Witness encryption (WE) for general NP remains challenging to realize with practical efficiency. A natural approach is to combine WE with SNARKs to obtain succinct witnesses; however, embedding general-purpose SNARK verification into existing WE constructions leads to prohibitive overhead. We introduce arithmetic affine determinant programs (AADPs), a variant of affine determinant programs designed to natively support arithmetic constraint systems. This enables direct expression of SNARK verification. To address security challenges in the arithmetic setting, we define projectively safe constraint systems and develop algebraic gadgets that preserve this property. Using these components, we construct a WE scheme for all NP languages based on AADPs, instantiated with a tailored SNARK. Our estimates indicate ciphertext sizes on the order of hundreds of terabytes at 100-bit security, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the most efficient instantiation of WE for general NP.

Secure TransFormer Inference (STFI) for LLMs aims to protect both user inputs and model parameters. Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) offers a promising approach for STFI due to its non-interactivity, which eliminates communication overhead. However, FHE-based STFI incurs significant computational costs compared to plaintext inference. Recent advancements have accelerated inference by optimizing packing strategies and reducing the number of rotations. Despite these improvements, several challenges persist, including excessive rotations in ciphertext-ciphertext matrix multiplications (CCMMs), low input/output projection throughput, and expensive maximum/inverse operations, as well as wasted storage slots and inflated ciphertext counts due to sparse packing. To address these issues, we propose STIP, an efficient and secure non-interactive transformer inference framework that incorporates three novel packing strategies: (1) Real-Imaginary Hybrid Packing (RIHP) halves the rotation costs of CCMMs by enabling the simultaneous computation of two output results within the real and imaginary components; (2) Dual-Head Packing (DHP) maps adjacent heads to the real and imaginary components, doubling the throughput of attention projections; and (3) Adaptive Multi-Column Packing (AMCP) packs multiple heads into a single ciphertext, maximizing slot occupancy to reduce the total ciphertext count and thereby enhance computational parallelism. Moreover, for non-linear layers, we employ the Gaussian Kernel instead of Softmax, eliminating the need for maximum value searches and inverse operations, supported by a column-packed RIHP-based L2-norm algorithm. We reformulate LayerNorm into an inverse-free form by exploiting scale-invariance. Experimental results on a GPU show that STIP achieves approximately 1.6× speedup over the SOTA scheme Euston (S&P '26) on BERT-base, LLAMA-3-8B, and GPT-2-1.5B.

We propose Eidolon, a post-quantum signature scheme grounded in the NP-complete $k$-colorability problem. Our construction generalizes the Goldreich–Micali–Wigderson zero-knowledge protocol to arbitrary $k \geq 3$, applies the Fiat–Shamir transform, and uses Merkle-tree commitments to compress signatures from $O(tn)$ to $O(t \log n)$. We generate instances by planting a coloring while aiming to preserve the statistical profile of random graphs. We present an empirical security analysis of such a scheme against both classical solvers (ILP, DSatur) and a custom graph neural network (GNN) attacker. Experiments show that for $n \geq 60$, neither approach is able to recover a valid coloring matching the planted solution, suggesting that well-engineered $k$-coloring instances can resist the considered classical and learning-based cryptanalytic approaches. These experiments indicate that the constructed instances resist the attacks considered in our evaluation.

This paper introduces a generalized cryptanalytic framework for RSA and its variants, systematizing existing attacks while revealing a wide class of structural weaknesses independent of the private exponent's size. While traditional analyses exploit the key equation $ed \equiv 1 \pmod{(p-1)(q-1)}$ or its extensions like $ed \equiv 1 \pmod{(p^n-1)(q^n-1)}$ for a given RSA modulus $N=pq$ and its public exponent $e$, we unify these approaches by investigating the more general algebraic property defined by the congruence $eu \equiv 1 \pmod{(p^n-a)(q^n-b)}$, where $a$, $b$, and $u$ are unknown small integer parameters. Using Coppersmith's method with unravelled linearization, we demonstrate that the modulus $N$ can be factored in polynomial time if such a relation exists for parameters within a new, rigorously derived bound. Our framework not only unifies and generalizes several well-known attacks (retrieving their bounds as special cases when $a=b=1$) but also significantly expands the set of weak keys. We show that an RSA instance secure against all previous small private exponent attacks may still be broken if its public key possesses this hidden algebraic structure. This work serves as a comprehensive security analysis, highlighting a new family of weak keys that future cryptographic designs should avoid.

In this paper, we study the problem of sampling random supersingular elliptic curves with unknown endomorphism rings. This problem has recently gained considerable attention as many isogeny-based cryptographic protocols require such ``secure'' curves for instantation, while existing methods achieve this only in a trusted-setup setting. We present the first provable quantum polynomial-time algorithms for sampling such curves with high probability, one of which is based on an algorithm of Booher et. al. One variant runs heuristically in $\tilde{O}(\log^{6.5} p)$ quantum gate complexity, and in $\tilde{O}(\log^{20} p)$ under the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis, and outputs a curve that is provably secure assuming quantum average-case hardness of the endomorphism ring problem. Another variant samples uniform $\mathcal O$-oriented curves with unknown endomorphism rings, for any imaginary quadratic order $\mathcal O$, with security based on the quantum average-hardness of Vectorization problem. When accompanied by an interactive quantum computation verification protocol, our algorithms provide a secure instantiation of the CGL hash function and related primitives and show quantum advantage over classical algorithms. Our analysis relies on a new spectral delocalization result for supersingular $\ell$-isogeny graphs: we prove the Quantum Unique Ergodicity conjecture and provide numerical evidence for complete eigenvector delocalization. We also prove a stronger $\varepsilon$-separation property for eigenvalues of isogeny graphs than that predicted in the quantum money protocol of Kane, Sharif, and Silverberg, thereby removing a key heuristic assumption in their construction.

Blockchains have achieved substantial progress in scalability and fault tolerance, yet they remain fundamentally limited in confidentiality, hindering adoption by businesses, communities, and individuals who require privacy-preserving computations. Existing zero-knowledge (ZK) solutions provide partial privacy guarantees but struggle with performance and composability, especially for multi-party computations over shared private state. In this work, we introduce gcVM, a novel extension to the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) that integrates garbled-circuit-based secure multi-party computation to enable general-purpose, privacy-preserving computation on-chain. gcVM allows transactional interactions between untrusted parties while balancing the transparency of public blockchains with strong confidentiality. Our implementation demonstrates up to 83 confidential transactions per second (cTPS) on standard cloud instances, with projected enhancements expected to scale throughput to approximately 500 cTPS—two to three orders of magnitude faster than comparable FHE-based solutions. gcVM is compatible with existing EVM tooling, provides public auditability, and requires no trusted hardware, offering a practical and efficient platform for privacy-centric blockchain applications across finance, governance, and decentralized services.

We will improve the best known lower bound of the $r$-th order nonlinearity of Boolean function for $r > 2$ via algebraic immunity

Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) play an important role in time series modeling, signal processing, and resource constrained applications. Their parameters encode valuable functionality and constitute proprietary intellectual property. Cryptanalytic extraction tests whether black box queries reveal functionally equivalent parameters. Such analysis is important for assessing the security of deployed RNNs. However, prior cryptanalytic attacks mainly target feedforward networks such as fully connected networks (FCNs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). RNNs reuse their recurrent parameters at every time step, which existing extraction pipelines do not address. We present cryptanalytic extraction of ReLU RNNs, including single-layer and stacked (a.k.a. multi-layer) RNNs, in both the hard-label and raw-output settings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such extraction. Using controlled inputs, we construct equivalent feedforward models whose depths depend on the number of recurrent layers, independently of the sequence length. However, parameter recovery from the equivalent models may yield recurrent weights with incompatible neuron orderings and positive scalings for the previous and current hidden states. We develop recurrent parameter alignment to make these transformations consistent and enable parameter reuse across time. Stacked RNNs are harder, because one equivalent model contains coupled branches, which prevent direct use of FCN sign recovery and complicate signature recovery. We therefore further develop two techniques, recurrent parameter recovery and folded bias difference. The former uses the recovered input weights to guide clustering and recover the remaining recurrent parameters, including their signs. The latter handles neurons that are otherwise difficult to recover. We demonstrate end-to-end extraction across five RNN architectures with up to three recurrent layers in both observation settings. An additional raw-output experiment extends the sequence length from 20 to 1024 using the same target parameters.

Spoed is an authenticated encryption scheme based on compression functions. We show that Spoed fails to achieve its claimed security guarantees with respect to both integrity and confidentiality. In particular, we present a universal forgery attack that succeeds with probability one using only a single encryption query and a single decryption query. The attack exploits a structural weakness in the feedback mechanism of Spoed, allowing internal inputs of the underlying pseudorandom function to coincide during verification. We further show that the same weakness enables efficient plaintext-recovery attacks, permitting recovery of almost the entire plaintext with at most two decryption queries, depending on the associated-data length. We explain why the original security proof of Spoed fails, and identify the mismatch between the collision events used in the H-coefficient analysis and the schemes actual behavior. Finally, we propose a minimally modified variant, fSpoed, and prove that it achieves the originally claimed security bounds under standard assumptions.

Private Set Union (PSU) enables two parties holding private sets $X$ and $Y$ to compute their union $X\cup Y$ without revealing anything else. Enhanced PSU (ePSU) further eliminates during-execution leakage, but existing constructions are limited to exact matching. This restriction is inadequate for many real-world applications involving noisy data, approximate representations, or feature embeddings, where similarity is naturally defined via distance metric rather than strict equality. In this work, we introduce fuzzy ePSU, a new cryptographic primitive that supports distance-based union while preserving the no during-execution leakage guarantee of ePSU. Given a distance metric $\mathsf{dist}(\cdot,\cdot)$ and a threshold $\delta$, fuzzy ePSU allows the receiver to learn exactly those sender items whose distance to all receiver items exceeds $\delta$, thereby computing a fuzzy union of the two sets. We present two concrete fuzzy ePSU constructions instantiated over different metric spaces. For the Hamming space, we design a protocol based on a new primitive called Fuzzy Oblivious Non-Membership Conditional Randomness Generation (FOnMCRG), achieving linear complexity in the input set sizes and $\delta$. For the Minkowski space, we introduce Fuzzy Permuted Non-Membership Conditional Randomness Generation (FpnMCRG), which combines fuzzy mapping with hashing-to-bin techniques and achieves (quasi-)linear complexity in the input sizes and dimension. We implement our protocols and evaluate their performance in both metric spaces. For input sets of size $2^{12}$, our Hamming-space protocol incurs about 79.990~MB of communication and 70.686~s of runtime with $\delta=4$. In the Minkowski space with $\{1,2,\infty\}$-norm, dimension $d=10$, and $\delta=30$, it incurs 388.137--689.889~MB of communication and 347.082--483.328~s of runtime.

We propose Curve5453 and Curve6071, two Montgomery curves over the Crandall prime $2^{545}-3$ and Mersenne prime $2^{607}-1$, respectively, providing 271 and 302 bits of classical security. Comprehensive security analysis shows Curve6071 passes all verifiable SafeCurves criteria, while Curve5453 passes all except completeness. We develop TMVP-optimized field multiplication tailored to the arithmetic structure of these primes for 10-limb representations on 64-bit architectures, achieving $12.0\%$ and $20.4\%$ speedups over the closest alternative. ARM64 benchmarks show scalar multiplication completing in 871,898 and 895,028 cycles, respectively, competitive with existing lower-security alternatives such as E-521 (259-bit security) while delivering higher security levels. These curves address a critical gap for hybrid post-quantum constructions requiring classical security commensurate with quantum-resistant components, blockchain systems with decades-long security requirements, and specialized deployments where implementation robustness and enhanced classical security are essential---providing the first SafeCurves-compliant alternatives beyond 260 bits with demonstrated practical performance on modern architectures.

In the past decade and largely in response to the NIST standardization effort for post-quantum cryptography, many new designs for digital signatures have been proposed. Among those, the FAEST digital signature scheme (Baum et al., CRYPTO 2023) stands out due to its interesting security-performance trade-off. It only relies on well-tested symmetric-key cryptographic primitives, as it constructs a digital signature from a zero-knowledge (ZK) proof of knowledge of an AES key. To achieve this, it uses the VOLE-in-the-Head ZK proof system which relies only on pseudorandom generator (PRG) and hash function calls. FAEST simultaneously has relatively small signature size and competitive sign and verify times. In this work, we improve both the security and practical efficiency of FAEST. We improve the main computational bottleneck of the original construction by replacing hash function calls in the underlying vector commitment scheme with calls to an AES-based PRG. At the same time, we also improve the signature size by revisiting the evaluation of the AES block cipher in ZK. We use observations from Galois Theory to compress the size of the witness (and thus signature), due to the algebraic nature of the AES S-Box. We implemented our new construction, and our benchmarks show that its sign and verify times reduce up to $50\%$ over the state-of-the-art while achieving the same security and smaller signatures. Finally, we analyze our resulting signature scheme both in the Quantum Random Oracle Model (QROM) and its classical analogue. To achieve concretely good security bounds, we devise a new classical proof for FAEST based on Renyi divergence techniques. We construct a QROM analogue and present a new Fiat-Shamir transform which is applicable to VOLE-in-the-Head-based signature schemes.

