of cryptography: the Internet of Things

We survey the computational foundations for public-key cryptography. We discuss the computational assumptions that have been used as bases for public-key encryption schemes, and the types of evidence we have for the veracity of these assumptions. This survey/tutorial was published in the book "Tutorials on the Foundations of Cryptography", dedicated to Oded Goldreich on his 60th birthday.

An important benchmark for multi-party computation protocols (MPC) is their round complexity. For several important MPC tasks, such as broadcast, (tight) lower bounds on the round complexity are known. However, some of these lower bounds can be circumvented when the termination round of every party is not a priori known, and simultaneous termination is not guaranteed. Protocols with this property are called \emph{probabilistic-termination (PT)} protocols. Running PT protocols in parallel affects the round complexity of the resulting protocol in somewhat unexpected ways. For instance, an execution of m protocols with constant expected round complexity might take O(\log m) rounds to complete. In a seminal work, Ben-Or and El-Yaniv (Distributed Computing '03) developed a technique for parallel execution of arbitrarily many broadcast protocols, while preserving expected round complexity. More recently, Cohen et al. (CRYPTO '16) devised a framework for universal composition of PT protocols, and provided the first composable parallel-broadcast protocol with a simulation-based proof. These constructions crucially rely on the fact that broadcast is "privacy free," and do not generalize to arbitrary protocols in a straightforward way. This raises the question of whether it is possible to execute arbitrary PT protocols in parallel, without increasing the round complexity. In this paper we tackle this question and provide both feasibility and infeasibility results. We construct a round-preserving protocol compiler, secure against a dishonest minority of actively corrupted parties, that compiles arbitrary protocols into a protocol realizing their parallel composition, while having a black-box access to the underlying \emph{protocols}. Furthermore, we prove that the same cannot be achieved, using known techniques, given only black-box access to the \emph{functionalities} realized by the protocols, unless merely security against semi-honest corruptions is required, for which case we provide a protocol. To prove our results, we utilize the language and results by Cohen et al., which we extend to capture parallel composition and reactive functionalities, and to handle the case of an honest majority.

We present TOPPSS, the most efficient Password-Protected Secret Sharing (PPSS) scheme to date. A (t; n)-threshold PPSS, introduced by Bagherzandi et al, allows a user to share a secret among n servers so that the secret can later be reconstructed by the user from any subset of t+1 servers with the sole knowledge of a password. It is guaranteed that any coalition of up to t corrupt servers learns nothing about the secret (or the password). In addition to providing strong protection to secrets stored online, PPSS schemes give rise to efficient Threshold PAKE (T-PAKE) protocols that armor single-server password authentication against the inherent vulnerability to offline dictionary attacks in case of server compromise. TOPPSS is password-only, i.e. it does not rely on public keys in reconstruction, and enjoys remarkable efficiency: A single communication round, a single exponentiation per server and just two exponentiations per client regardless of the number of servers. TOPPSS satises threshold security under the (Gap) One-More Diffie-Hellman (OMDH) assumption in the random-oracle model as in several prior efficient realizations of PPSS/TPAKE. Moreover, we show that TOPPSS realizes the Universally Composable PPSS notion of Jarecki et al under a generalization of OMDH, the Threshold One-More Diffie-Hellman (T-OMDH) assumption. We show that the T-OMDH and OMDH assumptions are both hard in the generic group model. The key technical tool we introduce is a universally composable Threshold Oblivious PRF which is of independent interest and applicability.

Since its introduction the UC framework by Canetti has received a lot of attention. A contributing factor to its popularity is that it allows to capture a large number of common cryptographic primitives using ideal functionalities and thus can be used to give modular proofs for many cryptographic protocols. However, an important member of the cryptographic family has not yet been captured by an ideal functionality, namely the zero-knowledge proof of membership. We give the first formulation of a UC zero-knowledge proof of membership and show that it is closely related to the notions of straight-line zero-knowledge and simulation soundness.

We show that indistinguishability obfuscation (IO) for all circuits can be constructed solely from secret-key functional encryption (SKFE). In the construction, SKFE need to be able to issue a-priori unbounded number of functional keys, that is, collusion-resistant. Our strategy is to replace public-key functional encryption (PKFE) in the construction of IO proposed by Bitansky and Vaikuntanathan (FOCS 2015) with puncturable SKFE. Bitansky and Vaikuntanathan introduced the notion of puncturable SKFE and observed that the strategy works. However, it has not been clear whether we can construct puncturable SKFE without assuming PKFE. In particular, it has not been known whether puncturable SKFE is constructed from ordinary SKFE. In this work, we show that a relaxed variant of puncturable SKFE can be constructed from collusion-resistant SKFE. Moreover, we show that the relaxed variant of puncturable SKFE is sufficient for constructing IO.

Three-party Password Authenticated Key Exchange (3PAKE) protocol is an important cryptographic primitive, where clients can establish a session key using easy-to-remember passwords. A number of 3PAKE protocols based on traditional mathematical problems have been presented in the literature, but these protocols are not able to resist attacks using quantum computers. In this paper, we construct the first 3PAKE protocol from lattices. Lattice-based cryptography is a promising post-quantum cryptography approach. We then prove its security in the random oracle model, and implement the proposed protocol using LatticeCrypto. The implementation results shows our protocol is very efficient in practice.

We present new protocols for conditional disclosure of secrets (CDS), where two parties want to disclose a secret to a third party if and only if their respective inputs satisfy some predicate. - For general predicates $\text{pred} : [N] \times [N] \rightarrow \{0,1\}$, we present two protocols that achieve $o(N^{1/2})$ communication: the first achieves $O(N^{1/3})$ communication and the second achieves sub-polynomial $2^{O(\sqrt{\log N \log\log N})} = N^{o(1)}$ communication. - As a corollary, we obtain improved share complexity for forbidden graph access structures. Namely, for every graph on $N$ vertices, there is a secret-sharing scheme for $N$ parties in which each pair of parties can reconstruct the secret if and only if the corresponding vertices in $G$ are connected, and where each party gets a share of size $2^{O(\sqrt{\log N \log\log N})} = N^{o(1)}$. Prior to this work, the best protocols for both primitives required communication complexity $\tilde{O}(N^{1/2})$. Indeed, this is essentially the best that all prior techniques could hope to achieve as they were limited to so-called ``linear reconstruction''. This is the first work to break this $O(N^{1/2})$ ``linear reconstruction'' barrier in settings related to secret sharing. To obtain these results, we draw upon techniques for non-linear reconstruction developed in the context of information-theoretic private information retrieval. We further extend our results to the setting of private simultaneous messages (PSM), and provide applications such as an improved attribute-based encryption (ABE) for quadratic polynomials.

We show how to build a UC-Secure Oblivious Transfer in the presence of Adaptive Corruptions from Quasi-Adaptive Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge proofs. Our result is based on the work of Jutla and Roy at Asiacrypt 2015, where the authors proposed a constant-size very efficient PAKE scheme. As a stepping stone, we first show how a two-flow PAKE scheme can be generically transformed in an optimized way, in order to achieve an efficient three-flow Oblivious-Transfer scheme. We then compare our generic transformations to existing OT constructions and see that we manage to gain at least a factor 2 to the best known constructions. To the best of our knowledge, our scheme is the first UC-secure Oblivious Transfer with a constant size flow from the receiver, and nearly optimal size for the server.

Non-malleable codes (NMCs), introduced by Dziembowski, Pietrzak and Wichs~\cite{DPW10}, provide a useful message integrity guarantee in situations where traditional error-correction (and even error-detection) is impossible; for example, when the attacker can completely overwrite the encoded message. NMCs have emerged as a fundamental object at the intersection of coding theory and cryptography. In particular, progress in the study of non-malleable codes and the related notion of non-malleable extractors has led to new insights and progress on even more fundamental problems like the construction of multi-source randomness extractors. A large body of the recent work has focused on various constructions of non-malleable codes in the split-state model. Many variants of NMCs have been introduced in the literature i.e. strong NMCs, super strong NMCs and continuous NMCs. The most general, and hence also the most useful notion among these is that of continuous non-malleable codes, that allows for continuous tampering by the adversary. We present the first efficient information-theoretically secure continuously non-malleable code in the constant split-state model, where there is a self-destruct mechanism which ensures that the adversary loses access to tampering after the first failed decoding. We believe that our main technical result could be of independent interest and some of the ideas could in future be used to make progress on other related questions.

