When Nakamoto invented Bitcoin, the first generation of cryptocurrencies followed it in applying POW (Proof of Work) consensus mechanism; due to its excessive energy consumption and heavy carbon footprints, new innovations evolved like Proof of Space, POS (Proof of Stake), and a lot more with many variants for each. Furthermore, the emergence of more blockchain applications and kinds beyond just cryptocurrencies needed more consensus mechanisms that is optimized to fit requirements of each application or blockchain kind; examples range from IoT (Internet of Things) blockchains for sustainability applications that often use variants of BFT (Byzantine Fault Tolerance) algorithm, and consensus needed to relay transactions and/or assets between different blockchains in interoperability solutions. Previous studies concentrated on surveying and/or proposing different blockchain consensus rules, on a specific consensus issue like attacks, randomization, or on deriving theoretical results. Starting from discussing most important theoretical results, this paper tries to gather and organize all significant existing material about consensus in the blockchain world explaining design challenges, tradeoffs and research areas. We realize that the topic could fit for a complete textbook, so we summarize the basic concepts and support with tables and appendices. Then we highlight some case examples from interoperability solutions to show how flexible and wide the design space is to fit both general and special purpose systems. The aim is to provide researchers with a comprehensive overview of the topic, along with the links to go deeper into every detail.

SAND is an AND-RX-based lightweight block cipher proposed by Chen et al. There are two variants of SAND, namely SAND-64 and SAND-128, due to structural differences. In this paper, we search for impossible differential distinguishers of SAND-64 using the Constraint Programming (CP) and reveal 56 types of impossible differential distinguishers up to 11 rounds. Furthermore, we demonstrate a key recovery attack on 17-round SAND-64. The complexities for the attack require $2^{56}$ data, $2^{127}$ encryptions, and $2^{60}$ bytes of memory, respectively. Although this result currently achieves the best attack on round-reduced SAND-64, this attack does not threaten the security of SAND-64 against impossible differential attack.

The YOSO (You Only Speak Once) model, introduced by Gentry et al. (CRYPTO 2021), helps to achieve strong security guarantees in cryptographic protocols for distributed settings, like blockchains, with large number of parties. YOSO protocols typically employ smaller anonymous committees to execute individual rounds of the protocol instead of having all parties execute the entire protocol. After completing their tasks, parties encrypt protocol messages for the next anonymous committee and erase their internal state before publishing ciphertexts, thereby enhancing security in dynamically changing environments. In this work, we consider the problem of secure multi-party computation (MPC), a fundamental problem in cryptography and distributed computing. We assume honest majority among the committee members, and work in the online-offline, i.e., preprocessing, setting. In this context, we present the first YOSO MPC protocol where efficiency---measured as communication complexity---improves as the number of parties increases. Specifically, for $0<\epsilon<1/2$ and an adversary corrupting $t<n(\frac{1}{2}-\epsilon)$ out of $n$ parties, our MPC protocol exhibits enhanced scalability as $n$ increases, where the online phase communication becomes independent of $n$. Prior YOSO MPC protocols considered $t$ as large as $(n-1)/2$, but a significant hurdle persisted in obtaining YOSO MPC with communication that does not scale linearly with the number of committee members, a challenge that is exagerbated when the committee size was large per YOSO's requirements. We show that, by considering a small ``gap'' of $\epsilon>0$, the sizes of the committees are only marginally increased, while online communication is significantly reduced. Furthermore, we explicitly consider fail-stop adversaries, i.e., honest participants who may inadvertently fail due to reasons such as denial of service or software/hardware errors. In prior YOSO work, these adversaries were grouped with fully malicious parties. Adding explicit support for them allows us to achieve even better scalability.

We introduce a novel symmetric key cryptographic scheme involving a light ray's interaction with a 2D cartesian coordinate setup, several smaller boxes within this setup, of either reflection or refraction type and $1^{st}$, $2^{nd}$ or $3^{rd}$ degree polynomial curves inside each of these smaller boxes. We also incorporate boolean logic gates of types XOR, NOT-Shift and Permutation which get applied to the light ray after each interaction with a reflecting or refracting polynomial curve. This alternating interaction between Optical gates (polynomial curves) and Non-optical gates creates a complex and secure cryptographic system. Furthermore, we design and launch customized attacks on our cryptographic system and discuss the robustness of it against these.

In this paper, we present an improved framework for proving query bounds in the Quantum Random Oracle Model (QROM) for algorithms with both quantum and classical query interfaces, where the classical input is partially controlled by the adversary. By extending existing techniques, we develop a method to bound the progress an adversary can make with such partial-control classical queries. While this framework is applicable to different hash function properties, we decided to demonstrate the impact of the new techniques by giving an analysis of the multi-target extended target collision resistance property (m-eTCR). This new approach allows us to achieve an improved bound that significantly reduces the required function key size. Our proof is tight in terms of query complexity and has significant implications for cryptographic applications, especially for signature schemes in the hash & sign paradigm, enabling more efficient instantiations with reduced salt sizes and smaller signature lengths. For an example of multiple signatures aggregation, we achieve a signature size of 30 kB smaller.

In the McEliece public-key encryption scheme, a private key is almost always not determined uniquely by its associated public key. We highlight a structural characterization of equivalent private keys that reduces the cost estimate for a simple private-key search using the support-splitting algorithm (SSA) by a polynomial but practically very substantial factor. In addition, we show how to apply the attack to extended codes in order to further improve the performance of the attack. (All of these techniques appear to be known to experts, but not all details have previously been laid out in the literature.) In addition to spelling out the — thus far — missing details underlying these attack strategies, we provide an optimized software implementation of the SSA for this kind of key search and demonstrate its capabilities in practice by solving a key-recovery challenge with a naïve a‑priori cost estimate of $2^{91}$ bit operations in just ${\approx}\,1470$ core days, testing ${\approx}\,7700$ private-key candidates per core and second in the process. We stress that the speedup from those equivalences on private keys and from our implementation techniques is merely polynomial and does not indicate any weakness in realistic instantiations of the McEliece cryptosystem, whose parameter choices are primarily constrained by decoding attacks rather than ludicrously more expensive key-recovery attacks.

The works of Garg et al. [S&P'24] (aka hinTS) and Das et al. [CCS'23] introduced the notion of silent threshold signatures (STS) - where a set of signers silently perform local computation to generate a public verification key. To sign a message, any set of $t$ signers sign the message non-interactively and these are aggregated into a constant-sized signature. This paradigm avoids performing expensive Distributed Key Generation procedure for each set of signers while keeping the public verification key constant-sized. In this work, we propose the notion of committee-based silent threshold signature (c-STS) scheme. In a c-STS scheme, a set of signers initially perform a one-time setup to generate the verification key, and then a subset of signers are randomly chosen for an epoch to perform the threshold signing while the other signers are not authorized to sign during that epoch. This captures existing systems like Ethereum Altair and Dfinity where only a specific committee is authorized to sign in a designated epoch. The existing STS schemes cannot be extended to the committee setting because the signature verification only attests to the number of signing parties, not which committee they belong to. So, we upgrade hinTS to the committee setting by proposing Dyna-hinTS. It is the $first$ c-STS scheme and it requires a one-time silent setup and generates a one-time public verification key that does not vary with the committee. Assuming a set of 1024 signers (with corrupt 682 signers), hinTS generates an aggregated signature in 1.7s whereas Dyna-hinTS generates it in $0.35$s within a committee of $80$ signers. This yields a $4.9\times$ improvement over hinTS for signature generation at the cost of increasing signature verification time by $4\%$ over hinTS. Dyna-hinTS supports general access structure, weighted signatures and improves existing multiverse threshold signatures.

The online realm has witnessed a surge in the buying and selling of data, prompting the emergence of dedicated data marketplaces. These platforms cater to servers (sellers), enabling them to set prices for access to their data, and clients (buyers), who can subsequently purchase these data, thereby streamlining and facilitating such transactions. However, the current data market is primarily confronted with the following issues. Firstly, they fail to protect client privacy, presupposing that clients submit their queries in plaintext. Secondly, these models are susceptible to being impacted by malicious client behavior, for example, enabling clients to potentially engage in arbitrage activities. To address the aforementioned issues, we propose payable secure computation, a novel secure computation paradigm specifically designed for data pricing scenarios. It grants the server the ability to securely procure essential pricing information while protecting the privacy of client queries. Additionally, it fortifies the server's privacy against potential malicious client activities. As specific applications, we have devised customized payable protocols for two distinct secure computation scenarios: Keyword Private Information Retrieval (KPIR) and Private Set Intersection (PSI). We implement our two payable protocols and compare them with the state-of-the-art related protocols that do not support pricing as a baseline. Since our payable protocols are more powerful in the data pricing setting, the experiment results show that they do not introduce much overhead over the baseline protocols. Our payable KPIR achieves the same online cost as baseline, while the setup is about $1.3-1.6\times$ slower than it. Our payable PSI needs about $2\times$ more communication cost than that of baseline protocol, while the runtime is $1.5-3.2\times$ slower than it depending on the network setting.

We introduce audience injection attacks, a novel class of vulnerabilities that impact widely used Web-based authentication and authorization protocols, including OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, FAPI, CIBA, the Device Authorization Grant, and various well-established extensions, such as Pushed Authorization Requests, Token Revocation, Token Introspection, and their numerous combinations. These protocols underpin services for billions of users across diverse ecosystems worldwide, spanning low-risk applications like social logins to high-risk domains such as open banking, insurance, and healthcare. Audience injection attacks exploit a critical weakness in a core security mechanism of these protocols - the handling of so-called audiences in signature-based client authentication mechanisms. This vulnerability allows attackers to compromise fundamental security objectives whenever these mechanisms are utilized across two or more server endpoints. They enable the attacker to impersonate users and gain unauthorized access to their resources, even in high-security protocol families specifically designed for sensitive applications. We responsibly disclosed these vulnerabilities to the relevant standardization bodies, which recognized their severity. In collaboration with these organizations, we developed fixes and supported a coordinated response, leading to an ongoing effort to update a dozen of standards, numerous major implementations, and far-reaching ecosystems.

FALCON is a post-quantum signature selected by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Although its side-channel resilience has been studied and a masking countermeasure proposed, the division is a major performance bottleneck. This work proposes a different approach to the masked FALCON division. We use the Newton-Raphson method and a convergent sequence to approximate this operation. The first term of the sequence is evaluated using pre-calculated second-order minimax polynomials. As a consequence, computing the inverse only requires 5 masked additions and 8 masked multiplications, compared to the roughly 55 masked additions required by the previous state-of-the-art. Formal security proofs using the MIMO-SNI criteria are also provided.

Group signatures allow a user to sign anonymously on behalf of a group of users while allowing a tracing authority to trace the signer's identity in case of misuse. In Chaum and van Heyst's original model (EUROCRYPT'91), the group needs to stay fixed. Throughout various attempts, including partially dynamic group signatures and revocations, Bootle et al. (ACNS'16, J. Cryptol.) formalized the notion of fully dynamic group signatures (FDGS), enabling both enrolling and revoking users of the group. However, in their scheme, the verification process needs to take into account the latest system information, and a previously generated signature will be invalidated as soon as, for example, there is a change in the group. We therefore raise a research question: Is it possible to construct an FDGS under which the validity of a signature can survive future changes in the system information? In this paper, we propose Everlasting Fully Dynamic Group Signatures (EFDGS) that allow signers to generate signatures that do not require verification with any specific epoch. Specifically, once the signatures are created, they are valid forever. It also guarantees that the signer can only output such a signature when she is a valid user of the system. We realize the above new model by constructing a plausibly post-quantum standard-lattice-based EFDGS.

Quantum computing is regarded as one of the most significant upcoming advancements in computer science. Although fully operational quantum computers have yet to be realized, they are expected to solve specific problems that are difficult to solve using classical computers. Given the limitations of quantum computing resources, it is crucial to design compact quantum circuits for core operations, such as quantum arithmetic. In this paper, we focus on optimizing the circuit depth of quantum multi-operand addition, which is a fundamental component in quantum implementations (as an example, SHA-2). Building on the foundational quantum carry-save approach by Phil Gossett, we introduce a tree-based quantum carry-save adder. Our design integrates the Wallace and Dadda trees to optimize carry handling during multi-operand additions. To further reduce circuit depth, we utilize additional ancilla qubits for parallel operations and introduce an efficient technique for reusing these ancilla qubits. Our tree-based carry-save adder achieves the lowest circuit depth ($T$-depth) and provides an improvement of over 82% (up to 99%) in the qubit count–circuit depth product for multi-operand addition. Furthermore, we apply our method to multiplication, achieving the lowest circuit depth and an improvement of up to 87% in the qubit count–circuit depth product.

We propose an encrypted controller framework for linear time-invariant systems with actuator non-linearity based on fully homomorphic encryption (FHE). While some existing works explore the use of partially homomorphic encryption (PHE) in implementing linear control systems, the impacts of the non-linear behaviors of the actuators on the systems are often left unconcerned. In particular, when the inputs to the controller become too small or too large, actuators may burn out due to unstable system state oscillations. To solve this dilemma, we design and implement FHECAP, an FHE-based controller framework that can homomorphically apply non-linear functions to the actuators to rectify the system inputs. In FHECAP, we first design a novel data encoding scheme tailored for efficient gain matrix evaluation. Then, we propose a high-precision homomorphic algorithm to apply non-arithmetic piecewise function to realize the actuator normalization. In the experiments, compared with the existing state-of-the-art encrypted controllers, FHECAP achieves $4\times$--$1000\times$ reduction in computational latency. We evaluate the effectiveness of FHECAP in the real-world application of encrypted control for spacecraft rendezvous. The simulation results show that the FHECAP achieves real-time spacecraft rendezvous with negligible accuracy loss.