A recent “dimension padding” note proposes a structural countermeasure to linear inversion in a dual-public-key code-based encryption construction. The note argues that padding makes the private parity structure non-identifiable from the public key and suggests phrasing security in terms of this non-identifiability. This comment points out that non-identifiability of a particular trapdoor representation does not prevent message recovery. In the padded construction, the public relations used for decryption remain linear constraints. Any solution to these public constraints suffices to recover the encryption randomness and then the plaintext by linear algebra. Consequently, public-key-only decryption remains polynomial-time

Modern system-on-chips (SoCs) are becoming prone to numerous security vulnerabilities due to their ever-growing complexity and size. Therefore, a comprehensive security verification framework is needed at the very early stage of the SoC design lifecycle. The datapath of a complex SoC design may be vulnerable to information leakage and data integrity issues. The designers might be unaware of hidden information flow paths present in a particular SoC design at the pre-silicon stage, which can eventually lead to severe data breaches. Hence, it is crucial to develop a novel framework that comprehensively identifies the presence of such paths. Moreover, novel mathematical metrics need to be formulated to perform an exhaustive quantitative assessment of the detected information leakage paths. It will assist designers in quantifying the security risk level associated with these data propagation paths, ultimately making them aware of the potential implications of these leakage paths. In this paper, we propose an information flow verification framework that utilizes a combination of static and formal methodologies to identify information flow paths based on a mathematical metric for quantifying the security risk level of the detected paths. Our experiments across numerous open-source designs, varying in size and complexity, demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework for identifying severe information leakage and data integrity issues at the pre-silicon stage of the design lifecycle

Recent years have witnessed significant progress in first-order hardware masking of AES. However, most of the work focus on the optimizations over solely one of the metrics: chip area, latency or randomness. The optimizations for one metric often leads to increasing overheads of the other metrics. Consequently, few work focus on optimizations over all three metrics of first-order AES at the same time. To bridge this gap, we introduce two compact round-based first-order AES-128 encryption implementations with the latency of 31 cycles and 40 cycles, respectively. They are provably secure in the glitch-extended probing model with relatively low consumption of randomness. To achieve this, we first introduce a method to design first-order low-latency $d+1$ TI (Threshold Implementations) for multi-output Boolean functions with a latency of only one clock cycle. Moreover, the random bits used in the low-latency TI cancels out in the expressions of output shares, which enables the applications of a COTG-based concept to significantly reduce the randomness consumption. Finally, we apply our method to design first-order implementations for AES-128 with two shares, which allows the designs to be compact. As a result, our implementations achieve a excellent trade-off over latency, area, and randomness. Compared to the 10-cycle and 20-cycle AES-128 implementations provided respectively in TCHES 2020 and TCHES 2025, the area and randomness demands of our implementations are significantly less. We also use formal verification tools, PROLEAD, and TLVA to validate the security of our designs for S-Box and round-based AES-128 implementations, respectively.

Homomorphic Encryption (HE) provides strong data privacy for cloud services but at the cost of prohibitive computational overhead. While GPUs have emerged as a practical platform for accelerating HE, there remains an order-of-magnitude energy-efficiency gap compared to specialized (but expensive) HE ASICs. This paper explores an alternate direction: leveraging existing AI accelerators, like Google's TPUs with coarse-grained compute and memory architectures, to offer a path toward ASIC-level energy efficiency for HE. However, this architectural paradigm creates a fundamental mismatch with SoTA HE algorithms designed for GPUs. These algorithms rely heavily on: (1) high-precision (32-bit) integer arithmetic to now run on a TPU's low-throughput vector unit, leaving its high-throughput low-precision (8-bit) matrix engine (MXU) idle, and (2) fine-grained data permutations that are inefficient on the TPU's coarse-grained memory subsystem. Consequently, porting GPU-optimized HE libraries to TPUs results in severe resource under-utilization and performance degradation. To tackle above challenges, we introduce CROSS, a compiler framework that systematically transforms HE workloads to align with the TPU's architecture. CROSS makes two key contributions: (1) Basis-Aligned Transformation (BAT), a novel technique that converts high-precision modular arithmetic into dense, low-precision (INT8) matrix multiplications, unlocking and improving the utilization of TPU's MXU for HE, and (2) Memory-Aligned Transformation (MAT), which eliminates costly runtime data reordering by embedding reordering into compute kernels through offline parameter transformation. CROSS (TPU v6e) achieves higher throughput per watt on NTT and HE operators than WarpDrive, FIDESlib, FAB, HEAP, and Cheddar, establishing AI ASIC as the SotA efficient platform for HE operators. Code: https://github.com/EfficientPPML/CROSS

Nearly all existing SNARK systems are optimized for arithmetic over finite fields. Using them to prove statements involving ring arithmetic, which underlies lattice-based cryptography and fully homomorphic encryption (FHE), incurs substantial overhead. Consequently, practical deployments of FHE often rely on the \textit{honest-but-curious} assumptions, leaving a gap in the verifiability of the FHE computation. Several recent works have explored zero-knowledge proofs tailored to lattice-based schemes, yet still suffer from high prover costs and limited scalability. In this work, we introduce Dinocchio, the first distributed SNARK for rings with constant proof size and constant verification time. For a setting with $m$ sub-provers, Dinocchio achieves an approximately $m$-fold speedup in prover time compared to Rinocchio (JoC'23), while preserving the constant verification time independent of $m$. We demonstrate the practicality of Dinocchio through matrix multiplication, which is a crucial building block to large-scale lattice-based applications. With matrices of size $2^{12} \times 2^{12}$, the corresponding arithmetic circuit contains $\sim2^{32}$ constraints, which is beyond the reach of all existing works. Our microbenchmarks show that Dinocchio can generate a succinct proof in around $9.23$ hours with $128$ sub-provers, more than $108\times$ faster than the prior work, and the verifier completes the verification in under $16$ seconds.

Anonymous communication is essential for secure and private interactions over public networks. Existing solutions that provide provable anonymity rely on the so-called simple I/O setting, where every participant sends and receives the same number of messages, masking their true communication pattern. The only known way to enforce this setting is through dialing protocols. Such protocols establish pairwise conversations, but each recipient inevitably learns who attempted to contact them, violating sender anonymity, the guaranty that even the recipient cannot determine who attempted to contact them. In this work, we introduce the notion of enhanced dialing protocols, a broad class of protocols that enforce the simple I/O setting. We also initiate the first formal study of such protocols with respect to sender anonymity. We introduce a framework that captures three key properties: security, correctness, and fairness. Within this framework, we present Fusion, a protocol that achieves perfect correctness and fairness while incurring only unavoidable leakage, and Fusion+, a differentially private variant that reduces this leakage at the cost of some correctness. Through theoretical analysis, we quantify the fundamental trade-off between privacy and correctness in Fusion+. Note: This is the full version of the paper that has been accepted to appear at IEEE CSF 2026.

The Fujisaki-Okamoto transform is a popular solution to design post- quantum public key encryption schemes, or key encapsulation mechanisms. In order to ensure security against chosen-ciphertext attacks, it checks the validity of ciphertexts by re-encrypting decrypted messages. This operation in turn leads to severe side- channel weaknesses, because the re-encrypted messages can be made key-dependent. Hence, distinguishing them thanks to leakage is sufficient to extract (long-term) secret key information. As a result, recent works suggested to ensure the validity of ciphertexts by other means than re-encryption. For now, the main candidate for this purpose, integrated in the Polka encryption scheme (PKC 2023) and analyzed more generically by Hövelmanns et al. (EUROCRYPT 2025), is to use continuous norm checks through the decryption process. In this paper, we evaluate the extent to which replacing the FO-transform by such norm checks helps resistance against leakage. Negatively, we exhibit new attack vectors that were not anticipated in previous (heuristic) analyzes. Positively, we observe that the removal of the FO-transform nevertheless reduces the attack surface and we identify possible tracks to further minimize it. Overall, our results therefore shed light on the challenge of designing post-quantum public-key encryption schemes, or key encapsulation mechanisms, that can be efficiently protected against side-channel attacks. We hope they can inform theory about leakage sources that could be better taken over by design, to develop new schemes allowing a scarcer use of implementation-level countermeasures.

In this work, we present Hachi, a concretely efficient multilinear polynomial commitment scheme that offers succinct proof sizes of $\mathrm{poly}(\ell,\lambda)$ and achieves a “square-root” verifier time complexity of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{2^\ell \lambda})$ for $\ell$-variate polynomials under the Module-SIS assumption. Compared to the current state-of-the-art scheme, Greyhound (CRYPTO~2024), Hachi provides an asymptotic improvement of $\tilde{O}(\lambda)$ in verification time, which translates into a practical 12.5-fold speedup, while maintaining compact proofs of approximately $55$ KB. To improve the verification time, we adopt the sumcheck protocol. Note that the standard sumcheck has efficiency bottlenecks for lattice-based constructions, since lattice operations are usually performed over power-of-two cyclotomic rings $\mathbf{R}_{q} := \mathbb{Z}_q[X]/(X^d + 1)$. To address this challenge, we provide a novel approach that integrates Greyhound with the ring-switching idea proposed by Huang, Mao and Zhang (ePrint 2025). Surprisingly, under this approach, the verifier does not need to perform any multiplication over $\mathbf{R}_{q}$, enabling a much faster verification time. This technique could be of independent interest for building lattice-based SNARKs, particularly for achieving faster verification. As a separate contribution, we introduce a generic reduction that converts polynomial evaluation proofs over extension fields $\mathbb{F}_{q^k}$ (under suitable parameter regimes) into equivalent statements over cyclotomic rings $\mathbf{R}_{q}$. This reduction is compatible with existing lattice-based polynomial commitment schemes and can be integrated as a modular enhancement to broaden applicability to statements over extension fields.

The Module Learning With Errors (MLWE) problem is the fundamental hardness assumption underlying the key encapsulation and signature schemes ML-KEM and ML-DSA, which have been selected by NIST for post-quantum cryptography standardization. Understanding its quantum hardness is crucial for assessing the security of these standardized schemes. Inspired by the equivalence between LWE and Extrapolated Dihedral Cosets Problem (EDCP) in [Brakerski, Kirshanova, Stehlé and Wen, PKC 2018], we show that the MLWE problem is as hard as a structured variant of the EDCP, which we refer to as the Integer Polynomial Module EDCP(IP-M-EDCP). This extension from EDCP to IP-M-EDCP relies crucially on the algebraic structure of the ring underlying MLWE: the extrapolation depends not only on the noise rate, but also on the ring’s degree. In fact, an IP-M-EDCP state forms a superposition over an exponential (in ring degree) number of possibilities. Our equivalence result holds for MLWE defined over power-of-two cyclotomic rings with constant module rank, a setting of particular relevance in cryptographic applications. Moreover, we present a reduction from IP-M-EDCP to EDCP. Therefore, to analyze the quantum hardness of MLWE, it may be advantageous to study IP-M-EDCP, which might be easier than EDCP.

In this work, we present a practical fault-injection attack against the current Unbalanced Oil and Vinegar signature scheme non-deterministic implementation that enables complete secret key recovery from a single faulty signature, given one prior fault-free signature. By applying fault injection to disrupt the mixing of the vinegar and oil components during signature generation, the secret key can be recovered directly from the faulty signature. We validate the attack experimentally on a real device using an electromagnetic fault injection setup, establishing the required glitch in practice rather than through simulation. Our experimental results indicate that a single execution of the attack achieves a success rate exceeding 90%. Furthermore, we demonstrate the real-world feasibility of the attack by transferring the attack parameters to an architecturally equivalent target, requiring only minor recalibration. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to demonstrate an electromagnetic fault-injection attack in the context of multivariate-based signature schemes. Additionally, we discuss possible countermeasures to protect implementations of UOV-based schemes against such physical attacks.

Recent interest in fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) has motivated efforts to develop faster and more efficient homomorphic logic circuits. Currently, Torus FHE (TFHE) provides the fastest gate-level bootstrapping and enables homomorphic evaluation over encrypted bits. Prior works typically utilize standard Computer Aided Design (CAD) tools to synthesize TFHE-amenable gate-level netlists. However, the logic resynthesis and technology mapping stages of these tools are designed for reducing area and power rather than bootstrapped gates, which leads to suboptimal netlists for homomorphic execution. In this work, we introduce BOLT, a TFHE-amenable CAD synthesis framework that explicitly targets reductions in bootstrapping depth. BOLT employs a bootstrapping-aware logic resynthesis stage to rewrite sub-networks in the input netlist into functionally equivalent forms that can be evaluated with a single bootstrapping operation. Following this, our bootstrapping-aware technology mapping stage incorporates a custom simulated annealing-based scheduler to decide whether each transformed sub-network should replace its original counterpart immediately or be deferred to enable better future opportunities. Through extensive evaluation on standard benchmark circuits, BOLT achieves significant improvements in homomorphic evaluation time, delivering $8\times$ speedup over the current state-of-the-art and $31\times$ speedup over prior work on FHEW-like schemes.

At EUROCRYPT 2020, Hosoyamada and Sasaki obtained the first dedicated quantum collision attacks on hash functions reaching more rounds than the classical ones. Indeed, as the speedup of generic quantum collision search is less than quadratic, an attack based on Grover's search may become comparatively more efficient in the quantum setting. In this paper, we focus on collision attacks on double-block length hash functions, and more precisely the Hirose compression function (HCF). At ToSC 2021, Chauhan et al. found a 10-round free-start collision attack on HCF-AES-256. At ToSC 2024, Lee and Hong corrected its complexity analysis. However, these two works are superseded by another result of Hirose and Kuwakado (IMACC 2021), which shows that for any $2n$-bit HCF hash function, a quantum free-start collision attack of complexity $\mathcal{O}(2^{n/2})$ exists. While both the works of Chauhan et al. and Lee and Hong are above this generic complexity, we find that a classical attack from Chen et al. (IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci. 2016) translates to a 9-round quantum attack on HCF-AES-256. Next, we study the security of HCF against quantum collision attacks (not free-start). We use a generic strategy that transforms a partial preimage attack into a quantum collision attack, and give several applications on HCF hash functions: a 6-round attack on AES-256 and a 15-round attack on Romulus-H (based on Skinny), both exceeding the reach of classical attacks.

Side-channel attacks (SCAs) represent an important threat for the implementation of cryptographic algorithms. These attacks exploit the information leakage found in the physical magnitudes of hardware devices (e.g. current draw, electromagnetic emanation). Threshold Implementations (TIs) aim to mitigate SCAs by implementing a modified version of the algorithm that operates over randomized shares of its input and intermediate values. This strategy relies on the possibility of splitting the algorithm to be protected into sub-functions that satisfy certain properties about their dependence structure on the randomized shares. Non-complete set coverings (NCSCs) are combinatorial objects that can provide this dependence structure and guide the design of TIs. Given the desired order of protection $d$ and the algebraic degree $t$ of the functions to be implemented, for an NCSC to be useful, its cardinality $r$ should be small and similar to the number of input shares $s$. This work contributes to the study of NCSCs for efficient TIs by finding smaller coverings and proving novel theoretical bounds on their cardinality. We present a new NCSC for the case $t=3,d=2$ that is optimal and NCSCs for the cases $t=3,d=3$ and $t=4,d=2$ whose sizes are close to the lower bounds. We also present new combinatorial properties of these coverings and an algorithm for the search of small NCSCs.

