Paper 2025/1519
Does the UC-Security Notion for PAKE Imply Game-Based Security?
Abstract
A Password-Authenticated Key Exchange (PAKE) protocol allows two parties to jointly establish a cryptographically strong key, in the setting where the only information shared in advance is a low-entropy "password". The two standard security definitions for PAKE are the game-based one by Bellare, Pointcheval and Rogaway (BPR-security, EUROCRYPT 2000) and the Universally Composable (UC) one by Canetti et al. (EUROCRYPT 2005). It is well-known that UC-security implies BPR-security; however, there are a large number of variants of both definitions, and the relation between them is not entirely clear. In this work, we thoroughly study a variant of BPR-security by Katz, Ostrovsky and Yung (KOY-security, JACM 2009): 1. We show, via a counterexample, that UC-security does \emph{not} imply KOY-security; 2. We then prove that a variant of UC-security, called implicit-only UC-security (Dupont et al., EUROCRYPT 2018), implies KOY-security. Interestingly, we make the observation that KOY- and implicit-only UC-security essentially strengthen their standard counterparts in the same manner. We also present detailed explanations of all four security notions.
Metadata
- Available format(s)
-
PDF
- Category
- Cryptographic protocols
- Publication info
- Published by the IACR in CIC 2025
- Contact author(s)
- xujiay @ oregonstate edu
- History
- 2025-12-25: revised
- 2025-08-24: received
- See all versions
- Short URL
- https://ia.cr/2025/1519
- License
-
CC BY
BibTeX
@misc{cryptoeprint:2025/1519,
author = {Jiayu Xu},
title = {Does the {UC}-Security Notion for {PAKE} Imply Game-Based Security?},
howpublished = {Cryptology {ePrint} Archive, Paper 2025/1519},
year = {2025},
url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2025/1519}
}