In the classical world, the XOR of pseudorandom permutations $E_{k_1}\oplus\cdots\oplus E_{k_r}$ for $r\geq2$ is a well-established way to design a pseudorandom function with ``optimal'' security: security up to approximately $\min\{|K|,|X|\}$ queries, where $K$ and $X$ are the key and state space of the block cipher $E$. We investigate security of this construction against adversaries who have access to quantum computers. We first present a key recovery attack in $|K|^{r/(r+1)}$ complexity. The attack relies on a clever application of a claw-finding algorithm and testifies of a significant gap with the classical setting where $2$ pseudorandom permutations already yield optimal security. Next, we perform a quantum security analysis of the construction, and prove that it achieves security up to $\min\{|K|^{1/2}/r,|X|\}$ queries. The analysis relies on a generic characterization of classical and quantum distinguishers and a universal transformation of classical security proofs to the quantum setting that is of general interest.

Despite the fact that all current scientific white-box approaches of standardized cryptographic primitives have been publicly broken, these attacks require knowledge of the internal data representation used by the implementation. In practice, the level of implementation knowledge required is only attainable through significant reverse engineering efforts. In this paper we describe new approaches to assess the security of white-box implementations which require neither knowledge about the look-up tables used nor expensive reverse engineering efforts. We introduce the differential computation analysis (DCA) attack which is the software counterpart of the differential power analysis attack as applied by the cryptographic hardware community. Similarly, the differential fault analysis (DFA) attack is the software counterpart of fault-injection attacks on cryptographic hardware. For DCA, we developed plugins to widely available dynamic binary instrumentation (DBI) frameworks to produce software execution traces which contain information about the memory addresses being accessed. For the DFA attack, we developed modified emulators and plugins for DBI frameworks that allow injecting faults at selected moments within the execution of the encryption or decryption process as well as a framework to automate static fault injection. To illustrate the effectiveness, we show how DCA and DFA can extract the secret key from numerous publicly available non-commercial white-box implementations of standardized cryptographic algorithms. These approaches allow one to extract the secret key material from white-box implementations significantly faster and without specific knowledge of the white-box design in an automated or semi-automated manner.

We provide a tight security proof for an IND-CCA Ring-LWE based Key Encapsulation Mechanism that is derived from a generic construction of Dent (IMA Cryptography and Coding, 2003). Such a tight reduction is not known for the generic construction. The resulting scheme has shorter ciphertexts than can be achieved with other generic constructions of Dent or by using the well-known Fujisaki-Okamoto constructions (PKC 1999, Crypto 1999). Our tight security proof is obtained by reducing to the security of the underlying Ring-LWE problem, avoiding an intermediate reduction to a CPA-secure encryption scheme. The proof technique maybe of interest for other schemes based on LWE and Ring-LWE.

Lattice-based group signature is an active research topic in recent years. Since the pioneering work by Gordon, Katz and Vaikuntanathan (Asiacrypt 2010), eight other schemes have been proposed, providing various improvements in terms of security, efficiency and functionality. However, most of the existing constructions work only in the static setting where the group population is fixed at the setup phase. The only two exceptions are the schemes by Langlois et al. (PKC 2014) that handles user revocations (but new users cannot join), and by Libert et al. (Asiacrypt 2016) which addresses the orthogonal problem of dynamic user enrollments (but users cannot be revoked). In this work, we provide the first lattice-based group signature that offers full dynamicity (i.e., users have the flexibility in joining and leaving the group), and thus, resolve a prominent open problem posed by previous works. Moreover, we achieve this non-trivial feat in a relatively simple manner. Starting with Libert et al.'s fully static construction (Eurocrypt 2016) - which is arguably the most efficient lattice-based group signature to date, we introduce simple-but-insightful tweaks that allow to upgrade it directly into the fully dynamic setting. More startlingly, our scheme even produces slightly shorter signatures than the former. The scheme satisfies the strong security requirements of Bootle et al.'s model (ACNS 2016), under the Short Integer Solution (SIS) and the Learning With Errors (LWE) assumptions.

In this paper, we present a factoring algorithm that, assuming standard heuristics, uses just $(\log N)^{2/3+o(1)}$ qubits to factor an integer $N$ in time $L^{q+o(1)}$ where $L = \exp((\log N)^{1/3}(\log\log N)^{2/3})$ and $q=\sqrt[3]{8/3}\approx 1.387$. For comparison, the lowest asymptotic time complexity for known pre-quantum factoring algorithms, assuming standard heuristics, is $L^{p+o(1)}$ where $p>1.9$. The new time complexity is asymptotically worse than Shor's algorithm, but the qubit requirements are asymptotically better, so it may be possible to physically implement it sooner.

This paper proposes RSA parameters for which (1) key generation, encryption, decryption, signing, and verification are feasible on today's computers while (2) all known attacks are infeasible, even assuming highly scalable quantum computers. As part of the performance analysis, this paper introduces a new algorithm to generate a batch of primes. As part of the attack analysis, this paper introduces a new quantum factorization algorithm that is often much faster than Shor's algorithm and much faster than pre-quantum factorization algorithms. Initial pqRSA implementation results are provided.

In this survey paper we present a careful analysis of the Montgomery ladder procedure applied to the computation of the constant-time point multiplication operation on elliptic curves defined over binary extension fields. We give a general view of the main improvements and formula derivations that several researchers have contributed across the years, since the publication of Peter Lawrence Montgomery seminal work in 1987. We also report a fast software implementation of the Montgomery ladder applied on a Galbraith-Lin-Scott (GLS) binary elliptic curve that offers a security level close to 128 bits. Using our software we can execute the ephemeral Diffie-Hellman protocol in just 95,702 clock cycles when implemented on an Intel Skylake machine running at 4 GHz.

Quantum computing poses challenges to public key signatures as we know them today. LMS and XMSS are two hash based signature schemes that have been proposed in the IETF as quantum secure. Both schemes are based on well-studied hash trees, but their similarities and differences have not yet been discussed. In this work, we attempt to compare the two standards. We compare their security assumptions and quantify their signature and public key sizes. We also address the computation overhead they introduce. Our goal is to provide a clear understanding of the schemes’ similarities and differences for implementers and protocol designers to be able to make a decision as to which standard to chose.

With the adoption of a globalized and distributed IC design flow, IP piracy, reverse engineering, and counterfeiting threats are becoming more prevalent. Logic obfuscation techniques including logic locking and IC camouflaging have been developed to address these emergent challenges. A major challenge for logic locking and camouflaging techniques is to resist Boolean satisfiability (SAT) based attacks that can circumvent state-of-the-art solutions within minutes. Over the past year, multiple SAT attack resilient solutions such as Anti-SAT and AND-tree insertion (ATI) have been presented. In this paper, we perform a security analysis of these countermeasures and show that they leave structural traces behind in their attempts to thwart the SAT attack. We present three attacks, namely “signal probability skew” (SPS) attack, “AppSAT guided removal (AGR) attack, and “sensitization guided SAT” (SGS) attack”, that can break Anti-SAT and ATI, within minutes.

To protect integrated circuits against IP piracy, Physically Unclonable Functions (PUFs) are deployed. PUFs provide a specific signature for each integrated circuit. However, environmental variations, (e.g., temperature change), power supply noise and more influential IC aging affect the functionally of PUFs. Thereby, it is important to evaluate aging effects as early as possible, preferentially at design time. In this paper we investigate the effect of aging on the stability of two delay PUFs: arbiter-PUFs and loop-PUFs and analyze the architectural impact of these PUFS on reliability decrease due to aging. We observe that the reliability of the arbiter-PUF gets worse over time, whereas the reliability of the loop-PUF remains constant. We interpret this phenomenon by the asymmetric aging of the arbiter, because one half is active (hence aging fast) while the other is not (hence aging slow). Besides, we notice that the aging of the delay chain in the arbiter-PUF and in the loop-PUF has no impact on their reliability, since these PUFs operate differentially.

Lizard is a lightweight stream cipher proposed by Hamann, Krause and Meier in IACR ToSC 2017. It has a Grain-like structure with two state registers of size 90 and 31 bits. The cipher uses a 120 bit Secret Key and a 64 bit IV. The authors claim that Lizard provides 80 bit security against key recovery attacks and a 60-bit security against distinguishing attacks. In this paper, we present an assortment of results and observations on Lizard. First, we show that by doing $2^{58}$ random trials it is possible to a set of $2^{64}$ triplets $(K,IV_0,IV_1)$ such that the Key-IV pairs $(K,IV_0)$ and $(K,IV_1)$ produce identical keystream bits. Second, we show that by performing only around $2^{28}$ random trials it is possible to obtain $2^{64}$ Key-IV pairs $(K_0,IV_0)$ and $(K_1,IV_1)$ that produce identical keystream bits. Thereafter, we show that one can construct a distinguisher for Lizard based on IVs that produce shifted keystream sequences. The process takes around $2^{51.5}$ random IV encryptions and around $2^{76.6}$ bits of memory. Finally, we propose a key recovery attack on a version of Lizard with the number of initialization rounds reduced to 223 (out of 256) based on IV collisions.

