We propose a new notion of leakage-resilient signatures against existential forgeries where we demand that the adversary cannot produce $n = \lfloor \lambda / \vert \sigma \vert \rfloor + 1$ distinct valid message/signature pairs $(m_1, \sigma_1), \ldots, (m_n, \sigma_n)$ after receiving $\lambda$ bits of leakage. If $\lambda = 0$, this is the usual notion of existential unforgeability. If $1 < \lambda < \vert \sigma \vert$, this is essentially the usual notion of existential unforgeability in the presence of leakage. In addition, for $\lambda \ge \vert \sigma \vert$ our new notion still guarantees the best possible, namely that the adversary cannot produce more forgeries than he could have leaked, hence graceful degradation.
Besides the game-based notion hinted above, we also consider a variant which is more simulation-based, in that it asks that from the leakage a simulator can ``extract'' a set of $n-1$ messages (to be thought of as the messages corresponding to the leaked signatures), and no adversary can produce forgeries not in this small set. The game-based notion is easier to prove for a concrete instantiation of a signature scheme. The simulation-based notion is easier to use, when leakage-resilient signatures are used as components in larger protocols.
We prove that the two notion are equivalent and present a generic construction of signature schemes meeting our new notion and a concrete instantiation under fairly standard assumptions. We further give an application, to leakage-resilient identification.Category / Keywords: public-key cryptography / leakage resilience Original Publication (with minor differences): IACR-PKC-2014 Date: received 7 Jul 2014 Contact author: jbn at cs au dk Available format(s): PDF | BibTeX Citation Version: 20140708:063837 (All versions of this report) Discussion forum: Show discussion | Start new discussion