Paper 2025/1806
Improved Integral Attack on ChiLow-32 Exploiting the Inverse of the ChiChi Function
Abstract
The protection of executable code in embedded systems requires efficient mechanisms that ensure confidentiality and integrity. Belkheyar et al. recently proposed the Authenticated Code Encryption (ACE) framework, with ChiLow-(32 + $\tau$) as the first instantiation of ACE2 at EUROCRYPT 2025. The design of ChiLow-(32 + $\tau$) is based on a 32-bit tweakable block cipher with a quadratic nonlinear layer, known as ChiChi (denoted by $\chi\!\!\chi$), and a nested tweak key schedule optimized for secure code execution under strict query limits. In this work, we study the resistance of ChiLow to integral cryptanalysis. We identify new integral distinguishers in both the single-tweak and related-tweak models. Using these results and a nested strategy to recover all round tweaks, we present a key-recovery attack on 7 out of 8 rounds of ChiLow. The central contribution of our work is that it resolves the challenge of deriving the master key from the recovered round tweaks, an open problem highlighted by the designers and in a recent cryptanalysis by Peng et al. The attack on 7 rounds requires $2^{6.32}$ chosen ciphertexts, has a time complexity of about $2^{121.75}$ encryptions, and requires negligible memory.
Metadata
- Available format(s)
-
PDF
- Category
- Attacks and cryptanalysis
- Publication info
- Preprint.
- Keywords
- CryptanalysisIntegral attackAuthenticated Code EncryptionChiLowChiChi
- Contact author(s)
-
khalesi @ rcdat ac ir
z_ahmadian @ sbu ac ir
hossein hadipour @ ruhr-uni-bochum de - History
- 2026-02-25: revised
- 2025-10-02: received
- See all versions
- Short URL
- https://ia.cr/2025/1806
- License
-
CC BY
BibTeX
@misc{cryptoeprint:2025/1806,
author = {Akram Khalesi and Zahra Ahmadian and Hosein Hadipour},
title = {Improved Integral Attack on {ChiLow}-32 Exploiting the Inverse of the {ChiChi} Function},
howpublished = {Cryptology {ePrint} Archive, Paper 2025/1806},
year = {2025},
url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2025/1806}
}