<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 Reports</title>
    <link>http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/list.php?9</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Discussion forum for Cryptology ePrint Archive reports posted in 2009.
Please put the report number in the subject.

]]></description>
    <language>EN</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:47:35 -0600</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:47:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <category>2009 Reports</category>
    <generator>Phorum 5.1.22</generator>
    <ttl>600</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>2009/314</title>
      <link>http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/read.php?9,169,169#msg-169</link>
      <author>ca_beefnoodle</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I wonder if anybody has any thoughts on this article. Can a system that encrypts a 128-bit block with AES in several seconds (in comparison, Crypto++ benchmark only needs a fraction of a millisecond) really be called practical? Also some other works (e.g., reference [25]) also claimed that MPCs are becoming practical. But in [25], comparing two 16-bit integers takes up to a few minutes. With this kind of performance, can they really be used in the real-world?]]></description>
      <category>2009 Reports</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/read.php?9,169,169#msg-169</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:47:35 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
