Paper 2018/702
Tight Proofs of Space and Replication
Ben Fisch
Abstract
We construct a concretely practical proof-of-space (PoS) with arbitrarily tight security based on stacked depth robust graphs and constant-degree expander graphs. A proof-of-space (PoS) is an interactive proof system where a prover demonstrates that it is persistently using space to store information. A PoS is arbitrarily tight if the honest prover uses exactly N space and for any $\epsilon > 0$ the construction can be tuned such that no adversary can pass verification using less than $1-\epsilon N$ space. Most notably, the degree of the graphs in our construction are independent of $\epsilon$, and the number of layers is only $O(\log(1/\epsilon))$. The proof size is $O(d/\epsilon)$. The degree $d$ depends on the depth robust graphs, which are only required to maintain $\Omega(N)$ depth in subgraphs on 80% of the nodes. Our tight PoS is also secure against parallel attacks. Tight proofs of space are necessary for proof-of-replication (PoRep), which is a publicly verifiable proof that the prover is dedicating unique resources to storing one or more retrievable replicas of a file. Our main PoS construction can be used as a PoRep, but data extraction is as inefficient as replica generation. We present a second variant of our construction called ZigZag PoRep that has fast/parallelizable data extraction compared to replica generation and maintains the same space tightness while only increasing the number of levels by roughly a factor two.
Metadata
- Available format(s)
- Publication info
- Preprint. MINOR revision.
- Keywords
- proof of spaceproof of replicationtight security
- Contact author(s)
- benafisch @ gmail com
- History
- 2018-08-16: revised
- 2018-08-01: received
- See all versions
- Short URL
- https://ia.cr/2018/702
- License
-
CC BY
BibTeX
@misc{cryptoeprint:2018/702, author = {Ben Fisch}, title = {Tight Proofs of Space and Replication}, howpublished = {Cryptology {ePrint} Archive, Paper 2018/702}, year = {2018}, url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/702} }