Cryptographic implementations are vulnerable to side-channel analysis. Implementors often opt for masking countermeasures to protect against these types of attacks. Masking countermeasures can ensure theoretical protection against value-based leakages. However, the practical effectiveness of masking is often halted by physical effects such as glitches couplings and distance-based leakages, which violate the independent leakage assumption (ILA) and result in security order reductions. This paper aims to address this gap between masking theory and practice in the following threefold manner. First, we perform an in-depth investigation of the device-specific effects that invalidate ILA in the AVR microcontroller ATMega163. Second, we provide an automated tool, capable of detecting ILA violations in AVR assembly code. Last, we craft the first (to our knowledge) "hardened" 1st-order ISW-based, masked Sbox implementation, which is capable of resisting 1st-order, univariate side-channel attacks. Enforcing the ILA in the masked RECTANGLE Sbox requires 1319 clock cycles, i.e. a 15-fold increase compared to a naive 1st-order ISW-based implementation.

Cut-and-choose (C&C) is the standard approach to making Yao’s garbled circuit two-party computation (2PC) protocol secure against malicious adversaries. Traditional cut-and-choose operates at the level of entire circuits, whereas the LEGO paradigm (Nielsen & Orlandi, TCC 2009) achieves asymptotic improvements by per- forming cut-and-choose at the level of individual gates. In this work we propose a unified approach called DUPLO that spans the entire continuum between these two extremes. The cut-and-choose step in our protocol operates on the level of arbitrary circuit “components,” which can range in size from a single gate to the entire circuit itself. With this entire continuum of parameter values at our disposal, we find that the best way to scale 2PC to computations of realistic size is to use C&C components of in- termediate size, and not at the extremes. On computations requiring several millions of gates or more, our more general approach to C&C gives between 4-7x improvement over existing approaches. In addition to our technical contributions of modifying and optimizing previous proto- col techniques to work with general C&C components, we also provide an extension of the recent Frigate circuit compiler (Mood et al, EuroS&P 2016) to effectively express any C-style program in terms of components which can be processed efficiently using our protocol.

We study non-interactive computational intractability assumptions in prime-order cyclic groups. We focus on the broad class of computational assumptions, which we call target assumptions, where the adversary's goal is to compute a concrete group element and investigate the structure of this class. Our analysis identifies two families of intractability assumptions, the $q$-Generalized Diffie-Hellman Exponent assumptions and the $q$-Simple Fractional assumptions that imply all other target assumptions. These two assumptions therefore serve as Uber assumptions that can underpin all the target assumptions where the adversary has to compute specific group elements. We also study the internal hierarchy among members of these two assumption families. We provide heuristic evidence that both families are necessary to cover the full class of target assumptions, and we show that the lowest level in the $q$-GDHE hierarchy (the $1$-GDHE assumption) is equivalent to the computational Diffie-Hellman assumption. We generalize our results to the bilinear group setting. For the base groups our results translate nicely and a similar structure of non-interactive computational assumptions emerges. We also identify Uber assumptions in the target group but this requires replacing the $q$-GDHE assumption with a more complicated assumption, which we call the Bilinar Gap Assumption. Our analysis can assist both cryptanalysts and cryptographers. For cryptanalysts, we propose the $q$-GDHE and the $q$-SDH assumptions are the most natural and important targets for cryptanalysis in prime-order groups. For cryptographers, we believe our classification can aid the choice of assumptions underpinning cryptographic schemes and be used as a guide to minimize the overall attack surface that different assumptions expose.

GGH13, CLT13 and GGH15 of multilinear maps suffer from zeroizing attacks. In this paper, we present a new construction of multilinear maps using a variant of ring-LWE (vRLWE). Furthermore, we also present two new variants of vRLWE, which respectively support the applications of multipartite key exchange and witness encryption. At the same time, we also present a new variant of GGH13 using matrix form. The security of our construction depends upon new hardness assumptions.

As cryptography is the standard way of ensuring privacy, integrity and confidentiality of a public channel, steganography steps in to provide even stronger assumptions. Thus, in the case of cryptology, an attacker cannot obtain information about the payload while inspecting its encrypted content. In the case of steganography, one cannot prove the existence of the covert communication itself. The main purpose of the current paper is to provide insights into some of the existing techniques in steganography. A comparison between the performances of several steganography algorithms is accomplished, with focus on the metrics that characterize a steganography technique.

The impressive amount of recent technological advancements in the area of information systems have brought along, besides the multitude of positive aspects, some negative aspects too. The most obvious one is represented by the fact that the technological innovations are prone to various categories of threats. Making sure that information stays safe, unaltered and secret is an integral part of providing technology that behaves in the manner it is supposed to. Along with researching techniques of effectively securing the communication, other aspects that also deserve to receive attention are authentication, authorization and accounting. One security aspect that has been the most intensely researched in the past from the three, is authentication. From the various methods used in verifying the identity of users, one more recent one is biometrics that can significantly heighten the safety and security of a system. However, authenticating the user into an information system may not be entirely safe all the time. The aim of this paper is to present an overview of the different plausible methods of combining cryptography related concepts and biometrics techniques. This additional attachment of cryptography has proven to make the process of gainingaccess to an information system much more secure. The problem tackled in this paper will be presented from a two way perspective: on one hand, it will be discussed how biometrics can make use of cryptography-specific solutions in order to enhance its powers and, on the other hand, it will be presented how cryptography aspects can use the specific biometric data of a user to generate encryption keys that are much harder to decipher or to obtain. After this methods are presented, the theoretical basis for measuring performance of a biometric system will be presented and a survey on current performance results on fuzzy vault techniques will be enumerated and described.

ElsieFour (LC4) is a low-tech cipher that can be computed by hand; but unlike many historical ciphers, LC4 is designed to be hard to break. LC4 is intended for encrypted communication between humans only, and therefore it encrypts and decrypts plaintexts and ciphertexts consisting only of the English letters A through Z plus a few other characters. LC4 uses a nonce in addition to the secret key, and requires that different messages use unique nonces. LC4 performs authenticated encryption, and optional header data can be included in the authentication. This paper defines the LC4 encryption and decryption algorithms, analyzes LC4's security, and describes a simple appliance for computing LC4 by hand.

Monero is a cryptocurrency that has rapidly gained popularity since its launch in April 2014. The source of its growth can be mainly attributed to its unique privacy properties that go well beyond the pseudonymity property of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin. In this work, we conduct a forensic analysis of the Monero blockchain. Our main goal is to investigate Monero’s untraceability guarantee, which essentially means that given a transaction input, the real output being redeemed in it should be anonymous among a set of other outputs. To this end, we develop three heuristics that lead to simple-to-implement attack routines. We evaluate our attacks on the Monero blockchain and show that in 87% of cases, the real output being redeemed can be easily identified with certainty. Moreover, we have compelling evidence that two of our attacks also extend to Monero RingCTs — the second generation Monero that even hides the transaction value. Furthermore, we observe that for over 98% of the inputs that we have been able to trace, the real output being redeemed in it is the one that has been on the blockchain for the shortest period of time. This result shows that the mitigation measures currently employed in Monero fall short of preventing temporal analysis. Motivated by our findings, we also propose a new mitigation strategy against temporal analysis. Our mitigation strategy leverages the real spending habit of Monero users.

Storing the large-scale data on the cloud server side becomes nowadays an alternative for the data owner with the popularity and maturity of the cloud computing technique, where the data owner can manage the data with limited resources, and the user issues the query request to the cloud server instead of the data owner. As the server is not completely trusted, it is necessary for the user to perform results authentication to check whether or not the returned results from the cloud server are correct. We investigate in this paper how to perform efficient data update for the result authentication of the outsourced univariate linear function query. We seek to outsource almost all the data and computing to the server, and as few data and computations as possible are stored and performed on the data owner side, respectively. We present a novel scheme to achieve the security goal, which is divided into two parts. The first part is a verification algorithm for the outsourced computing of line intersections, which enables the data owner to store most of the data on the server side, and to execute less of the computing of the line intersections. The second part is an authentication data structure Two Level Merkle B Tree for the outsourced univariate linear function query, where the top level is used to index the user input and authenticate the query results, and the bottom level is used to index the query condition and authenticate the query results. The authentication data structure enables the data owner to update the data efficiently, and to implement the query on the server side. The theoretic analysis shows that our proposed scheme works with higher efficiency.

In this paper we focus on three open questions regarding NIST SP 800-22 randomness test: the probability of false acceptance, the number of minimum sample size to achieve a given probability error and tests independence. We shall point out statistical testing assumptions, source of errors, sample constructions and a computational method for determining the probability of false acceptance and estimating the correlation between the statistical tests.

