Cryptology ePrint Archive: Report 2013/216
Election Verifiability or Ballot Privacy: Do We Need to Choose?
Edouard Cuvelier and Olivier Pereira and Thomas Peters
Abstract: We propose a new encryption primitive, \emph{commitment consistent encryption} (CCE), and instances of this primitive that enable building the first universally verifiable voting schemes with a perfectly private audit trail (PPAT) and practical complexity. That is:
\begin{myitemize}
\item the audit trail that is published for verifying elections
guarantees everlasting privacy, and
\item the computational load required from the participants is only
increased by a small constant factor compared to traditional
voting schemes, and is optimal in the sense of Cramer, Gennaro and
Schoenmakers~\cite{CGS97}.
\end{myitemize}
These properties make it possible to introduce election verifiability in large scale elections as a pure benefit, that is, without loss of privacy compared to a non-verifiable scheme and at a similar level of efficiency.
We propose different approaches for constructing voting schemes with PPAT from CCE, as well as two efficient CCE constructions: one is tailored for elections with a small number of candidates, while the second is suitable for elections with complex ballots.
Category / Keywords: public-key cryptography / electronic voting scheme, provable everlasting privacy
Date: received 12 Apr 2013
Contact author: thomas peters at uclouvain be
Available format(s): PDF | BibTeX Citation
Version: 20130414:154621 (All versions of this report)
Short URL: ia.cr/2013/216
Discussion forum: Show discussion | Start new discussion
[ Cryptology ePrint archive ]