Paper 2026/1404

Anonymous Communication on Expander Networks

Abstract

Who is talking to whom? Consider a group of users who wish to communicate anonymously via a network of intermediate relays. We study anonymous communication under two standard strong adversarial models. A passive adversary observes all network traffic and additionally views the internal states of a constant fraction of corrupted relays, while an active adversary may also control the behavior of these corrupted relays. The goal of an anonymous communication protocol is to ensure that the adversary cannot distinguish who is communicating with whom. One of the most practical and widely adopted approaches is onion routing, where messages are first wrapped in layers of encryption and anonymity emerges through repeated "shuffling" of onions at honest relays that peel a layer and randomly permute outgoing onions. In general, this approach may not achieve anonymity. The challenge is to rigorously quantify conditions for efficiently achieving anonymity, where efficiency is measured as a function of the protocol's security parameter λ, which we assume, without loss of generality, is at least linear in the network size. A well-known result from ICALP'18 shows that if each hop in a routing path is chosen uniformly at random from all relays, then onion routing achieves anonymity against a passive adversary whenever both the number of rounds and the server load grow faster than log λ. In this setting, anonymity arises from the fact that every onion is repeatedly shuffled with a uniformly random subset of other onions. However, this assumption requires a fully connected network. We generalize this result to sparse networks. We show that when routing paths are selected by performing independent random walks on a sparse, constant-degree expander graph, onion routing still achieves anonymity with the same asymptotic efficiency parameters as in the complete-network setting. In particular, this matches the optimal round-complexity bound known for complete networks, despite the fact that onions only shuffle within their local neighborhoods at each round, and an adversary may extract information from observing transitions between neighboring nodes. We further extend our results to active adversaries. In the sparse-expander setting, we construct, under different conditions, (1) a differentially private protocol that achieves (ε, negligible in λ)-differential privacy, and (2) an anonymous protocol. Both run efficiently in polylogarithmic rounds and incur polylogarithmic server load.