Linear regression is an important statistical tool that models the relationship between some explanatory values and an outcome value using a linear function. In many current applications (e.g. predictive modelling in personalized healthcare), these values represent sensitive data owned by several different parties that are unwilling to share them. In this setting, training a linear regression model becomes challenging and needs specific cryptographic solutions. In this work, we propose a new system that can train two different variants of linear regression (i.e. ridge regression and lasso regression) on a dataset obtained by merging a finite number of private datasets. Our system assures that no extra information on a single private dataset is revealed to the entities performing the learning algorithm. Moreover, our solution is based on efficient cryptographic tools (e.g. Paillier’s scheme and pseudorandom generator).

Recent progress on NFS imposed a new estimation of the security of pairings. In this work we study the best attacks against some of the most popular pairings and propose new key sizes using an analysis which is more precise than the analysis in a recent article of Menezes, Sarkar and Singh. We also select pairing-friendly curves for standard security levels.

In this paper we present an encoding method for fixed-point numbers tailored for homomorphic function evaluation. The choice of the degree of the polynomial modulus used in all popular somewhat homomorphic encryption schemes is dominated by security considerations, while with the current encoding techniques the correctness requirement allows for much smaller values. We introduce a generic encoding method using expansions with respect to a non-integral base, which exploits this large degree at the benefit of reducing the growth of the coefficients when performing homomorphic operations. In practice this allows one to choose a smaller plaintext coefficient modulus which results in a significant reduction of the running time. We illustrate our approach by applying this encoding in the setting of homomorphic electricity load forecasting for the smart grid which results in a speed-up by a factor 13 compared to previous work, where encoding was done using balanced ternary expansions.

This work pursues the idea of multi-forgery attacks as introduced by Ferguson in 2002. We recoin reforgeability for the complexity of obtaining further forgeries once a first forgery has succeeded. First, we introduce a security notion for the integrity (in terms of reforgeability) of authenticated encryption schemes: j-Int-CTXT, which is derived from the notion INT-CTXT. Second, we define an attack scenario called j-IV-Collision Attack (j-IV-CA), wherein an adversary tries to construct j forgeries provided a first forgery. The term collision in the name stems from the fact that we assume the first forgery to be the result from an internal collision within the processing of the associated data and/or the nonce. Next, we analyze the resistance to j-IV-CAs of classical nonce-based AE schemes (CCM, CWC, EAX, GCM) as well as all 3rd-round candidates of the CAESAR competition. The analysis is done in the nonce-respecting and the nonce-ignoring setting. We find that none of the considered AE schemes provides full built-in resistance to j-IV-CAs. Based on this insight, we briefly discuss two alternative design strategies to resist j-IV-CAs.

Quantum Key Recycling (QKR) is a quantum-cryptographic primitive that allows one to re-use keys in an unconditionally secure way. By removing the need to repeatedly generate new keys it improves communication efficiency. Škorić and de Vries recently proposed a QKR scheme based on 8-state encoding (four bases). It does not require quantum computers for encryption/decryption but only single-qubit operations. We provide a missing ingredient in the security analysis of this scheme in the case of noisy channels: accurate bounds on the privacy amplification. We determine optimal attacks against the message and against the key, for 8-state encoding as well as 4-state and 6-state conjugate coding. We show that the Shannon entropy analysis for 8-state encoding reduces to the analysis of Quantum Key Distribution, whereas 4-state and 6-state suffer from additional leaks that make them less effective. We also provide results in terms of the min-entropy. Overall, 8-state encoding yields the highest capacity.

We devise a novel simulation technique that makes black-box use of the adversary as well as the distinguisher. Using this technique we construct several round-optimal protocols, many of which were previously unknown even using non-black-box simulation techniques: - Two-round witness indistinguishable (WI) arguments for $\NP$ from different assumptions than previously known. - Two-round arguments and three-round arguments of knowledge for $\NP$ that achieve strong WI, witness hiding (WH) and distributional weak zero knowledge (WZK) properties in a setting where the instance is only determined by the prover in the last round of the interaction. The soundness of these protocols is guaranteed against adaptive provers. - Three-round two-party computation satisfying input-indistinguishable security as well as a weaker notion of simulation security against malicious adversaries. - Three-round extractable commitments with guaranteed correctness of extraction from polynomial hardness assumptions. Our three-round protocols can be based on DDH or QR or N^th residuosity and our two-round protocols require quasi-polynomial hardness of the same assumptions. In particular, prior to this work, two-round WI arguments for NP were only known based on assumptions such as the existence of trapdoor permutations, hardness assumptions on bilinear maps, or the existence of program obfuscation; we give the first construction based on (quasi-polynomial) DDH. Our simulation technique bypasses known lower bounds on black-box simulation [Goldreich-Krawcyzk'96] by using the distinguisher's output in a meaningful way. We believe that this technique is likely to find more applications in the future.

Oblivious RAM (ORAM) has emerged as an enabling technology to secure cloud-based storage services. The goal of this cryptographic primitive is to conceal not only the data but also the access patterns from the server. While the early constructions focused on a single client scenario, a few recent works have focused on a setting where multiple clients may access the same data, which is crucial to support data sharing applications. All these works, however, either do not consider malicious clients or they significantly constrain the definition of obliviousness and the system's practicality. It is thus an open question whether a natural definition of obliviousness can be enforced in a malicious multi-client setting and, if so, what the communication and computational lower bounds are. In this work, we formalize the notion of maliciously secure multi-client ORAM, we prove that the server-side computational complexity of any secure realization has to be $\Omega(n)$, and we present a cryptographic instantiation of this primitive based on private information retrieval techniques, which achieves an $O(\sqrt{N})$ communication complexity. We further devise an efficient access control mechanism, built upon a novel and generally applicable realization of plaintext equivalence proofs for ciphertext vectors. Finally, we demonstrate how our lower bound can be bypassed by leveraging a trusted proxy, obtaining logarithmic communication and server-side computational complexity. We implemented our scheme and conducted an experimental evaluation, demonstrating the feasibility of our approach.

We describe an algorithm which can efficiently evaluate Bernstein-Rabin-Winograd (BRW) polynomials. The presently best known complexity of evaluating a BRW polynomial on $m\geq 3$ field elements is $\lfloor m/2\rfloor$ field multiplications. Typically, a field multiplication consists of a basic multiplication followed by a reduction. The new algorithm requires $\lfloor m/2\rfloor$ basic multiplications and $1+\lfloor m/4\rfloor$ reductions. Based on the new algorithm for evaluating BRW polynomials, we propose two new hash functions ${\sf BRW}128$ and ${\sf BRW}256$ with digest sizes $128$ bits and $256$ bits respectively. The practicability of these hash functions is demonstrated by implementing them using instructions available on modern Intel processors. Timing results obtained from the implementations suggest that ${\sf BRW}$ based hashing compares favourably to the highly optimised implementation by Gueron of Horner's rule based hash function.

It is well known that multivariate quadratic (MQ) digital signature schemes have small signatures but huge public keys. However, in some settings, such as public key infrastructure (PKI), both variables are important. This paper explains how to transform any MQ signature scheme into one with a much smaller public key at the cost of a larger signature. The transformation aims to reduce the combined size of the public key and signature and this metric is improved significantly. The security of our transformation reduces to that of the underlying MQ signature scheme in the random oracle model. It is possible to decrease signature sizes even further but then its security is related to the conjectured hardness of a new problem, the Approximate MQ Problem (AMQ).

We consider the problem of privacy-preserving processing of outsourced data, where a Cloud server stores data provided by one or multiple data providers and then is asked to compute several functions over it. We propose an efficient methodology that solves this problem with the guarantee that a honest-but-curious Cloud learns no information about the data and the receiver learns nothing more than the results. Our main contribution is the proposal and efficient instantiation of a new cryptographic primitive called Labeled Homomorphic Encryption (labHE). The fundamental insight underlying this new primitive is that homomorphic computation can be significantly accelerated whenever the program that is being computed over the encrypted data is known to the decrypter and is not secret---previous approaches to homomorphic encryption do not allow for such a trade-off. Our realization and implementation of labHE targets computations that can be described by degree-two multivariate polynomials, which capture an important range of statistical functions. As a specific application, we consider the problem of privacy preserving Genetic Association Studies (GAS), which require computing risk estimates for given traits from statistically relevant features in the human genome. Our approach allows performing GAS efficiently, non interactively and without compromising neither the privacy of patients nor potential intellectual property that test laboratories may want to protect.

This document provides a self-contained, comprehensive, and fully-detailed specification of a new cryptographic voting protocol designed for political elections in Switzerland. The document describes every relevant aspect and every necessary technical detail of the computations and communications performed by the participants during the protocol execution. To support the general understanding of the cryptographic protocol, the document accommodates the necessary mathematical and cryptographic background information. By providing this information to the maximal possible extent, it serves as an ultimate companion document for the developers in charge of implementing this system. It may also serve as a manual for developers trying to implement an independent election verification software. The decision of making this document public even enables implementations by third parties, for example by students trying to develop a clone of the system for scientific evaluations or to implement protocol extensions to achieve additional security properties. In any case, the target audience of this document are system designers, software developers, and cryptographic experts.