In november 2024, the Ethereum foundation (EF) issued a bounty program with challenges on Poseidon and Poseidon2. The goal of these challenges is to find CICO solutions on different round-reduced instances of Poseidon and Poseidon2, defined on different prime fields. We denote the four main instances Poseidon-256, Poseidon2-64, Poseidon2-31m and Poseidon2-31k. In the challenges, the goal is to solve CICO-1 for Poseidon-256 and Poseidon-64, and CICO-2 for Poseidon-31m and Poseidon-31k. We found CICO solutions to the first 3 proposed instances of Poseidon2-31m and Poseidon2-31k, along with solutions for the first two Poseidon-256 instances. These solutions have been confirmed to be correct and eligible for bounty by the Ethereum fundation, except for the first instance of Poseidon-256, which was claimed by another team before us. In order to solve the instances of Poseidon2-31m and Poseidon2-31k, we used a new resultant-based approach, whereas our attacks on Poseidon-256 only relies on already-known univariate root finding.

NAT is widely assumed to conceal the private IP addresses of internal clients from both off-path attackers within the same LAN and external observers. We show that this assumption does not hold. We present a novel off-path deanonymization attack that infers the private IP addresses of NATed clients engaged in active TCP connections with a remote server. Our attack builds on known NAT behaviors in real-world Wi-Fi routers, such as port preservation, insufficient reverse-path validation, and the absence of TCP window tracking, previously shown to enable off-path TCP hijacking. By inferring a NATed client’s private IP address, our attack defeats the anonymity commonly attributed to NAT, creating a persistent privacy leak that enables deanonymization and user profiling. We validate the attack on 6 Wi-Fi routers and 2 real-world Wi-Fi networks using SSH and HTTP/HTTPS traffic over TCP, finding that 5 of the 6 routers and both networks are vulnerable.

We study the cryptographic properties of sums of commutators of quaternions modulo $q$. We show that for certain parameters, the distribution of the sum of commutators of uniformly random elements with elements sampled from a discrete Gaussian is statistically close to uniform. We also give reductions from worst-case lattice problems such as SIVP to SIS-style problems defined using commutators on structured quaternionic lattices. Together these results indicate one-wayness and collision resistance of the sum-of-commutators function, under worst-case assumptions on lattices. We use this to develop a linearly homomorphic commitment scheme, dubbed `ABBA', which in many cases can be substituted for the widely-used Ajtai commitment scheme. We demonstrate the utility of the properties of commutation by replacing the Ajtai commitments used in Neo (a state-of-the-art folding scheme from lattices) with ABBA commitments, obtaining a 25% commitment size reduction and an almost equally efficient scheme.

Bridges, protocols that enforce a state transition on a destination ledger conditioned on an event on a source ledger, are central to modern DeFi. Conventional designs implicitly assume the source ledger event is publicly observable, an assumption that breaks with Layer-2 payment channels such as the Lightning Network, where state updates occur off-chain between counterparties and are invisible to others. This state of affairs advocates for new bridge designs for this setting. This paper introduces OptiBridge, a bridge between a payment channel (e.g., Lightning Network) and a smart-contract blockchain (e.g., Ethereum) that preserves safety and liveness without adding trust assumptions and remains fully compatible with existing Lightning and Ethereum stacks. OptiBridge follows an optimistic path in the common case: two honest channel peers materialize the intended state on the destination chain by revealing a pre-agreed secret. To handle faults and adversarial behavior, OptiBridge provides a dispute path orchestrated by a more expressive contract that is deployed {only on demand}. An implementation demonstrates substantial cost savings in the optimistic case: compared to Alba (NDSS’25), the optimistic contract deployment uses $\sim 73\%$ less gas ($1.22$M vs. $4.51$M), and proof submission costs $40{,}107$ vs. $253{,}566$ gas; when disputes arise, the dispute contract deployment costs $2{,}785{,}514$ gas and the core dispute call is cheaper ($196{,}438$ vs.$515{,}860$). Our analysis shows that rational users strictly prefer the optimistic path, whereas the dispute mechanism prevents coin theft and imposes higher fees and delays on the deviator.

We present a new generic approach to extend proof techniques in the quantum random oracle model (QROM) — such as query-recording and reprogramming — to the quantum random permutation model (QRPM). Our framework involves simulating bidirectional-query random permutation oracles using Feistel constructions to port the QROM features for the underlying random round functions to the overall Feistel-simulated QRP. We then demonstrate the power of our framework by: • Obtaining a tighter than state-of-the-art lower bound for the query extrapolation problem — a variant of which was studied by Boneh and Zhandry (Eurocrypt 2013) in the QROM — in the bidirectional QRPM, as well as recovering a meaningful lower bound for the double-sided zero search problem (Unruh, Asiacrypt 2023). • Proving the adaptive zero-knowledge property of NIZKs derived from a recent variant of the Fiat-Shamir transform — called duplex-sponge Fiat-Shamir (Chiesa and Orrù, TCC 2025) which is deployed in the wild — in a post-quantum setting against non-uniform adversaries with preprocessing capabilities. All in all, our work illustrates how the “Feistel toolkit” effectively bridges the QROM-QRPM gap by not only achieving the standard QROM techniques of query-recording and reprogramming techniques for QRPs, but also unlocking new state-of-the-art features such as proving non-uniform security in the QRPM.

A blind signature scheme is an interactive protocol that enables a user to obtain a signature on a message without revealing any information about the message–signature pair to the signer. Despite more than 40 years of research, all existing constructions suffer from at least two of the following limitations. 1. The protocol is not round-optimal, requiring more than two messages to be exchanged during the signature phase. 2. There is only game-based security and/or lack of composability with global and observable setup (i.e., there is a need for trusted parameters or to program random oracles). 3. Security (unlike regular signatures) is based on demanding hardness assumptions, especially when considering quantum attacks. In this work, we show how to blindly sign a message, simultaneously overcoming all of the above three limitations. Specifically, we construct a Universally Composable (UC), two-round (optimal) blind signature protocol that relies only on one-way functions (optimal), without trusted parameters. The only deviation from the plain model is the need for a global non-programmable random oracle (NPRO). Nicely, our scheme can be instantiated from a variety of assumptions believed to be post-quantum secure (e.g., AES). A central technical component of our scheme is the construction of a novel commitment scheme that enjoys a special (mild) form of composability, which may be of independent interest. We also discuss a concrete instantiation of our scheme that is suitable for practical applications.

Recently, the notion of dynamic zk-SNARKs was introduced. A dynamic zk-SNARK augments a standard zk-SNARK with an efficient update algorithm. Given a valid source statement-witness pair $(x,w)$ together with a verifying proof $p$, and a valid target statement-witness pair $(x',w')$, the update algorithm outputs a verifying proof $p'$ for $(x',w')$. Crucially, $p'$ is not recomputed from scratch; instead, the update algorithm takes time roughly proportional to the Hamming distance between $(x,w)$ and $(x',w')$, analogous to how dynamic data structures update the result of a computation after a small change. In this paper, we initiate the study of designated-verifier dynamic zk-SNARKs: dynamic zk-SNARKs in which only a designated verifier, holding secret verification state, can be convinced by a proof. Following recent advances in designated-verifier zk-SNARKs---such as efficient post-quantum designated verifier SNARKs (CCS 2021) and designated verifier SNARKs with very small proofs (CRYPTO 2025)---we construct a designated-verifier dynamic zk-SNARK with $O(\log n)$ update time, constant proof size, and concrete efficiency. Our construction significantly outperforms Dynalog (both asymptotically and concretely), the only publicly verifiable dynamic zk-SNARK with polylogarithmic update time (Wang et al., 2024). The concrete efficiency of our construction enables, for the first time, an efficient implementation of a dynamic proof of index: Given a digest $d$ of an arbitrary set and a digest $d'$ of its sorted index (e.g., binary search tree), we produce a SNARK proof certifying the consistency of $d$ and $d'$. More importantly, this proof can be updated in sublinear time when the underlying set changes---for example, when an element is modified or inserted, potentially altering the sorted order. We demonstrate applications of designated-verifier dynamic proofs of index to verifiable dynamic database outsourcing, where a client outsources a database and later maintains verifiable indices for efficient query answering, even under arbitrary database updates.

In the formal verification of complexity-theoretic properties of cryptography, researchers have traditionally attempted to capture ``overwhelming truth'' (satisfaction with all but negligible probability) via satisfaction on individual traces of probabilistic execution. However, this approach introduces significant complexity when quantification is present: satisfaction of existential quantification over traces often produces witnesses---such as nonce-guessing oracles---that, without further constraints, may not correspond to meaningful global objects like PPT algorithms respecting causal structure. This discrepancy creates significant obstacles when attempting to combine trace properties, such as reachability, with properties that are defined on non-negligible sets such as computability, or global properties, such as algorithmic indistinguishability. We resolve this by shifting from defining local satisfaction as satisfaction on individual traces to a semantics based on ever-decreasing non-negligible sets. We demonstrate that the logical key to this unification lies in first-order modal logic S4 with \emph{non-negligible sets} as possible worlds, rather than the propositional S5 fragment with \emph{traces} as possible worlds suggested in previous investigations by the Squirrel Prover team. By introducing a PPT computational first-order S4 Kripke semantics and adopting Fitting's embedding for trace properties, we provide a unified quantified treatment of overwhelming truth for trace properties and indistinguishability, together with a first-order calculus, $\mathsf{BC}^+$, whose sole modal operator is the overwhelming-truth bracket $[\,\cdot\,]$. The calculus is sound and, on its fragment, derives exactly the theorems of first-order S4 with persistence; computational completeness holds on the fragment; cut elimination holds propositionally, while at first order every cut is confined to an optimal Barcan shape. We show that Fitting's embedding naturally accommodates the higher-order quantification used in the Squirrel prover by interpreting function types as sorts in a many-sorted first-order logic; this reduces the need for the specialized \texttt{const} predicate and its associated structural restrictions. Finally, using our findings, we present a hybrid semantics for CryptoVampire that eliminates the need for bounded Skolemization.

In this paper, we examine the One-time signature scheme using run-length encoding, as proposed by Steinwandt et al., under the scenario where an adversary is allowed to obtain signatures on two messages before attempting to forge a signature on a third message. Our analysis follows the line of security discussion presented by Groot Bruinderink et al. in their paper “Oops, I Did It Again – Security of One-Time Signatures under Two-Message Attacks.” By considering various attack models and different strategies, we estimate both the attack complexity and the probability of forging a signature. Our results indicate that the signature scheme performs well under a two-message attack, making it an interesting candidate for a few-time signature scheme. Few-time signature schemes such as HORS are a fundamental building block of stateless hash-based signature schemes.

While existing Proof-of-Work (PoW) based blockchain protocols have demonstrated innovative potential, they face inherent limitations regarding scalability, efficiency, and decentralization. The compact block propagation method, though effective in reducing network bandwidth and propagation delay in ideal environments, suffers from performance degradation due to mempool inconsistencies among nodes. This paper proposes a novel block propagation and consensus protocol that mitigates the blockchain's dependency on mempool synchronization. The proposed approach redefines the PoW process to shorten the time to consensus despite increased block sizes. Specifically, it includes a compressed transaction input ID list within the compact block to induce nodes to immediately begin mining without full verification. The full verification of transactions adopts a 'delayed verification' method, performed in parallel with the mining operation. This study enables the processing of more transactions quickly while maintaining the decentralization and security of Bitcoin (e.g., achieving approximately 66.7 TPS with 10MB blocks).

Post-quantum migration must balance two risks: future quantum breaks of classical cryptography and residual uncertainty in newly standardized post-quantum cryptography (PQC). Hybrid Key Encapsulation Mechanisms (KEMs) hedge by combining a classical and a PQC component. Prior work shows that optimized combiners may omit large public inputs from the final key-derivation step, but only if the derived key remains bound to the ciphertext transcript and, in multi-target settings, to the intended recipient; otherwise ciphertext manipulation and cross-recipient amortization at the KDF layer can increase an adversary’s concrete advantage. In practice, these requirements are often conflated, leading either to unsafe secret-only schedules or to unnecessary hashing of large transcripts. We distill practitioner-facing, interface-level guidance by separating ciphertext-to-secret binding from multi-target security, and by adopting ciphertext second-preimage resistance (C2PRI) as a checkable criterion under deployed encodings. We apply this perspective to X-Wing, a hybrid combining ML-KEM with an X25519-based DH-to-KEM under consideration as an IETF Internet-Draft. Under the deployed raw-output interface, we show how distinct classical ciphertexts can yield the same shared secret, motivating hashing of the classical ciphertext in the outer KDF and clarifying when recipient public-key context is needed in multi-target deployments. We also show that similar issues arise for other widely deployed elliptic-curve Diffie–Hellman (ECDH) APIs, including P-256, when they export only partial point information. Finally, we summarize when ciphertext hashing can be omitted, including canonical prime-order abstractions such as Ristretto255 and designs that internalize transcript context via per-component hashing, as in HPKE Diffie–Hellman-based KEM (DHKEM) profiles.

Neural network model extraction attacks pose a serious threat to the intellectual property of deep learning models. While most prior work focuses on Fully Connected Networks (FCNs), effective extraction of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) remains underexplored, particularly in the hard-label setting. In this work, we propose the first systematic method for the recovery of complete CNN parameters in such conditions. By reformulating convolutional layers as sparse Block Toeplitz with Toeplitz Blocks (BTTB) matrices, we extend the model extraction attack method from FCNs to CNNs. The proposed method supports both one- and two-dimensional CNNs, handling scenarios with multiple kernels, multi-channel structures, and average pooling. To enhance computational efficiency and scalability, a kernel-centric clustering algorithm is proposed to exploit kernel parameter sharing, and a Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)-based acceleration strategy is adopted to address the computational cost of large sample sets. Moreover, we perform experiments to demonstrate that our method accurately and efficiently extracts CNN parameters, including multi-channel, multi-kernel and average-pooling layers, with a worst-case relative error of $2^{-17.75}$ and up to $2^{9.26}$ speedup, and recover large models LeNet-5 within practical runtime.