Update: We retract the claim that main construction in the paper is cryptographically secure. In particular, the trapdoor functions generated in Algorithm 1 from three dimensional tensors are efficiently distinguishable from random tensors, since their two dimensional slices (in the longest dimension) are rank deficient. We leave the article as a record, in hopes that some of the techniques are useful in other contexts. Weyman and Zelevinsky generalised Vandermonde matrices to higher dimensions, which we call Vandermonde-Weyman-Zelevinsky tensors. We generalise Lagrange interpolation to higher dimensions by devising a nearly linear time algorithm that given a Vandermonde-Weyman-Zelevinsky tensor and a sparse target vector, finds a tuple of vectors that hit the target under tensor evaluation. Tensor evaluation to us means evaluating the usual multilinear form associated with the tensor in all but one chosen dimension. Yet, this interpolation problem phrased with respect to a random tensor appears to be a hard multilinear system. Leveraging this dichotomy, we propose preimage sampleable trapdoor one-way functions in the spirit of Gentry-Peikert-Vaikuntanathan (GPV) lattice trapdoors. We design and analyse ``Hash-and-Sign'' digital signatures from such trapdoor one-way functions, yielding short signatures whose lengths scale nearly linearly in the security parameter. We also describe an encryption scheme. Our trapdoor is a random Vandermonde-Weyman-Zelevinsky tensor over a finite field and a random basis change. We hide the Vandermonde-Weyman-Zelevinsky tensor under the basis change and publish the resulting pseudorandom tensor. The one way function is the tensor evaluation derived from the public tensor, restricted so as to only map to sparse vectors. We then design the domain sampler and preimage sampler demanded by the GPV framework. The former samples inputs that map to uniform images under the one-way function. The latter samples preimages given supplementary knowledge of the trapdoor. Preimage sampling is a randomised version of interpolation and knowing the basis change allows efficient translation between interpolation corresponding to the public and trapdoor tensors. An adversary seeking a preimage must solve a pseudorandom multilinear system, which seems cryptographically hard.

Set reconciliation is a fundamental task in distributed systems, particularly in blockchain networks, where it enables the synchronization of transaction pools among peers and facilitates block dissemination. Existing traditional set reconciliation schemes are either statistical, providing success probability as a function of the communication overhead and the size of the symmetric difference, or require parametrization and estimation of the size of the symmetric difference, which can be prone to error. In this paper, we present CertainSync, a novel reconciliation framework that, to the best of our knowledge, is the first to guarantee successful set reconciliation without any parametrization or estimators in use. The framework is rateless and adapts to the unknown symmetric difference size. The set reconciliation is guaranteed to be completed successfully whenever the communication overhead reaches a lower bound derived from the symmetric difference size and the universe size. Our framework is based on recent constructions of Invertible Bloom Lookup Tables (IBLTs) ensuring successful element listing as long as the number of elements is bounded. We provide a theoretical analysis to prove the certainty in the set reconciliation for multiple constructions. The approach is also validated by simulations, showing the ability to synchronize sets with efficient communication costs while maintaining reconciliation guarantees compared to other baseline schemes for set reconciliation. To further improve communication overhead for large universes as blockchain networks, CertainSync is extended with a universe reduction technique to minimize communication overhead. We compare and validate the extended framework UniverseReduceSync against the basic CertainSync framework through simulations using real blockchain transaction hash data from the Ethereum blockchain network. The results illustrate a trade-off between improved communication costs and maintaining reconciliation guarantees without relying on parametrization or estimators, offering a comprehensive solution for set reconciliation in diverse scenarios.

Byzantine Reliable Broadcast is one of the most popular communication primitives in distributed systems. Byzantine reliable broadcast ensures that processes agree to deliver a message from an initiator, even if some processes (possibly including the initiator) are Byzantine. In asynchronous settings, it is known since the prominent work of Bracha \cite{Bracha87} that Byzantine reliable broadcast can be implemented deterministically if the total number of processes, denoted by $n$, satisfies $n \geq 3t+1$ where $t$ is an upper bound on the number of Byzantine processes. Here, we study Byzantine Reliable Broadcast when processes are equipped with \emph{trusted components}, special software or hardware designed to prevent equivocation. Our contribution is threefold. First, we show that, despite common belief, when each process is equipped with a trusted component, Bracha's algorithm still needs $n \geq 3t+1$. Second, we present a novel algorithm that uses a single trusted component (at the initiator) that implements Byzantine Reliable Asynchronous Broadcast with $n \geq 2t+1$. \yag{Lastly, building on our broadcast algorithm, we present TenderTee, a transformation of the Tendermint consensus algorithm by using trusted component, giving better Byzantine resilience. Tendertee works with $n \geq 2t+1$, where Tendermint needed $n=3t+1$.}

This work presents SPHINCSLET, the first fully standard-compliant and area-efficient hardware implementation of the SLH-DSA algorithm, formerly known as SPHINCS+, a post-quantum digital signature scheme. SPHINCSLET is designed to be parameterizable across different security levels and hash functions, offering a balanced trade-off between area efficiency and performance. Existing hardware implementations either feature a large area footprint to achieve fast signing and verification or adopt a coprocessor-based approach that significantly slows down these operations. SPHINCSLET addresses this gap by delivering a 4.7$\times$ reduction in area compared to high-speed designs while achieving a 2.5$\times$ to 5$\times$ improvement in signing time over the most efficient coprocessor-based designs for a SHAKE256-based SPHINCS+ implementation. The SHAKE256-based SPHINCS+ FPGA implementation targeting the AMD Artix-7 requires fewer than 10.8K LUTs for any security level of SLH-DSA. Furthermore, the SHA-2-based SPHINCS+ implementation achieves a 2$\times$ to 4$\times$ speedup in signature generation across various security levels compared to existing SLH-DSA hardware, all while maintaining a compact area footprint of 6K to 15K LUTs. This makes it the fastest SHA-2-based SLH-DSA implementation to date. With an optimized balance of area and performance, SPHINCSLET can assist resource-constrained devices in transitioning to post-quantum cryptography.

Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) are a rapidly growing technique for privacy-preserving and verifiable computation. ZKPs enable one party (a prover: $\mathcal{P}$) to prove to another (a verifier: $\mathcal{V}$) that a statement is true or correct without revealing any additional information. This powerful capability has led to ZKPs being applied and proposed for application in blockchain technologies, verifiable machine learning, and electronic voting. However, ZKPs have yet to see widespread, ubiquitous adoption due to the exceptionally high computational complexity of the proving process. Naturally, there has been recent work to accelerate ZKP primitives and protocols using GPUs and ASICs. However, the protocols considered so far face one of two challenges: they require a trusted setup for each new application or generate large proofs with high verification costs, limiting their applicability in scenarios with numerous verifiers or strict verification time constraints. HyperPlonk is a state-of-the-art ZKP protocol that supports both one-time, universal setup and small proof sizes/verification costs expected by publicly verifiable, consensus-based systems (e.g., blockchain). While HyperPlonk's setup and verifier properties are highly desirable, the proving phase is costly. A HyperPlonk prover must compute on large bitwidths (e.g., 255-381b) and polynomials (e.g., of degree 2$^{24}$), employs computationally (e.g., MSM) and bandwidth (e.g., SumCheck) intensive kernels, and the complete protocol comprises many steps, each constituting distinct kernels. We present an accelerator, \emph{zkSpeed}, to address these challenges and effectively accelerate HyperPlonk. zkSpeed provides hardware support for all major primitives (e.g., SumCheck and Multi-Scalar Multiplications (MSMs)) and judiciously schedules each protocol phase onto the allocated hardware. We leverage high-level synthesis to thoroughly explore and optimize the hardware design tradeoffs of each unit. These are then input into a full-chip simulator for large-scale design space exploration to optimize all aspects of the architecture in unison. Our Pareto analysis demonstrates that with a 366mm$^2$ chip and 2 TB/s of off-chip bandwidth, zkSpeed is able to accelerate the entire proof generation by 801$\times$ (geomean) over a CPU baseline.

eIDAS 2.0 (electronic IDentification, Authentication and trust Services) is a very ambitious regulation aimed at equipping European citizens with a personal digital identity wallet (EU Digital Identity Wallet) on a mobile phone that not only needs to achieve a high level of security, but also needs to be available as soon as possible for a large number of citizens and respect their privacy (as per GDPR - General Data Protection Regulation). In this paper, we introduce the foundations of a digital identity wallet solution that could help move closer to this objective by leveraging the proven anonymous credentials system BBS (Eurocrypt 2023), also known as BBS+, but modifying it to avoid the limitations that have hindered its widespread adoption, especially in certified infrastructures requiring trusted hardware implementation. In particular, the solution we propose, which we call BBS#, does not rely, contrary to BBS/BBS +, on bilinear maps and pairing-friendly curves (which are not supported by existing hardware) and only depends on the hardware implementation of well-known digital signature schemes such as ECDSA (ISO/IEC 14888-3) or ECSDSA (also known as ECSchnorr, ISO/IEC 14888-3) using classical elliptic curves. More precisely, BBS# can be rolled out without requiring any change in existing hardware or the algorithms that hardware supports. BBS# , which is proven secure in the random oracle model, retains the well-known security property (unforgeability of the credentials under the (gap) q-SDH assumption) and anonymity properties (multi-show full unlinkability and statistical anonymity of presentation proofs) of BBS/BBS+. By implementing BBS# on several smartphones using different secure execution environments, we show that it is possible to achieve eIDAS 2.0 transactions which are not only efficient (around 70 ms on Android StrongBox), secure and certifiable at the highest level but also provide strong (optimal) privacy protection for all European ID Wallet users.

Modern life makes having a digital identity no longer optional, whether one needs to manage a bank account or subscribe to a newspaper. As the number of online services increases, it is fundamental to safeguard user privacy and equip service providers (SP) with mechanisms enforcing Sybil resistance, i.e., preventing a single entity from showing as many. Current approaches, such as anonymous credentials and self-sovereign identities, typically rely on identity providers or identity registries trusted not to track users' activities. However, this assumption of trust is no longer appropriate in a world where user data is considered a valuable asset. To address this challenge, we introduce a new cryptographic notion, Anonymous Self-Credentials (ASC) along with two implementations. This approach enables users to maintain their privacy within an anonymity set while allowing SPs to obtain Sybil resistance. Then, we present a User-issued Unlinkable Single Sign-On (U2SSO) implemented from ASC that solely relies on an identity registry to immutably store identities. A U2SSO solution allows users to generate unlinkable child credentials for each SP using only one set of master credentials. We demonstrate the practicality and efficiency of our U2SSO solution by providing a complete proof-of-concept.

Side-channel attacks consist of retrieving internal data from a victim system by analyzing its leakage, which usually requires proximity to the victim in the range of a few millimetres. Screaming channels are EM side channels transmitted at a distance of a few meters. They appear on mixed-signal devices integrating an RF module on the same silicon die as the digital part. Consequently, the side channels are modulated by legitimate RF signal carriers and appear at the harmonics of the digital clock frequency. While initial works have only considered collecting leakage at these harmonics, late work has demonstrated that the leakage is also present at frequencies other than these harmonics. This result significantly increases the number of available frequencies to perform a screaming-channel attack, which can be convenient in an environment where multiple harmonics are polluted. This work studies how this diversity of frequencies carrying leakage can be used to improve attack performance. We first study how to combine multiple frequencies. Second, we demonstrate that frequency combination can improve attack performance and evaluate this improvement according to the performance of the combined frequencies. Finally, we demonstrate the interest of frequency combination in attacks at $15$ and, for the first time to the best of our knowledge, at $30$ meters. One last important observation is that this frequency combination divides by $2$ the number of traces needed to reach a given attack performance.

A set of unacquainted parties, some of which may misbehave, communicate with each other over an unauthenticated and unreliable gossip network. They wish to jointly replicate a state machine $\Pi$ so that each one of them has fair access to its operation. Specifically, assuming parties' computational power is measured as queries to an oracle machine $H(\cdot)$, parties can issue symbols to the state machine in proportion to their queries to $H(\cdot)$ at a given fixed rate. Moreover, if such access to the state machine is provided continuously in expected constant time installments we qualify it as fast fairness. A state machine replication (SMR) protocol in this permissionless setting is expected to offer consistency across parties and reliably process all symbols that honest parties wish to add to it in a timely manner despite continuously fluctuating participation and in the presence of an adversary who commands less than half of the total queries to $H(\cdot)$ per unit of time. A number of protocols strive to offer the above guarantee together with fast settlement --- notably, the Bitcoin blockchain offers a protocol that settles against Byzantine adversaries in polylogarithmic rounds, while fairness only holds in a fail-stop adversarial model (due to the fact that Byzantine behavior can bias access to the state machine in the adversary's favor). In this work, we put forth the first Byzantine-resilient protocol solving SMR in this setting with both expected-constant-time settlement and fast fairness. Furthermore, our protocol is self-sufficient in the sense of performing its own time keeping while tolerating an adaptively fluctuating set of parties.

Weightwise degree-$d$ functions are Boolean functions that, on each set of fixed Hamming weight, coincide with a function of degree at most $d$. They generalize both symmetric functions and the Hidden Weight Bit Function (HWBF), which has been studied in cryptography for its favorable properties. In this work, we establish a general upper bound on the algebraic immunity of such functions, a key security parameter against algebraic attacks on stream ciphers like filtered Linear Feedback Shift Registers (LFSRs). We construct explicit low-degree annihilators for WWdd functions with small $d$, and show how to generalize these constructions. As an application, we prove that the algebraic immunity of the HWBF is upper bounded by $3\sqrt{n}$ disproving a result from 2011 that claimed a lower bound of $n/3$. We then apply our technique to several generalizations of the HWBF proposed since 2021 for homomorphically friendly constructions and LFSR-based ciphers, refining or refuting results from six prior works.

Secure two-party computation (2PC) enables two parties to jointly evaluate a function while maintaining input privacy. Despite recent significant progress, a notable efficiency gap remains between actively secure and passively secure protocols. In S\&P'12, Huang, Katz, and Evans formalized the notion of \emph{active security with one-bit leakage}, providing a promising approach to bridging this gap. Protocols derived from this notion have become foundational in designing highly efficient actively secure 2PC protocols. However, a critical challenge identified by Huang, Katz, and Evans remains unexplored: these protocols face significant weaknesses in ensuring fairness for honest parties when employed in standalone settings rather than as components within larger protocols. While the authors proposed two potential solutions to mitigate this issue, both approaches are prohibitively expensive and lack formalization of security guarantees. In this paper, we first formally define an enhanced notion called \emph{active security with one-bit-advantage bound}, in which the adversaries' advantages are strictly bounded to at most one bit beyond what honest parties obtain. This bound is enforced through a \emph{progressive revelation} mechanism, where the evaluation result is disclosed incrementally bit by bit. In addition, we propose a novel approach leveraging label structures within garbled circuits to design a highly efficient constant-round 2PC protocol that achieves active security with one-bit advantage bound. Our protocol demonstrates \emph{runtime performance nearly identical to that of passively secure garbled-circuit counterparts} in duplex networks (\eg $1.033\times$ for the {\tt SHA256} circuit in LAN), with \emph{low overhead} for output progressive revelation (only $80$ communicated bytes per bit release). With its strengthened security guarantees and minimal overhead, our protocol is highly suitable for practical 2PC applications.

