Our findings are partly based on a case study of prominent voting systems, ThreeBallot and VAV, for which, among others, we show that, unlike commonly believed, they do not provide any reasonable level of verifiability, even though they satisfy individual and universal verifiability. Also, we show that the original variants of ThreeBallot and VAV provide a better level of coercion-resistance than of privacy.
Category / Keywords: cryptographic protocols / voting; verifiability; coercion-resistance; privacy; protocol analysis Original Publication (with minor differences): Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P 2011) Date: received 20 Sep 2011, last revised 2 Feb 2015 Contact author: kuesters at uni-trier de Available format(s): PDF | BibTeX Citation Note: Added publication information as well as some explanation in Section 5.2. Version: 20150202:165229 (All versions of this report) Short URL: ia.cr/2011/517 Discussion forum: Show discussion | Start new discussion