We consider the mathematical object: \textit{collection of arithmetic progressions} with elements satisfying the property: \textit{$j^{th}$ terms of $i^{th}$ and $(i+1)^{th}$ progressions of the collection are multiplicative inverses of each other modulo the $(j+1)^{th}$ term of $i^{th}$ progression}. Under a \textit{certain} condition on the common differences of the progressions, such a collection is {\em uniquely} generated from a pair of co-prime seed integers. The object is closely connected to the standard Euclidean gcd algorithm. In this work, we present one application of this object to a novel construction of a new family of pseudo random number generators (PRG) or symmetric key ciphers. We present an authenticated encryption scheme which is another application of the defined object. In this paper, we pay our attention to a basic symmetric key method of the new family. The security of the method is based on a well-defined hard problem. Interestingly, a special case of the hard problem (defined as Problem A) is shown to be computationally equivalent to the problem of factoring integers. The work leaves some open issues, which are being addressed in our ongoing work.

In general, identity-based encryption (IBE) does not support an efficient revocation procedure. In ACM CCS'08, Boldyreva et al. proposed revocable identity-based encryption (RIBE), which enables us to efficiently revoke (malicious) users in IBE. In PKC 2013, Seo and Emura introduced an additional security notion for RIBE, called decryption key exposure resistance (DKER). Roughly speaking, RIBE with DKER guarantees that the security is not compromised even if an adversary gets (a number of) short-term decryption keys. Therefore, DKER captures realistic scenarios and is an important notion. In this paper, we introduce bounded decryption key exposure resistance (B-DKER), where an adversary is allowed to get a-priori bounded number of short-term decryption keys in the security game.B-DKER is a weak version of DKER, but it seems to be sufficient for practical use. We obtain the following results: (1) We propose a lattice-based (anonymous) RIBE scheme with B-DKER, which is the first lattice-based construction resilient to decryption key exposure. Our lattice-based construction is secure under the LWE assumption. A previous lattice-based construction satisfies anonymity but is vulnerable even with a single decryption key exposure. (2) We propose the first pairing-based RIBE scheme that simultaneously realizes anonymity and B-DKER. Our pairing-based construction is secure under the SXDH assumption. Our two constructions rely on cover free families to satisfy B-DKER, whereas all the existing works rely on the key re-randomization property to achieve DKER.

In this paper, we investigate the hardness of the approximate polynomial common divisor problem, which is regarded as a polynomial analogy of the approximate integer common divisor problem. In order to solve this problem, we present a simple method by using the polynomial lattice reduction algorithm and contain complete theoretical analyses. Further, we propose an improved lattice attack to reduce both space and time costs. Moreover, these two attacking methods can be directly applied to solving the noisy multipolynomial reconstruction problem in the field of error-correcting codes. On the basis of the above situations, our improved lattice attack performs fastest.

In this work, we present a new obfuscator using a Graded Encoding Scheme (GES) with a binary slot. We characterize a class of circuits taking locally keyed input (each input bit of the circuit is a keyed function over c>1 bits of a binary-variable vector X of length n, where c is called the locality), called ideal functions, such that any function of algebraic degree d (called d-function) over them, can be obfuscated with multilinearity \mu=(d+1)n/c. Next we show that obfuscation of a general circuit C can be bootstrapped by O(n)-functions (the circuit (called RE) composing a garbled circuit (GC) with a pseudorandom function (PRF)), following an approach similar to that of Zimmerman and Applebaum et al., assuming PRF (or more precisely RE) exists among d-functions with constant d. To instantiate the above scheme, we achieve the following: 1. A concrete GC of algebraic degree 3 over its random bits, which has output size no more than 20\lambda|C| and random tape length about 10\lambda|C|, where \lambda is the security parameter, |C| denotes the number of gates of the circuit C. 2. A candidate d-function construction, where we argue that d=1 suffices to stop linear distinguishing attacks and d=2 seems enough for fully secure PRF. 3. Instantiation of the GES with a simplified version of the CLT multilinear map, and various techniques that further reduce \mu of the core obfuscator cost-equivalently to dn/(2c)+1 in cases of our interest. If we replace the PRF with d-functions, then we get various heuristic obfuscation-friendly REs, and thus general obfuscators with explicit complexities. For the most optimistic choice, we have \mu=1.5n'/c +2.5, n'\approx n+\log |C|+\log \lambda, n is the number of input bits of C, and c is a selectable constant which result in a {2^c}/{c} times increase of the key size of the RE. Our general obfuscator is VBB secure assuming that our RE is secure and our simplified CLT map is a secure instantiation of our GES (defined relative to known attacks). We leave these assumptions with concrete parameter sets as open challenges. We illustrate the efficiency of our methods with some examples: 1. Our obfuscated AES (c=13, \mu=20.5) has code size <1.5\times 10^{17} bits, whereas no implementable solution is known prior to this work. 2. We can practically obfuscate conjunction functions for n=64, while the latest implementation can only handle n=32 with comparable resources. We also verify the security against algebraic attacks in this example.

This paper presents faster inversion-free point addition formulas for the curve y*(1+a*x^2)=c*x*(1+d*y^2). The proposed formulas improve the point doubling operation count record from 6M+5S to 8M and mixed-addition operation count record from 10M to 8M. Both sets of formulas are shown to be 4-way parallel, leading to an effective cost of 2M per either of the group operations.

We present a new class of public-key predicate encryption schemes that are provably function private in the standard model under well-known cryptographic assumptions, and assume predicate distributions satisfying realistic min-entropy requirements. More concretely, we present public-key constructions for identity-based encryption (IBE) and inner-product encryption (IPE) that are computationally function private in the standard model under a family of weaker variants of the DLIN assumption. Existing function private constructions in the public-key setting impose highly stringent requirements on the min-entropy of predicate distributions, thereby limiting their applicability in the context of real-world predicates. For example, the statistically function private constructions of Boneh, Raghunathan and Segev (CRYPTO'13 and ASIACRYPT'13) are inherently restricted to predicate distributions with min-entropy roughly proportional to $\lambda$, where $\lambda$ is the security parameter. Our constructions allow relaxing this min-entropy requirement to $\omega(\log\lambda)$, while achieving a computational notion of function privacy against probabilistic polynomial-time adversaries, which suffices for most real-world applications. Our constructions also avoid the need for strong assumptions such as indistinguishability obfuscation.

Fine-grained access control, especially in shared data environments such as the cloud, is a common scenario. Suppose a data owner encrypts and stores a collection of $N$ documents in the cloud, and wishes to grant access to a subset $\mathcal{S}$ of these to a data user. The data user must therefore be able to perform search operations only on the subset $\mathcal{S}$ of documents, and nothing else. For example, the user may want to store the documents in separate folders pertaining to work, family, personal etc., and selectively grant search access to one or more folders among different users. This is a commonly encountered in document sharing environments such as Dropbox and Google Drive. Most existing searchable encryption schemes today assume that a user has search permissions over the entire document collection, and are hence not designed explicitly to address such a controlled-search scenario. The only previous work in this direction by Cui et al. possesses inherent security weaknesses that can be exploited to trivially break the privacy of their system. \noindent In this paper, we provide a novel, efficient and secure solution to this problem by introducing a new public-key searchable encryption primitive referred to as the key-aggregate searchable encryption~(KASE). KASE is secure under well-defined cryptographic assumptions, and requires optimal network communication between the server and the data owners/data users. KASE is the first public key searchable encryption scheme to achieve performance and security at par with the most efficient symmetric key searchable encryption constructions. Additionally, while all existing schemes produce trapdoors that grow linearly with the size of the document collection, KASE produces constant-size trapdoors that are independent of the document collection size. KASE is also efficient and scalable with respect to data updates, making it ideal for use in dynamic cloud-based search applications.

Blockchains and more general distributed ledgers are becoming increasingly popular as efficient, reliable, and persistent records of data and transactions. Unfortunately, they ensure reliability and correctness by making all data public, raising confidentiality concerns that eliminate many potential uses. In this paper we present Solidus, a protocol for confidential transactions on public blockchains, such as those required for asset transfers with on-chain settlement. Solidus operates in a framework based on real-world financial institutions: a modest number of banks each maintain a large number of user accounts. Within this framework, Solidus hides both transaction values and the transaction graph (i.e., the identities of transacting entities) while maintaining the public verifiability that makes blockchains so appealing. To achieve strong confidentiality of this kind, we introduce the concept of a Publicly-Verifiable Oblivious RAM Machine (PVORM). We present a set of formal security definitions for both PVORM and Solidus and show that our constructions are secure. Finally, we implement Solidus and present a set of benchmarks indicating that the system is efficient in practice.

