Paper 2011/235
Computer-Aided Decision-Making with Trust Relations and Trust Domains (Cryptographic Applications)
Simon Kramer, Rajeev Goré, and Eiji Okamoto
Abstract
We propose generic declarative definitions of individual and collective trust relations between interacting agents and agent collections, and trust domains of trust-related agents in distributed systems. Our definitions yield (1) (in)compatibility, implicational, and transitivity results for trust relationships, including a Datalog-implementability result for their logical structure; (2) computational complexity results for deciding potential and actual trust relationships and membership in trust domains; (3) a positive (negative) compositionality result for strong (weak) trust domains; (4) a computational design pattern for building up strong trust domains; and (5) a negative scalability result for trust domains in general. We instantiate our generic trust concepts in five major cryptographic applications of trust, namely: Access Control, Trusted Third Parties, the Web of Trust, Public-Key Infrastructures, and Identity-Based Cryptography. We also show that accountability induces trust. Our defining principle for weak and strong trust (domains) is (common) belief in and (common) knowledge of agent correctness, respectively.
Note: added two bibliographic references
Metadata
- Available format(s)
- Category
- Foundations
- Publication info
- Published elsewhere. J Logic Computation (2012) doi: 10.1093/logcom/exs013
- Keywords
- cryptographic-key managementTTPWeb of TrustPKI
- Contact author(s)
- simon kramer @ a3 epfl ch
- History
- 2012-05-31: last of 2 revisions
- 2011-05-17: received
- See all versions
- Short URL
- https://ia.cr/2011/235
- License
-
CC BY
BibTeX
@misc{cryptoeprint:2011/235, author = {Simon Kramer and Rajeev Goré and Eiji Okamoto}, title = {Computer-Aided Decision-Making with Trust Relations and Trust Domains (Cryptographic Applications)}, howpublished = {Cryptology {ePrint} Archive, Paper 2011/235}, year = {2011}, url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2011/235} }