On the Necessity of a Prescribed Block Validity Consensus: Analyzing Bitcoin Unlimited Mining Protocol

Ren Zhang; Bart Preneel

eprint.iacr.org will be offline for approximately an hour for routine maintenance at 11pm UTC on Tuesday, April 16. We lost some data between April 12 and April 14, and some authors have been notified that they need to resubmit their papers.

Paper 2017/686

On the Necessity of a Prescribed Block Validity Consensus: Analyzing Bitcoin Unlimited Mining Protocol

Ren Zhang and Bart Preneel

Abstract

Bitcoin has not only attracted many users but also been considered as a technical breakthrough by academia. However, the expanding potential of Bitcoin is largely untapped due to its limited throughput. The Bitcoin community is now facing its biggest crisis in history as the community splits on how to increase the throughput. Among various proposals, Bitcoin Unlimited recently became the most popular candidate, as it allows miners to collectively decide the block size limit according to the real network capacity. However, the security of BU is heatedly debated and no consensus has been reached as the issue is discussed in different miner incentive models. In this paper, we systematically evaluate BU's security with three incentive models via testing the two major arguments of BU supporters: the block validity consensus is not necessary for BU's security; such consensus would emerge in BU out of economic incentives. Our results invalidate both arguments and therefore disprove BU's security claims. Our paper further contributes to the field by addressing the necessity of a prescribed block validity consensus for cryptocurrencies.

Metadata

Available format(s): PDF
Publication info: Published elsewhere. CoNEXT '17: The 13th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies
DOI: 10.1145/3143361.3143389
Keywords: cryptocurrency Bitcoin Unlimited incentive compatibility
Contact author(s): ren zhang @ esat kuleuven be
History: 2017-10-30: last of 2 revisions; 2017-07-18: received; See all versions
Short URL: https://ia.cr/2017/686
License: CC BY

BibTeX

@misc{cryptoeprint:2017/686,
      author = {Ren Zhang and Bart Preneel},
      title = {On the Necessity of a Prescribed Block Validity Consensus: Analyzing Bitcoin Unlimited Mining Protocol},
      howpublished = {Cryptology ePrint Archive, Paper 2017/686},
      year = {2017},
      doi = {10.1145/3143361.3143389},
      note = {\url{https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/686}},
      url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/686}
}