The Internet of Things (IoT) has become a reality: small connected devices feature in everyday objects including childrens' toys, TVs, fridges, heating control units, etc. Supply chains feature sensors throughout, and significant investments go into researching next-generation healthcare, where sensors monitor wellbeing. A future in which sensors and other (small) devices interact to create sophisticated applications seems just around the corner. All of these applications have a fundamental need for security and privacy and thus cryptography is deployed as part of an attempt to secure them. In this paper we explore a particular type of flaw, namely side channel information, on the protocol level that can exist despite the use of cryptography. Our research investigates the potential for utilising packet length and timing information (both are easily obtained) to extract interesting information from a system. We find that using these side channels we can distinguish between devices, different programs running on the same device including which sensor is accessed. We also find it is possible to distinguish between different types of ICMP messages despite the use of encryption. Based on our findings, we provide a set of recommendations to efficiently mitigate these side channels in the IoT context.

In this paper we propose MIE, a Multimodal Indexable Encryption framework that for the first time allows mobile applications to securely outsource the storage and search of their multimodal data (i.e. data containing multiple media formats) to public clouds with privacy guarantees. MIE is designed as a distributed framework architecture, leveraging on shared cloud repositories that can be accessed simultaneously by multiple users. At its core MIE relies on Distance Preserving Encodings (DPE), a novel family of encoding algorithms with cryptographic properties that we also propose. By applying DPE to multimodal data features, MIE enables high-cost clustering and indexing operations to be handled by cloud servers in a privacy-preserving way. Experiments show that MIE achieves better performance and scalability when compared with the state of art, with measurable impact on mobile resources and battery life.

Cryptography is essential for the security of Internet communication, cars, and implanted medical devices. However, many commonly used cryptosystems will be completely broken once big quantum computers exist. Post-quantum cryptography is cryptography under the assumption that the attacker has a large quantum computer; post-quantum cryptosystems strive to remain secure even in this scenario. This relatively young research area has seen some successes in identifying mathematical operations for which quantum algorithms offer little speedup, and then building cryptographic systems around those. The central challenge in post-quantum cryptography is to meet demands for cryptographic usability and flexibility without sacrificing trust.

Identity-based sequential aggregate signature (IBSAS) schemes are usually applied to secure network routing and sensor networks, since they allow multiple signers to sequentially produce a short signature of different messages to reduce bandwidth overhead and storage space for signatures, and allow signers to attest to these messages as well as the order in which they signed using their identities. In CCS’07, Boldyreva et al. introduced this concept and constructed the first IBSAS scheme in the random oracle model. After that, a couple of IBSAS schemes are proposed and proved. Unfortunately, none of them is constructed based on a standard computational problem and secure in the standard model (i.e., without random oracles). How to construct this kind of scheme is still an open problem. In this paper, we propose a generic construction of IBSAS schemes by employing 2-level Hierarchical Identity-based Encryption Schemes, and then prove its security in the security model proposed by Boldyreva et al. in CCS'07. Afterwards, we instantiate the generic construction to obtain a concrete IBSAS scheme secure under the Computational Diffie-Hellman (CDH) assumption in the standard model, thus solving the above open problem. An extra fruit of our generic construction is that it can be used to construct the first lattice-based IBSAS scheme, which is secure in the random oracle model. Finally, we show the performance comparisons between our schemes and previous ones.

Consider a pseudorandom generator $G$ with $m$ outputs, whose seed contains $n$ blocks of $b$ bits each. Further, assume that this PRG has block-locality $\ell$, i.e. each output bit depends on at most $\ell$ out of the $n$ blocks. The question of the maximum stretch $m$ that such PRGs can have, as a function of $n,b,\ell$ recently emerged in the context of constructing provably secure program obfuscation. It also relates to the question of refuting constraint satisfaction problems on predicates with large alphabets in complexity theory. We show that such $\ell$-block local PRGs can have output length at most $\tilde{O}(2^{\ell b} n^{\lceil \ell/2 \rceil})$, by presenting a polynomial time algorithm that distinguishes inputs of the form $G(x)$ (for any $x$) from inputs where each coordinate is sampled independently according to the marginal distributions of the coordinates of $G$. As a corollary, we refute some conjectures recently made in the context of constructing provably secure indistinguishability obfuscation (iO). This includes refuting the assumptions underlying Lin and Tessaro's \cite{LinT17} recently proposed candidate iO from bilinear maps. Specifically, they assumed the existence of a secure pseudorandom generator $G\colon \{ \pm 1 \}^{nb} \rightarrow \{ \pm 1 \}^{2^{cb}n}$ as above for large enough $c>3$ with $\ell=2$. (Following this work, and an independent work of Lombardi and Vaikuntanthan \cite{LombardiV17a}, Lin and Tessaro retracted the bilinear maps based candidate from their manuscript.) Our results follow from a general framework that handles more general class of pseudorandom generators. Namely they work even if the outputs are not binary valued and are computed using low-degree polynomial over $R$ (instead of the more restrictive local/block-local assumption). Specifically, we prove that for every function $G\colon\{\pm 1\}^n \rightarrow \mathbb R^m$ ($\mathbb R$ = reals), if every output of $G$ is a polynomial (over the real numbers $\mathbb{R}$) of degree at most $d$ of at most $s$ monomials and $m \ge \tilde{\Omega}(sn^{\lceil d/2 \rceil})$, then there is a polynomial time algorithm for the distinguishing task above. This implies that any such map $G$ cannot be a pseudorandom generator. Our results yield, in particular, that natural modifications to notion of generators that are still sufficient for obtaining indistinguishability obfuscation from bilinear maps run into similar barriers. Our algorithms follow the Sum of Squares (SoS) paradigm, and in most cases can even be defined more simply using a semidefinite program. We complement our algorithm by presenting a class of candidate generators with block-wise locality $3$ and constant block size, that resists both Gaussian elimination and sum of squares (SOS) algorithms whenever $m = n^{1.5-\epsilon}$. This class is extremely easy to describe: Let $\mathbb G$ be any simple non-abelian group with the group operation ``$\ast$'', and interpret the blocks of $x$ as elements in $\mathbb G$. The description of the pseudorandom generator is a sequence of $m$ triples of indices $(i,j,k)$ chosen at random and each output of the generator is of the form $x_i \ast x_j \ast x_k$.

We propose new algorithms for constructing multidimensional differential addition chains and for performing multidimensional scalar point multiplication based on these chains. Our algorithms work in any dimension and offer some key efficiency and security features. In particular, our scalar point multiplication algorithm is uniform, it has high potential for constant time implementation, and it can be parallelized. It also allows trading speed for precomputation cost and storage requirements. These key features and our theoretical estimates indicate that this new algorithm may offer significant performance advantages over the existing point multiplication algorithms in practice. We also report some experimental results and verify some of our theoretical findings.

The Learning Parity with Noise (LPN) problem has found many applications in cryptography due to its conjectured post-quantum hardness and simple algebraic structure. Over the years, constructions of different public-key primitives were proposed from LPN, but most of them are based on the LPN assumption with _low noise_ rate rather than _constant noise_ rate. A recent breakthrough was made by Yu and Zhang (Crypto'16), who constructed the first Public-Key Encryption (PKE) from constant-noise LPN. However, the problem of designing a PKE with _Key-Dependent Message_ (KDM) security from constant-noise LPN is still open. In this paper, we present the first PKE with KDM-security assuming certain sub-exponential hardness of constant-noise LPN, where the number of users is predefined. The technical tool is two types of _multi-fold LPN on squared-log entropy_, one having _independent secrets_ and the other _independent sample subspaces_. We establish the hardness of the multi-fold LPN variants on constant-noise LPN. Two squared-logarithmic entropy sources for multi-fold LPN are carefully chosen, so that our PKE is able to achieve correctness and KDM-security simultaneously.

Secure Message Transmission (SMT) is a two-party cryptographic scheme by which a sender securely and reliably sends messages to a receiver using $n$ channels. Suppose that an adversary corrupts at most $t$ out of $n$ channels and makes eavesdropping or tampering over the corrupted channels. It is known that if $t < n/2$ then the perfect SMT (PSMT) in the information-theoretic sense is achievable and if $t\ge n/2$ then no PSMT scheme is possible to construct. If we are allowed to use a public channel in addition to the normal channels, we can achieve the almost reliable SMT (ARSMT), which admits transmission failures of small probability, against $t < n$ corruptions. In the standard setting in cryptography, the participants are classified into honest ones and corrupted ones: every honest participant follows the protocol but corrupted ones are controlled by the adversary and behave maliciously. As a real setting, the notion of rationality in the game theory is often incorporated into cryptography. In this paper, we first consider ``rational adversary'' who behaves according to his own preference in SMT. We show that it is possible to achieve PSMT even against any $t < n$ corruptions under some reasonable settings for rational adversaries. \end{abstract}

We present improved algorithms for gaussian preimage sampling using the lattice trapdoors of (Micciancio and Peikert, CRYPTO 2012). The MP12 work only offered a highly optimized algorithm for the on-line stage of the computation in the special case when the lattice modulus $q$ is a power of two. For arbitrary modulus $q$, the MP12 preimage sampling procedure resorted to general lattice algorithms with complexity cubic in the bitsize of the modulus (or quadratic, but with substantial preprocessing and storage overheads.) Our new preimage sampling algorithm (for any modulus $q$) achieves linear complexity, and has very modest storage requirements. As an additional contribution, we give a new off-line quasi-linear time perturbation sampling algorithm, with performance similar to the (expected) running time of an efficient method proposed by (Ducas and Nguyen, Asiacrypt 2012) for power-of-two cyclotomics, but without the (matrix factorization) preprocessing and (lattice rounding) postprocessing required by that algorithm. All our algorithms are fairly simple, with small hidden constants, and offer a practical alternative to use the MP12 trapdoor lattices in a broad range of cryptographic applications.