Semantic communication systems, which focus on transmitting the semantics of data rather than its exact reconstruction, redefine the design of communication networks for transformative efficiency in bandwidth-limited and latency-critical applications. Addressing these goals, we tackle the rate-distortion-perception (RDP) problem for image compression, a critical challenge in achieving perceptually realistic reconstructions under rate constraints. Formulated within the randomized distributed function computation (RDFC) framework, we establish an achievable non-asymptotic RDP region, providing finite blocklength trade-offs between rate, distortion, and perceptual quality, aligning with semantic communication objectives. We extend this region to also include a secrecy constraint, providing strong secrecy guarantees against eavesdroppers via physical-layer security methods, ensuring resilience against quantum attacks. Our contributions include (i) establishing achievable bounds for non-asymptotic RDP regions under realism and distortion constraints; (ii) extending these bounds to provide strong secrecy guarantees; (iii) characterizing the asymptotic secure RDP region under a perfect realism constraint; and (iv) illustrating significant reductions in rates and the effects of secrecy constraints and finite blocklengths. Our results provide actionable insights for designing low-latency, high-fidelity, and secure image compression systems with realistic outputs, advancing applications, e.g., in privacy-critical domains.

Recently, $\mathsf{NTRU}$+$\mathsf{Sign}$ was proposed as a new compact signature scheme, following `Fiat-Shamir with Aborts' (FSwA) framework. Its compactness is mainly based on their novel NTRU-based key structure that fits well with bimodal distributions in the FSwA framework. However, despite its compactness, $\mathsf{NTRU}$+$\mathsf{Sign}$ fails to provide a diverse set of parameters that can meet some desired security levels. This limitation stems from its reliance on a ring $\mathbb{Z}_q[x]/\langle x^n+1 \rangle$, where $n$ is restricted to powers of two, limiting the flexibility in selecting appropriate security levels. To overcome this limitation, we propose a revised version of $\mathsf{NTRU}$+$\mathsf{Sign}$ by adopting a ring $\mathbb{Z}_q[x]/\langle x^n-x^{n/2}+1\rangle$ from cyclotomic trinomials, where $n=2^{i}3^{j}$ for some positive integers $i$ and $j$. Our parameterization offers three distinct security levels: approximately $120$, $190$, and $260$ bits, while preserving the compactness in $\mathbb{Z}_q[x]/\langle x^n+1 \rangle$. We implement these re-parameterized $\mathsf{NTRU}$+$\mathsf{Sign}$ schemes, showing that the performance of $\mathsf{NTRU}$+$\mathsf{Sign}$ from cyclotomic trinomials is still comparable to previous lattice-based signature schemes such as $\mathsf{Dilithium}$ and $\mathsf{HAETAE}$.

zkVMs are SNARKs for verifying CPU execution. They allow an untrusted prover to show that it correctly ran a specified program on a witness, where the program is given as bytecode conforming to an instruction set architecture like RISC-V. Existing zkVMs still struggle with high prover resource costs, notably large runtime and memory usage. We show how to implement Jolt—an advanced, sum-check- based zkVM—with a significantly reduced memory footprint, without relying on SNARK recursion, and with only modest runtime overhead (potentially well below a factor of two). We discuss benefits of this approach compared to prevailing recursive techniques.

CRLite is a low-bandwidth, low-latency, privacy-preserving mechanism for distributing certificate revocation data. A CRLite aggregator periodically encodes revocation data into a compact static hash set, or membership test, which can can be downloaded by clients and queried privately. We present a novel data-structure for membership tests, which we call a clubcard, and we evaluate the encoding efficiency of clubcards using data from Mozilla's CRLite infrastructure. As of November 2024, the WebPKI contains over 900 million valid certificates and over 8 million revoked certificates. We describe an instantiation of CRLite that encodes the revocation status of these certificates in a 6.7 MB package. This is $54\%$ smaller than the original instantiation of CRLite presented at the 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, and it is $21\%$ smaller than the lower bound claimed in that work. A sequence of clubcards can encode a dynamic dataset like the WebPKI revocation set. Using data from late 2024 again, we find that clubcards encoding 6 hour delta updates to the WebPKI can be compressed to 26.8 kB on average---a size that makes CRLite truly practical. We have extended Mozilla's CRLite infrastructure so that it can generate clubcards, and we have added client-side support for this system to Firefox. We report on some performance aspects of our implementation, which is currently the default revocation checking mechanism in Firefox Nightly, and we propose strategies for further reducing the bandwidth requirements of CRLite.

A Random Oracle Combiner (ROC), introduced by Dodis et al. (CRYPTO ’22), takes two hash functions $h_1, h_2$ from m bits to n bits and outputs a new hash function $C$ from $m$' to $n$' bits. This function C is guaranteed to be indifferentiable from a fresh random oracle as long as one of $h_1$ and $h_2$ (say, $h_1$) is a random oracle, while the other h2 can “arbitrarily depend” on $h_1$. The work of Dodis et al. also built the first length-preserving ROC, where $n$′ = $n$. Unfortunately, despite this feasibility result, this construction has several deficiencies. From the practical perspective, it could not be directly applied to existing Merkle-Damgård-based hash functions, such as SHA2 or SHA3. From the theoretical perspective, it required $h_1$ and $h_2$ to have input length $m$ > 3λ, where λ is the security parameter. To overcome these limitations, Dodis et al. conjectured — and left as the main open question — that the following (salted) construction is a length-preserving ROC: $C^{h1,h2}_{\mathcal{Z}_1,\mathcal{Z}_2} (M ) = h_1^*(M, \mathcal{Z}_1) \oplus h^*_2(M,\mathcal{Z}_2),$ where $\mathcal{Z}_1, \mathcal{Z}_2$ are random salts of appropriate length, and $f^*$ denotes the Merkle-Damgård-extension of a given compression function $f$. As our main result, we resolve this conjecture in the affirmative. For practical use, this makes the resulting combiner applicable to existing, Merkle-Damgård-based hash functions. On the theory side, it shows the existence of ROCs only requiring optimal input length $m$ = λ+O(1).

This paper presents new results that establish connections between isogeny graphs and nonlinear recurrences over finite fields. Specifically, we prove several theorems that link these two areas, offering deeper insights into the structure of isogeny graphs and their relationship with nonlinear recurrence sequences. We further provide two related conjectures which may be worth of further research. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the endomorphism ring of a curve, advancing progress toward the resolution of the Endomorphism Ring Problem, which aims to provide a computational characterization of the endomorphism ring of a supersingular elliptic curve.

Physically Unclonable Constants (PUCs) are a special type of Physically Unclonable Constants and they can be used to embed secret bit-strings in chips. Most PUCs are an array of cells where each cell is a digital circuit that evolve spontaneously toward one of two states, the chosen state being function of random manufacturing process variations. In this paper we propose an Analog Physically Unclonable Constant (APUC) whose output is an analog value to be transformed in digital by a digitizer circuit. The ratio behind this proposal is that an APUC cell has the potential of providing more than one bit, reducing the required footprint. Preliminary theoretical analysis and simulation results are presented. The proposed APUC has interesting performances (e.g., it can provide up to 5 bits per cell) that grant for further investigation.

The security of ML-DSA, like most signature schemes, is partially based on the fact that the nonce used to generate the signature is unknown to any attacker. In this work, we exhibit a lattice-based attack that is possible if the nonces share implicit or explicit information. From a collection of signatures whose nonces share certain coefficients, it is indeed possible to build a collection of non full-rank lattices. Intersecting them, we show how to create a low-rank lattice that contains one of the polynomials of the secret key, which in turn can be recovered using lattice reduction techniques. There are several interpretations of this result: firstly, it can be seen as a generalization of a fault-based attack on BLISS presented at SAC'16 by Thomas Espitau et al. Alternatively, it can be understood as a side-channel attack on ML-DSA, in the case where an attacker is able to recover only one of the coefficients of the nonce used during the generation of the signature. For ML-DSA-II, we show that $4 \times 160$ signatures and few hours of computation are sufficient to recover the secret key on a desktop computer. Lastly, our result shows that simple countermeasures, such as permuting the generation of the nonce coefficients, are not sufficient.

Laconic cryptography focuses on designing two-message protocols that allow secure computation on large datasets while minimizing communication costs. While laconic cryptography protocols achieve asymptotically optimal communication complexity for many tasks, their concrete efficiency is prohibitively expensive due to the heavy use of public-key techniques or the non-black-box of cryptographic primitives. In this work, we initiate the study of "laconic cryptography with preprocessing", introducing a model that includes an offline phase to generate database-dependent correlations, which are then used in a lightweight online phase. These correlations are conceptually simple, relying on linear-algebraic techniques. This enables us to develop a protocol for private laconic vector oblivious linear evaluation (plvOLE). In such a protocol, the receiver holds a large database $\mathsf{DB}$, and the sender has two messages $v$ and $w$, along with an index $i$. The receiver learns the value $v \cdot \mathsf{DB}_i + w$ without revealing other information. Our protocol, which draws from ideas developed in the context of private information retrieval with preprocessing, serves as the backbone for two applications of interest: laconic private set intersection (lPSI) for large universes and laconic function evaluation for RAM-programs (RAM-LFE). Based our plvOLE protocol, we provide efficient instantiations of these two primitives in the preprocessing model.

Side-channel attacks following a classical differential power analysis (DPA) style are well understood, along with the effect the mask- ing countermeasure has on them. However, simple attacks (SPA) where the target variable does not vary thanks to a known value, such as the plaintext, are less studied. In this paper, we investigate how the masking countermeasure affects the success rate of simple attacks. To this end, we provide theoretical, simulated, and practical experiments. Interestingly, we will see that masking can allow us to asymptotically recover more information on the secret than in the case of an unprotected implemen- tation, depending on the masking type. We will see that this is true for masking encodings that add non-linearity with respect to the leakages, such as arithmetic masking, while it is not for Boolean masking. We be- lieve this context provides interesting results, as the average information of arithmetic encoding is proven less informative than the Boolean one.

In this paper, we address the Byzantine Agreement problem in synchronous systems where Byzantine agents can move from process to process, corrupting their host. We focus on three representative models: \emph{Garay's}, \emph{Bonnet's} and \emph{Buhrman's} models. In \emph{Garay's model} when a process has been left by the Byzantine, it is in the \emph{cured} state and it is aware of its condition and thus can remain silent for a round to prevent the dissemination of wrong information. In \emph{Bonnet's model} a cured process may send messages (based on a state corrupted by the malicious agent), however it will behave correctly in the way it sends those messages: i.e., send messages according to the algorithm. In \emph{Buhrman's model} Byzantine agents move together with the message. It has been shown that in order to solve Byzantine Agreement in the \emph{Garay's model} at least $4t+1$ processors are needed, for \emph{Bonnet's model} at least $5t+1$ processors are needed, while for \emph{Buhrman's model} at least $3t+1$ processors are needed. In this paper we target to increase the tolerance to mobile Byzantines by integrating a trusted counter abstraction to the above models. This abstraction prevents nodes to equivocate. In the new models we prove that at least $3t+1$, respectively $4t+1$, and $2t+1$ processors are needed to tolerate $t$ mobile Byzantine agents. Furthermore, we propose novel Mobile Byzantine Agreement algorithms that match these new lower bounds for \emph{Garay's}, \emph{Bonnet's} and \emph{Buhrman's} models.

Sanitizable Signature Schemes (SSS) enable a designated party, the sanitizer, to modify predefined parts of a signed message without invalidating the signature, making them useful for applications like pseudonymization and redaction. Since their introduction by Ateniese et al. (ESORICS'05), several classical SSS constructions have been proposed, but none have been instantiated from quantum-resistant assumptions. In this work, we develop the first quantum-secure sanitizable signature schemes based on lattice assumptions. Our primary focus is on SSS constructions that rely on chameleon hash functions (CHFs), a key component for enabling the controlled modification of messages. While lattice-based CHFs exist, they do not meet the required security guarantees for SSS, becoming insecure under adversarial access to an adapt oracle. To address this, we construct a novel lattice-based CHF that achieves collision resistance even in such settings, called full collision resistance. However, our CHF lacks the uniqueness property, a limitation we show to be inherent in lattice-based CHFs. As a result, our SSS constructions initially fall short of achieving the critical security property of accountability. To overcome this, we apply a transformation based on verifiable ring signatures (VRS), for which we present the first lattice-based instantiation. Additionally, we provide a comprehensive analysis of existing classical SSS constructions, explore their potential for post-quantum instantiations, and present new attacks on previously assumed secure SSS schemes. Our work closes the gap in constructing quantum-secure SSS and lays the groundwork for further research into advanced cryptographic primitives based on lattice assumptions.

The transition to quantum-safe public-key cryptography has begun: for key agreement, NIST has standardized ML-KEM and selected HQC for future standardization. The relative immaturity of these schemes encourages crypto-agile implementations, to facilitate easy transitions between them. Intelligent crypto-agility requires efficient sharing strategies to compute operations from different cryptosystems using the same resources. This is particularly challenging for cryptosystems with distinct mathematical foundations, like lattice-based ML-KEM and code-based HQC. We introduce PHOENIX, the first crypto-agile hardware coprocessor for lattice- and code-based cryptosystems--specifically, ML-KEM and HQC, at all three NIST security levels--with an effective agile sharing strategy. PHOENIX accelerates polynomial multiplication, which is the main operation in both cryptosystems, and the current bottleneck of HQC. To maximise sharing, we replace HQC's Karatsuba-based polynomial multiplication with the Frobenius Additive FFT (FAFFT), which is similar on an abstract level to ML-KEM's Number Theoretic Transform (NTT). We show that the FAFFT already brings substantial performance improvements in software. In hardware, our sharing strategy for the FAFFT and NTT is based on a new SuperButterfly unit that seamlessly switches between these two FFT variants over completely different rings. This is, to our knowledge, the first FAFFT hardware accelerator of any kind. We have integrated PHOENIX in a real System-on-Chip FPGA scenario, where our performance measurements show that efficient crypto-agility for lattice- and code-based KEMs can be achieved with low overhead.