Efficiently masking multiplications in software is a long standing and extensively studied problem. A variety of gadgets have been proposed to perform these multiplications, each offering different trade-offs between efficiency and security. However, almost all existing solutions rely on arithmetic masking, in which multiplications cannot be naturally protected. In this work, we introduce two novel gadgets, named A2S and S2A, that enable conversions between arithmetic masking and Shamir’s Secret Sharing (SSS)-based masking. With this approach, multiplications can be performed naturally and securely in a sharewise manner. We prove that our gadgets achieve SNI security, which provides security guarantees and straightforward composability. Moreover, we demonstrate that composing them with multiplication yields PINI security. We then provide a detailed complexity analysis and discuss the contexts where our gadgets are most relevant. As a case study, we apply them to the MQOM post-quantum signature scheme, a candidate in the second round of the NIST additional post-quantum digital signature standardization process. When computing the sensitive multiplications in MQOM, for masking order t = 1, our approach reduces the number of multiplications, additions, and randomness requirements by 31%, 71%, and 60%, respectively, compared to the state of the art, while incurring only small additional memory overhead. We further show that these gains not only hold but actually increase as the masking order grows. Our results demonstrate that arithmetic-to-SSS conversions provide an effective and scalable path toward efficient masked implementations, making them particularly attractive for postquantum cryptography.

We demonstrate a general and efficient technique to Hensel-lift a solution to a system of ($p$‑adically analytic) equations which may be given implicitly in the form of an efficient evaluation algorithm. Contrary to textbook Hensel lifting, we do not require the equations to be represented explicitly; indeed, our main application uses the method for a system of equations that can be exponentially larger than its representation as an arithmetic circuit: we show how to compute traces of separable elliptic-curve endomorphisms over a finite field $\mathbb{F}_q$ by constructing an approximate lift to $\mathbb{Z}_q$. Our examples include endomorphisms represented as a chain of Vélu, √élu, modular, or radical isogenies, as well as HD‑embedded endomorphisms. The resulting trace-computation algorithm outperforms the state of the art both asymptotically and concretely.

Position verification schemes are interactive protocols where entities prove their physical location to others; this enables interactive proofs for statements of the form "I am at a location L." Although secure position verification cannot be achieved with classical protocols (even with computational assumptions), they are feasible with quantum protocols. In this paper we introduce the notion of zero-knowledge position verification, which generalizes position verification in two ways: 1. enabling entities to prove more sophisticated statements about their locations at different times (for example, "I was NOT near location L at noon yesterday"). 2. maintaining privacy for any other detail about their true location besides the statement they are proving. We construct zero-knowledge position verification from standard position verification and post-quantum one-way functions. The central tool in our construction is a primitive we call position commitments, which allow entities to privately commit to their physical position in a particular moment, which is then revealed at some later time.

The primary goal of Anamorphic encryption ($\mathsf{AE}$), introduced at Eurocrypt 2022, is to enable private communication even in highly adversarial settings, such as when an adversarial $\textit {dictator}$ "legally" confiscates a user's secret keys (compromising the receiver's privacy) and/or coerces users into sending specific messages (compromising the sender's privacy). To achieve this, $\mathsf{AE}$ embeds hidden additional messages within seemingly innocuous ciphertexts where the sender and receiver comply with the dictator's demands and, in doing so, $\mathsf{AE}$ uncovers novel structural properties of encryption mechanisms. One methodology that extends the capability of a ciphertext is to embed the hidden anamorphic message in the randomness used in encryption. However, not all schemes reveal this randomness as part of the decryption process! Here, we unveil a conceptually simple yet general new methodology that achieves $\mathsf{AE}$. It is based on the concept of $\textit {Trapdoor-Aided Randomness Recovery}$ by which one can generate special key pairs $(\mathsf{pk},\mathsf{sk})$ that are still indistinguishable from honestly generated key pairs but possess an associated trapdoor $\mathsf{td}$ that first allows for randomness extraction from a ciphertext (and nothing more). Secondly, importantly and differently from prior proposals, the new trapdoor should be different from and computationally independent of "the decryption trapdoor key." Primarily, this new methodology allows for a generic construction of $\textit{public-key}~\mathsf{AE}$ which is a notion introduced at Crypto 24, where, to date, the only known public-key anamorphism relied on a specific CCA encryption scheme. Note that public-key $\mathsf{AE}$ eliminates the need for a preliminary private interaction between the receiver and the sender, thus greatly extending the applicability of anamorphism. In addition to obtaining public-key anamorphism, the new methodology, in turn, generically allows for extended anamorphic properties: Specifically and significantly, the methodology allows protections against a dictator that may ask for the randomness employed by the sender. We then show concrete instantiations of the above methodology based on known lattice-based schemes. Specifically, due to the new methodology, we give efficient anamorphic versions of the Dual Regev scheme and the Lindner-Peikert scheme. Technically, we first define a new problem, called $\textit{randomness finding}~(\mathsf{RFinding})$, which requires that even if the adversary obtains the receiver's secret key, then, while it can decrypt, it cannot fully recover the randomness from the ciphertext. Secondly, we reduce the standard LWE assumptions to the hardness of $\mathsf{RFinding}$ for both schemes. Notably, in both schemes we achieve public-key anamorphism utilizing the "trapdoor techniques for lattices" introduced by Micciancio and Peikert at Eurocrypt 2012.

We present the first formally verified implementation of a hash-based signature scheme that is linked to a machine-checked proof of security. Specifically, we provide reference implementations of XMSS and XMSS$^{\textrm{MT}}$ written in Jasmin, targeting the AMD64 architecture. Beyond the implementations, we provide formal EasyCrypt specifications of XMSS and XMSS$^{\textrm{MT}}$, transcribed from RFC~8391, and prove that our implementations adhere to these specifications. Furthermore, for XMSS, we give a machine-checked proof that our specification of RFC~8391 refines the abstract specification proven secure in EasyCrypt by Barbosa, Dupressoir, Grégoire, Hülsing, Meijers and Strub [CRYPTO'23]. In particular, we prove the security of our specification via a reduction, demonstrating that breaking our specification contradicts the [CRYPTO'23] result for our instantiation. Consequently, our implementation is not only functionally correct, but also adheres to a specification that is proven secure. The core technical challenge in our work resides in bridging low-level implementations of TreeHash algorithms with high-level functional specifications used in the pre-existing formalization.

Homomorphic Signatures (HS) enable the authentication of data that has been processed by an untrusted party, allowing a verifier to check the correctness of a computation without access to the original signed inputs. Since their introduction, HS have evolved from algebraically restricted linear schemes to expressive non-linear and Fully Homomorphic Signature (FHS) constructions, spanning diverse cryptographic assumptions and security models. This paper presents a Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) on homomorphic signatures. We organize existing schemes along key dimensions including functional expressiveness, underlying cryptographic primitives, security notions (selective vs. adaptive, single-key vs. multi-key), and privacy guarantees such as context hiding. This unified perspective highlights a fundamental shift from algebraic constructions toward proof-based and post-quantum designs, as well as the growing importance of Multi-Key Homomorphic Signatures (MKHS) for decentralized settings. We conclude by identifying open problems and emerging directions that must be addressed to bridge the gap between theoretical HS constructions and practical verifiable computation.

We show how to improve rank-metric solvers when certain side information (hints) about the secret is available. Concretely, we adapt the kernel search algorithm for MinRank and the GRS algorithm for the Rank Syndrome Decoding problem when some entries in the rank decomposition of the error matrix are known. This setting is motivated by side-channel leakage and cryptographic applications: Mirath and RYDE, two signature candidates in the NIST post-quantum competition, rely on these problems and employ secret keys in this decomposed form. As a main technical ingredient, we give an optimal procedure for guessing a subspace containing the row space of a systematic matrix given only partial knowledge of its entries. Further, we describe a profiling side-channel attack on the reference implementation of Mirath to demonstrate the plausibility of obtaining such hints.

Masking is the standard defense against power-based side-channel analysis (SCA) for cryptographic software, in which sensitive variables are split into independent shares. Although prior work often attributes leakage to microarchitectural effects, architectural interactions alone can already introduce subtle leaks that remain poorly understood. In this work, we propose ISALeak, a target-agnostic framework for analyzing full masked implementations to precisely identify and attribute the root causes of side-channel leakage at the instruction-set (ISA) level. ISALeak complements statistical tests such as TVLA by not only detecting leakage, but also localizing and explaining its source. We evaluate our approach on masked AES and masked Ascon across multiple compiler versions and optimizations. Using power measurements from ASIC (PicoRV32) and FPGA (Ibex) RISC-V cores, we show that 20-40% of the leaks detected by TVLA for masked AES originate from architectural register interactions. For masked Ascon, 17-23% of the observed leakage likewise stems from ISA-level effects and consistently manifests in physical power traces.

Threshold ECDSA has been an active research topic in recent years, driven by its wide-ranging applications, particularly in blockchain domains. In these real-world applications, robustness is a critical requirement. It ensures that a signature is successfully generated as long as $t+1$ honest parties are present, regardless of malicious behavior from others. Existing robust constructions generally fall into two categories: those based on threshold linearly homomorphic encryption (TLHE) and those leveraging the Multiplicative-to-Additive (MtA) paradigm. The TLHE-based approach (e.g., WMC24 in NDSS'24) achieves constant sending communication per party but incurs an expensive online phase. In contrast, the MtA-based approach (e.g., TX25 in S\&P'25) is online-friendly, requiring only elliptic-curve group operations during the online phase. However, it has the drawback of requiring $O(n)$ sending communication per party when $n$ parties are involved. In this work, we propose ARES, a robust threshold ECDSA scheme designed to reduce both communication and computational overhead within the online-friendly MtA framework. To improve the communication efficiency of TX25, we propose verifiable non-interactive multiplication (VNIM), a new primitive which endows standard non-interactive multiplication with public verifiability. Simultaneously, we leverage super-invertible matrices and packed secret sharing to amortize the overall costs. Specifically, when setting the packing parameter of packed secret sharing to $\ell = 1$ (i.e., without secret packing), ARES exhibits linear communication complexity while already achieving an approximately $50\%$ improvement over TX25. When configuring $\ell = t/3$ with $t \ge 12$, ARES achieves lower communication overhead than WMC24, requiring a constant $\approx 4.5\text{ KB}$ per party. Furthermore, setting $\ell = t/2$ reduces the amortized communication cost to roughly $3\text{ KB}$ per party. On the other hand, amortizing across $\ell$ signatures incurs a trade-off by increasing the required party size by $\ell$.

Arithmetic correlations represent the extension of classical correlations into the with-carry setting and serve as a critical performance criterion for pseudorandom sequences constructed via feedback with carry shift registers. The arithemetic correlation values should be as small as possible for application perspective. This paper establishes a sufficient condition for $N$-ary sequences to have ideal arithmetic correlation. Based on this characterization, it is demonstrated that $N$-ary $\ell$-sequences with a prime connection integer $p$ satisfying $p\equiv1(\textup{mod}\:N)$ exhibit ideal arithmetic correlation. Furthermore, under the condition $N^{p-1}\not\equiv1(\textup{mod}\:p^{2})$, this result is extended to the case where the connection integer is a prime power. Additionally, an upper bound is established for the arithmetic crosscorrelation of binary sequences derived from Fermat quotients with coprime periods.

The Merkle-Damgård construction (in its strengthened form as used in SHA-256 and SHA-512, the untruncated members of SHA-2) is not classically indifferentiable from a Variable-Input-Length (VIL) random oracle because of the length-extension attack. Nevertheless, Dodis, Ristenpart, and Shrimpton showed that Merkle-Damgård is publicly indifferentiable, a weaker notion that still justifies replacing a VIL random oracle by Merkle-Damgård in many security proofs when all inputs to a random oracle are public (e.g., Fiat-Shamir and full-domain-hash signatures). In this paper, we show that this replacement fails in the post-quantum setting: (Strengthened) Merkle-Damgård is not publicly indifferentiable from a VIL random oracle against quantum distinguishers with superposition access to the underlying primitive (while construction queries remain classical), even if the compression function is ideally random. We first formalize post-quantum public indifferentiability so that the corresponding composition theorem extends to the quantum random oracle model. We also introduce a post-quantum version of sequential indifferentiability, an even weaker notion. We then prove that (strengthened) Merkle-Damgård satisfies neither notion by showing that an explicit quantum distinguisher achieves non-negligible advantage against any efficient simulator, using Zhandry's compressed-oracle technique. We thus obtain an explicit, conjecture-free separation between an indifferentiability-style notion in the classical setting and its post-quantum analogue.

This paper presents a formal framework for decentralized identity (DID), which achieves both minimal disclosure and session unlinkability under public verifiability. We instantiate this framework as PrivDID. In PrivDID, a user can prove a predicate about a committed attribute via a single ring signature, thereby hiding in an anonymity set dynamically selected from the public ledger. PrivDID builds on Pedersen commitments and binary-range encodings, and is proven secure in the random oracle model. It is fully W3C-compliant and requires no trusted setup. Implementation shows practical efficiency in storage, communication, and computation, confirming real-world feasibility.

Censorship resistance and high throughput are two key benefits of modern multi-proposer BFT protocols. However, in existing designs these two properties are at odds: censorship resistance is typically achieved through duplicating transactions, which in turn harms throughput. This leaves open the question of whether it is possible to improve both properties simultaneously. In this paper, we formally study the trade-offs between censorship resistance and throughput in multi-proposer BFT protocols, where up to $f$ parties may be Byzantine. We present a model for the transaction assignment process, which allows us to classify assignment protocols into meaningful categories. Using this model, we establish fundamental tradeoffs between censorship resistance and throughput. We show that under well-defined conditions, any deterministic transaction assignment protocol that achieves optimal throughput must suffer from $f$ rounds of censorship delay; any deterministic assignment protocol that guarantees every transaction is committed within a constant number of rounds must suffer a factor of $f$ loss in throughput relative to the optimal baseline. On the positive side, we propose and analyze new transaction-assignment protocols that enable flexible choices among throughput–censorship tradeoffs spanning the full spectrum dictated by our lower bounds. In particular, we give a protocol that achieves $\log f$ censorship delay while paying only a factor-2 throughput loss relative to the state-of-the-art MirBFT (EuroSys’23), which incurs $f$ rounds of censorship delay. We further propose randomized assignment protocols that provably break both the deterministic lower bound for the censorship delay and throughput in expectation. All assignment protocols discussed can be integrated with existing multi-proposer protocols within our model as add-ons without modifying the consensus.

