Having precise notions for such reductions is very important when it comes to black-box separations, where one shows that black-box reductions cannot exist. An impossibility result, which clearly specifies the type of reduction it rules out, enables us to identify the potential leverages to bypass the separation. We acknowledge this by extending the RTV framework in several respects using a more fine-grained approach. First, we capture a type of reduction---frequently ruled out by so-called meta-reductions---which escapes the RTV framework so far. Second, we consider notions that are ``almost black-box'', i.e., where the reduction receives additional information about the adversary, such as its success probability. Third, we distinguish explicitly between efficient and inefficient primitives and adversaries, allowing us to determine how relativizing reductions in the sense of Impagliazzo and Rudich (STOC, 1989) fit into the picture.
Category / Keywords: foundations / Foundations, black-box reductions, black-box separations. Original Publication (with major differences): IACR-ASIACRYPT-2013 Date: received 22 Feb 2013, last revised 29 Nov 2013 Contact author: pbaecher at gmail com Available format(s): PDF | BibTeX Citation Version: 20131129:170323 (All versions of this report) Short URL: ia.cr/2013/101 Discussion forum: Show discussion | Start new discussion