Cryptology ePrint Archive: Report 2012/713

Systematic Treatment of Remote Attestation

Aurelien Francillon and Quan Nguyen and Kasper B. Rasmussen and Gene Tsudik

Abstract: Embedded computing devices (such as actuators, controllers and sensors of various sizes) increasingly permeate many aspects of modern life: from medical to automotive, from building and factory automation to weapons, from critical infrastructures to home entertainment. Despite their specialized nature as well as limited resources and connectivity, these devices are now becoming increasingly popular and attractive targets for various attacks, especially, remote malware infestations. There has been a number of research proposals to detect and/or mitigate such attacks. They vary greatly in terms of application generality and underlying assumptions. However, one common theme is the need for Remote Attestation, a distinct security service that allows a trusted party (verifier) to check the internal state of a remote untrusted embedded device (prover).

This paper provides a systematic treatment of Remote Attestation, starting with a precise definition of the desired service and proceeding to its systematic deconstruction into necessary and sufficient properties. These properties are, in turn, mapped into a minimal collection of hardware and software components that results in secure Remote Attestation. One distinguishing feature of this line of research is the need to prove (or, at least argue) architectural minimality; this is rarely encountered in security research. This work also offers some insights into vulnerabilities of certain prior techniques and provides a promising platform for attaining more advanced security services and guarantees.

Category / Keywords: applications/Remote Attestation, Embedded Devices, Architectural Minimality, Authentication

Publication Info: N/A

Date: received 20 Dec 2012, last revised 27 Dec 2012

Contact author: gene tsudik at uci edu

Available formats: PDF | BibTeX Citation

Version: 20121227:233719 (All versions of this report)

Discussion forum: Show discussion | Start new discussion