Paper 2026/1697

Actively Secure Two-Party Function Secret Sharing with Dynamic Cross-Phase Verification

Yujie Xue, College of Computer Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Center for Cryptologic Research, National University of Defense Technology
Lin Liu, College of Computer Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Center for Cryptologic Research, National University of Defense Technology
Rongmao Chen, College of Computer Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Center for Cryptologic Research, National University of Defense Technology
Yizhen Jiang, College of Computer Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Center for Cryptologic Research, National University of Defense Technology
Yuchuan Luo, College of Computer Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Center for Cryptologic Research, National University of Defense Technology
Bing Sun, College of Science, National University of Defense Technology, Center for Cryptologic Research, National University of Defense Technology
Shaojing Fu, College of Computer Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Center for Cryptologic Research, National University of Defense Technology
Abstract

Function secret sharing (FSS) gives two parties succinct keys whose local evaluations add up to a hidden function value. Removing the dealer is the natural next step for preprocessing-based secure computation, but malicious security then requires more than checking a finished key: the generation transcript, the function the key actually computes, and every released evaluation share must all be bound to one execution. We call this the cross-phase binding problem, and we solve it. We present VeriFSS, a dealer-free two-party FSS scheme with active security, proved in the standard simulation-based framework against one static malicious corruption. The construction rests on a two-plane key: the distributed generator produces a key for the paired function $x\mapsto(f_\theta(x),\Lambda f_\theta(x))$, where $\Lambda$ is a secret global authentication scalar. The second plane makes every local evaluation an authenticated sharing for free, which yields online report binding without vector commitments, extractable hashing, or per-point interaction. It also supplies the ingredient the audit was missing: we prove a moment-fidelity lemma showing that a corrupted party cannot misreport the full-domain moments of its own sealed key except with probability $3/|E|$ over the challenge set $E$, and a shape-identification lemma showing that three moment equations pin a point function down exactly, with error $2n/|E|$ over any field. The proof isolates the coefficient of the square monomial in the support polynomial and is therefore characteristic-free; in characteristic two an odd-size equal-weight support defeats the support equation on its own, and we show the position equation takes over. A discrete-derivative reduction carries both lemmas to comparison functions, and a Galois-ring variant covers fixed-point payloads over $\mathbb{Z}_{2^k}$ by a $2$-adic valuation argument, so no non-additive lift into a binary field is ever needed. Generation costs two rounds and five field elements per party per level; certification adds $O(n)$ elements with no dependence on the domain size, and a dynamic cross-domain aggregation certifies arbitrarily many heterogeneous instances under one challenge and a constant number of rounds. We then lift the general-purpose FSS gates of Boyle et al. (EUROCRYPT 2021): every gate that is a public affine post-processing of a constant number of DPF/DCF evaluations---interval containment, splines, ReLU, arithmetic shift, bit decomposition, zero test, table lookup---inherits active security at no additional online cost. We evaluate our construction using a C++ implementation that certifies keys over $\mathbb{F}_{p^2}$ ($p=2^{61}-1$) and $\mathrm{GF}(2^{128})$, realises the gate layer, and agrees bit‑for‑bit on every exported test vector. A certified DPF key at $n=16$ takes $5.7$ ms to generate and $3.3$ ms to certify. Certified DPF keys are $5.4\%$ larger than the semi-honest dealer-free baseline at $n=16$, and aggregated certification traffic converges to $1{,}282$ bytes per instance while the round count stays constant. Replaying the certified execution between two processes over TCP shows what that constancy is worth: at a $50$ ms round trip a session takes $1.15$ s, and the figure is unchanged whether one key or sixty-four are certified together, so wide-area certification of a whole preprocessing session is latency-bound by a single key. A campaign of $1{,}400$ injected generation deviations plus shape, moment and release forgeries is rejected without exception in six of seven deviation classes; the seventh is rejected in exactly the $105$ of $200$ trials in which the attacked index bit is one, which is a quantitatively exact confirmation of the single-bit selective-failure predicate that we model explicitly in the ideal functionality, matching the leakage profile of the best known actively secure distributed DPF.

Metadata
Available format(s)
PDF
Category
Cryptographic protocols
Publication info
Preprint.
Keywords
Function secret sharingDistributed point functionSecure two‑party computationMalicious security
Contact author(s)
xyj1997 @ nudt edu cn
liulin16 @ nudt edu cn
chromao @ nudt edu cn
jiangyizhen @ nudt edu cn
luoyuchuan09 @ nudt edu cn
sunbing06 @ nudt edu cn
fushaojing @ nudt edu cn
History
2026-08-16: approved
2026-08-15: received
See all versions
Short URL
https://ia.cr/2026/1697
License
Creative Commons Attribution
CC BY

BibTeX

@misc{cryptoeprint:2026/1697,
      author = {Yujie Xue and Lin Liu and Rongmao Chen and Yizhen Jiang and Yuchuan Luo and Bing Sun and Shaojing Fu},
      title = {Actively Secure Two-Party Function Secret Sharing with Dynamic Cross-Phase Verification},
      howpublished = {Cryptology {ePrint} Archive, Paper 2026/1697},
      year = {2026},
      url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2026/1697}
}
Note: In order to protect the privacy of readers, eprint.iacr.org does not use cookies or embedded third party content.