Cryptology ePrint Archive: Report 2019/616

Channels of Small Log-Ratio Leakage and Characterization of Two-Party Differentially Private Computation

Iftach Haitner and Noam Mazor and Ronen Shaltiel and Jad Silbak

Abstract: Consider a PPT two-party protocol $\Pi=(A,B)$ in which the parties get no private inputs and obtain outputs $O^A,O^B\in \{0,1\}$, and let $V^A$ and $V^B$ denote the parties' individual views. Protocol $\Pi$ has $\alpha$-agreement if $Pr[O^A=O^B]=1/2+\alpha$. The leakage of $\epsilon$ is the amount of information a party obtains about the event $\{O^A=O^B\}$; that is, the leakage $\epsilon$ is the maximum, over $P\in \{A,B\}$, of the distance between $V^P|_{O^A=O^B}$ and $V^P|_{O^A\neq O^B}$. Typically, this distance is measured in statistical distance, or, in the computational setting, in computational indistinguishability. For this choice, Wullschleger [TCC '09] showed that if $\epsilon<<\alpha$ then the protocol can be transformed into an OT protocol.

We consider measuring the protocol leakage by the log-ratio distance (which was popularized by its use in the differential privacy framework). The log-ratio distance between $X,Y$ over domain $\Omega$ is the minimal $\epsilon\geq 0$ for which, for every $v\in\Omega, \log(Pr[X=v]/Pr[Y=v])\in [-\epsilon,\epsilon]$. In the computational setting, we use computational indistinguishability from having log-ratio distance $\epsilon$. We show that a protocol with (noticeable) accuracy $\alpha\in\Omega(\epsilon^2)$ can be transformed into an OT protocol (note that this allows $\epsilon>>\alpha$). We complete the picture, in this respect, showing that a protocol with $\alpha\in o(\epsilon^2)$ does not necessarily imply OT. Our results hold for both the information theoretic and the computational settings, and can be viewed as a ``fine grained'' approach to ``weak OT amplification''.

We then use the above result to fully characterize the complexity of differentially private two-party computation for the XOR function, answering the open question put by Goyal, Khurana, Mironov, Pandey, and Sahai [ICALP '16] and Haitner, Nissim, Omri, Shaltiel, and Silbak [FOCS '18]. Specifically, we show that for any (noticeable) $\alpha\in\Omega(\epsilon^2)$, a two-party protocol that computes the XOR function with $\alpha$-accuracy and $\epsilon$-differential privacy can be transformed into an OT protocol. This improves upon Goyal et al. that only handle $\alpha\in\Omega(\epsilon)$, and upon Haitner et al. who showed that such a protocol implies (infinitely-often) key agreement (and not OT). Our characterization is tight since OT does not follow from protocols in which $\alpha\in o(\epsilon^2)$, and extends to functions (over many bits) that ``contain'' an ``embedded copy'' of the XOR function.

Category / Keywords: foundations / oblivious transfer; differential privacy; hardness amplification

Date: received 31 May 2019, last revised 31 May 2019

Contact author: iftachh at cs tau ac il,noammaz@gmail com,jadsilbak@gmail com,ronen@cs haifa ac il

Available format(s): PDF | BibTeX Citation

Version: 20190603:070530 (All versions of this report)

Short URL: ia.cr/2019/616


[ Cryptology ePrint archive ]