This short paper formally specifies and analyzes the UG hybrid KEM construction from the IRTF CFRG’s recent draft on hybrid (post-quantum/traditional) KEMs. The UG construction is an optimized hybrid of a Diffie-Hellman (DH)-based KEM in a nominal group and a generic IND-CCA KEM. The main optimization is that the group elements derived in the DH-based KEM are “inlined” in the key derivation, saving unnecessary hashing. We perform two security analyses of the UG construction: one shows UG is IND-CCA even if the generic IND-CCA KEM is broken; the other complementary analysis shows UG is IND-CCA even if the DH assumptions in the nominal group are broken (by, e.g., a cryptographically-relevant quantum computer).

This work extends the methodology of the Class Elimination Attack (CEA) and the Reference Identities (RI/GRI) used in cryptanalysis for its application to block ciphers like AES and complex SPN variants. Probabilistic results concerning the partitioned key space are generalized to algebraic structures defined over finite fields $ \mathbb{F}_{2^n} $, linking them to the cipher's diffusion and confusion properties. Theorems establishing upper bounds for the expected number of classes to explore as a function of the diffusion capacity are proposed, and a parameterized complexity analysis is provided. The results offer a theoretical framework for evaluating the resistance of symmetric ciphers against attacks based on genetic algorithms and partition optimization.

Masking, the primary countermeasure against differential power attacks, guarantees formal security under abstract execution models that are violated in modern micro-architectures. Meanwhile, processors with out-of-order micro-architectures are increasingly used for high-assurance tasks, yet their physical side-channel leakage remains poorly characterized, hindering side-channel security on such platforms. In this work, we present the first empirical study of physical power side-channel leakage on out-of-order cores. Through practical lab experiments, we identify and validate multiple micro-architectural leakage sources that undermine software masking: register renaming reintroduces register overwrites beyond software control; forwarding leaks through the common data bus, with less impact on security order than in-order forwarding; and concurrent instructions leaks through coupling, with affected instructions determined at runtime. We demonstrate that runtime scheduling and dynamic resource allocation undermine software-only mitigations. To address this, we propose countermeasures that shift part of the responsibility to hardware and require security by design. We further demonstrate that these effects are exploitable in practice by breaking the security of a theoretically secure software-masked lattice-based post-quantum implementation on an out-of-order core. Finally, we find that clock frequency significantly affects leakage of software-masked implementations. This makes security unstable across frequencies and suggests that cryptographic software should be constrained to verified frequencies.

Accordion modes have experienced a surge in popularity, partially motivated by the recent NIST Accordion modes project. None of the existing practical constructions is leakage-resilient by default. In this work, we design a leakage-resilient Accordion mode. We start by presenting a generic analysis of the Encode-then-Encipher (EtE) framework in the leakage-resilient setting, assuming the enciphering is a leakage-resilient STPRP (STPRPl2). We show that the resulting security, while strong, suffers from some limitations. Next, we introduce Motte-and-Bailey, a general framework for building leakage-resilient accordion modes, in the spirit of the PIV construction. Motte-and-Bailey, or MaB for short, is a leveled construction, requiring light assumptions on most of its components to guarantee good STPRPl2, CIML2 and CCAMl2 security. In particular, we require two fully protected calls to a TBC, a collision-resistant hash function (with unbounded or light leakage), and an ideal leakage-resilient PRG, secure against single-trace attacks. Additionally, we present particular instantiations, Qaitbay and Alicante. In Qaitbay the PRG and the hash function are replaced by the Sponge function, while an independent TBC is used for the leak-free calls. Alicante makes use of an ideal cipher, and uses the MDPH hash function and the 2PRG construction, while the leak-free calls are implemented using independent calls to the ideal cipher. We also give three flavours of how to instantiate the TBC inside Qaitbay. Last but not least, we show how to strengthen MaB, Qaitbay and Alicante to also achieve CCAmL2.

Since 2009, the cryptographic community has its eyes fixed on automatic tools based on solvers to help the cryptanalysts trying to attack symmetric cryptographic schemes. Among those automatic tools, TAGADA is dedicated to search for a particular kind of cryptanalysis called differential cryptanalysis. It is of major importance for the cryptographic community to have automatic tools dedicated to the analysis of security of symmetric key primitives to be convince about what symmetric key schemes should be used and what symmetric key schemes should not be used. In this paper, we will see how to extend TAGADA from differential cryptanalysis to boomerang cryptanalysis which is an important kind of attacks in symmetric key cryptography. We will also compare our tool with the two existing ones dedicated to boomerang distinguishers proposed by Hadipour et al. and Derbez et al.

We show reductions and equivalences between various problems related to the computation of the endomorphism ring of principally polarised superspecial abelian surfaces. Problems considered are the computation of the Ibukiyama-Katsura-Oort matrix and computation of unpolarised isomoprhisms between superspecial abelian surfaces.

Decentralized identity is revolutionizing secure digital interactions by giving users control over their personal data. Anonymous credentials (ACs) are fundamental to this paradigm, yet their practical application is hindered by significant usability and efficiency challenges. Existing AC systems often struggle with limitations in predicate expressiveness, privacy protection, and incompatibility with widely adopted legacy signatures based on recommended curves. To overcome these obstacles, this paper introduces a novel AC system named Re2creds. Re2creds establishes a new paradigm of reusable credential presentation, which drastically cuts computational costs by allowing the core of a presentation to be reused across multiple sessions with only lightweight updates. Furthermore, Re2creds incorporates a proof combination mechanism that efficiently supports legacy signatures by moving the most computationally intensive cryptographic operations outside the arithmetic circuit. This approach makes it practical to use credentials based on NIST-recommended curves, removing a critical barrier to real-world adoption. We demonstrate Re2creds’ security properties through a refined UC ideal functionality, accompanied by rigorous proofs. Experimental evaluations demonstrate significant performance improvements over existing schemes: credential generation time decreases by more than 50% when derivingfrom an existing presentation. Additionally, Re2creds makes the presentation of legacy signatures feasible compared to other ACs, which takes less than 1s for a BLS signature based on BN254.

We introduce a simple pairing-based vector commitment with subvector opening where, after a one-time preprocessing, the prover can open a subvector of size $\ell$ in linear time. Our focus is on practically relevant solutions compatible with already deployed setups—specifically, the powers-of-$\tau$ setup used by KZG and many popular SNARKs. We achieve substantial concrete speedups over aSVC (Tomescu et al., SCN 2020), the state of the art in deployable subvector commitments with $O(\ell \log^2 \ell)$ prover and verifier time: our opening is over $60\times$ faster on subvectors of any size; on large subvectors ($\ell \approx$ 64K) our opening and verification achieve $\approx 4000\times$ and $170\times$ speedups respectively (and four times as much with parallelism). Our main result is a construction where: - A commitment is a single $\mathbb{G}_2$ element; a proof is a single $\mathbb{G}_1$ element; - Opening requires $\ell$ point additions in $\mathbb{G}_1$; - Verification is dominated by $2\ell$ $\mathbb{G}_1$ operations. We also describe two variants of our main design that are directly compatible with deployed schemes and where the commitment is a $\mathbb{G}_1$ element; these two schemes show similar speedups over prior work. We additionally support cross-commitment and distributed aggregation, and provide an open-source implementation.

To enhance the diversity of basic hard problems underlying post-quantum cryptography (PQC) schemes, NIST launched an additional call for PQC signatures in 2023. Among numerous candidate schemes, several code-based ones, which have successfully advanced to the second round, are constructed by applying the Fiat--Shamir transform to the parallel repetition of a (relatively low soundness) commit-and-prove sigma protocol similar to the Stern identification scheme. In Fiat--Shamir-based signatures, it is well-known that key material will be leaked if an attacker can somehow obtain what amounts, in the sigma protocol, to the responses to different challenges with respect to the same commitment. This idea is for example at the basis of a famous differential fault attack against deterministic Fiat--Shamir-based signatures like EdDSA. It is usually difficult to mount a fault injection attack based on that principle against a properly randomized Fiat--Shamir-based scheme however (at least with single faults): since commitment collisions are ruled out, it typically involves obtaining the responses to multiple challenges with respect to the same commitment within a single execution of the signature, which is often impossible by construction (e.g., because the extra information will not fit in a single signature, or because it is hard to force the computation of both responses). Due to the comparative inefficiency of signatures based on Stern-like protocols with parallel repetition, candidate constructions are led to use clever compression techniques to reduce signature size, in a way that increases the attack surface for physical attacks. In this paper, we demonstrate this against the LESS signature scheme, which uses so-called GGM trees for signature compression. We propose a simple fault attack on the construction of a binary array used to build the GGM tree, and show that a small number of faulty signatures suffice for full key recovery. We provide a thorough mathematical model of the attack as well as extensive experimental validation with glitch attacks on a ChipWhisperer board, showing that, depending on the target parameter set and the precise fault model we consider, full key recovery can very often be achieved with just one or two faulty signatures, and never more than a couple hundred even in the least favorable scenario for the attacker.

Falcon is a lattice-based signature scheme that has been selected as a standard in NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization project. The trapdoor generation process of Falcon amounts to generating two polynomials, $f$ and $g$, that satisfy certain conditions to achieve a quality parameter $\alpha$ as small as possible, because smaller $\alpha$ usually leads to higher security levels and shorter signatures. The original approach to generate NTRU trapdoors, proposed by Ducas, Lyubashevsky, and Prest (ASIACRYPT 2014), is based on trial-and-repeat, which generates $f$ and $g$ with small Gaussian coefficients and tests whether they satisfy the condition or not. If not, the process is repeated. In practice, $\alpha$ is chosen as 1.17 because it is the smallest value that keeps the number of repetitions relatively small. A recent work by Espitau et al. (ASIACRYPT 2023) proposed a new approach to generate NTRU trapdoors: instead of using trial-and-repeat, sample $f$ and $g$ in the Fourier domain that satisfies the targeted quality and map them back to ring elements. In principle, the idea of Fourier sampling applies to Falcon itself as well, but the sampling region in the Fourier domain for Falcon has a distinct, less elegant geometric shape, which makes sampling more challenging. In this paper, we adopt Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods for sampling. The core idea is to start from an arbitrary point within the target region and perform random walks until the point approximates a random sample from the desired distribution. Specifically, we use Gibbs sampler with Fourier sampling to generate Falcon trapdoors. Our approach allows us to achieve \(\alpha\) values arbitrarily close to 1 efficiently, whereas the original trial-and-repeat method would require impractically many repetitions (far exceeding trillions) to reach even \(\alpha = 1.04\). In particular, Falcon-512 currently falls short of the NIST level one requirement of 128 bits, but our method effectively mitigates this gap. Furthermore, our approach eliminates the need for discrete Gaussian sampling, which is challenging to implement and secure. Instead, our method relies solely on uniform sampling over an interval, simplifying the implementation and improving efficiency.

The Functional Decomposition Problem (FDP) involves expressing a given set of multivariate polynomials as a composition of simpler polynomials. Traditional methods, such as Faugère-Perret’s AlgoFDP and its generalized variant MultiComPoly, rely on Gröbner basis computations on ideals generated from derivatives of composed polynomials h = f ◦ g, where f and g are called left-factor and right-factor of h, respectively. The computational cost of these methods increases significantly with both the number of variables and the degrees of the component polynomials in f and g, and their existing complexity estimates are not sufficiently precise. This paper presents two algorithmic improvements to FDP. First, we replace Gröbner basis computation with Gauss–Jordan elimination (GJE) to convert the coefficient matrix into its reduced row-echelon form (RREF), offering a clearer formulation of a key step in MultiComPoly. The resulting algorithm, named RREFComPoly, integrates this change. Additionally, by using exact binomials in place of original binomial approximations and refining the estimation of a critical parameter, we achieve a tighter complexity bound than that of MultiComPoly. Our second and more impactful contribution, PartComPoly, inverts the conventional FDP workflow. Instead of directly recovering the vector space spanned by the component polynomials of g, PartComPoly first uses a localization strategy to recover f and partial information of g with RREFComPoly, and then iteratively reconstructs g by solving a series of linear systems derived from the obtained f and partial information of g. This inversion dramatically reduces computational complexity and expands the solvable domain of FDP, making previously intractable instances – such as those which were claimed to be not computationally exploitable in [1, page 175] – computationally tractable for the first time. Our experiments have confirmed the correctness and validity of both algorithms RREFComPoly and PartComPoly.

The devastating attacks against SIDH (Supersingular Isogeny Diffie-Hellman) have popularised the practical use of isogenies of dimension $2$ and above in cryptography. Though this effort was primarily focused on dimension 2, $4$-dimensional isogenies, have been used in several isogeny-based cryptographic constructions including SQIsignHD, SQIPrime, (qt-)Pegasis and MIKE. These isogenies are also interesting for number theoretic applications related to higher dimensional isogeny graphs. In 2024, a work by Pierrick Dartois introduced algorithms to compute efficiently chains of $2$-isogenies with Mumford's level $2$ theta coordinates in all dimensions, focusing on cryptographic applications in dimension $4$. In this paper, we improve Dartois' results by providing a simpler and faster method to compute generic isogenies in any dimension, and new computation and evaluation algorithms adapted to gluing isogenies from a product of four elliptic curves, with techniques that generalise a previous work by Max Duparc in dimension $2$. Unlike previous algorithms by Dartois, the algorithms we propose are both easy to implement and naturally constant time. We apply our results to propose the first constant time C implementation of a $4$-dimensional chain of $2$-isogenies, adapted to the qt-Pegasis algorithm and running in less than $25$ ms for a $500$ bit prime. With our new gluing evaluation method, we are able to work fully over $\mathbb{F}_p$ instead of $\mathbb{F}_{p^2}$, allowing further efficiency gains. Indeed, our new formulae accelerate the proof of concept SageMath implementation of qt-Pegasis by up to 19 % for a $500$ bit prime.

