2009 Reports : Cryptology ePrint Archive Forum
Discussion forum for Cryptology ePrint Archive reports posted in 2009.
Please put the report number in the subject.
134
Posted by: Krause (IP Logged)
Date: 01 July 2009 12:22
Dear Authors of report 2009/134,
I think that in the proof of your main theorem (Theorem 1, section 3, p.7,8 there is a bug. Equation (6) at page 8 has to be g=g_1 and not g=(1+x_k)g_1 as putting g_1=g_2 into Equation (5) yields g=g_1.
But then deg(g)=deg(g_1) and your inductive argument fails.
Can you repair this?
Best regards
Matthias
I think that in the proof of your main theorem (Theorem 1, section 3, p.7,8 there is a bug. Equation (6) at page 8 has to be g=g_1 and not g=(1+x_k)g_1 as putting g_1=g_2 into Equation (5) yields g=g_1.
But then deg(g)=deg(g_1) and your inductive argument fails.
Can you repair this?
Best regards
Matthias
Please log in for posting a message. Only registered users may post in this forum.