<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 Reports</title>
    <link>http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/list.php?9</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Discussion forum for Cryptology ePrint Archive reports posted in 2009.
Please put the report number in the subject.

]]></description>
    <language>EN</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:22:04 -0600</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:22:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <category>2009 Reports</category>
    <generator>Phorum 5.1.22</generator>
    <ttl>600</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>134</title>
      <link>http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/read.php?9,134,134#msg-134</link>
      <author>Krause</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Dear Authors of report 2009/134,

I think that in the proof of your main theorem (Theorem 1, section 3, p.7,8 there is a bug. Equation (6) at page 8 has to be g=g_1 and not g=(1+x_k)g_1 as putting g_1=g_2 into Equation (5) yields g=g_1.

But then deg(g)=deg(g_1) and your inductive argument fails.

Can you repair this?

Best regards

Matthias]]></description>
      <category>2009 Reports</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/read.php?9,134,134#msg-134</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:22:04 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
