Our results give a negative answer to this important question by introducing attacks against several kinds of mathematical realization of a practical leakage resilient cryptographic scheme. Our results show that there may exist a big gap between the theoretical tolerance leakage rate and the practical tolerance leakage rate of the same leakage resilient cryptographic scheme if the mathematical components in the mathematical realization are not provably secure in leakage setting. Therefore, on one hand, we suggest that all (practical) leakage resilient cryptographic schemes should at least come with a kind of mathematical realization. Using this kind of mathematical realization, its practical security can be guaranteed. On the other hand, our results inspire cryptographers to design advanced leakage resilient cryptographic schemes whose practical security is independent of the specific details of its mathematical realization.
Category / Keywords: Physical Attacks, Leakage Resilient Cryptography, Mathematical Realization, Physical Realization. Date: received 12 Apr 2013, last revised 26 Sep 2014 Contact author: guangjunfan at 163 com Available format(s): PDF | BibTeX Citation Version: 20140926:090138 (All versions of this report) Short URL: ia.cr/2013/213 Discussion forum: Show discussion | Start new discussion