Paper 2026/1509

Efficient Unclonable Encryption from Pauli Eigenstates

Abstract

We give, to our knowledge, the first plain-model, one-time information-theoretically secure, efficient unclonable encryption scheme for one classical bit. Previous work by Bhattacharyya and Culf (Nature Physics, 2026) and Bhattacharyya, Broadbent, and Culf (arXiv:2603.08916) either only showed $1/\mathsf{poly}(\lambda)$ security loss or required inefficient encryption/decryption operations. We avoid both of these caveats; in doing so, we obtain (to our knowledge) the first plain-model construction of many-time secure $1 \to 2$ unclonable encryption for arbitrary polynomial-length messages, assuming the existence of pseudorandom function-like states (Bartusek and Goldin, arXiv:2605.27647). The key is a uniformly random non-identity phase-free Pauli on $n$ qubits, and bit $a$ is encrypted as a random $(-1)^a$ eigenstate of that Pauli. Encryption and decryption use $O(n)$ single-qubit operations and $O(n)$ time classical computation; key generation uses only $O(n)$ time classical computation. The scheme is exponentially secure; we prove that the probability that both receivers recover the bit is at most $\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{{2^n}/({4^n-1})} = \frac{1}{2} + O\left(2^{-n/2}\right).$ By a lower bound due to Broadbent, Culf, and Rochette, this is the best probability bound achievable with $n$-qubit ciphertexts (up to the constant hidden in the $O(\cdot)$). The main conceptual idea is to leverage, in a precise spectral sense, the balanced commutation-anticommutation structure of the Pauli group. The proof is intricate but completely elementary and makes use of standard spectral bound techniques. The main technical workhorse is a standalone linear-algebraic lemma which we present in its own section: informally, it relates the positivity of two different operators, each capturing the intuition that if the two receivers can individually decrypt unusually often then they must also disagree often. GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra found this proof in an extended conversation with the author and drafted a preliminary version of this paper. The author is fully accountable for the correctness of this paper.