In particular, under what we call the {\it subgroup indistinguishability assumption}, of which the QR and DCR are special cases, we can construct a scheme that has:
* Key-dependent message (circular) security. Achieves security even when encrypting affine functions of its own secret key (in fact, w.r.t. affine ``key-cycles'' of predefined length). Our scheme also meets the requirements for extending key-dependent message security to broader classes of functions beyond affine functions using previous techniques of [BGK, ePrint09] or [BHHI, Eurocrypt10].
* Leakage resiliency. Remains secure even if any adversarial low-entropy (efficiently computable) function of the secret key is given to the adversary. A proper selection of parameters allows for a ``leakage rate'' of $(1-o(1))$ of the length of the secret key.
* Auxiliary-input security. Remains secure even if any sufficiently \emph{hard to invert} (efficiently computable) function of the secret key is given to the adversary.
Our scheme is the first to achieve key-dependent security and auxiliary-input security based on the DCR and QR assumptions. Previous schemes that achieved these properties relied either on the DDH or LWE assumptions. The proposed scheme is also the first to achieve leakage resiliency for leakage rate $(1-o(1))$ of the secret key length, under the QR assumption. We note that leakage resilient schemes under the DCR and the QR assumptions, for the restricted case of composite modulus product of safe primes, were implied by the work of [NS, Crypto09], using hash proof systems. However, under the QR assumption, known constructions of hash proof systems only yield a leakage rate of $o(1)$ of the secret key length.
Category / Keywords: public-key cryptography / Date: received 22 Apr 2010, last revised 16 Nov 2010 Contact author: zvika brakerski at weizmann ac il Available format(s): PDF | BibTeX Citation Note: Editorial changes (results are unchanged). Version: 20101116:194313 (All versions of this report) Short URL: ia.cr/2010/226 Discussion forum: Show discussion | Start new discussion