We give an IOPP (interactive oracle proof of proximity) for trivariate Reed-Muller codes that achieves the best known query complexity in some range of security parameters. Specifically, for degree $d$ and security parameter $\lambda\leq \frac{\log^2 d}{\log\log d}$ , our IOPP has $2^{-\lambda}$ round-by-round soundness, $O(\lambda)$ queries, $O(\log\log d)$ rounds and $O(d)$ length. This improves upon the FRI [Ben-Sasson, Bentov, Horesh, Riabzev, ICALP 2018] and the STIR [Arnon, Chiesa, Fenzi, Yogev, Crypto 2024] IOPPs for Reed-Solomon codes, that have larger query and round complexity standing at $O(\lambda \log d)$ and $O(\log d+\lambda\log\log d)$ respectively. We use our IOPP to give an IOP for the NP-complete language Rank-1-Constraint-Satisfaction with the same parameters. Our construction is based on the line versus point test in the low-soundness regime. Compared to the axis parallel test (which is used in all prior works), the general affine lines test has improved soundness, which is the main source of our improved soundness. Using this test involves several complications, most significantly that projection to affine lines does not preserve individual degrees, and we show how to overcome these difficulties. En route, we extend some existing machinery to more general settings. Specifically, we give proximity generators for Reed-Muller codes, show a more systematic way of handling "side conditions" in IOP constructions, and generalize the compiling procedure of [Arnon, Chiesa, Fenzi, Yogev, Crypto 2024] to general codes.

We show that the attribute-based signature scheme [Information Sciences, 654(2024), 119839] is insecure, because an adversary can generate valid signatures for any message even though he cannot access the signer's secret key. The four components of signature $\{\delta_1, \delta_2, \delta_3, \delta_4\}$ are not tightly bound to the target message $M$ and the signer's public key. The dependency between the signer's public key and secret key is not properly used to construct any intractable problem. The inherent flaw results in that the adversary can find an efficient signing algorithm functionally equivalent to the valid signing algorithm.

State-separating proofs are a powerful tool to structure cryptographic arguments, so that they are amenable for mechanization, as has been shown through implementations, such as SSProve. However, the treatment of separation for heaps has never been satisfactorily addressed. In this work, we present the first comprehensive treatment of nominal state separation in state-separating proofs using nominal sets. We provide a Rocq library, called Nominal-SSProve, that builds on nominal state separation supporting mechanized proofs that appear more concise and arguably more elegant.

More and more people take advantage of mobile apps to strike up relationships and casual contacts. This sometimes results in the sharing of self-generated nudes. While this opens a way for sexual exploration, it also raises concerns. In this paper, we review existing technology-assisted permissive proposals/features that provide security, privacy or accountability benefits when sharing nudes online. To do so, we performed a systematic literature review combing through 10,026 search results and cross-references, and we identified real-world solutions by surveying OS features and 52 dating, messaging and social network apps. We systematized knowledge by defining a sexting threat model, deriving a taxonomy of the proposals/features, discussing some of their shortcomings, organizing privacy-related concepts, and providing take-aways with some directions for future research and development. Our study found a very diverse ecosystem of academic proposals and app features, showing that safer sexting goes far beyond nude detection. None of the techniques represents the ultimate solution for all threats, but each contributes to a safer sexting in a different way.

The matrix code equivalence problem consists, given two matrix spaces $\mathcal{C},\mathcal{D} \subset \mathbb{F}_q^{m\times n}$ of dimension $k$, in finding invertible matrices $P\in\mathrm{GL}_m(\mathbb{F}_q)$ and $Q\in\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$ such that $\mathcal{D}=P\mathcal{C} Q^{-1}$. Recent signature schemes such as MEDS and ALTEQ relate their security to the hardness of this problem. Recent works by Narayanan, Qiao and Tang on the one hand and by Ran and Samardjiska on the other hand tackle this problem. The former is restricted to the ``cubic'' case $k = m =n$ and succeeds in $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(q^{\frac k 2})$ operations. The latter is an algebraic attack on the general problem whose complexity is not fully understood and which succeeds only on $\mathcal{O}(1/q)$ instances. We present a novel algorithm which solves the problem in the general case. Our approach consists in reducing the problem to the matrix code conjugacy problem, \emph{i.e.} the case $P=Q$. For the latter problem, similarly to the permutation code equivalence problem in Hamming metric, a natural invariant based on the \emph{Hull} of the code can be used. Next, the equivalence of codes can be deduced using a usual list collision argument. For $k=m=n$, our algorithm achieves the same time complexity as Narayanan \emph{et al.} but with a lower space complexity. Moreover, ours extends to a much broader range of parameters.

In CRYPTO 2022, Esser et al. proposed a partial key exposure attack on several post-quantum cryptographic schemes including Rainbow which is a variant of UOV. The task of the attack is to recover a full secret key from its partial information such as a secret key with symmetric/asymmetric bit errors. One of the techniques Esser et al. developed is a partial enumeration that combines the standard algorithms to solve the MQ problem with enumeration. Although an efficient attack on Rainbow was proposed, UOV and its variants have still been paid much attention since UOV and its three variants, i.e., MAYO, QR-UOV and SNOVA, were selected as the Round 2 candidates of the additional call for digital signature schemes proposal by NIST. In this paper, we analyze partial key exposure attacks on UOV, MAYO, and QR-UOV. Although our proposed attacks use the partial enumeration, we refine their enumeration strategy. We employ two enumeration strategies and analyze the complexity of the proposed attacks. Then, we find a structural difference between UOV and its variants to resist partial enumeration. Specifically, the partial enumeration is effective if the number of vinegar variables is smaller than the number of equations and the order of a finite field is small. As a result, the proposed attack is the most effective on MAYO. While our attacks on UOV and QR-UOV are effective only when the symmetric error probabilities are 0.11 and 0.05, respectively, that on MAYO is effective even when the probability is close to 0.5.

In this paper, we present efficient SNARKs for Boolean circuits, achieving significant improvements in the prover efficiency. The core of our technique is a novel tower sumcheck protocol and a tower zero-check protocol tailored for tower fields, which enable this efficiency boost. When instantiated with Wiedemann's binary tower fields with the base field of $GF(2)$ and the top-level field $GF(2^{2^\ell})$, assuming the quadratic complexity of multiplications \(O(2^{2\ell})\) in the top-level field with $2^\ell$ bits, the prover time of our sumcheck protocol is \(O(2^{1.5\ell}N)\). It is faster than the standard sumcheck protocol over the large field with the complexity of \(O(2^{2\ell}N)\). To achieve a reasonable security level, $2^\ell$ is usually set to $128$. Leveraging this advancement, we improve the efficiency of IOP protocols over the binary or small characteristic fields for Plonkish, CCS, and GKR-based constraint systems. Moreover, to further improve the prover efficiency of the SNARKs, we introduce a basis-switching mechanism that efficiently transforms polynomial evaluations on the base-field polynomial to evaluations on the tower-field polynomial. With the basis-switching, we are able to compile the binary-field IOPs to SNARKs using large-field polynomial commitment schemes (PCS) that batch the witness over the base field. The size of the large-field PCS is only $\frac{1}{2^\ell}$ of the size of the witness over the base field. Combining the IOP and the PCS, the overall prover time of our SNARKs for Boolean circuits significantly faster than the naive approach of encoding Boolean values in a large field.

An oblivious RAM (ORAM) compiler is a cryptographic tool that transforms a program $P$ running in time $n$ into an equivalent program $\tilde P$, with the property that the sequence of memory addresses read from/written to by $\tilde P$ reveal nothing about $\tilde P$'s data (Goldreich and Ostrovsky, JACM'96). An efficient ORAM compiler $C$ should achieve some combination of the following: - Low bandwidth blow-up: $\tilde P$ should read/write a similar amount of data as does P. - Low latency: $\tilde P$ should incur a similar number of roundtrips to the memory as does P. - Low space complexity: $\tilde P$ should run in as few words of local memory as possible. It is well known that for a generic compiler (i.e. one that works for any RAM program $P$), certain combinations of efficiencies are impossible. Any generic ORAM compiler must incur $\Omega(\log n)$ bandwidth blow-up, and any ORAM compiler with no latency blow-up must incur either $\Omega(\sqrt n)$ bandwidth blow-up and/or local space. Moreover, while a $O(\log n)$ bandwidth blow-up compiler is known, it requires the assumption that one-way functions exist and incurs enormous constant factors. To circumvent the above problems and improve efficiency of particular ORAM programs, we develop a compiler for a specific class of programs. Let $P$ be a program that interacts with an immutable memory. Namely, $P$ may write values to memory, then read them back, but it cannot change values that were already written. Using only information-theoretic techniques, we compile any such $P$ into an oblivious form $\tilde P$ with a combination of efficiencies that no generic ORAM compiler can achieve: - $\tilde P$ incurs $\Theta(\log n)$ amortized bandwidth blow-up. - $\tilde P$ incurs $O(1)$ amortized latency blow-up. - $\tilde P$ runs in $O(\lambda)$ words of local space ($\tilde P$ incurs an error with probability $2^{-\Omega(\lambda)}$). We show that this, for instance, implies that any pure functional program can be compiled with the same asymptotics. Our work builds on and is compatible with prior work (Appan et al., CCS'24) that showed similar results for pointer machine programs that manipulate objects with constant in-degree (i.e., the program may only maintain a constant number of pointers to any one memory cell; our immutable memory approach does not have this limitation). By combining techniques, we can consider programs that interact with a mixed memory that allows each memory cell to be updated until it is frozen, after which it becomes immutable, allowing further reads to be compiled with the above asymptotics, even when in-degree is high. Many useful algorithms/data structures can be naturally implemented as mixed memory programs, including suffix trees (powerful data structures used in computational biology) and deterministic finite automata (DFAs).

This paper formalizes the Deterministic State Machine, or DSM, as a guarded, linear, forward only, constraint based computation model. DSM does not require a blockchain, validator set, sequencer, gas market, mempool, clock based ordering rule, or global consensus layer for ordinary state evolution. State validity is determined by local verification of cryptographically precommitted candidate futures, deterministic fulfillment guards, explicit resource consumption keys, canonical encodings, signatures, and Sparse Merkle Tree commitments. The architectural shift is that finality moves from a network decision to a state property. Instead of requiring some external party, committee, sequencer, validator set, or global clock to agree that a transition happened, DSM asks whether the proposed transition consumes the committed state resource and advances it deterministically. If it does, the successor is locally realized. If it does not, it is not state. Finality is therefore not provided as a service by an ordering network; it is a consequence of the consumed resource itself. This is global realization without global ordering: local acceptance composes into a coherent realized history because incompatible histories cannot merge. The central claim is not that DSM forbids all branching at the level of precommitment. DSM explicitly permits precommitment forking. Multiple candidate futures may be prepared for a common parent, including Deterministic Limbo Vault release paths, refund paths, hash fulfillment paths, recovery paths, abort paths, contingent payment paths, CPTA token operations, offline bearer steps, and other mutually exclusive branches. The invariant is: multiple futures may be described, but for a fixed consumed resource, at most one may be realized. A resource is the thing that produces exactly one realized successor. A relationship parent, spendable object, vault generation, token balance object, source vault generation, recovery generation, or offline anchor step is a resource in this sense. Candidate branches are only possible futures. Realization consumes the resource. A generation is a logical version of a resource family. It is not a time period, not a clock interval, not a scheduling unit, and not an external ordering coordinate. Generations are ordered only by DSM derivability and resource consumption. This paper makes explicit the machinery required for that statement. Guard exclusivity is not left as convention. A DSM precommit set is valid only if its guard family is well formed. A well formed guard family gives either a deterministic branch selector, a mechanically proven exclusive guard class, or a set of branch predicates that are structurally tied to the same consumed resource. Parent consumption is modeled through canonical resource consumption keys and a consumed parent set committed by the DSM root. Branch local keys may exist for indexing or audit, but the shared resource key is what enforces linear exclusion. A hardened form of the model is also stated: for any conflict class, all conflicting candidates must resolve to an identical canonical resource consumption set, and those keys must be derived from the committed parent state rather than supplied as discretionary branch data. This removes the implementation hazard where release, refund, recovery, or policy branches accidentally consume different keys. The role of guard exclusivity is clarified. Pairwise guard exclusivity is useful and required for guard classes that claim exclusive fulfillment, but it is not the only safety mechanism. When conflicting branches share the same derived resource consumption key set, linearity alone prevents co realization even if several guards are simultaneously fulfilled. Thus the load bearing safety rule is not merely that guards should not overlap. The load bearing safety rule is that conflicting futures must fight over the same derived resource. Tripwire is formalized as the theorem that two conflicting realized successors from the same consumed resource cannot both be derivable. More precisely, conflicting candidates may be constructed or transmitted as bytes, but they cannot both validate under the DSM step predicate and cannot both go through as accepted state transitions for the same consumed resource. Forks are therefore not selected against by consensus. They are excluded by guarded realization and exposed by reconciliation if conflicting invalid bytes are presented outside the valid model. Offline bearer mode is treated as an optional mode predicate, and this revision states its corrected form. Transfer uniqueness, including offline transfer uniqueness, is a software theorem of the guarded linear kernel. An SMT committed anchor counter makes the offline origin an explicit coordinate of the committed state, every offline candidate from that origin consumes the same derived anchor step resource key, and realized history uniqueness applies without a hardware term. Hardware is thereby demoted to the one job software cannot perform: uniqueness of the physical device instance. Every offline release carries a three factor identity witness, a seed rooted DSM signature, a PUF rooted non exportable chip signature, and a partition sealed host signature over the same root advance message, and the physical monotonic counter survives only as a tracker of the SMT counter: a non rewind floor, a stale image tripwire, and an offline exposure cap. The receiver witnessed counter positioned commit of earlier drafts is superseded: a scalar counter read never binds the transition it brackets, and the binding was never needed. The safety theorems of this paper are supported by machine checked artifacts. The general key scoped fork exclusion theorems are proved in Lean 4 over an abstract guarded model, with the uniqueness and Tripwire core depending on no axioms. A companion TLA${}^{+}$ development model checks the same statements in both a per state form and a realized history form on concrete guard families, and by deliberate falsification of a malformed family confirms that guard family well formedness is load bearing. A relationship scoped model checks that same parent multi receiver forks are unconstructible in online DSM. Appendices A and B point to these artifacts. Their exact scope and boundary are stated in the Claim Boundary section.

