Synchronous Consensus with Optimal Asynchronous Fallback Guarantees

Erica Blum; Jonathan Katz; Julian Loss

Paper 2019/692

Synchronous Consensus with Optimal Asynchronous Fallback Guarantees

Erica Blum, Jonathan Katz, and Julian Loss

Abstract

Typically, protocols for Byzantine agreement (BA) are designed to run in either a synchronous network (where all messages are guaranteed to be delivered within some known time from when they are sent) or an asynchronous network (where messages may be arbitrarily delayed). Protocols designed for synchronous networks are generally insecure if the network in which they run does not ensure synchrony; protocols designed for asynchronous networks are (of course) secure in a synchronous setting as well, but in that case tolerate a lower fraction of faults than would have been possible if synchrony had been assumed from the start. Fix some number of parties , and . We ask whether it is possible (given a public-key infrastructure) to design a BA protocol that (1) is resilient to corruptions when run in a synchronous network and (2) remains resilient to faults even if the network happens to be asynchronous. We show matching feasibility and infeasibility results demonstrating that this is possible if and only if .

Note: Minor fix in BA protocol

Metadata

Available format(s): PDF
Category: Cryptographic protocols
Publication info: A minor revision of an IACR publication in TCC 2019
Keywords: Byzantine agreement
Contact author(s): jkatz2 @ gmail com
History: 2021-09-27: last of 5 revisions; 2019-06-12: received; See all versions
Short URL: https://ia.cr/2019/692
License: CC BY

BibTeX

@misc{cryptoeprint:2019/692,
      author = {Erica Blum and Jonathan Katz and Julian Loss},
      title = {Synchronous Consensus with Optimal Asynchronous Fallback Guarantees},
      howpublished = {Cryptology {ePrint} Archive, Paper 2019/692},
      year = {2019},
      url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/692}
}