Paper 2021/1508
High-Speed Hardware Architectures and FPGA Benchmarking of CRYSTALS-Kyber, NTRU, and Saber
Viet Ba Dang, Kamyar Mohajerani, and Kris Gaj
Abstract
Performance in hardware has typically played a significant role in differentiating among leading candidates in cryptographic standardization efforts. Winners of two past NIST cryptographic contests (Rijndael in case of AES and Keccak in case of SHA-3) were ranked consistently among the two fastest candidates when implemented using FPGAs and ASICs. Hardware implementations of cryptographic operations may quite easily outperform software implementations for at least a subset of major performance metrics, such as latency, number of operations per second, power consumption, and energy usage, as well as in terms of security against physical attacks, including side-channel analysis. Using hardware also permits much higher flexibility in trading one subset of these properties for another. This paper presents high-speed hardware architectures for four lattice-based CCA-secure Key Encapsulation Mechanisms (KEMs), representing three NIST PQC finalists: CRYSTALS-Kyber, NTRU (with two distinct variants, NTRU-HPS and NTRU-HRSS), and Saber. We rank these candidates among each other and compare them with all other Round 3 KEMs based on the data from the previously reported work.
Metadata
- Available format(s)
- Category
- Implementation
- Publication info
- Preprint. MINOR revision.
- Keywords
- public-key cryptographyPost-Quantum Cryptographylattice-basedKey Encapsulation Mechanismhardware implementationsFPGA
- Contact author(s)
-
vdang6 @ gmu edu
mmohajer @ gmu edu
kgaj @ gmu edu - History
- 2021-11-15: received
- Short URL
- https://ia.cr/2021/1508
- License
-
CC BY
BibTeX
@misc{cryptoeprint:2021/1508, author = {Viet Ba Dang and Kamyar Mohajerani and Kris Gaj}, title = {High-Speed Hardware Architectures and {FPGA} Benchmarking of {CRYSTALS}-Kyber, {NTRU}, and Saber}, howpublished = {Cryptology {ePrint} Archive, Paper 2021/1508}, year = {2021}, url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/1508} }