Bitcoin script cannot easily access and store state information onchain without an upgrade such as BIP-347 (OP_CAT); this makes performing general (stateful) computation on Bitcoin impossible to do directly. Despite this limitation, several approaches have been proposed to bypass it, with BitVM being the closest to production. BitVM enables fraud-proof-based computation on Bitcoin, relying on a $1$-out-of-$n$ honesty assumption. This left the question of whether it is possible to achieve computation under the same honesty assumption without requiring onlookers to ensure validity through fraud proofs. In this note, we answer this question affirmatively by introducing ColliderVM, a new approach for performing computation on Bitcoin today. Crucially, this approach eliminates some capital inefficiency concerns stemming from reliance on fraud proofs. For our construction, a key point is to replace the Lamport or Winternitz signature-based storage component in contemporary protocols with a hash collision-based commitment. Our techniques are inspired by ColliderScript, but are more efficient, reducing the number of hash evaluations required by at least $\times 10000$. With it, we estimate that the Bitcoin script length for STARK proof verification becomes nearly practical, allowing it to be used alongside other, pairing-based proof systems common today in applications.

Secure graph processing enables computing on graphs while hiding the graph topology as well as the associated node/edge data. This facilitates collaborative analysis among multiple data owners, who may only hold a private, partial view of the global graph. Several works address this problem using the technique of secure multiparty computation (MPC) in the presence of 2 or 3 parties. However, when moving to the multiparty setting, as required for collaborative analysis among multiple data owners, the existing solutions are no longer scalable. Specifically, the runtime of the state-of-the-art scales linearly with the number of parties. Additionally, it has an expensive initialisation phase, which requires secure sorting operations known to be expensive in MPC. Thus, we propose $\mathsf{GraSP}$, a generic framework for secure graph processing that improves efficiency and scalability for the multiparty setting. Further, $\mathsf{GraSP}$ is designed to have a lightweight initialisation, which eliminates the need for secure sorting. Unlike any of the prior works, achieving a round complexity in MPC that is independent of the number of parties is what makes $\mathsf{GraSP}$ scalable. Finally, we implement and benchmark the performance of $\mathsf{GraSP}$ for the application of PageRank computation and showcase its efficiency and scalability improvements over the state-of-the-art. Concretely, we witness improvements of up to $78\times$ in runtime in comparison to the state-of-the-art. Further, we observe that $\mathsf{GraSP}$ takes under a minute to perform 10 iterations of PageRank on a graph of size $10^6$ that is distributed among $25$ data owners, making it highly practical for secure graph processing in the multiparty setting.

In this article, we present for the first time a cross-core Prime+Probe attack on ARM TrustZone, which bypasses the AutoLock mechanism. We introduce our simulation- driven methodology based on gem5 for vulnerability analysis. We demonstrate its utility in reverse engineering a SoC platform in order to study its microarchitectural behavior (caches, etc.), inside a simulator, in spite of hardware protection. We present a novel vulnerability analysis technique, which takes into account the cache set occupancy for targeted victim executable. This proves to be essential in identifying information leakage in presence of AutoLock. The above tool also identifies the cache lines leaking a maximum amount of information. A cross-core Prime+Probe attack is then mounted on these max-leakage cache lines both in simulation for fine-tuning, and in real hardware. We validate our analysis and attack method on OP-TEE, an open-source trusted execution environment running on RockPi4 a board based on RK3399 SoC. More specifically we target the RSA subroutine in the MbedTLS library used inside OP-TEE. Despite the presence of AutoLock, multiplier obfuscation, and assuming a cross-core attack, we are able to retrieve 30% of the key bits, which can later be used in Branch-and-Prune methods to recover the full key.

The Ethereum Global Network (EGN) is the peer-to-peer (P2P) network underlying Ethereum and thousands of subsequent blockchain services. Deviating from traditional single-service P2P networks, EGN's multi-service architecture has gained widespread acceptance for supposedly improving node discovery efficiency and security. This paper challenges this belief by critically examining EGN's design and its purported benefits. Our analysis reveals significant shortcomings in EGN's node discovery process. EGN nodes struggle to connect with peers offering the desired service: over three-quarters of connection attempts reach nodes of other services. In an extreme case, one node spent an average of $45\,908$ connection attempts to find each neighbor. Moreover, this blended architecture compromises EGN's security. The network demonstrates high susceptibility to DHT pollution and partition attacks. Even with only $300$ malicious nodes in EGN, an attacker can isolate thousands of nodes, significantly hindering recovery. In contrast, such a small number of malicious nodes has minimal impact on every single-service P2P network. We propose solutions to improve EGN's node discovery efficiency and strengthen its resilience against attacks.

The Titanic was the ship that "could not sink," fortunately its designers installed lifeboats (not enough) despite having no logical grounding for this waste of space and material. It was out of respect for unforeseen surprises. NIST-Post Quantum Ciphers represent the best and the brightest in world crypto intelligence. They are certified as good for their purpose. And likely so, alas, not surely so. If we could find a crypto equivalent for the Titanic Lifeboats, should not we load them up for our journey? Indeed, pattern-devoid cryptography is the crypto equivalent of the lifeboats that mitigated the Titanic disaster. Pattern-Devoid cryptography (PDC) may be deemed inelegant, inconvenient, and bloated, but it will hold up against quantum computers more powerful than expected, and more importantly, it will hold up against adversarial mathematical talent greater than expected. Which is why we should put up with its negatives, and install it just in case the Titanic story repeats itself in cyberspace. This article elaborates on this proposition.

In lattice-based cryptography, many attacks are performed by finding a short enough vector on a specific lattice. However, it is possible that length is not the only restriction on the vector to be found. A typical example is SVP with infinity norm: since most SVP solving algorithms only aim to find short vector under Euclidean norm, the infinity norm is in fact another restriction on the vector. In the literature, such problems are usually solved by performing exhaustive search on a list of short vectors generated from lattice sieving. However, the sieving list might either be too large or too small to pass the additional restriction, which makes the solving algorithm inefficient in some cases. Our contribution in this work is as follows: (1) We formally define a new lattice hard problem called restricted SVP, and show that it can be used to generalize many lattice hard problems, including SVP with non-Euclidean norm and Kannan's embedding on approximate CVP. (2) We extend the dimension for free technique and the enumerate-then-slice technique into approximate SVP where the goal is to output a list of short vectors with a certain size. (3) We give the heuristic algorithm for solving restricted SVP, and design a hardness estimator for this algorithm, which can be used to estimate the concrete hardness of signature forgery in Dilithium and other lattice-based signatures. Using this estimator, we present a concrete security analysis for Dilithium against signature forgery under the gate-count model for the first time. Our estimation matches well with the security estimation from core-SVP model in the document of Dilithium, and we also combine our estimator with the rescaling technique to generate a tighter estimation.

Key-exfiltration attacks on cryptographic keys are a significant threat to computer security. One proposed defense against such attacks is big-key cryptography which seeks to make cryptographic secrets so large that it is infeasible for an adversary to exfiltrate the key (without being detected). However, this also introduces an inconvenience to the user who must now store the large key on all of their different devices. The work of Döttling, Garg, Sekar and Wang (TCC 2022) introduces an elegant solution to this problem in the form of big-key identity-based encryption (IBE). Here, there is a large master secret key, but very short identity keys. The user can now store the large master secret key as her long-term key, and can provision each of her devices with short ephemeral identity keys (say, corresponding to the current date). In this way, the long-term secret key is protected by conventional big-key cryptography, while the user only needs to distribute short ephemeral keys to their different devices. Döttling et al. introduce and construct big-key IBE from standard pairing-based assumptions. However, their scheme only satisfies selective security where the adversary has to declare its challenge set of identities at the beginning of the security game. The more natural notion of security is adaptive security where the user can adaptively choose which identities it wants to challenge after seeing the public parameters (and part of the master secret key). In this work, we give the first adaptively-secure construction of big-key IBE from standard cryptographic assumptions. Our first construction relies on indistinguishability obfuscation (and one-way functions), while our second construction relies on witness encryption for NP together with standard pairing-based assumptions (i.e., the SXDH assumption). To prove adaptive security, we show how to implement the classic dual-system methodology with indistinguishability obfuscation as well as witness encryption.

Abstract The Singularity Random Number Generator (SRNG) represents a groundbreaking advancement in the generation of random numbers by integrating two key properties - computational irreducibility and seed independence - into a deterministic algorithm. Unlike conventional pseudorandom number generators (PRNGs) whose randomness is intrinsically linked to seed quality or chaotic sensitivity, SRNG transforms even low-entropy seeds into complex, unpredictable outputs. SRNG demonstrates high-quality randomness can emerge independently of seed entropy or size. This paper explores how SRNG not only challenges classical paradigms of predictability in deterministic systems but also offers transformative applications in cryptography, artificial intelligence (AI), and interdisciplinary research. Furthermore, by drawing parallels with cognitive variability research - such as insights from the Forbes article “Why A ‘Productively Distracted’ Brain Is A Superpower” - we discuss how the emergent unpredictability of SRNG may contribute to enhanced adaptive learning and decision-making processes in AI systems. Ultimately, SRNG is presented as a model that bridges the realms of science and mystery, inviting a new understanding of randomness and the limits of scientific inquiry, thereby expanding the frontiers of interdisciplinary research.

In 2012, the Tor project expressed the need to upgrade Tor’s onion encryption scheme to protect against tagging attacks and thereby strengthen its end-to-end integrity protection. Tor proposal 261, where each encryption layer is processed by a strongly secure, yet relatively expensive tweakable wide-block cipher, is the only concrete candidate replacement to be backed by formal, yet partial, security proofs (Degabriele and Stam, EUROCRYPT 2018, and Rogaway and Zhang, PoPETS 2018). We identify the functionality and security desiderata for Tor’s onion encryption, and propose an alternative onion encryption scheme, called Counter Galois Onion (CGO), that follows a minimalistic, modular design and includes several improvements over proposal 261. CGO’s underlying primitive is an updatable tweakable split-domain cipher accompanied with a new security notion, that augments the recently introduced rugged pseudorandom permutation (Degabriele and Karadžić, CRYPTO 2022). Thus, we relax the security compared to a tweakable wide-block cipher, allowing for more efficient designs. We show that our security notion for updatable tweakable split-domain ciphers successfully hybridizes, which allows us to argue informally that CGO meets the full security requirements. Finally, we suggest a concrete instantiation for the updatable tweakable split-domain cipher, called UIV+, prove its security, and benchmark our full CGO scheme against Tor’s existing onion encryption scheme, demonstrating a clear performance gain at the proxy and at exit and entry routers, at the expense of a mild slowdown at intermediate routers.

The module-lattice-based digital signature standard, formerly known as CRYSTALS-DILITHIUM, is a lattice-based post-quantum cryptographic scheme. In August 2024, the National Institute of Standards and Technology officially standardized ML-DSA under FIPS 204. ML-DSA generates one valid signature and multiple rejected signatures during a single signing process. Most side-channel attacks targeting ML-DSA have focused solely on the valid signature, while largely neglecting the hints contained in rejected signatures. Building on prior SASCA frameworks originally proposed for ML-DSA, in this paper we present an efficient and fully practical instantiation of a private-key recovery attack on ML-DSA that jointly exploits side-channel leakages from both valid and rejected signatures within a unified factor graph. This concrete instantiation maximizes the information extracted from a single signing attempt and minimizes the number of required traces for full key recovery. We conducted a proof-of-concept experiment with both reference and ASM-optimized implementations on a Cortex-M4 core chip, where the results demonstrate that incorporating rejected signatures reduces the required number of traces by at least $50.0\%$ for full key recovery. Moreover, we show that using only rejected signatures suffices to recover the key with fewer than $30$ traces under our setup. Our findings highlight that protecting rejected signatures is crucial, as their leakage provides valuable side-channel information. We strongly recommend implementing countermeasures for rejected signatures during the signing process to mitigate potential threats.

Homomorphic Encryption (HE) enables computation on encrypted data while preserving privacy. We explore its application in the multi-party setting, where data is stored in the cloud under several distinct keys. For $n$ parties, Multi-Key HE (MKHE) supports such scenarios but incurs $O(n)$ space and computational overhead, making it impractical for large-scale use. Conversely, Multi-Party HE (MPHE) achieves constant $O(1)$ overhead but is typically limited by a static group structure: ciphertexts are traditionally tied to a fixed set of parties, which poses challenges for dynamically joining new members or reusing existing ciphertexts for different party sets. To address these limitations, we first construct a Dynamic MPHE (dMPHE) scheme that allows new parties to join, while the original parties are not required to remain online. Our construction bridges the gap between existing MPHE and MKHE frameworks while achieving superior efficiency compared to prior dynamic MPHE attempts. Building on this, we introduce Reusable Dynamic MPHE (rdMPHE), a new primitive that simultaneously supports dynamicity and ciphertext reusability. We implement both schemes based on the RLWE assumption. Our analyzes and experiments demonstrate that rdMPHE maintains $O(1)$ efficiency while overcoming the scalability and static constraints of previous MKHE and MPHE. To support open research, our code has been made publicly available.

The Middle-Product Learning with Errors (MPLWE) assumption is a variant of the Learning with Errors (LWE) assumption. The MPLWE assumption reduces the key size of corresponding LWE-based schemes by setting keys as sets of polynomials. Moreover, MPLWE has more robust security than other LWE variants such as Ring-LWE and Module-LWE. Lombardi et al. proposed an identity-based encryption (IBE) scheme (LVV-IBE) based on the MPLWE assumption in the random oracle model (ROM) by following Gentry et al.'s IBE scheme (GPV-IBE) based on LWE. Due to the benefit of MPLWE, LVV-IBE has a shorter master public key and a secret key than GPV-IBE without changing the size of a ciphertext. However, Lombardi et al.'s proof is not tight in the ROM, while Katsumata et al. proved that GPV-IBE achieves tight adaptive anonymity in the quantum ROM (QROM). Revocable IBE (RIBE) is a variant of IBE supporting a key revocation mechanism to remove malicious users from the system. Takayasu proposed the most efficient RIBE scheme (Takayasu-RIBE) based on LWE achieving tight adaptive anonymity in the QROM. Although a concrete RIBE scheme based on MPLWE has not been proposed, we can construct a scheme (LVV-based RIBE) by applying Ma and Lin's generic transformation to LVV-IBE. Due to the benefit of MPLWE, LVV-based RIBE has an asymptotically shorter master public key and a shorter secret key than Takayasu-RIBE although the former has a larger ciphertext than the latter. Moreover, the security proof is not tight and anonymous in the ROM due to security proofs of Ma-Lin and Lombardi et al. In this paper, we propose a concrete RIBE scheme based on MPLWE. Compared with the above RIBE schemes, the proposed RIBE scheme is the most asymptotically efficient since the sizes of a master public key and a secret key (resp. ciphertext) of the proposed scheme are the same as those of LVV-based RIBE scheme (resp. Takayasu-RIBE). Moreover, we prove the tight adaptive anonymity of the proposed RIBE scheme in the QROM. For this purpose, we also prove the tight adaptive anonymity of LVV-IBE in the QROM.