We present new protocols for Byzantine state machine replication and Byzantine agreement in the synchronous and authenticated setting. The celebrated PBFT state machine replication protocol tolerates f Byzantine faults in an asynchronous setting using 3f +1 replicas, and has since been studied or deployed by numerous works. In this work, we improve the Byzantine fault tolerance threshold to n = 2f + 1 by utilizing a relaxed synchrony assumption. We present a synchronous state machine replication protocol that commits a decision every 3 rounds in the common case. The key challenge is to ensure quorum intersection at one honest replica. Our solution is to rely on the synchrony assumption to form a post-commit quorum of size 2f + 1, which intersects at f + 1 replicas with any pre-commit quorums of size f + 1. Our protocol also solves synchronous authenticated Byzantine agreement in expected 8 rounds. The best previous solution (Katz and Koo, 2006) requires expected 24 rounds. Our protocols may be applied to build Byzantine fault tolerant systems or improve cryptographic protocols such as cryptocurrencies when synchrony can be assumed.

The cube attack is a powerful cryptanalytic technique and is especially powerful against stream ciphers. Since we need to analyze the complicated structure of a stream cipher in the cube attack, the cube attack basically analyzes it by regarding it as a blackbox. Therefore, the cube attack is an experimental attack, and we cannot evaluate the security when the size of cube exceeds an experimental range, e.g., 40. In this paper, we propose cube attacks on non-blackbox polynomials. Our attacks are developed by using the division property, which is recently applied to various block ciphers. The clear advantage is that we can exploit large cube sizes because it never regards the cipher as a blackbox. We apply the new cube attack to Trivium, Grain128a, ACORN and Kreyvium. As a result, the secret keys of 832-round Trivium, 183-round Grain128a, 704-round ACORN and 872-round Kreyvium are recovered. These attacks are the current best key-recovery attack against these ciphers.

Many seminal results in Interactive Proofs (IPs) use algebraic techniques based on low-degree polynomials, the study of which is pervasive in theoretical computer science. Unfortunately, known methods for endowing such proofs with zero knowledge guarantees do not retain this rich algebraic structure. In this work, we develop algebraic techniques for obtaining zero knowledge variants of proof protocols in a way that leverages and preserves their algebraic structure. Our constructions achieve unconditional (perfect) zero knowledge in the Interactive Probabilistically Checkable Proof (IPCP) model of Kalai and Raz [KR08] (the prover first sends a PCP oracle, then the prover and verifier engage in an Interactive Proof in which the verifier may query the PCP). Our main result is a zero knowledge variant of the sumcheck protocol [LFKN92] in the IPCP model. The sumcheck protocol is a key building block in many IPs, including the protocol for polynomial-space computation due to Shamir [Sha92], and the protocol for parallel computation due to Goldwasser, Kalai, and Rothblum [GKR15]. A core component of our result is an algebraic commitment scheme, whose hiding property is guaranteed by algebraic query complexity lower bounds [AW09,JKRS09]. This commitment scheme can then be used to considerably strengthen our previous work [BCFGRS16] that gives a sumcheck protocol with much weaker zero knowledge guarantees, itself using algebraic techniques based on algorithms for polynomial identity testing [RS05,BW04]. We demonstrate the applicability of our techniques by deriving zero knowledge variants of well-known protocols based on algebraic techniques. First, we construct zero knowledge IPCPs for NEXP starting with the Multi-prover Interactive Proofs of Babai, Fortnow, and Lund [BFL91]. This result is a direct application of our zero knowledge sumcheck and our algebraic commitment scheme, augmented with the use of `randomized' low-degree extensions. We also construct protocols in a more restricted model where the prover and verifier engage in a standard Interactive Proof with oracle access to a uniformly random low-degree polynomial (soundness holds with respect to any oracle). In this setting we achieve zero knowledge variants of the protocols of Shamir and of Goldwasser, Kalai, and Rothblum.

NTRUEncrypt is a fast and standardized lattice-based public key encryption scheme, but it lacks a proof of security. Stehle and Steinfeld (EUROCRYPT 2011) first gave a variant of NTRUEncrypt, denoted by pNE, over power-of-2 cyclotomic rings. The pNE scheme is provably secure assuming the hardness of worst-case problems over ideal lattices. Recently, Yu, Xu and Wang (PKC 2017) proposed a pNE variant over prime cyclotomic rings, but it requires the parameters to be of rather larger sizes. In this paper, working with canonical embedding, we modify the key generation algorithm of pNE scheme to make it applicable to general cyclotomic rings. Through an improved analysis, we provide tighter parameters of pNE over prime power cyclotomic rings. To be more specific, even for the general case, our parameters are as good as that obtained by Stehle and Steinfeld for the case of power-of-2; compared to that of Yu, Xu and Wang (PKC 2017), the sizes of our parameters get significantly reduced. Thus our result not only applies to a larger class of rings but also enjoys greater efficiency. In proving our results, we have developed some technical tools which may be of general interest. Some remarks on further extension of the work (e.g., for more general polynomial rings) have also been made.

In a recent result, Dachman-Soled et al.(TCC '15) proposed a new notion called locally decodable and updatable non-malleable codes, which informally, provides the security guarantees of a non-malleable code while also allowing for efficient random access. They also considered locally decodable and updatable non-malleable codes that are leakage-resilient, allowing for adversaries who continually leak information in addition to tampering. The bounded retrieval model (BRM) (cf. [Alwen et al., CRYPTO '09] and [Alwen et al., EUROCRYPT '10]) has been studied extensively in the setting of leakage resilience for cryptographic primitives. This threat model assumes that an attacker can learn information about the secret key, subject only to the constraint that the overall amount of leaked information is upper bounded by some value. The goal is then to construct cryptosystems whose secret key length grows with the amount of leakage, but whose runtime (assuming random access to the secret key) is independent of the leakage amount. In this work, we combine the above two notions and construct locally decodable and updatable non-malleable codes in the split-state model, that are secure against bounded retrieval adversaries. Specifically, given leakage parameter l, we show how to construct an efficient, 3-split-state, locally decodable and updatable code (with CRS) that is secure against one-time leakage of any polynomial time, 3-split-state leakage function whose output length is at most l, and one-time tampering via any polynomial-time 3-split-state tampering function. The locality we achieve is polylogarithmic in the security parameter.

SHA3 and its extendable output variant SHAKE belong to the family of sponge functions. In this work, we present formal security arguments for the quantum preimage, $2^{\text{nd}}$-preimage, and collision resistance of any sponge function. We just assume that the internally used transformation behaves like a random transformation. These are the first formal arguments that sponge functions (incl. SHA3 and SHAKE) are secure in the post-quantum setting. We even go one step further and prove that sponges are collapsing (Unruh, EUROCRYPT'16). Thereby, we can also derive the applicability of sponge functions for collapse-binding commitments. In addition to the security arguments, we also present a quantum collision attack against sponges. The complexity of our attack asymptotically matches the proven lower bound up to a square root.

Lin and Tessaro (ePrint 2017) recently proposed indistinguishability obfuscation (IO) and functional encryption (FE) candidates and proved their security based on two assumptions: a standard assumption on bilinear maps and a non-standard assumption on ``Goldreich-like'' pseudorandom generators. In a nutshell, their second assumption requires the existence of pseudorandom generators $G:[q]^n \rightarrow \{0,1\}^m$ for some $\mathsf{poly}(n)$-size alphabet $q$, each of whose output bits depend on at most two input alphabet symbols, and which achieve sufficiently large stretch. We show polynomial-time attacks against such generators, invalidating the security of the IO and FE candidates. Our attack uses tools from the literature on two-source extractors (Chor and Goldreich, SICOMP 1988) and efficient refutation of random $\mathsf{2}$-$\mathsf{XOR}$ instances (Charikar and Wirth, FOCS 2004).

