Paper 2024/1207
What Have SNARGs Ever Done for FHE?
Abstract
In recent years, there have been several constructions combining FHE with SNARGs to add integrity guarantees to FHE schemes. Most of these works focused on improving efficiency, while the precise security model with regards to client side input privacy has remained understudied. Only recently it was shown by Manulis and Nguyen (Eurocrypt'24) that this combination does not yield IND-CCA1 security. So an interesting open question is: does the SNARG actually add any meaningful security to input privacy? We address this question in this note and give a security definition that meaningfully captures the security of the FHE plus SNARG construction.
Note: This version corrects the incorrect claim that IND-SA implies FuncCPA. We thank Jérôme Nguyen for pointing out that error.
Metadata
- Available format(s)
- Category
- Public-key cryptography
- Publication info
- Preprint.
- Keywords
- FHESNARGs
- Contact author(s)
- michael walter @ zama ai
- History
- 2024-07-31: revised
- 2024-07-26: received
- See all versions
- Short URL
- https://ia.cr/2024/1207
- License
-
CC BY
BibTeX
@misc{cryptoeprint:2024/1207, author = {Michael Walter}, title = {What Have {SNARGs} Ever Done for {FHE}?}, howpublished = {Cryptology {ePrint} Archive, Paper 2024/1207}, year = {2024}, url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/1207} }