Know Your Customer (KYC) is a core component of the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) framework, designed to prevent illicit activities within financial systems. However, enforcing KYC and AML on blockchains remains challenging due to difficulties in establishing accountability and preserving user privacy. This study proposes REGKYC, a privacy-preserving Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) framework that balances user privacy with externally mandated KYC and AML requirements. REGKYC leverages a structured ABAC model to support the flexible verification of KYC attributes and the enforcement of compliance policies, providing benefits to multiple stakeholders. First, it enables legitimate users to meet compliance requirements while preserving the privacy of their on-chain activities. Second, it empowers Crypto-asset Service Providers (CASPs) to tailor compliance policies to operational needs, ensuring adaptability to evolving regulations. Finally, it enhances regulatory accountability by enabling authorized deanonymization of malicious actors. We hope this work inspires future research to harmonize user privacy and regulatory compliance in blockchain systems.

Yao's garbled circuits have received huge attention in both theory and practice. While garbled circuits can be constructed using minimal assumption (i.e., the existence of pseudorandom functions or one-way functions), the state-of-the-art constructions (e.g., Rosulek-Roy, Crypto 2021) are based on stronger assumptions. In particular, the ``Free-XOR'' technique (Kolesnikov-Schneider, ICALP 2008) is essential in these state-of-the-art constructions, and their security can only be proven in the random oracle model, or rely on the ``circular-correlation robust hash'' assumption. In this paper, we aim to develop new techniques to construct efficient garbling schemes using minimal assumptions. Instead of generically replacing the Free-XOR technique, we focus on garbling schemes for specific functionalities. We successfully eliminated the need for Free-XOR in several state-of-the-art schemes, including the one-hot garbling (Heath and Kolesnikov, CCS 2021) and the garbled pseudorandom functions, and the garbled lookup tables (Heath, Kolesnikov and Ng, Eurocrypt 2024). Our schemes are based on minimal assumptions, i.e., standard pseudorandom functions (PRFs)---we resolved the need for circular security. The performance of our scheme is almost as efficient as the best results except for a small constant factor. Namely, for any lookup table $\{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}^m$, our scheme takes $n + (5n+9)m\lambda + 2^n \cdot m$ bits of communication, where $\lambda$ is the security parameter of PRF.

The GCM authenticated encryption (AE) scheme is one of the most widely used AE schemes in the world, while it suffers from risk of nonce misuse, short message length per encryption and an insufficient level of security. The goal of this paper is to design new AE schemes achieving stronger provable security in the standard model and accepting longer nonces (or providing nonce misuse resistance), with the design rationale behind GCM. As a result, we propose two enhanced variants of GCM and GCM-SIV, dubbed eGCM and eGCM-SIV, respectively. eGCM and eGCM-SIV are built on top of a new CENC-type encryption mode, dubbed eCTR: using 2n-bit counters, eCTR enjoys beyond-birthday-bound security without significant loss of efficiency. eCTR is combined with an almost uniform and almost universal hash function, yielding a variable input-length variable output-length pseudorandom function, dubbed HteC. GCM and GCM-SIV are constructed using eCTR and HteC as building blocks. eGCM and eGCM-SIV accept nonces of arbitrary length, and provide almost the full security (namely, n-bit security when they are based on an n-bit block cipher) for a constant maximum input length, under the assumption that the underlying block cipher is a pseudorandom permutation (PRP). Their efficiency is also comparable to GCM in terms of the rate and the overall speed.

Conventional Publicly Verifiable Secret Sharing (PVSS) protocols allow a dealer to share a secret among $n$ parties without interaction, ensuring that any $t + 1$ parties (where $t+1 \le n$) can recover the secret, while anyone can publicly verify the validity of both the individual shares and the reconstructed secret. PVSS schemes are shown to be a key tool in a wide range of practical applications. In this paper, we introduce Pre-constructed PVSS (PPVSS), an extension of standard PVSS schemes, highlighting its enhanced utility and efficiency in various protocols. Unlike standard PVSS, PPVSS requires the dealer to publish a commitment or encryption of the main secret and incorporates a novel secret reconstruction method. We show that these refinements make PPVSS more practical and versatile than conventional PVSS schemes. To build a PPVSS scheme, we first point out that the well-known PVSS scheme by Schoenmakers (CRYPTO'99) and its pairing-based variant presented by Heidarvand and Villar (SAC'08) can be seen as special cases of PPVSS, where the dealer also publishes a commitment to the main secret. However, these protocols are not practical for many applications due to efficiency limitations and are less flexible compared to a standard PPVSS scheme. To address this, we propose a general strategy for transforming a Shamir-based PVSS scheme into a PPVSS scheme. Using this strategy, we construct two practical PPVSS schemes in both the Random Oracle (RO) and plain models, grounded in state-of-the-art PVSS designs. Leveraging the new RO-based PPVSS scheme, we revisit some applications and present more efficient variants. Notably, we propose a new universally verifiable e-voting protocol that improves on the alternative scheme by Schoenmakers (CRYPTO'99), reducing the verification complexity with $m$ voters from $O(n^2m)$ to $O(nm)$ exponentiations--a previously unattainable goal with standard PVSS schemes. Our implementation results demonstrate that both our proposed PPVSS schemes and the new universally verifiable e-voting protocol significantly outperform existing alternatives in terms of efficiency.

At CRYPTO 2015, Kirchner and Fouque claimed that a carefully tuned variant of the Blum-Kalai-Wasserman (BKW) algorithm (JACM 2003) should solve the Learning with Errors problem (LWE) in slightly subexponential time for modulus $q=\mathrm{poly}(n)$ and narrow error distribution, when given enough LWE samples. Taking a modular view, one may regard BKW as a combination of Wagner's algorithm (CRYPTO 2002), run over the corresponding dual problem, and the Aharonov-Regev distinguisher (JACM 2005). Hence the subexponential Wagner step alone should be of interest for solving this dual problem - namely, the Short Integer Solution problem (SIS) - but this appears to be undocumented so far. We re-interpret this Wagner step as walking backward through a chain of projected lattices, zigzagging through some auxiliary superlattices. We further randomize the bucketing step using Gaussian randomized rounding to exploit the powerful discrete Gaussian machinery. This approach avoids sample amplification and turns Wagner's algorithm into an approximate discrete Gaussian sampler for $q$-ary lattices. For an SIS lattice with $n$ equations modulo $q$, this algorithm runs in subexponential time $\exp(O(n/\log \log n))$ to reach a Gaussian width parameter $s = q/\mathrm{polylog}(n)$ only requiring $m = n + \omega(n/\log \log n)$ many SIS variables. This directly provides a provable algorithm for solving the Short Integer Solution problem in the infinity norm ($\mathrm{SIS}^\infty$) for norm bounds $\beta = q/\mathrm{polylog}(n)$. This variant of SIS underlies the security of the NIST post-quantum cryptography standard Dilithium. Despite its subexponential complexity, Wagner's algorithm does not appear to threaten Dilithium's concrete security.

Federated Learning (FL) has become a crucial framework for collaboratively training Machine Learning (ML) models while ensuring data privacy. Traditional synchronous FL approaches, however, suffer from delays caused by slower clients (called stragglers), which hinder the overall training process. Specifically, in a synchronous setting, model aggregation happens once all the intended clients have submitted their local updates to the server. To address these inefficiencies, Buffered Asynchronous FL (BAsyncFL) was introduced, allowing clients to update the global model as soon as they complete local training. In such a setting, the new global model is obtained once the buffer is full, thus removing synchronization bottlenecks. Despite these advantages, existing Secure Aggregation (SA) techniques—designed to protect client updates from inference attacks—rely on synchronized rounds, making them unsuitable for asynchronous settings. In this paper, we present Buffalo, the first practical SA protocol tailored for BAsyncFL. Buffalo leverages lattice-based encryption to handle scalability challenges in large ML models and introduces a new role, the assistant, to support the server in securely aggregating client updates. To protect against an actively corrupted server, we enable clients to verify that their local updates have been correctly integrated into the global model. Our comprehensive evaluation—incorporating theoretical analysis and real-world experiments on benchmark datasets—demonstrates that Buffalo is an efficient and scalable privacy-preserving solution in BAsyncFL environments.

Formal methods are becoming an important tool for ensuring correctness and security of cryptographic constructions. However, the support for certain advanced proof techniques, namely rewinding, is scarce among existing verification frameworks, which hinders their application to complex schemes such as multi-party signatures and zero-knowledge proofs. We expand the support for rewinding in EasyCrypt by implementing a version of the general forking lemma by Bellare and Neven. We demonstrate its usability by proving EUF-CMA security of Schnorr signatures.

Data analytics is a powerful tool for uncovering patterns and generating insights. However, once a claim is made based on data analysis, its audience must either trust the analyst or re-execute the analysis (often on private or proprietary data) to verify its correctness. This reliance raises significant concerns about transparency and trust in the analytics process. Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs), a cryptographic technique, offer a principled solution by enabling analysts to produce proofs of correctness without revealing the underlying data. This paradigm, known as verifiable computation, allows any verifier to check the validity of the analysis result solely from the proof. In this paper, we introduce Zinnia, a expressive and efficient ZKP framework designed for general-purpose data analytics. Zinnia provides a high-level domain-specific language (DSL) for encoding analytics workflows and a symbolic execution engine that reasons about the programs and compiles them into optimized ZKP circuits. Together, these components support rich language features such as data-dependent control flow (e.g., dynamic loops, recursion, early exits), real-valued arithmetic, non-linear functions and multidimensional array manipulations. We evaluate Zinnia's usability through real-world case studies and a user study, and benchmark its performance across diverse analytics tasks. Zinnia achieves up to $5.8\times$ speedup over zkVMs and produces ZKP circuits that are $19.3\%$ smaller than those generated by existing zero-knowledge programming languages.

Password-Authenticated Key Exchange (PAKE) establishes a secure channel between two parties who share a password. Asymmetric PAKE is a variant of PAKE, where one party stores a hash of the password to preserve security under the situation that the party is compromised. The security of PAKE and asymmetric PAKE is often analyzed in the framework of universal composability (UC). Abdalla et al. (CRYPTO '20) relaxed the UC security of PAKE and showed that the relaxed security still guarantees reasonable properties. This relaxation makes it possible to prove the security in the UC framework for several PAKE protocols. In this paper, we propose a relaxed functionality of asymmetric PAKE by following the approach of Abdalla et al. We prove that the SPAKE2+ protocol UC-realizes this functionality. We also define a more relaxed functionality and prove that a variant of the AuCPace protocol UC-realizes it.

Embedded devices can be exposed to a wide range of attacks. Some classes of attacks can be mitigated using security features or dedicated countermeasures. Examples include Trusted Execution Environments, and masking countermeasures against physical side-channel attacks. However, a system that incorporates such secure components is not automatically a secure system. Partial Key Overwrite attacks are one class of attacks that specifically target the interface between different components of the security system. These attacks may allow an adversary to extract otherwise protected cryptographic keys through careful manipulation of memory-mapped registers. So far this powerful class of attacks has received little attention in the academic literature. In this work, we provide an overview of known Partial Key Overwrite vulnerabilities and how they were used in real-world attacks. Additionally, we evaluated 31 common microcontrollers and embedded microprocessors from eleven distinct vendors and detail our findings. Based on a first high-level evaluation we selected 15 SoCs and performed an in-depth evaluation. This evaluation revealed that at least eight of these SoCs are vulnerable to partial key overwrite attacks.

Issuing tokens on Bitcoin remains a highly sought-after goal, driven by its market dominance and robust security. However, Bitcoin's limited on-chain storage and functionality pose significant challenges. Among the various approaches to token issuance on Bitcoin, client-side validation (CSV) has emerged as a prominent solution. CSV delegates data storage and functionalities beyond Bitcoin’s native capabilities to off-chain clients, while leveraging the blockchain to validate tokens and prevent double-spending. Nevertheless, these protocols require participants to maintain token ownership and transactional data, rendering them vulnerable to data loss and malicious data withholding. In this paper, we propose UTxO binding, a novel framework that achieves both robust data availability and enhanced functionality compared to existing CSV designs. This approach securely binds a Bitcoin UTxO, which prevents double-spending, to a UTxO on an auxiliary blockchain, providing data storage and programmability. We formally prove its security and implement our design using Nervos CKB as the auxiliary blockchain.

The Nintendo DSi is a handheld gaming console released by Nintendo in 2008. In Nintendo's line-up the DSi served as a successor to the DS and was later succeeded by the 3DS. The security systems of both the DS and 3DS have been fully analysed and defeated. However, for over 14 years the security systems of the Nintendo DSi remained standing and had not been fully analysed. To that end this work builds on existing research and demonstrates the use of a second-order fault injection attack to extract the ROM bootloaders stored in the custom system-on-chip used by the DSi. We analyse the effect of the induced fault and compare it to theoretical fault models. Additionally, we present a security analysis of the extracted ROM bootloaders and develop a modchip using cheap off-the-shelf components. The modchip allows to jailbreak the console, but more importantly allows to resurrect consoles previously assumed irreparable.

Uncertified DAG-based BFT protocols, such as Mysticeti and Cordial Miners, achieve state-of-the-art latency by eliminating per-block quorum certificates. However, they have lacked rigorous liveness proofs, and recent work has demonstrated explicit desynchronization attacks where honest parties fail to commit leaders after Global Stabilization Time (GST). We present Starfish, an uncertified DAG-based BFT protocol that closes this gap with a new Push pacemaker. This mechanism ensures party synchronization after GST by requiring parties to create their own blocks before advancing rounds and introducing a safe “catch-up” condition for slow parties. To address scalability, Starfish decouples payload from metadata: block headers carry only commitments to Reed-Solomon-encoded fragments, and data availability is certified directly on the DAG via Data Availability Certificates (DACs). This achieves order-optimal worst-case linear payload communication while increasing sequencing latency by only one round. We further propose Starfish-L, combining multi-signatures with a Lazy-Push pacemaker to reduce metadata communication from quartic to cubic in the worst case and quadratic in the happy case. Applying these techniques to Mysticeti yields Mysticeti-L, which matches Mysticeti's low latency while achieving quadratic metadata and linear payload communication costs in the happy case. Finally, we provide full safety and liveness proofs and derive latency bounds in terms of the actual message delay.