We propose Meshcash, a new framework for cryptocurrency protocols that combines a novel, proof-of-work based, permissionless byzantine consensus protocol (the tortoise) that guarantees eventual consensus and irreversibility, with a possibly-faulty but quick consensus protocol (the hare). The construction is modular, allowing any suitable ``hare'' protocol to be plugged in. The combined protocol enjoys best of both worlds properties: consensus is quick if the hare protocol succeeds, but guaranteed even if it is faulty. Unlike most existing proof-of-work based consensus protocols, our tortoise protocol does not rely on leader-election (e.g., the single miner who managed to extend the longest chain). Rather, we use ideas from asynchronous byzantine agreement protocols to gradually converge to a consensus. Meshcash, is designed to be race-free: there is no ``race'' to generate the next block, hence honestly-generated blocks are always rewarded. This property, which we define formally as a game-theoretic notion, turns out to be useful in analyzing rational miners' behavior: we prove (using a generalization of the blockchain mining games of Kiayias et al.) that race-free blockchain protocols are incentive-compatible and satisfy linearity of rewards (i.e., a party receives rewards proportional to its computational power). Because Meshcash can tolerate a high block rate regardless of network propagation delays (which will only affect latency), it allows us to lower both the variance and the expected time between blocks for honest miners; together with linearity of rewards, this makes pooled mining far less attractive. Moreover, race-free protocols scale more easily (in terms of transaction rate). This is because the race-free property implies that the network propagation delays are not a factor in terms of rewards, which removes the main impediment to accommodating a larger volume of transactions. We formally prove that all of our guarantees hold in the asynchronous communication model of Pass, Seeman and shelat, and against a constant fraction of byzantine (malicious) miners; not just rational ones.

Private Set Intersection (PSI) is a cryptographic technique that allows two parties to compute the intersection of their sets without revealing anything except the intersection. We use fully homomorphic encryption to construct a fast PSI protocol with a small communication overhead that works particularly well when one of the two sets is much smaller than the other, and is secure against semi-honest adversaries. The most computationally efficient PSI protocols have been constructed using tools such as hash functions and oblivious transfer, but a potential limitation with these approaches is the communication complexity, which scales linearly with the size of the larger set. This is of particular concern when performing PSI between a constrained device (cellphone) holding a small set, and a large service provider (e.g. \emph{WhatsApp}), such as in the Private Contact Discovery application. Our protocol has communication complexity linear in the size of the smaller set, and logarithmic in the larger set. More precisely, if the set sizes are $N_Y < N_X$, we achieve a communication overhead of $O(N_Y \log N_X)$. Our running-time-optimized benchmarks show that it takes $36$ seconds of online-computation, $71$ seconds of non-interactive (receiver-independent) pre-processing, and only $12.5$MB of round trip communication to intersect five thousand $32$-bit strings with $16$ million $32$-bit strings. Compared to prior works, this is roughly a $38$--$115 \times$ reduction in communication with minimal difference in computational overhead.

This paper presents a performance and statistical analysis of random number generators and discrete Gaussian samplers implemented in software. Most Lattice-based cryptographic schemes utilise discrete Gaussian sampling and will require a quality random source. We examine a range of candidates for this purpose, including NIST DRBGs, stream ciphers and well-known PRNGs. The performance of these random sources is analysed within 64-bit implementations of Bernoulli, CDT and Ziggurat sampling. In addition we perform initial statistical testing of these samplers and include an investigation into improper seeding issues and their effect on the Gaussian samplers. Of the NIST approved Deterministic Random Bit Generators (DRBG), the AES based CTR-DRBG produced the best balanced performance in our tests.

Distance-bounding protocols have been introduced to thwart relay attacks against contactless authentication protocols. In this context, verifiers have to authenticate the credentials of untrusted provers. Unfortunately, these protocols are themselves subject to complex threats such as terrorist-fraud attacks, in which a malicious prover helps an accomplice to authenticate. Provably guaranteeing the resistance of distance-bounding protocols to these attacks is a complex task. The classical countermeasures usually assume that rational provers want to protect their long-term authentication credentials, even with respect to their accomplices. Thus, terrorist-fraud resistant protocols generally rely on artificial extraction mechanisms, ensuring that an accomplice can retrieve the credential of his partnering prover. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to obtain provable terrorist-fraud resistant protocols without assuming that provers have any long-term secret key. Instead, the attacker simply has to replay the information that he has received from his accomplice. Based on this, we present a generic construction for provably secure distance-bounding protocols, and give three instances: (1) an efficient symmetric-key protocol, (2) a public-key protocol protecting the identities of the provers against external eavesdroppers, and finally (3) a fully anonymous protocol protecting the identities of the provers even against malicious verifiers trying to profile them.

A distributed computation in which nodes are connected by a partial communication graph is called topology-hiding if it does not reveal information about the graph beyond what is revealed by the output of the function. Previous results have shown that topology-hiding computation protocols exist for graphs of constant degree and logarithmic diameter in the number of nodes [Moran-Orlov-Richelson, TCC'15; Hirt \etal, Crypto'16] as well as for other graph families, such as cycles, trees, and low circumference graphs [Akavia-Moran, Eurocrypt'17], but the feasibility question for general graphs was open. In this work we positively resolve the above open problem: we prove that topology-hiding computation is feasible for all graphs under either the Decisional Diffie-Hellman or Quadratic-Residuosity assumption. Our techniques employ random-walks to generate paths covering the graph, upon which we apply the Akavia-Moran topology-hiding broadcast for chain-graphs (paths). To prevent topology information revealed by the random-walk, we design multiple random-walks that, together, are locally identical to receiving at each round a message from each neighbors and sending back processed messages in a randomly permuted order.

At PQ Crypto 2014, Peikert proposed efficient and practical lattice-based protocols for key transport, encryption and authenticated key exchange. One of the main technical innovations of this work is a reconciliation technique that allows two parties who "approximately agree" on a secret value to reach exact agreement, a setting common to essentially all lattice-based encryption schemes. Peikert's reconciliation technique has been extended in the Frodo key exchange scheme, allowing for agreement on more than one bit. In both cases, only one reconciliation bit is required to reach exact agreement. As symmetric keys typically require many bits, say 128 or more, the parties compute multiple secret values, and reach exact agreement on each of those values individually. In this paper, we propose a reconciliation method that sends more than one reconciliation bit. In this way, the parties can agree on the same number of bits as with Peikert's method with less stringent conditions on "how approximate" the approximate agreement must be. An instance of our method allows the two parties on a secret value that is one bit longer than with the previous methods, with virtually the same approximation requirements (i.e., with virtually the same security guarantees) as before. We numerically illustrate the advantages of our method with the impact to the instantiations of the Frodo scheme.

As genome sequencing technology develops rapidly, there has lately been an increasing need to keep genomic data secure even when stored in the cloud and still used for research. In this paper, we are interested in designing a protocol for the secure outsourcing matching problem on encrypted data. We propose an efficient method to securely search a matching position with the query data and extract some information at the position. After decryption, we only perform a small amount of comparison with the query information in plaintext. We apply this method to find a set of biomarkers in encrypted genomes. The important feature of our method is to encode a genomic database as a single element of polynomial ring. It also requires only a single homomorphic multiplication for query computation. Thus this method has the advantage over the previous methods in parameter size, computational complexity, and communication cost. We evaluate the performance of our method and verify that computation on large-scale personal data can be securely and practically outsourced to a cloud environment during data analysis. It takes about 3.9 seconds to search-and-extract the reference and alternate sequences of the queried position in a database of size 4M.

The Montgomery ladder is a remarkably simple method of computing scalar multiples of points on a broad class of elliptic curves. This article surveys a wide range of topics related to the Montgomery ladder, both from the historical perspective of Weierstrass curves and from the modern perspective of Edwards curves. New material includes a full proof of a complete constant-time ladder algorithm suitable for cryptographic applications.

Substitution box (S-box) is an important component of block ciphers for providing confusion into the cryptosystems. The functions used as S-boxes should have low differential uniformity, high nonlinearity and high algebraic degree. Due to the lack of knowledge on the existence of APN permutations over $\mathbb{F}_{2^{2k}}$, which have the lowest differential uniformity, when $k>3$, they are often constructed from differentially 4-uniform permutations. Up to now, many infinite families of such functions have been constructed. Besides, the less cost of hardware implementation of S-boxes is also an important criterion in the design of block ciphers. If the S-box is an involution, which means that the compositional inverse of the permutation is itself, then the implementation cost for its inverse is saved. The same hardware circuit can be used for both encryption and decryption, which is an advantage in hardware implementation. In this paper, we investigate all the differentially 4-uniform permutations that are known in the literature and determine whether they can be involutory. We found that some involutory differentially 4-uniform permutations with high nonlinearity and algebraic degree can be given from these known constructions.