The celebrated work of Impagliazzo and Rudich (STOC'89) provides an oracle separation between those primitives implied by a random oracle (RO) and those that imply key agreement and public-key cryptography. For the last 36 years, this result seemed to cleanly separate two worlds: Minicrypt, which is often described as what can be achieved from only ROs, and Cryptomania, which is a world where public-key cryptography exists. This work presents a natural primitive, called an oblivious interactive hash function (OIHF), and shows the following: (1) OIHFs can be constructed from ROs. (2) OIHFs can be constructed from oblivious transfer (OT), and hence they are implied by various well-studied public-key-style assumptions. (3) The existence of an OIHF implies OT, via a non-black-box reduction. Point (1) places the primitive into Minicrypt, point (2) implies that numerous well-studied standard-model complexity assumptions imply that OIHFs exist, and point (3) shows that this primitive circumvents the barrier imposed by Impagliazzo and Rudich. Our results show that a protocol constructible in Minicrypt implies OT. However, this *does not* imply that OT can be constructed from RO; indeed, Impagliazzo/Rudich shows this is impossible. Our non-black-box reduction is well-defined only for standard-model OIHFs, i.e. ones that do not use RO, and at present we can only construct standard-model OIHF in Cryptomania. This is to say that we do not propose an OT protocol that can be constructed from a cryptographic hash function. Rather, our results call into question the value of the random oracle model as an idealization of Minicrypt, and they question where the boundaries of Minicrypt lie.

Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) is a powerful primitive which allows a computationally weak client to outsource computation to a powerful server while maintaining privacy. However, FHE typically suffers from high ciphertext expansion, meaning that the amount of data the client has to send to the server increases by many orders of magnitude after it is encrypted. To solve this problem, the approach known as transciphering consists in combining symmetric encryption with FHE. The most common choice of cipher in this context is the AES, which has been used as a benchmark for transciphering. However, although FHE is typically post-quantum secure, existing transciphering protocols only use AES-128, failing thus to offer security against quantum adversaries. In this work, we construct transciphering protocols based on standard ciphers that offer post-quantum security. For this, we propose algorithms to efficiently evaluate the ChaCha cipher with FHE. We notice that ChaCha is a well-established cipher which even has a standardized version in TLS offering 256 bits of security against classic attackers, thus, 128 bits of security in the quantum world. We show that our solutions have both better latency and throughput than the state-of-the-art transciphering protocol based on AES. Namely, compared with an extended (128-bit PQ secure) version of Hippogryph (Belaïd et al., IACR CiC 2025), in single-core experiments, our running times are up to 11.7 times faster while our throughput is more than 50 times higher.

Succinct zero-knowledge machine learning (zkML) uses zk succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (zkSNARKs) to prove neural-network (NN) computations with logarithmic-size proofs. However, general-purpose zkSNARKs do not scale in zkML because compiling matrix-heavy NNs into arithmetic circuits is memory-prohibitive. Existing zkML methods rely on rank-1 constraint systems (R1CS) to hide NN architectures while retaining succinctness. Removing circuit-based representations, it has remained unclear how to hide NN architectures without sacrificing succinctness. Motivated by this gap, we introduce matrix-circuit satisfiability (Mat-Circ-SAT) and a high-dimensional variant of R1CS, termed high-dimensional R1CS (HD-R1CS), for Mat-Circ-SAT. Architecturally, HD-R1CS encodes NN architectures via sparse matrices whose dimensions scale with the number of matrices, rather than with the total number of scalar entries, as in R1CS. Notably, we present zkSMART (zero-knowledge sparse matrix argument via restructuring transform) as a zkSNARK protocol for HD-R1CS. Compared to Evalyn (Asiacrypt '25), which hides the NN architecture using the proof-of-proof technique, zkSMART performs better in concrete prover time for deep NNs. More precisely, for NN computations with $M$ matrices of size $n \times n$, we achieve $O(n^2 M)$ prover time, $O(\log(nM))$ proof size and verifier time, and $O(n^2 M)$ RAM usage with a small constant factor. Such asymptotic efficiency enables our protocol to scale to NNs with up to a billion parameters.

In this work we study quantitative existence results for genus-$2$ curves over $\mathbb{Q}$ whose Jacobians have Mordell-Weil rank at least $1$ or $2$, ordering the curves by the naive height of their integral Weierstrass models. We use geometric techniques to show that asymptotically the Jacobians of almost all integral models with two rational points at infinity have rank $r \geq 1$. Since there are $\asymp X^{\frac{13}{2}}$ such models among the $X^7$ curves $y^2=f(x)$ of height $\leq X$, this yields a lower bound of logarithmic density $13/14$ for the subset of rank $r \geq 1$. We further present a large explicit subfamily where Jacobians have ranks $r \geq 2$, yielding an unconditional logarithmic density of at least $5/7$. Independently, we give a construction of genus-$2$ curves with split Jacobian and rank $2$, producing a subfamily of logarithmic density at least $ 2/21$. Finally, we analyze quadratic and biquadratic twist families in the split-Jacobian setting, obtaining a positive proportion of rank-$2$ twists. These results have implications for Regev's quantum algorithm in hyperelliptic curve cryptography.

Blind signatures (Chaum, CRYPTO 82) are important building blocks in many privacy-preserving applications, such as anonymous credentials or e-cash schemes. Recent years saw a strong interest in building Blind signatures from post-quantum assumptions, primarily from lattices. While performance has improved, no construction has reached practical efficiency in terms of computation and communication. The state of the art requires at least $20$ KB size of communication for each showing of a lattice-based Blind signature to a verifier, and more than $100$ ms in prover time. In this work, we propose an alternative direction with a plausibly post-quantum Blind signature scheme called PoMFRIT. It builds on top of the VOLE-in-the-head Zero-Knowledge proof system (Baum et al. CRYPTO 2023), which we combine with the MAYO digital signature scheme (Beullens, SAC 2021). We implement multiple versions of PoMFRIT to demonstrate security and performance trade-offs, and provide detailed benchmarks of our constructions. Signature issuance requires \(0.45\) KB communication for Blind signatures of size \(6.7\) KB. Showing a Blind signature can be done in $<76$ ms even for a conservative construction with $128$ bit security. As a building block for our Blind signature scheme, we implement the first VOLE-in-the-head proof for hash functions in the SHA-3 family, which we consider of independent interest.

Specified as part of the (standard, optional) M extension, the mul and mulhu instructions reflect support for unsigned integer multiplication in RISC-V base Instruction Set Architectures (ISAs) such as RV32I and RV64I: given w-bit integers x and y for a word size w, they respectively produce the less- and more-significant w bits of the (2 · w)-bit product r = x × y. This typically minimal, and hence RISC-like form contrasts sharply with many alternative ISAs. For example, ARMv7-M includes a rich set of multiply and multiply-accumulate instructions; these cater for a wide variety of important use-cases in cryptography, where multi-precision integer arithmetic is often a central requirement. In this paper, we explore the extension of RV32I and RV64I, i.e., an Instruction Set Extension (ISE), with richer support for unsigned integer multiplication. Our design has three central features: 1) it includes dedicated carry propagation and multiply-accumulate instructions, 2) those instructions allow flexible selection of the radix (thus catering for reduced- and full-radix representations), and 3) the design can be considered for any w, and so uniformly across both RV32I and RV64I. A headline outcome of our evaluation is that, for X25519-based scalar multiplication, use of the ISE affords 1.5× and 1.6× improvement for full- and reduced-radix cases, respectively, on RV32I, and 1.3× and 1.7× improvement for full- and reduced-radix cases, respectively, on RV64I.

The Beneš network can be utilised to apply a single permutation to different inputs repeatedly. We present novel generalisations of Bernstein's formulae for the control bits of a Beneš network and from them derive an iterative control bit setting algorithm. We provide verified proofs of our formulae and prototype a a provably correct implementation in the Lean language and theorem prover. We develop and evaluate portable and vectorised implementations of our algorithm in the C programming language. Our implementation utilising Intel's Advanced Vector eXtensions 2 feature reduces execution latency by 25% compared to the equivalent implementation in the libmceliece software library.

This paper improves quantum circuits for realizing Shor's algorithm on elliptic curves. We present optimized quantum point addition circuits that focus on reducing circuit depth at the cost of using more qubits. Our implementation includes in-place and out-of-place point additions, considering both affine and projective coordinates, respectively. This significantly reduces the circuit depth and achieves about 58%-82% improvement in the qubit count $-$ \(T\)-depth product and 43%-87% improvement in the qubit count $-$ full depth product over previous works, including those of M. Roetteler et al. (Asiacrypt 2017) and T. Häner et al. (PQCrypto 2020). Based on these circuits, we construct Shor's algorithm and evaluate the post-quantum security of elliptic curve cryptography. Under the MAXDEPTH constraint proposed by NIST, which limits the maximum circuit depth to $2^{40}$, the maximum depth in our work is ${2^{28.9}}$ for the P-521 curve. For the total gate count and full depth product, a metric defined by NIST for evaluating quantum attack resistance, the maximum complexity for the same curve is ${2^{65.6}}$, far below the post-quantum security level~1 requirement of $2^{157}$. Beyond these logical analyses, we estimate the fault-tolerant costs (i.e., at the level of physical resources) for breaking elliptic curve cryptography. As one of our results, the P-224 curve (comparable to RSA-2048 in classical security) can be broken in 1.4 minutes using about 107 million physical qubits, or in 14.3 hours using about 670000 physical qubits.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as cloud services, raising practical concerns about the confidentiality of user prompts and generated completions. In this paper, we survey privacy-preserving inference solutions for Transformer-based LLMs with the explicit goal of supporting operational choices in real-world deployments. We adopt a strong operational notion of privacy: only the client can read the prompt and the corresponding completion, end to end. The review is organised around the main families of Privacy-Enhancing Technologies (PETs). For each family, we examine representative systems and how they address key bottlenecks in confidential LLM inference, such as non-linear layers and autoregressive decoding. We then compare these approaches in terms of trust assumptions, scalability, and deployment maturity. This comparison characterises the current practical landscape of privacy-preserving LLM inference and motivates a trust-minimising deployment trajectory: from TEE-based solutions that enable large-scale confidential inference today; through crypto-augmented designs that reduce reliance on hardware trust at higher computational cost; toward Fully Homomorphic Encryption as a principled long-term endpoint for non-interactive confidentiality.

We analyzed in depth the Homomorphic Secret Sharing construction applied for Pseudorandom Correlation Function, and we obtained interesting results for various applications. In this paper, we discuss how the PCF can be achieved using the Damgard-Jurik HSS schema by solving the distance function over a ciphertext parametric space of \(\mathbb{Z}^{*}_{n^{\zeta + 1}}\), performing the distributed multiplication protocol as the base building block for our PCF. We created a weak PCF for Vector-OLE via 1-depth HSS circuit, furthermore, via what we called pre-computation with RO-less, we achieved a strong PCF for V-OLE between two parties correct against anhonest-but-curious adversary \(\mathcal{A}_{\mathsf{hbc}}\) and fail-safe secure against an active adversary \(\mathcal{A}_{\mathsf{poly}}\). We also extended our main construction by describing a silent approach in two different ways described as semi-silent by a pre-sampling assumption between the parties and a true-silent protocol execution exploiting the generation of seeds by a PRF. As a last step, we discussed how to build a \(n \times\)OLE generator via our pre-computation session to craft an arbitrary amount of OLE correlation. Our entire paper is further verified by the implementation of a complete and exhaustive library covering all HSS operations, publicly accessible and usable via \(\textit{pip install obliviouspy-HSS}\) and importing \(\textit{import oblivious}\).

The increasing reliance on cloud-based computation for data-intensive applications raises critical concerns about data confidentiality. Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) provides strong theoretical guarantees by allowing computations over encrypted data, but its high computational cost limits its practicality in large-scale scenarios such as image analysis or matrix-based workloads. In this work, we introduce $\Pi_{ROI}$, a hybrid privacy-preserving computation protocol that leverages region-based selective encryption. The core idea is to encrypt only the sensitive Regions of Interest (ROIs) under an FHE scheme, while keeping the remaining, non-sensitive parts of the data in plaintext. This approach achieves end-to-end confidentiality for sensitive regions while significantly improving computational efficiency. We formally define the security of $\Pi_{ROI}$ through an ideal functionality $\mathcal{F}_{\text{proc}}$ and prove that it securely realizes $\mathcal{F}_{\text{proc}}$ against a semi-honest cloud service provider under standard cryptographic assumptions (IND-CPA, IND-CCA2, EUF-CMA, and collision-resistance). Experimental evaluation demonstrates that $\Pi_{ROI}$ offers substantial performance gains in mixed-sensitivity workloads.

Secure Multi-Party Computation (MPC) protocols naturally operate over rings/fields, and they are less efficient for real-number arithmetics, which are commonly needed in AI-powered applications. State-of-the-art solutions are hindered by the high cost of fixed-point and floating-point operations. This work addresses these bottlenecks by proposing a series of novel MPC protocols. Compared to SOTA, our fixed-point multiplication protocol reduces the online communication cost by about $75\%$. For scenarios where higher precision is required, we present the first constant-round floating-point arithmetic protocol for addition and multiplication in the three-party computation (3PC) setting, reducing the communication overhead of SOTA by approximately $95\%$. The experimental results demonstrate that our fixed-point multiplication protocol is more than $3\times$ faster than all mainstream solutions (such as ABY3, Falcon, Orca, etc.). Our floating-point addition and multiplication protocols are over $3\times$ and $5\times$, respectively, faster than SOTA, SecFloat [S&P 23].

Nym is a reputation- and incentive-enhanced anonymous communications network that utilizes staking, performance monitoring, and rewards to encourage high-quality contributions. In this work, we analyze the reputation mechanism used in Nym’s Mixnet and NymVPN service. Using a combination of source code analysis, data collection from Nym mainnet, and network simulations with a custom simulator, we demonstrate active attacks that may allow a moderately resourced adversary to gain control of a fraction of Nym Mixnet’s active set. This condition may enable connection de-anonymization attacks. In particular, we show that the mechanism Nym uses to measure node performance is vulnerable to a form of “framing” attack that allows a small number of low-stake nodes to damage the score of high-reputation active nodes. We then consider and discuss various mitigations. This work highlights the challenge of nodes’ reliability measurement in reputation-enhanced networks, where the entry of low-reputation nodes is required for network survivability but also grants attackers a platform to launch attacks against the network.

