<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 Reports</title>
    <link>http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/list.php?9</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Discussion forum for Cryptology ePrint Archive reports posted in 2009.
Please put the report number in the subject.

]]></description>
    <language>EN</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:59:55 -0600</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:59:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <category>2009 Reports</category>
    <generator>Phorum 5.1.22</generator>
    <ttl>600</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>2009/431</title>
      <link>http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/read.php?9,158,158#msg-158</link>
      <author>Skeptic</author>
      <description><![CDATA[The aim of the article is to improve the design of Trivium. The main part of the article is an analysis of its design. The tweak is described at the very end of the article with the introduction of &quot;k-order polynomials&quot;. Unfortunately, there is no evidence of how the tweak improves the design. What kind of attack does it make harder ? How is the period affected ? Without this, the article seems weak.]]></description>
      <category>2009 Reports</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/read.php?9,158,158#msg-158</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:59:55 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