Fruit-F is a lightweight short-state stream cipher designed by Ghafari et al. The authors designed this version of the cipher, after earlier versions of the cipher viz. Fruit 80/v2 succumbed to correlation attacks. The primary motivation behind this design seemed to be preventing correlation attacks. Fruit-F has a Grain-like structure with two state registers of size 50 bits each. In addition, the cipher uses an 80-bit secret key and an 80-bit IV. The authors use a complex key-derivation function to update the non-linear register which prevents the same key-bit alignment across fixed-length window of keystream bits, which is essentially what stops the correlation attacks. In this paper, we first present two attacks against Fruit-F. The first attack stems from the fact that the key-derivation can be rewritten as the Boolean xor of two key-dependent terms one of which is the Boolean OR of two bits of the key. Using this we show that the cipher does not offer 80-bit security: the effective key space of Fruit-F is slightly less than $2^{80}$, i.e. a simple brute force attack costs around $2^{80}-2^{49}$ time. The second is a differential attack using the cipher's complex initialization process. We show that under some given conditions, it is possible to have two initial vectors $V_1$ and $V_2$ that produce identical keystream vectors with any given key. Using this as a distinguisher, it is possible to collect enough linear and quadratic equations of the secret key to find it in practical time with very few keystream bits.

We demonstrate an attack on the soundness of a widely known optimization of the Gemini multilinear Polynomial Commitment Scheme (PCS). The attack allows a malicious prover to falsely claim that a multilinear polynomial takes a value of their choice, for any input point. We stress that the original Gemini multilinear PCS and HyperKZG, an adaptation of Gemini, are not affected by the attack.

Both masking and shuffling are very common software countermeasures against side-channel attacks. However, exploring possible combinations of the two countermeasures to increase and fine-tune side-channel resilience is less investigated. With this work, we aim to bridge that gap by both concretising the security guarantees of several masking and shuffling combinations presented in earlier work and additionally investigating their randomness cost. We subsequently implement these approaches to also analyse their performance. In this context, we present five different protected implementations of the new standard for lightweight cryptography, Ascon, on a 32-bit RISC-V architecture: A 3rd-order masked, unshuffled implementation and three combined 3rd-order masked and shuffled implementations. Additionally, we present a levelled implementation where only the particularly vulnerable keyed initialisation and finalisation of the permutation are masked and shuffled, while the rest is only shuffled. To further improve the security and performance of our implementations we make use of the Probe Isolating Non-Interference (PINI) masked AND gadget, coupled with techniques like bit-slicing and bit-interleaving. Utilising benchmarking and an MI-shortcut security analysis, we pinpoint the best masking-shuffling combinations that maximize security at reasonable overheads.

Since the selection of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) standardization algorithms, research on integrating PQC into security protocols such as TLS/SSL, IPSec, and DNSSEC has been actively pursued. However, PQC migration for Internet of Things (IoT) communication protocols remains largely unexplored. Embedded devices in IoT environments have limited computational power and memory, making it crucial to optimize PQC algorithms for efficient computation and minimal memory usage when deploying them on low-spec IoT devices. In this paper, we introduce KEM-MQTT, a lightweight and efficient Key Encapsulation Mechanism (KEM) for the Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) protocol, widely used in IoT environments. Our approach applies the NIST KEM algorithm Crystals-Kyber (Kyber) while leveraging MQTT’s characteristics and sensor node constraints. To enhance efficiency, we address certificate verification issues and adopt KEMTLS to eliminate the need for Post-Quantum Digital Signatures Algorithm (PQC-DSA) in mutual authentication. As a result, KEM-MQTT retains its lightweight properties while maintaining the security guarantees of TLS 1.3. We identify inefficiencies in existing Kyber implementations on 8-bit AVR microcontrollers (MCUs), which are highly resource-constrained. To address this, we propose novel implementation techniques that optimize Kyber for AVR, focusing on high-speed execution, reduced memory consumption, and secure implementation, including Signed LookUp-Table (LUT) Reduction. Our optimized Kyber achieves performance gains of 81%,75%, and 85% in the KeyGen, Encaps, and DeCaps processes, respectively, compared to the reference implementation. With approximately 3 KB of stack usage, our Kyber implementation surpasses all state-of-the-art Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) implementations. Finally, in KEM-MQTT using Kyber-512, an 8-bit AVR device completes the handshake preparation process in 4.32 seconds, excluding the physical transmission and reception times.

We show that the certificateless authentication scheme [Mob. Networks Appl. 2022, 27, 346-356] fails to keep anonymity, not as claimed. The scheme neglects the basic requirement for bit-wise XOR, and tries to encrypt data by the operator. The negligence results in some trivial equalities. The adversary can retrieve the user's identity from one captured string via the open channel.

Current hardware security verification processes predominantly rely on manual threat modeling and test plan generation, which are labor-intensive, error-prone, and struggle to scale with increasing design complexity and evolving attack methodologies. To address these challenges, we propose ThreatLens, an LLM-driven multi-agent framework that automates security threat modeling and test plan generation for hardware security verification. ThreatLens integrates retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to extract relevant security knowledge, LLM-powered reasoning for threat assessment, and interactive user feedback to ensure the generation of practical test plans. By automating these processes, the framework reduces the manual verification effort, enhances coverage, and ensures a structured, adaptable approach to security verification. We evaluated our framework on the NEORV32 SoC, demonstrating its capability to automate security verification through structured test plans and validating its effectiveness in real-world scenarios.

Deep learning-based side-channel analysis has become a popular and powerful option for side-channel attacks in recent years. One of the main directions that the side-channel community explores is how to design efficient architectures that can break the targets with as little as possible attack traces, but also how to consistently build such architectures. In this work, we explore the usage of the JumpReLU activation function, which was designed to improve the robustness of neural networks. Intuitively speaking, improving the robustness seems a natural requirement for side-channel analysis, as hiding countermeasures could be considered adversarial attacks. In our experiments, we explore three strategies: 1) exchanging the activation functions with JumpReLU at the inference phase, training common side-channel architectures with JumpReLU, and 3) conducting hyperparameter search with JumpReLU as the activation function. While the first two options do not yield improvements in results (but also do not show worse performance), the third option brings advantages, especially considering the number of neural networks that break the target. As such, we conclude that using JumpReLU is a good option to improve the stability of attack results.

In this paper, we present a side-channel attack on the hardware AES accelerator of a Bluetooth chip used in millions of devices worldwide, ranging from wearables and smart home products to industrial IoT. The attack leverages information about AES computations unintentionally transmitted by the chip together with RF signals to recover the encryption key. Unlike traditional side-channel attacks that rely on power or near-field electromagnetic emissions as sources of information, RF-based attacks leave no evidence of tampering, as they do not require package removal, chip decapsulation, or additional soldered components. However, side-channel emissions extracted from RF signals are considerably weaker and noisier, necessitating more traces for key recovery. The presented profiled machine learning-assisted attack can recover the full encryption key from 90,000 traces captured at a one-meter distance from the target device, with each trace being an average of 10,000 samples per encryption. This is a twofold improvement over the correlation analysis-based attack on the same AES accelerator.

Content-defined chunking (CDC) algorithms split streams of data into smaller blocks, called chunks, in a way that preserves chunk boundaries when the data is partially changed. CDC is ubiquitous in applications that deduplicate data such as backup solutions, software patching systems, and file hosting platforms. Much like compression, CDC can introduce leakage when combined with encryption: fingerprinting attacks can exploit chunk length patterns to infer information about the data. To address these risks, many systems—mainly in the cloud backup setting—have developed bespoke mitigations by mixing a cryptographic key into the chunking process. We study these keyed CDC (KCDC) schemes “in the wild”, presenting efficient key recovery attacks against five different KCDC schemes, deployed in the backup solutions Borg, Bupstash, Duplicacy, Restic, and Tarsnap. Our attacks are in a realistic threat model that relies only on weak known or chosen-plaintext capabilities. This shows, in particular, that they fail to protect against fingerprinting attacks. To demonstrate practical exploitability, we also present “end-to-end” attacks on three complete encrypted backup applications, namely Borg, Restic and Tarsnap. These build on our attacks on the underlying KCDC schemes. In an effort to tackle these problems, we introduce the first formal treatment for KCDC schemes and propose a provably secure construction that fulfills a strong notion of security. We benchmark our construction against existing (broken) approaches, showing that it has competitive performance. In doing so, we take a step towards making real-world systems that rely on KCDC more resilient to attacks.

Succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (SNARK) is a powerful cryptographic primitive with diverse real-world applications. The rank-one constraint system (R1CS), an intermediate representation of SNARK, has been widely used for proving arithmetic circuits. Distributed SNARKs allow multiple provers to jointly generate proofs for improving prover efficiency. However, state-of-the-art distributed SNARKs for R1CS, i.e., DIZK (USENIX Sec. '18) and Hekaton (CCS '24), fail to simultaneously achieve scalable prover efficiency and constant proof sizes. In this paper we propose Soloist, a distributed SNARK for R1CS with constant proof size, amortized communication and verification. For a size-O(n) R1CS, its prover complexity is $O(n/\ell · \log(n/\ell))$ given $\ell$ sub-provers. Experiments show that the concrete prover time of Soloist is $\ell$× as fast as the non-distributed R1CS-targeted Marlin (Eurocrypt '20) given $\ell$ sub-provers. Compared with Hekaton, Soloist features a 100× smaller communication overhead, and has a 7× faster prover time when proving general circuits. For R1CS-friendly zkRollups, Soloist outperforms the Plonk-targeted Pianist (S&P '24) with a 2.5× smaller memory cost, a 2.8× faster preprocessing, and a 1.8× faster prover when proving general circuits. To build Soloist, we design a distributed polynomial oracle proof (PIOP) for R1CS. Its core techniques include an improved (and distributed) inner product PIOP, and a distributed preprocessing PIOP via lookup tables. To instantiate the PIOPs, we propose a (distributed) batch scheme for bivariate KZG, which enables opening multiple points on multiple polynomials with a proof size irrelevant to polynomial size or point number.

In order for a client to securely connect to a server on the web, the client must trust certificate authorities (CAs) only to issue certificates to the legitimate operator of the server. If a certificate is miss-issued, it is possible for an attacker to impersonate the server to the client. The goal of Certificate Transparency (CT) is to log every certificate issued in a manner that allows anyone to audit the logs for miss-issuance. A client can even audit a CT log itself, but this would leak sensitive browsing data to the log operator. As a result, client-side audits are rare in practice. In this work, we revisit private CT auditing from a real-world perspective. Our study is motivated by recent changes to the CT ecosystem and advancements in Private Information Retrieval (PIR). First, we find that checking for inclusion of Signed Certificate Timestamps (SCTs) in a log — the audit performed by clients — is now possible with PIR in under a second and under 100kb of communication with minor adjustments to the protocol that have been proposed previously. Our results also show how to scale audits by using existing batching techniques and the algebraic structure of the PIR protocols, in particular to obtain certificate hashes by included in the log. Since PIR protocols are more performant with smaller databases, we also suggest a number of strategies to lower the size of the SCT database for audits. Our key observation is that the web will likely transition to a new model for certificate issuance. While this transition is primarily motivated by the need to adapt the PKI to larger, post-quantum signature schemes, it also removes the need for SCT audits in most cases. We present the first estimates of how this transition may impact SCT auditing, based on data gathered from public CT logs. We find that large scale deployment of the new issuance model may reduce the number of SCT audits needed by a factor of 1,000, making PIR-based auditing practical to deploy.

We initiate the study of strong federated authentication with password-based credential against identity server corruption (SaPBC). We provide a refined formal security model, which captures all the necessary security properties in registration, authentication, and session key establishment between a user and an application server. The new model with fine-grained information leakage separates the leakage of password-related files and long-term secrets (including passwords and credentials). Moreover, we present two SaPBC protocols constructed from efficient cryptographic primitives for these corruption scenarios. In addition to rigorous security proofs, we also conduct comprehensive performance evaluation of the two protocols.

We analyze the composition of symmetric encryption and digital signatures in secure group messaging protocols where group members share a symmetric encryption key. In particular, we analyze the chat encryption algorithms underlying MLS, Session, Signal, and Matrix using the formalism of symmetric signcryption introduced by Jaeger, Kumar, and Stepanovs (Eurocrypt 2024). We identify theoretical attacks against each of the constructions we analyze that result from the insufficient binding between the symmetric encryption scheme and the digital signature scheme. In the case of MLS and Session, these translate into practically exploitable replay and reordering attacks by a group-insider. For Signal this leads to a forgery attack by a group-outsider with access to a user’s signing key, an attack previously discovered by Balbás, Collins, and Gajland (Asiacrypt 2023). In Matrix there are mitigations in the broader ecosystem that prevent exploitation. We provide formal security theorems that each of the four constructions are secure up to these attacks. Additionally, in Session we identified two attacks outside the symmetric signcryption model. The first allows a group-outsider with access to an exposed signing key to forge arbitrary messages and the second allows outsiders to replay ciphertexts.

Hardware IP blocks have been subjected to various forms of confidentiality and integrity attacks in recent years due to the globalization of the semiconductor industry. System-on-chip (SoC) designers are now considering a zero-trust model for security, where an IP can be attacked at any stage of the manufacturing process for piracy, cloning, overproduction, or malicious alterations. Hardware redaction has emerged as a promising countermeasure to thwart confidentiality and integrity attacks by untrusted entities in the globally distributed supply chain. However, existing redaction techniques provide this security at high overhead costs, making them unsuitable for real-world implementation. In this paper, we propose HIPR, a fine-grain redaction methodology that is robust, scalable, and incurs significantly lower overhead compared to existing redaction techniques. HIPR redacts security-critical Boolean and sequential logic from the hardware design, performs interconnect randomization, and employs multiple overhead optimization steps to reduce overhead costs. We evaluate HIPR on open-source benchmarks and reduce area overheads by 1 to 2 orders of magnitude compared to state-of-the-art redaction techniques without compromising security. We also demonstrate that the redaction performed by HIPR is resilient against conventional functional and structural attacks on hardware IPs. The redacted test IPs used to evaluate HIPR are available at: https://github.com/UF-Nelms-IoT-Git-Projects/HIPR.

