You are looking at a specific version 20080203:205700 of this paper. See the latest version.

Paper 2008/059

Buying random votes is as hard as buying no-votes

Stefan Popoveniuc and Jonathan Stanton

Abstract

In voting systems where a mark in a fixed position may mean a vote for Alice on a ballot,and a vote for Bob on another ballot, an attacker may coerce voters to put their mark at a certain position, enforcing effectively a random vote. This attack is meaningful if the voting system allows to take receipts with them and/or posts them to a bulletin board. The coercer may also ask for a blank receipt. We analyze this kind of attack and prove that it requires the same effort as a comparable attack would require against any voting system, even one without receipts.

Metadata
Available format(s)
PDF
Category
Applications
Publication info
Published elsewhere. the paper has not been published anywhere
Keywords
votingrandomizartion attack
Contact author(s)
poste @ gwu edu
History
2008-02-03: received
Short URL
https://ia.cr/2008/059
License
Creative Commons Attribution
CC BY
Note: In order to protect the privacy of readers, eprint.iacr.org does not use cookies or embedded third party content.