Functional Encryption: Definitions and Challenges

Dan Boneh; Amit Sahai; Brent Waters

Paper 2010/543

Functional Encryption: Definitions and Challenges

Dan Boneh, Amit Sahai, and Brent Waters

Abstract

We initiate the formal study of functional encryption by giving precise definitions of the concept and its security. Roughly speaking, functional encryption supports restricted secret keys that enable a key holder to learn a specific function of encrypted data, but learn nothing else about the data. For example, given an encrypted program the secret key may enable the key holder to learn the output of the program on a specific input without learning anything else about the program. We show that defining security for functional encryption is non-trivial. First, we show that a natural game-based definition is inadequate for some functionalities. We then present a natural simulation-based definition and show that it (provably) cannot be satisfied in the standard model, but can be satisfied in the random oracle model. We show how to map many existing concepts to our formalization of functional encryption and conclude with several interesting open problems in this young area.

Metadata

Available format(s): PDF
Publication info: Published elsewhere. Unknown where it was published
Contact author(s): bwaters @ cs utexas edu
History: 2011-01-04: last of 3 revisions; 2010-10-25: received; See all versions
Short URL: https://ia.cr/2010/543
License: CC BY

BibTeX

@misc{cryptoeprint:2010/543,
      author = {Dan Boneh and Amit Sahai and Brent Waters},
      title = {Functional Encryption: Definitions and Challenges},
      howpublished = {Cryptology {ePrint} Archive, Paper 2010/543},
      year = {2010},
      url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2010/543}
}