A (single server) private information retrieval (PIR) allows a client to read data from a public database held on a remote server, without revealing to the server which locations she is reading. In a doubly efficient PIR (DEPIR), the database is first preprocessed offline into a data structure, which then allows the server to answer any client query efficiently in sub-linear online time. Constructing DEPIR is a notoriously difficult problem, and this difficulty even extends to a weaker notion secret-key DEPIR (SK-DEPIR), where the database is preprocessed using secret randomness and the client is given a secret key for making queries. We currently only have constructions of SK-DEPIR from the Ring LWE assumption or from non-standard code-based assumptions. We show that the black-box use of essentially all generic cryptographic primitives (e.g., key agreement, oblivious transfer, indistinguishability obfuscation, etc.), including idealized primitives (e.g., random oracles, generic multilinear groups, virtual black-box obfuscation, etc.) is essentially useless for constructing SK-DEPIR. In particular, in any such SK-DEPIR construction, we can replace all black-box use of these primitives with just a black-box use of one-way functions. While we conjecture that SK-DEPIR cannot be constructed using black-box one-way functions alone, we are unable to show this in its full generality. However, we do show this for 2-round schemes with a passive server that simply outputs requested locations in the preprocessed data structure, which is the format of all known schemes. Overall, this shows that the black-box use of essentially all crypto primitives is insufficient for constructing 2-round passive-server SK-DEPIR, and does not provide any benefit beyond black-box one-way functions for constructing general SK-DEPIR.

In a social key recovery scheme, users back up their secret keys (typically using Shamir's secret sharing) with their social connections, known as a set of guardians. This places a heavy burden on the guardians, as they must manage their shares both securely and reliably. Finding and managing such a set of guardians may not be easy, especially when the consequences of losing a key are significant. We take an alternative approach of social recovery within a community, where each member already holds a secret key (with possibly an associated public key) and uses other community members as their guardians forming a mutual dependency among themselves. Potentially, each member acts as a guardian for upto $(n-1)$ other community members. Therefore, in this setting, using standard Shamir's sharing leads to a linear ($O(n)$) blow-up in the internal secret storage of the guardian for each key recovery. Our solution avoids this linear blowup in internal secret storage by relying on a novel secret-sharing scheme, leveraging the fact that each member already manages a secret key. In fact, our scheme does not require guardians to store anything beyond their own secret keys. We propose the first formal definition of a social key recovery scheme for general access structures in the community setting. We prove that our scheme is secure against any malicious and adaptive adversary that may corrupt up to $t$ parties. As a main technical tool, we use a new notion of secret sharing, that enables $(t+1)$ out of $n$ sharing of a secret even when the shares are generated independently -- we formalize this as bottom-up secret sharing (BUSS), which may be of independent interest. Finally, we provide an implementation benchmarking varying the number of guardians both in a regional, and geo-distributed setting. For instance, for 8 guardians, our backup protocol takes around 146-149 ms in a geo-distributed WAN setting, and 4.9-5.9 ms in the LAN setting; for recovery protocol, the timings are approximately the same for the WAN setting (as network latency dominates), and 1.2-1.4 ms for the LAN setting.

This work presents an exact and compact formula for the probability of rotation-xor differentials (RX-differentials) through modular addition, for arbitrary rotation amounts, which has been a long-standing open problem. The formula comes with a rigorous proof and is also verified by extensive experiments. Our formula uncovers error in a recent work from 2022 proposing a formula for rotation amounts bigger than 1. Surprisingly, it also affects correctness of the more studied and used formula for the rotation amount equal to 1 (from TOSC 2016). Specifically, it uncovers rare cases where the assumptions of this formula do not hold. Correct formula for arbitrary rotations now opens up a larger search space where one can often find better trails. For applications, we propose automated mixed integer linear programming (MILP) modeling techniques for searching optimal RX-trails based on our exact formula. They are consequently applied to several ARX designs, including Salsa, Alzette and a small-key variant of Speck, and yield many new RX-differential distinguishers, some of them based on provably optimal trails. In order to showcase the relevance of the RX-differential analysis, we also design Malzette, a 12-round Alzette-based permutation with maliciously chosen constants, which has a practical RX-differential distinguisher, while standard differential/linear security arguments suggest sufficient security.

Digital identity wallets allow citizens to prove who they are and manage digital documents, called credentials, such as mobile driving licenses or passports. As with physical documents, secure and privacy-preserving management of the credential lifecycle is crucial: a credential can change its status from issued to valid, revoked or expired. In this paper, we focus on the analysis of cryptographic accumulators as a revocation scheme for digital identity wallet credentials. We describe the most well-established public key accumulators, and how zero-knowledge proofs can be used with accumulators for revocation of non-anonymous credentials. In addition, we assess the computational and communication costs analytically and experimentally. Our results show that they are comparable with existing schemes used in the context of certificate revocation.

HuFu is an unstructured lattice-based signature scheme proposed during the NIST PQC standardization process. In this work, we present a side-channel analysis of HuFu's reference implementation. We first exploit the multiplications involving its two main secret matrices, recovering approximately half of their entries through a non-profiled power analysis with a few hundred traces. Using these coefficients, we reduce the dimension of the underlying LWE problem, enabling full secret key recovery with calls to a small block-sized BKZ. To mitigate this attack, we propose a countermeasure that replaces sensitive computations involving a secret matrix with equivalent operations derived solely from public elements, eliminating approximately half of the identified leakage and rendering the attack unfeasible. Finally, we perform a non-profiled power analysis targeting HuFu's Gaussian sampling procedure, recovering around 75\% of the remaining secret matrix's entries in a few hundred traces. While full key recovery remains computationally intensive, we demonstrate that partial knowledge of the secret significantly improves the efficiency of signature forgery.

This paper presents a security analysis of the South Korean Format-Preserving Encryption (FPE) standards FEA-1 and FEA-2. In 2023, Chauhan \textit{et al.} presented the first third-party analysis of FEA-1 and FEA-2 against the square attack. The authors proposed new distinguishing attacks covering up to three rounds of FEA-1 and five rounds of FEA-2, with a data complexity of $2^8$ plaintexts. Additionally, using these distinguishers, they presented key recovery attacks for four rounds of FEA-1 and six rounds of FEA-2, for 192-bit and 256-bit key sizes. The complexities of both the four-round FEA-1 and six-round FEA-2 key recovery attacks are $2^{137.6}$. \\ In this work, we successfully extend the number of rounds attacked for both FEA-1 and FEA-2, using the square attack technique. Specifically, we present a four-round distinguishing attack against FEA-1 and six-round distinguishing attack against FEA-2. The data complexities of these distinguishers are $2^{64}$ plaintexts. Furthermore, we apply these distinguishers to perform key recovery attacks on five rounds of FEA-1 and seven rounds of FEA-2, targeting the 256-bit key size. The time complexities of the presented key recovery attacks are $2^{193.6}$.

The current landscape of system-on-chips (SoCs) security verification faces challenges due to manual, labor-intensive, and inflexible methodologies. These issues limit the scalability and effectiveness of security protocols, making bug detection at the Register-Transfer Level (RTL) difficult. This paper proposes a new framework named BugWhisperer that utilizes a specialized, fine-tuned Large Language Model (LLM) to address these challenges. By enhancing the LLM's hardware security knowledge and leveraging its capabilities for text inference and knowledge transfer, this approach automates and improves the adaptability and reusability of the verification process. We introduce an open-source, fine-tuned LLM specifically designed for detecting security vulnerabilities in SoC designs. Our findings demonstrate that this tailored LLM effectively enhances the efficiency and flexibility of the security verification process. Additionally, we introduce a comprehensive hardware vulnerability database that supports this work and will further assist the research community in enhancing the security verification process.

CHide is one of the most prominent e-voting protocols, which, while combining security and efficiency, suffers from having very long encrypted credentials. In this paper, starting from CHide, we propose a new protocol, based on multiparty Class Group Encryption (CGE) instead of discrete logarithm cryptography over known order groups. We achieve a computational complexity of $O(nr)$, for $n$ votes and $r$ voters, while calling the MixNet algorithm one time. The homomorphic properties of CGE allow for credentials that are shorter by a factor of 20 while maintaining the same level of security, at the cost of a small slowdown in efficiency.

The ETSI Technical Specification 104 015 proposes a framework to build Key Encapsulation Mechanisms (KEMs) with access policies and attributes, in the Ciphertext-Policy Attribute-Based Encryption (CP-ABE) vein. Several security guarantees and functionalities are claimed, such as pre-quantum and post-quantum hybridization to achieve security against Chosen-Ciphertext Attacks (CCA), anonymity, and traceability. In this paper, we present a formal security analysis of a more generic construction, with application to the specific Covercrypt scheme, based on the pre-quantum ECDH and the post-quantum ML-KEM KEMs. We additionally provide an open-source library that implements the ETSI standard, in Rust, with high effiency.

In order to compute a multiple of a point on an elliptic curve in Weierstrass form one can use formulas in only one of the two coordinates of the points. These $x$-only formulas can be seen as an arithmetic on the Kummer line associated to the curve. In this paper, we look at models of Kummer lines, and define an intrinsic notion of isomorphisms of Kummer lines. This allows us to give conversion formulas between Kummer models in a unified manner. When there is one rational point $T$ of $2$-torsion on the curve, we also use Mumford's theory of theta groups to show that there are two type of models: the “symmetric” ones with respect to $T$ and the “anti-symmetric“ ones. We show how this recovers the Montgomery model and various variants of the theta model. We also classify when curves admit these different models via Galois representations and modular curves. When an elliptic curve is viewed inside a $2$-isogeny volcano, we give a criteria to say if it has a given Kummer model based solely on its position in the volcano. We also give applications to the ECM factorization algorithm.

Over two decades since their introduction in 2005, all major verifiable pairing delegation protocols for public inputs have been designed to ensure unconditional security. However, we note that a delegation protocol involving only ephemeral secret keys in the public view can achieve everlasting security, provided the server is unable to produce a pairing forgery within the protocol's execution time. Thus, computationally bounding the adversary's capabilities during the protocol's execution may be more reasonable when the goal is to achieve significant efficiency gains for the delegating party. This consideration is particularly relevant given the continuously evolving computational costs associated with pairing computations and their ancillary blocks, which creates an ever-changing landscape for what constitutes efficiency in pairing delegation protocols. With the goal of fulfilling both efficiency and everlasting security, we present AmorE, a protocol equipped with an adjustable security and efficiency parameter for sequential pairing delegation, which achieves state-of-the-art Amortized Efficiency in terms of the number of pairing computations. For example, delegating batches of 10 pairings on the BLS48-575 elliptic curve via our protocol costs to the client, on average, less than a single scalar multiplication in $G_2$ per delegated pairing, while still ensuring at least 40 bits of statistical security.

Power side-channel (PSC) vulnerabilities present formidable challenges to the security of ubiquitous microelectronic devices in mission-critical infrastructure. Existing side-channel assessment techniques mostly focus on post-silicon stages by analyzing power profiles of fabricated devices, suffering from low flexibility and prohibitively high cost while deploying security countermeasures. While pre-silicon PSC assessments offer flexibility and low cost, the true nature of the power signatures cannot be fully captured through RTL or gate-level design. Although physical design-level analysis provides precise power traces, collecting data is time and resource-consuming at the layout level. To address this challenge, we propose, for the first time, a fast and efficient physical design-level PSC assessment framework using a graph neural network (GNN). This framework predicts dynamic power traces for new layouts, using them to assess physical design security through metrics evaluation. Our experiments on AES-GF layout implementations achieve a tremendous 133 times speedup compared to conventional simulation-based flow without sacrificing substantial accuracy.

SNARKs are frequently used to prove encryption, yet the circuit size often becomes large due to the intricate operations inherent in encryption. It entails considerable computational overhead for a prover and can also lead to an increase in the size of the public parameters (e.g., evaluation key). We propose an encryption-friendly SNARK framework, $\textsf{Tangram}$, which allows anyone to construct a system by using their desired encryption and proof system. Our approach revises existing encryption schemes to produce Pedersen-like ciphertext, including identity-based, hierarchical identity-based, and attribute-based encryption. Afterward, to prove the knowledge of the encryption, we utilize a modular manner of commit-and-prove SNARKs, which uses commitment as a `bridge'. With our framework, one can prove encryption significantly faster than proving the whole encryption within the circuit. We implement various $\textsf{Tangram}$ gadgets and evaluate their performance. Our results show 12x - 3500x times better performance than encryption-in-the-circuit.

Blockchain advancements, currency digitalization, and declining cash usage have fueled global interest in Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). The BIS states that the hybrid model, where central banks authorize intermediaries to manage distribution, is more suitable than the direct model. However, designing a CBDC for practical implementation requires careful consideration. First, the public blockchain raises privacy concerns due to transparency. While zk-SNARKs can be a solution, they can introduce significant proof generation overhead for large-scale transactions. Second, intermediaries that provide user-facing services on behalf of the central bank commonly performs Proof of Liabilities on customers' static liabilities. However, in real-world scenarios where user liabilities can arbitrarily increase or decrease, the static nature poses such as window attacks. In this paper, we propose a new smart contract-based privacy-preserving CBDC framework based on zk-SNARKs, called $\textbf{Aegis}$. our framework introduces a transaction batching technique to enhance scalability and defines a new dynamic PoL which is near-real time. We formally define the security models for our system and provide rigorous security proofs to demonstrate its robustness. To evaluate the system’s performance, we instantiate our proposed framework and measure its efficiency. The result indicates that, the end-to-end process, including proof generation for 512 transactions, takes approximately 2.8 seconds, with a gas consumption of 74,726 per user.

Digital signatures underpin identity, authenticity, and trust in modern computer systems. Cryptography research has shown that it is possible to prove possession of a valid message and signature for some public key, without revealing the message or signature. These proofs of possession work only for specially-designed signature schemes. Though these proofs of possession have many useful applications to improving security, privacy, and anonymity, they are not currently usable for widely deployed, legacy signature schemes such as RSA, ECDSA, and Ed25519. Unlocking practical proofs of possession for these legacy signature schemes requires closing a huge efficiency gap. This work brings proofs of possession for legacy signature schemes very close to practicality. Our design strategy is to encode the signature's verification algorithm as a rank-one constraint system (R1CS), then use a zkSNARK to prove knowledge of a solution. To do this efficiently we (1) design and analyze a new zkSNARK called Dorian that supports randomized computations, (2) introduce several new techniques for encoding hashes, elliptic curve operations, and modular arithmetic, (3) give a new approach that allows performing the most expensive parts of ECDSA and Ed25519 verifications outside R1CS, and (4) generate a novel elliptic curve that allows expressing Ed25519 curve operations very efficiently. Our techniques reduce R1CS sizes by up to 200$\times$ and prover times by 3-22$\times$. We can generate a 240-byte proof of possession of an RSA signature over a message the size of a typical TLS certificate (two kilobytes) in only three seconds.