Paper 2014/642
Balanced permutations Even-Mansour ciphers
Shoni Gilboa and Shay Gueron
Abstract
The $r$-rounds Even-Mansour block cipher uses $r$ public permutations of $\{0, 1\}^n$ and $r+1$ secret keys. An attack on this construction was described in \cite{DDKS}, for $r = 2, 3$. Although this attack is only marginally better than brute force, it is based on an interesting observation (due to \cite{NWW}): for a "typical" permutation $P$, the distribution of $P(x) \oplus x$ is not uniform. To address this, and other potential threats that might stem from this observation in this (or other) context, we introduce the notion of a ``balanced permutation'' for which the distribution of $P(x) \oplus x$ is uniform, and show how to generate families of balanced permutations from the Feistel construction. This allows us to define a $2n$-bit block cipher from the $2$-rounds Even-Mansour scheme. The cipher uses public balanced permutations of $\{0, 1\}^{2n}$, which are based on two public permutations of $\{0, 1\}^{n}$. By construction, this cipher is immune against attacks that rely on the non-uniform behavior of $P(x) \oplus x$. We prove that this cipher is indistinguishable from a random permutation of $\{0, 1\}^{2n}$, for any adversary who has oracle access to the public permutations and to an encryption/decryption oracle, as long as the number of queries is $o (2^{n/2})$. As a practical example, we discuss the properties and the performance of a $256$-bit block cipher that is based on AES.
Metadata
- Available format(s)
- Category
- Secret-key cryptography
- Publication info
- Preprint. MINOR revision.
- Keywords
- Even-Mansour cipherblock ciphersrandom permutations
- Contact author(s)
- shay @ math haifa ac il
- History
- 2014-08-27: received
- Short URL
- https://ia.cr/2014/642
- License
-
CC BY
BibTeX
@misc{cryptoeprint:2014/642, author = {Shoni Gilboa and Shay Gueron}, title = {Balanced permutations Even-Mansour ciphers}, howpublished = {Cryptology {ePrint} Archive, Paper 2014/642}, year = {2014}, url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2014/642} }