<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 Reports</title>
    <link>http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/list.php?10</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Discussion forum for Cryptology ePrint Archive reports posted in 2010.
Please put the report number in the subject.

]]></description>
    <language>EN</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:21:03 -0600</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:21:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <category>2010 Reports</category>
    <generator>Phorum 5.1.22</generator>
    <ttl>600</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>2010/625: Reason for revision 4</title>
      <link>http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/read.php?10,429,429#msg-429</link>
      <author>Ben.Smyth</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Version 20110321:170045 (posted 01-Jun-2011 12:17:16 UTC) adds further attacks against electronic voting schemes which do not assure ballot independence; in particular, we consider the protocols by Lee et al., Sako &amp; Kilian and Schoenmakers. In addition, we argue that no general relationships exist between independence and privacy properties.]]></description>
      <category>2010 Reports</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eprint.iacr.org/forum/read.php?10,429,429#msg-429</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:21:03 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
