Despite its importance, very little is known about the feasibility of extending oblivious transfer, beyond the fact that it is impossible information theoretically. Specifically, it is not known whether or not one-way functions are actually necessary for extending oblivious transfer, whether or not it is possible to extend oblivious transfers with adaptive security, and whether or not it is possible to extend oblivious transfers when starting with just a few. In this paper, we address these questions and provide almost complete answers to all of them. We show that the existence of any oblivious transfer extension protocol with security for static semi-honest adversaries implies one-way functions, that an oblivious transfer extension protocol with adaptive security implies oblivious transfer with static security, and that the existence of an oblivious transfer extension protocol from only $O(\log n)$ oblivious transfers implies oblivious transfer itself.
Category / Keywords: oblivious transfer, extending oblivious transfer, feasibility study, adaptive security Date: received 12 Jun 2012, last revised 23 Jan 2013 Contact author: zarosih at cs biu ac il Available format(s): PDF | BibTeX Citation Version: 20130123:104941 (All versions of this report) Short URL: ia.cr/2012/333 Discussion forum: Show discussion | Start new discussion