Paper 2024/1235

Blue fish, red fish, live fish, dead fish

Victor Shoup, Offchain Labs
Abstract

We show that the DAG-based consensus protocol Tusk [DKSS22] does not achieve liveness, at least under certain reasonable assumptions on the implementation that are consistent with its specification. In addition, we give a simple 2-round variation of Tusk with lower latency and strong liveness properties, but with suboptimal resilience. We also show that another 2-round protocol, GradedDAG [DZX+24], which has optimal resilience, also has liveness problems analogous to Tusk.

Metadata
Available format(s)
PDF
Category
Cryptographic protocols
Publication info
Preprint.
Keywords
asynchronyconsensus
Contact author(s)
victor @ shoup net
History
2024-08-06: revised
2024-08-03: received
See all versions
Short URL
https://ia.cr/2024/1235
License
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND

BibTeX

@misc{cryptoeprint:2024/1235,
      author = {Victor Shoup},
      title = {Blue fish, red fish, live fish, dead fish},
      howpublished = {Cryptology ePrint Archive, Paper 2024/1235},
      year = {2024},
      note = {\url{https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/1235}},
      url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/1235}
}
Note: In order to protect the privacy of readers, eprint.iacr.org does not use cookies or embedded third party content.