Our findings are partly based on a case study of prominent voting systems, ThreeBallot and VAV, for which, among others, we show that, unlike commonly believed, they do not provide any reasonable level of verifiability, even though they satisfy individual and universal verifiability. Also, we show that the original variants of ThreeBallot and VAV provide a better level of coercion-resistance than of privacy.
Category / Keywords: cryptographic protocols / voting; verifiability; coercion-resistance; privacy; protocol analysis Date: received 20 Sep 2011 Contact author: vogt at uni-trier de Available formats: PDF | BibTeX Citation Version: 20110922:024828 (All versions of this report) Discussion forum: Show discussion | Start new discussion