Paper 2013/216
Election Verifiability or Ballot Privacy: Do We Need to Choose?
Edouard Cuvelier, Olivier Pereira, and Thomas Peters
Abstract
We propose a new encryption primitive, \emph{commitment consistent encryption} (CCE), and instances of this primitive that enable building the first universally verifiable voting schemes with a perfectly private audit trail (PPAT) and practical complexity. That is: \begin{myitemize} \item the audit trail that is published for verifying elections guarantees everlasting privacy, and \item the computational load required from the participants is only increased by a small constant factor compared to traditional voting schemes, and is optimal in the sense of Cramer, Gennaro and Schoenmakers~\cite{CGS97}. \end{myitemize} These properties make it possible to introduce election verifiability in large scale elections as a pure benefit, that is, without loss of privacy compared to a non-verifiable scheme and at a similar level of efficiency. We propose different approaches for constructing voting schemes with PPAT from CCE, as well as two efficient CCE constructions: one is tailored for elections with a small number of candidates, while the second is suitable for elections with complex ballots.
Metadata
- Available format(s)
- Category
- Public-key cryptography
- Publication info
- Published elsewhere. Unknown where it was published
- Keywords
- electronic voting schemeprovable everlasting privacy
- Contact author(s)
- thomas peters @ uclouvain be
- History
- 2013-04-14: received
- Short URL
- https://ia.cr/2013/216
- License
-
CC BY
BibTeX
@misc{cryptoeprint:2013/216, author = {Edouard Cuvelier and Olivier Pereira and Thomas Peters}, title = {Election Verifiability or Ballot Privacy: Do We Need to Choose?}, howpublished = {Cryptology {ePrint} Archive, Paper 2013/216}, year = {2013}, url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/216} }