Cryptology ePrint Archive: Report 2008/172

The Round Complexity of Verifiable Secret Sharing Revisited

Arpita Patra and Ashish Choudhary and Tal Rabin and C. Pandu Rangan

Abstract: The round complexity of interactive protocols is one of their most important complexity measures. In this work we prove that existing lower bounds for the round complexity of VSS can be circumvented by introducing a negligible probability of error in the reconstruction phase. Previous results show matching lower and upper bounds of {\em three} rounds for VSS, with $n = 3t+1$, where the reconstruction of the secrets always succeeds, i.e. with probability 1. In contrast we show that with a negligible probability of error in the reconstruction phase:

\begin​{enumerate} \item There exists an efficient 2-round VSS protocol for $n = 3t + 1$. If we assume that the adversary is non-rushing then we can achieve a 1-round reconstruction phase.

\item There exists an efficient 1-round VSS for $t = 1$ and $n > 3$.

\item We prove that our results are optimal both in resilience and number of sharing rounds by showing:


\item There does not exist a 2-round WSS \footnote{WSS is a weaker notion of VSS.} (and hence VSS) for $n \leq 3t$. \item There does not exist a 1-round VSS protocol for $t \geq 2$ and $n \geq 4$. \end{enumerate}


Category / Keywords: Foundations, VSS, Information Theoretic Security

Publication Info: This is a full version of thepaper that is accepted in CRYPTO 2009

Date: received 15 Apr 2008, last revised 4 Jun 2009

Contact author: arpitapatra_10 at yahoo co in, talr@us ibm com

Available format(s): PDF | BibTeX Citation

Note: This paper is the combined version of our two papers titled "Probabilistic Verifiable Secret Sharing Tolerating Adaptive Adversary" and "Efficient Protocol for Generating IC Signature and its Application to Unconditional Verifiable Secret Sharing", which appeared earlier as ePrint Archive report no 2008/101 and 2008/172 respectively. The article 2008/172 was based on the improvement of the results of article 2008/101. However, there was a minor common bug in both the papers, which could be easily rectified. So instead of rectifying the bug separately in each paper, we corrected it and combined both the papers. We also changed the title of the combined paper as we found the new title to be more appropriate.

Version: 20090605:054053 (All versions of this report)

Short URL:

[ Cryptology ePrint archive ]