<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 Reports</title>
    <link>http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/list.php?11</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Discussion forum for Cryptology ePrint Archive reports posted in 2011.
Please put the report number in the subject.]]></description>
    <language>EN</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:41:03 -0600</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:41:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <category>2011 Reports</category>
    <generator>Phorum 5.1.22</generator>
    <ttl>600</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Eprint report 2011/312</title>
      <link>http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/read.php?11,496,496#msg-496</link>
      <author>Orr</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Despite the claims on page 4 (the version of the 18th of June):

&quot;by the top cryptography experts active in the area of block cipher cryptanalysis such as Schneier, Biham, Biryukov, Dunkelman, Wagner, various Australian, Japanese, German and Russian scientists, ISO cryptography experts, and all researchers always seemed to agree that it could be or should be secure.&quot;

I never claimed that GOST is a secure block cipher, following its related-key distinguisher (2 CPs, 2 keys, time of two encryptions).]]></description>
      <category>2011 Reports</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/read.php?11,496,496#msg-496</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:41:03 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
