Paper 2019/238
Robust Encryption, Extended
Rémi Géraud, David Naccache, and Răzvan Roşie
Abstract
Robustness is a notion often tacitly assumed while working with encrypted data. Roughly speaking, it states that a ciphertext cannot be decrypted under different keys. Initially formalized in a public-key context, it has been further extended to key-encapsulation mechanisms, and more recently to pseudorandom functions, message authentication codes and authenticated encryption. In this work, we motivate the importance of establishing similar guarantees for functional encryption schemes, even under adversarially generated keys. Our main security notion is intended to capture the scenario where a ciphertext obtained under a master key (corresponding to Authority 1) is decrypted by functional keys issued under a different master key (Authority 2). Furthermore, we show there exist simple functional encryption schemes where robustness under adversarial key-generation is not achieved. As a secondary and independent result, we formalize robustness for digital signatures – a signature should not verify under multiple keys – and point out that certain signature schemes are not robust when the keys are adversarially generated. We present simple, generic transforms that turn a scheme into a robust one, while maintaining the original scheme’s security. For the case of public-key functional encryption, we look into ciphertext anonymity and provide a transform achieving it.
Metadata
- Available format(s)
- Category
- Public-key cryptography
- Publication info
- Published elsewhere. Minor revision. CT-RSA 2019
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-12612-4_8
- Contact author(s)
- razvan rosie @ ens fr
- History
- 2019-02-28: received
- Short URL
- https://ia.cr/2019/238
- License
-
CC BY
BibTeX
@misc{cryptoeprint:2019/238, author = {Rémi Géraud and David Naccache and Răzvan Roşie}, title = {Robust Encryption, Extended}, howpublished = {Cryptology {ePrint} Archive, Paper 2019/238}, year = {2019}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-12612-4_8}, url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/238} }