Paper 2026/782
Failure of proximity gaps close to capacity
Abstract
We give a simple counterexample which shows that, for Reed--Solomon codes over multiplicative subgroups of prime fields, proximity gaps do not hold near capacity, at least not as conjectured by Ben-Sasson, et al., in BCIKS20. For relative distance $\theta = 1-\rho-\eta$, where $\rho$ is the rate of the code, and positive $\eta = \Theta_\rho(1/\log n)$, where $n$ is the length of the code, we construct an affine line that is not entirely $\theta$-close to the code but still contains $2^{\Omega_\rho(1/\eta)}$ such points. The same construction gives a slightly stronger list-decoding lower bound. The proof uses a new additive-combinatorics lemma on sums of roots of unity.
Note: added acknowledgments
Metadata
- Available format(s)
-
PDF
- Category
- Foundations
- Publication info
- Preprint.
- Keywords
- Reed-Solomon CodesProximity gapList-decodabilityAdditive combinatorics
- Contact author(s)
-
dk9781 @ princeton edu
stepurik @ stanford edu
ulrich haboeck @ gmail com - History
- 2026-04-24: revised
- 2026-04-20: received
- See all versions
- Short URL
- https://ia.cr/2026/782
- License
-
CC BY-SA
BibTeX
@misc{cryptoeprint:2026/782,
author = {Dmitry Krachun and Stepan Kazanin and Ulrich Haböck},
title = {Failure of proximity gaps close to capacity},
howpublished = {Cryptology {ePrint} Archive, Paper 2026/782},
year = {2026},
url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2026/782}
}