<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 Reports</title>
    <link>http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/list.php?9</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Discussion forum for Cryptology ePrint Archive reports posted in 2009.
Please put the report number in the subject.

]]></description>
    <language>EN</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:19:25 -0600</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:19:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <category>2009 Reports</category>
    <generator>Phorum 5.1.22</generator>
    <ttl>600</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>2009/418</title>
      <link>http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/read.php?9,171,171#msg-171</link>
      <author>jrf</author>
      <description><![CDATA[The EF-CMA case

I was wondering whether the exclusion and penalty-style definitions of EF-CMA security for digital signature schemes are equivalent or not?]]></description>
      <category>2009 Reports</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/read.php?9,171,171#msg-171</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:19:25 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