This paper presents an in-depth analysis of vulnerabilities in MIFARE Ultralight C (MF0ICU2), MIFARE Ultralight AES (MF0AES), NTAG 223 DNA (NT2H2331G0 and NT2H2331S0), NTAG 224 DNA (NT2H2421G0 and NT2H2421S0), and widely circulated counterfeit Ultralight C cards based on Giantec GT23SC4489, Feiju FJ8010, and USCUID-UL. We reveal multiple avenues to substantially weaken the security of each technology and its implementation across a range of configurations. We demonstrate how, through relay-based man-in-the-middle techniques and partial key overwrites --- optionally combined with tearing techniques --- an attacker can reduce the keyspace of two-key Triple DES (2TDEA) from $2^{112}$ to $2^{28}$ or less in certain real-world deployments, thereby making brute-force key recovery feasible with modest computational resources. We further discuss how the MIFARE Ultralight AES protocol can be similarly affected, particularly when CMAC integrity checks are not enforced. We also find that the security offered by NTAG 223 DNA and NTAG 224 DNA is undermined by the absence of integrity checks on commands and the calculation of a CMAC over Secure Unique NFC (SUN) messages, providing an unauthenticated ciphertext oracle that facilitates key recovery. Field observations, especially in hospitality deployments, underscore the urgent need for proper configuration, key diversification, and counterfeit detection.

Half-$\ell$-sequences, as a extension of $\ell$-sequences, have attracted research interest over the past decade. The arithmetic correlation of half-$\ell$-sequences is known for connection integers of the form $p^r$. In this paper, we extend this result by deriving the arithmetic correlation for half-$\ell$-sequences with connection integers of the form $p^r q^s $. The results indicate that when $p\equiv -1 \pmod{8}$ and $q\equiv \pm 3 \pmod{8}$, the arithmetic autocorrelation can be determined by the number of odd integers in the cyclic subgroup generated by $2$ modulo $p$.

The ongoing transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) has highlighted the need for cryptographic schemes that offer high security, strong performance, and fine-grained parameter selection. In lattice-based cryptography, particularly for the popular module variants of learning with errors (Module-LWE) and learning with rounding (Module-LWR) schemes based on power-of-two cyclotomics, existing constructions often force parameter choices that either overshoot or undershoot desired security levels due to structural constraints. In this work, we introduce a new class of techniques that are the best of both worlds: structured Module-LWE (or LWR) embeds more algebraic structure than a module such that it significantly improves performance, yet less structure than a power-of-two cyclotomic ring such that it still enables more flexible and efficient parameter selection. We present two concrete instances: a construction based on a radical extension of a two-power cyclotomic field denoted radical Ring-LWE (RR-LWE) or Ring-LWR (RR-LWR), and a cyclotomic block-ring module lattice approach (BRM-LWE or BRM-LWR). These new structured Module-LWE and LWR reduce the required number of uniformly random bytes in its matrix by a factor up to the module rank and allows efficient NTT implementations while enabling more granular security-performance trade-offs. We analyze the security of these constructions, provide practical parameter sets, and present implementation results demonstrating a performance improvement of up to 37% compared to an optimized implementation of ML-KEM. Our techniques apply to both key encapsulation mechanisms and digital signature schemes, offering a pathway to more adaptable and performant PQC standards.

We present fault injection attacks against MAYO in which a single faulty execution reveals structural information about the secret. We consider two closely related single-block fault models. In the first one, a controlled perturbation affects one oil coordinate of a signature block and induces an error $e \in \mathcal{O}$. In the second one, the perturbation may affect several oil coordinates of the same block. In both cases, we show that the observable verification mismatch can be written as the image of the induced error under a publicly derivable linear operator. This yields two recovery strategies. In the linear route, when the relevant oil part of the error can be identified, recovery reduces to solving a linear system over $\mathbb{F}_q$. In the reduced-quadratic route, the same linear relation is combined with the constraint $P(e)=0$, which leaves, in the generic full-rank case, a reduced system of $m$ quadratic equations in $n-m$ variables. For the MAYO parameter sets, $n-m=o$ is small, and the resulting reduced quadratic systems can be solved over the base field. Recovering $e$ yields a nonzero vector of the secret subspace and provides a starting point for key-recovery techniques against the oil space. We also discuss the practical cost of both approaches and explain why the attack applies to randomized MAYO.

Falcon is a selected signature scheme in the NIST post-quantum standardization. It is an efficient instantiation of the GPV framework over NTRU lattices. While the GPV framework comes with an elegant security proof in theory, Falcon had no formal proof involving concrete parameters for a long time. Until recently, Fouque et al. initiate the concrete security analysis of Falcon-type signatures. They give a formal proof of Falcon+, a minor modification of Falcon, in the random oracle model, whereas they claim that Falcon+-512 barely achieves the claimed 120-bit security for plain unforgeability. % and neither Falcon+-512 nor Falcon+-1024 offer strong unforgeability. Furthermore, they show that standard reductions for strong unforgeability are vacuous for Falcon parameters, necessitating the introduction of a new, non-standard assumption. In this work, we revisit the concrete security analysis of Falcon-type signatures and present positive results. We develop improved analytic tools by leveraging the profile of the NTRU trapdoor bases. This eliminates the security loss for both Falcon+-512 and Falcon+-1024 in the case of plain unforgeability. We also apply our new analysis to the recent weak-smoothness variant Falcon-ws (Zhang et al. Asiacrypt 2025) that admits smaller parameters than Falcon under a non-standard assumption. As a result, we propose new parameters for Falcon-ws allowing for provable security under standard assumptions and signature size 17.8% (resp. 12.8%) smaller than that of Falcon-512 (resp. Falcon-1024) simultaneously. Moreover, we give a refined strong unforgeability security proof by replacing the worst-case analysis with a probabilistic analysis, which leads to a substantial increase in concrete security. Based on this, we show that by using a tighter Gaussian sampler, e.g. the one in Falcon-ws, Falcon-type signatures can achieve concrete security for strong unforgeability closely consistent with the claimed security level while keeping the compact size.

We use tropical algebras as platforms for a very efficient digital signature protocol. Security relies on computational hardness of factoring a given tropical matrix in a product of two matrices of given dimensions; this problem is known to be NP-complete. We also offer a secret sharing scheme with an arbitrary access structure where security of the shared secret is based on computational hardness of the same problem.

We propose Asymmetric Robust Threshold ECDSA (ART-ECDSA), a robust and hardware-friendly threshold ECDSA protocol designed for asymmetric settings where one participant is a resource-constrained hardware device. The scheme achieves full robustness and cheater identification while minimizing the computational and communication burden on the hardware signer. Our design leverages Castagnos–Laguillaumie (CL) homomorphic encryption to replace Paillier-based operations and remove costly range proofs, yielding compact ciphertexts and simple zero-knowledge proofs. All heavy multiparty computations, including multiplicative-to-additive (MtA) conversions and distributed randomness generation, are offloaded to online cosigners, allowing the hardware party to remain lightweight. ART-ECDSA provides an efficient asymmetric signing protocol with formal security proofs in the UC framework, achieving both robustness and hardware efficiency within a single design. Our implementation on an ARM Cortex-M7 microcontroller (400 MHz, 3 MB Flash, 2 MB SRAM) shows that the hardware party performs only lightweight computation (50 ms in presigning and ≤ 10 s in signing) and transmits about 300 Bytes and 3 KB in each phase, which easily fits within the bandwidth limits of BLE and NFC. These results demonstrate that ART-ECDSA is practical for cold-storage and embedded hardware environments without compromising security.

As quantum computing continues to advance, traditional public-key cryptosystems face increasing vulnerability, necessitating a global transition toward post-quantum cryptography (PQC). A primary challenge for both cryptographers and system architects is the efficient integration of PQC into high-performance computing platforms. ARM, a dominant processor architecture, has recently introduced ARMv9-A to accelerate modern workloads such as artificial intelligence and cloud computing. Leveraging its Scalable Vector Extension 2 (SVE2) and Scalable Matrix Extension (SME), ARMv9-A provides sophisticated hardware support for high-performance computing. This architectural evolution motivates the need for efficient implementations of PQC schemes on the new architecture. In this work, we present a highly optimized implementation of ML-KEM, the post-quantum key encapsulation mechanism (KEM) standardized by NIST as FIPS 203, on the ARMv9-A architecture. We redesign the polynomial computation pipeline to achieve deep alignment with the vector and matrix execution units. Our optimizations encompass refined modular arithmetic and highly vectorized polynomial operations. Specifically, we propose two NTT variants tailored to the architectural features of SVE2 and SME: the vector-based NTT (VecNTT) and the matrix-based NTT (MatNTT), which effectively utilize layer fusion and optimized data access patterns. Experimental results on the Apple M4 Pro processor demonstrate that VecNTT and MatNTT achieve performance improvements of up to $7.18\times$ and $7.77\times$, respectively, compared to the reference implementation. Furthermore, the matrix-vector polynomial multiplication, which is the primary computational bottleneck of ML-KEM, is accelerated by up to $5.27\times$. Our full ML-KEM implementation achieves a 52.47% to 60.09% speedup in key encapsulation across all security levels. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to implement and evaluate ML-KEM leveraging SVE2 and SME on real ARMv9-A hardware, providing a practical foundation for future PQC deployments on next-generation ARM platforms.

Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) allows secure communication without relying on computational assumptions, but can currently only be deployed over relatively short distances due to hardware constraints. To extend QKD over long distances, networks of trusted repeater nodes can be used, wherein QKD is executed between neighbouring nodes and messages between non-neighbouring nodes are forwarded using a relay protocol. Although these networks are being deployed worldwide, no protocol exists which provides provable guarantees of integrity against manipulation from both external adversaries and corrupted intermediates. In this work, we present the first protocol that provably provides both confidentiality and integrity. Our protocol combines an existing cryptographic technique, Algebraic Manipulation Detection (AMD) codes, with multi-path relaying over trusted repeater networks. This protocol achieves Information-Theoretic Security (ITS) against the detection of manipulation, which we prove formally through a sequence of games.

We present the first practical, round-optimal blind signatures in pairing-free groups. We build on the Fischlin paradigm (EUROCRYPT 2007) where a first signature is computed on a commitment to the message and the final signature is a zero-knowledge proof of the first signature. We use the Nyberg-Rueppel signature scheme as the basis (CCS 1993), it is a well-studied scheme with a verification equation that is sufficiently algebraic to allow efficient proofs, that do not need to make non-black box use of a random oracle. Our construction offers flexibility for trade-offs between underlying assumptions and supports issuance of signatures on vectors of attributes making it suitable for use in anonymous credential systems. As a building block, we show how existing NIZKs can be modified to allow for straight-line extraction. We implement variants of our construction to demonstrate its practicality, varying the choice of elliptic curve and the proof system used to compute the NIZK. With conservative parameters (NIST-P256 and SHA-256) and targeting short proofs, signatures are 1349 bytes long, and on a typical laptop can be generated in under 500ms and verified in under 100ms.

Blind signatures play a central role in cryptographic protocols for privacy-preserving authentication and have attracted substantial attention in both theory and practice. A major line of research, dating back to the 1990s, has focused on constructing blind signatures from pairing-free groups. However, all known constructions in this setting require at least three moves of interaction between the signer and the user. These schemes treat the underlying group as a black box and rely on the random oracle in their security proofs. While computationally efficient, they suffer from the drawback that the signer must maintain state during a signing session. In contrast, round-optimal solutions are known under other assumptions and structures (e.g., RSA, lattices, and pairings), or via generic transformations such as Fischlin’s method (CRYPTO~'06), which employ non-black-box techniques. This paper investigates whether the three-round barrier for pairing-free groups is inherent. We provide the first negative evidence by proving that, in a model combining the Random Oracle Model (ROM) with Maurer’s Generic Group Model, no blind signature scheme can be secure if it signs sufficiently long messages while making at most a logarithmic number of random oracle queries. Our lower-bound techniques are novel in that they address the interaction of both models (generic groups and random oracles) simultaneously.

The Plonky3 Merkle tree implementation has become one of the most widely deployed Merkle tree constructions due to its high efficiency, and—through its integration into numerous succinct-argument systems—it currently helps secure an estimated \$4 billion in assets. Somewhat paradoxically, however, the underlying 2-to-1 compression function is not collision-resistant, nor even one-way, which at first glance appears to undermine the security of the entire Merkle tree. The prevailing ad-hoc countermeasure is to pre-hash data before using them as leaves in this otherwise insecure Merkle tree. In this work, we provide the first rigorous security analysis of this Merkle tree design and show that the Plonky3 approach is, in fact, sound. Concretely, we show (strong) position-binding and extractability.

This paper introduces BLISK, a framework that compiles a monotone Boolean authorization policy into a single signature verification key, enabling only the authorized signer subset to produce the standard constant-size aggregated signatures. BLISK combines (1) $n$-of-$n$ multisignatures to realize conjunctions, (2) key agreement protocols to realize disjunctions, and (3) verifiable group operations (for instance, based on the 0-ART framework). BLISK avoids distributed key generation (allowing users to reuse their long-term keys), supports publicly verifiable policy compilation, and enables non-interactive key rotation.

Anonymous credential schemes such as BBS face a significant deployment barrier: currently available secure hardware such as HSMs required for eIDAS Level of Assurance High does not yet support BBS signatures or pairing-friendly curves. We address this challenge by augmenting BBS credentials with a conventional signature (such as ECDSA), where the issuer additionally signs part of the BBS signature using a conventional signature private key that can be secured in widely available HSMs. While disclosing the extra signature breaks unlinkability, we argue this is acceptable for high-assurance use cases where disclosed attributes already uniquely identify the user. For use cases not requiring this additional security, the conventional signature can be omitted to preserve BBS unlinkability. We prove that augmented BBS credentials are existentially unforgeable under chosen message attacks, with security depending solely on the conventional signature private key rather than the BBS private key. This approach provides a practical migration path to full BBS deployment while (apart from unlinkability) maintaining several key BBS advantages.

General-purpose secure multiparty computation (MPC) remains bottlenecked in large part by a lack of efficient techniques for handling memory access. We demonstrate a remarkably simple and efficient 2PC instantiation of random access memory (RAM), based on distributed point functions (DPFs, Gilboa and Ishai, Eurocrypt'14). Our semi-honest 2PC protocol can be achieved from oblivious transfer (OT) and a black-box pseudorandom generator (PRG). For a memory storing large enough data words, our 2PC RAM incurs constant communication overhead per access. Like prior works using DPFs to achieve memory access, our work incurs linear computation per access, but per-access communication is lean. Our 2PC RAM is built on top of an obliviousness-friendly model of computation called the single access machine model (SAM, Appan et al., CCS'24). In the SAM model, each memory slot can be read at most once. We present a simple 2PC SAM protocol, where each single-access memory operation incurs at most $O(w + \lambda \lg n)$ bits of communication, where $w$ is the word size, $n$ is the number of memory words, and $\lambda$ is a security parameter. Of this cost, only $2w + 2\lg n$ bits are incurred in the online phase. There are now many oblivious algorithms that compile directly to SAM more efficiently than via a compilation to RAM, and our 2PC SAM can instantiate these algorithms. As one example, we can use our 2PC SAM to implement privacy-preserving graph traversal (DFS or BFS) over a secret-shared size-$n$ graph while revealing nothing beyond the runtime of the SAM program. Our construction achieves online communication $O(n \lg n)$ bits, asymptotically matching the number of bits touched in a corresponding cleartext graph traversal.

The block cipher (BC) mode for realizing a variable-input-length strong tweakable pseudorandom permutation (VIL-STPRP), also known as the accordion mode, is a rapidly growing research field driven by NIST's standardization project, which considers AES as a primitive. Widely used VIL-STPRP modes, such as HCTR2, have birthday-bound security and provide only 64-bit security with AES. To provide higher security, NIST is considering two directions: to develop new modes with beyond-birthday-bound (BBB) security and to use Rijndael-256-256 with HCTR2. This paper pursues the first direction while maintaining compatibility with HCTR2. In particular, we provide two solutions to achieve BBB security for two different approaches: (i) general cases without any conditions on the tweak and (ii) under the condition that the same tweak is not repeated too often as adopted in bbb-ddd-AES recently presented at Eurocrypt 2025. For the first approach, we propose a new mode, CHCTR, that iterates HCTR2 with two independent keys, which achieves $2n/3$-bit security in the multi-user (mu) setting and satisfies NIST's requirements. For the second approach, we prove mu security of HCTR2, which allows us to apply the tweak-based key derivation (TwKD) to HCTR2 in a provable manner. When the number of BC calls processed by a single tweak is upper-bounded by $2^{n/3}$, HCTR2-TwKD achieves $2n/3$-bit mu security. By benchmarking optimized software implementations, we show that CHCTR with AES-256 outperforms HCTR2 with Rijndael-256-256, in all the twelve processor models examined. Similarly, HCTR2-TwKD outperforms bbb-ddd-AES in general cases, and it is even comparable to bbb-ddd-AES rigorously optimized for tweak-repeating use cases using precomputation.

Cryptographic hardware implementations are vulnerable to combined physical implementation attacks, integrating Side-Channel Analysis and Fault-Injection Analysis to compromise their security. Although theoretically sound countermeasures exist, their practical application is often complicated and error-prone, making automated security verification a necessity. Various tools have been developed to address this need, using different approaches to formally verify security, but they are limited in their ability to analyze complex hardware circuits in the context of Combined Analysis and advanced probabilistic adversary models. In this work, we introduce a novel verification method that assesses the security of complex hardware circuits in the context of random probing with random faults, a scenario that more closely reflects real-world combined attack scenarios. Our approach centers around symbolic fault simulation and the derivation of a fault-enhanced leakage function using the Fourier-Hadamard Transform, enabling the computation of tight leakage probabilities for arbitrary circuits and providing a more accurate and comprehensive security analysis. By integrating our method into the INDIANA security verification framework, we extended its capabilities to analyze the leakage behavior of circuits in the presence of random faults, demonstrating the practicality of our approach. The results of our evaluation highlight the versatility and scalability of our approach, which can efficiently compute leakage probabilities under various fault scenarios for large-scale attacks, e.g., for a masked round of the PRESENT cipher. Notably, our method can complete most experiments in less than an hour, demonstrating a significant improvement over existing estimation-based tools. This achievement confirms the potential of our approach to provide a more comprehensive and practically useful security assessment of hardware circuits, and marks an important step forward for the development of secure hardware systems.

The NIST lattice-based cryptographic standards are set to be widely adopted, offering solutions to the most common cryptographic needs, namely key establishment and authentication (signature). This shifted the attention to more advanced primitives such as threshold cryptography as well as privacy-enhanced technologies, where the transition is expected to be more complex. This is particularly true in the context of post-quantum anonymous authentication where the existing mechanisms may not match the performance requirements of industrial applications. An important avenue for improvement of said performances is the lattice sampler, which is at the center of these mechanisms. Despite recent progress, prior samplers neglected one component: the tag. The latter is not only necessary for security, but it also impacts the efficiency of the subsequent constructions if not handled properly. In this paper, we introduce a new sampler with an enhanced tag management that yet retain the main features of current samplers, and can thus be used as a plug-in replacement. It offers a sampling quality independent of the tag, allowing for producing preimages that are both smaller and faster to generate than those from the very recent sampler of Jeudy and Sanders (Asiacrypt'25). Far from being anecdotal, plugging it into several advanced authentication mechanisms results in size improvements of up to 30%, while being 35% faster.

The Rank Syndrome Decoding (RSD) problem forms the foundation of many post-quantum cryptographic schemes. Its inherent hardness, with best known algorithms for common parameter regimes running in time exponential in $n^2$ (for $n$ being the code length), enables compact parameter choices and efficient constructions. Several RSD-based submissions to the first NIST PQC process in 2017 were, however, invalidated by algebraic attacks, raising fundamental concerns about the security of RSD-based designs. In this work, we revisit the parameters of prominent rank-based constructions and analyze the rationales that guided their selection, as well as their security against modern attacks. We provide a unified complexity analysis of all major RSD algorithms, including combinatorial, algebraic, and hybrid approaches, under a common cost model. All estimates are made publicly available through a dedicated open source module. Furthermore, we present the first asymptotic analysis of these algorithms, yielding deep insights into the relations between different procedures. We show that all studied algorithms converge to one of three distinct asymptotic runtime exponents. We then provide an asymptotic baseline in terms of the worst-case decoding exponent. In particular, we find that for an extension degree equal to the code length, the best known algorithms achieve a complexity of $2^{0.1481n^2 + o(n^2)}$, attained simultaneously by algebraic and combinatorial approaches. Overall, our results reinforce confidence in the RSD assumption and the design rationales of modern RSD-based schemes such as RYDE.

Post-quantum secure digital signatures based on the MPC-in-the-Head (MPCitH) paradigm, a zero-knowledge (ZK) proof-based construction, are becoming increasingly popular due to their small public key size. However, the development of techniques for protecting MPCitH-based schemes against side-channel attacks remains slow, despite them being critical for real-world deployment. In this work, we adapt the Hypercube-MPCitH framework exploiting its native use of additive secret sharing to enable inherent protection against first- and high-order differential power analysis (DPA). We first perform a sensitivity analysis of the Hypercube Syndrome Decoding in the Head (SDitH) digital signature scheme with respect to both simple and differential power analysis. Based on the insight into its side-channel sensitivity, we then propose a tweak to the signature scheme to increase its inherent resistance against DPAs by design, eliminating the need to explicitly mask large parts of the signing procedure. More specifically, this is achieved through the novel (k+1)-Hypercube ZK Protocol: the proposed tweak increases the number of hidden shares an adversary must probe to recover the secret key from one to k+1, thus achieving inherent masking order k. Typically, increasing the amount of hidden shares results in a degradation of soundness in the zero-knowledge proof and as a result increases the signature size to a point where the scheme becomes of limited practical interest. To address this, we propose a technique to select the hidden shares in a more structured and optimal fashion, by exploiting the GGM tree structure in the Hypercube-MPCitH framework. As a result, the amount of revealed seeds is reduced, thus resulting in a smaller signature size even compared to the original hypercube protocol. Finally, we implement and benchmark the proposed Hypercube-SDitH signature scheme, comparing it against the cost of traditional masking. We propose different parameter sets that explore a trade-off between computational overhead and signature size. For 3rd-order protection, our tweaked signature scheme only incurs a 35-50% overhead in computational cost, compared to an estimated overhead of 300% for a fully masked implementation, while the overhead in signature size stays relatively low (52%). Overall, we demonstrate that the proposed (k+1)-Hypercube ZK Protocol can be used to construct efficient, DPA-resistant MPCitH-based digital signatures.

Private set intersection (PSI) protocols are an essential privacy-enhancing technology for many real-world use cases, ranging from mobile contact discovery to fraud detection. However, PSI executed directly between input parties can result in unreasonable performance overhead. This motivates the study of outsourced PSI, where clients delegate the heavy PSI operations to an untrusted (cloud) server. In this SoK, we introduce a framework of 12 distinct properties that characterize outsourced PSI protocols based on security, functionality, and efficiency. By analyzing 20 protocols through this framework, we provide a valuable resource and an interactive tool for researchers and practitioners to select the most suitable protocols for their specific requirements. Finally, we discuss research gaps between trends in regular PSI and the current state of outsourced PSI, identifying promising avenues for future work.

In the field of hardware masking, threshold implementations are a well-known technique that provides glitch-resistant power analysis security. While they guarantee probing security, finding a uniform sharing without additional randomness is difficult, making it challenging to apply to certain functions and, consequently, making it impossible to develop a tool that can straightforwardly generate the masked circuit. Additionally, this approach forces designers to use at least three shares in the underlying masking, which can make the design more costly. Other schemes, like DOM, which can work with two shares, often require fresh randomness. To address these issues, Shahmirzadi and Moradi introduced the NullFresh masking technique at CHES 2021. This method allows for uniform sharing with no additional randomness, using the minimal number of shares. However, similar to original threshold implementations, it is not always straightforward to find a NullFresh masking for arbitrary functions. In this work, we introduce an automated technique to provide masking for arbitrary functions, ensuring first-order security. This technique is applicable to functions where the number of output bits does not exceed the number of input bits. While this technique introduces additional register stages (resulting in higher latency and area) compared to existing methods, it addresses the automation challenges of threshold implementations, which have remained an open problem since their inception. We present the masking technique, along with proofs of glitch-extended probing security, and demonstrate its application to several ciphers, including PRINCE, MIDORI, SKINNY, KECCAK, and AES. The masked designs were verified using SILVER and PROLEAD, and tested on an FPGA through TVLA.

Signature schemes based on the MPC-in-the-Head (MPCitH) paradigm play an important role in enabling cryptosystems founded on a wide diversity of hardness assumptions. While the design of such schemes is currently stabilizing, providing efficient implementations on embedded devices remains a critical challenge, as MPCitH frameworks are known to manipulate large data structures and to rely heavily on symmetric primitives. In this work, we present a highly optimized implementation of the NIST candidate MQOM (version 2) targeting embedded microcontrollers. Our implementation significantly outperforms existing MPCitH implementations on such platforms, both in terms of memory footprint and execution time. In particular, for the L1 parameter set, we can achieve an SRAM usage below 10 KB, including the key and signature buffers, while preserving practical signing and verification performance (on the order of a few hundred megacycles). We further explore time-memory trade-offs, achieving execution times below 100 Mc for certain variants at the cost of an additional 5-10 KB of memory. We also provide the first memory-friendly implementation of the one-tree technique, which is used to reduce signature sizes in several MPCitH-based schemes. This enables a comparative analysis of the implementation costs of correlated trees (used in MQOM) versus the one-tree technique (used in other candidates). We then demonstrate how streaming and precomputation techniques can further mitigate the impact of the running time and the signature size. For instance, these approaches enable overlapping computation with data reception, for example by starting computations before all inputs are available, thereby reducing overall latency.

This paper presents a formal framework for enhancing privacy in decentralized identity (DID) systems, resolving the inherent conflict between blockchain verifiability and the principle of minimal data disclosure. At its core, we introduce a provably secure cryptographic protocol that leverages attribute commitments on-chain and zero-knowledge proofs for off-chain validation. This approach allows users to demonstrably prove the validity of predicates about their attributes without revealing the underlying sensitive values. We formally define the security and privacy requirements for such a system—including consistency, attribute-based indistinguishability, and predicate-based indistinguishability—within a semi-honest adversarial model. We then construct a concrete scheme that realizes these properties under standard cryptographic assumptions. The proposed architecture is designed for full backward compatibility with W3C DID standards, ensuring practical deployability. Security analysis provides rigorous, provable guarantees, while performance evaluation confirms the efficiency of the core cryptographic operations, supporting its use in resource-constrained environments. This work establishes a foundational and analyzable basis for building decentralized identity systems where both accountability and user privacy are essential.

We introduce Lether, the first practical account-based private block-chain payment protocol based on post-quantum lattice assumptions, following the paradigm of Anonymous Zether (FC '19, IEEE S&P '21). The main challenge in building such a protocol from lattices lies in the absence of core building blocks: unbounded-level additively-homomorphic multi-message multi-recipient public key encryption (mmPKE), and event-oriented linkable ring signatures with support for multiple tags (events). To address these issues, we propose a verifiable refreshable additively-homomorphic mmPKE scheme and a plug-and-play event-oriented linkable tag scheme from lattices. We believe both to be of independent interest To achieve unbounded-level homomorphic evaluation in the lattice-based setting without relying on heavy techniques such as bootstrapping or large moduli (e.g., over 60 bits) in fully homomorphic encryption (FHE), we introduce a simple yet blockchain-friendly mechanism called refresh. Namely, each user is required to verifiably refresh their account after a certain number of transactions. With our tailored parameter settings, the amortized per-refresh costs of communication and computation are only about 1.3% and 1.5%, respectively, of the cost of a transaction. We also optimize the implementations of LNP22 lattice-based zero-knowledge proof system (Crypto '22) in the LaZer library (CCS ’24), to support efficient batching of various proof components.Overall, for a typical transaction, the total communication cost becomes about 68 KB, with the associated zero-knowledge proof accounting for about 51 KB of this total. Each of proof generation and verification take a fraction of a second on a standard PC. As an additional contribution, we formalize new definitions for Anonymous Zether-like protocols that more accurately capture real-world blockchain settings. These definitions are generic and are expected to benefit the broader development of account-based private blockchain payment protocols, beyond just lattice settings.